Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free CHE.UN Stock Alerts

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (CHE.UN) Competitors

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund logo
C$16.48 -0.09 (-0.54%)
As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

CHE.UN vs. VNP, NEO, BOS, ECO, and NANO

Should you buy Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund include 5N Plus (VNP), Neo Performance Materials (NEO), AirBoss of America (BOS), EcoSynthetix (ECO), and Nano One Materials (NANO). These companies are all part of the "specialty chemicals" industry.

How does Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund compare to 5N Plus?

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (TSE:CHE.UN) and 5N Plus (TSE:VNP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund presently has a consensus price target of C$19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.81%. 5N Plus has a consensus price target of C$46.69, suggesting a potential upside of 39.37%. Given 5N Plus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe 5N Plus is more favorable than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
5N Plus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.22

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than 5N Plus. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 5N Plus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chemtrade Logistics Income FundC$2.03B0.91C$139.02MC$1.0316.00
5N PlusC$420.07M7.17C$11.26MC$0.6551.54

In the previous week, 5N Plus had 1 more articles in the media than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 5N Plus and 2 mentions for Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat 5N Plus' score of 0.20 indicating that Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
5N Plus
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a beta of 0.878679, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 5N Plus has a beta of 0.991465, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

5N Plus has a net margin of 13.95% compared to Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's net margin of 7.85%. 5N Plus' return on equity of 30.00% beat Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund7.85% 19.73% 7.26%
5N Plus 13.95%30.00%3.16%

7.4% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of 5N Plus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of 5N Plus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

5N Plus beats Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (TSE:CHE.UN) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund and 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Neo Performance Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chemtrade Logistics Income FundC$2.03B0.91C$139.02MC$1.0316.00
Neo Performance MaterialsC$512.15M3.43-C$1.56M-C$0.24N/A

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund presently has a consensus target price of C$19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.81%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 32.20%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a beta of 0.878679, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.440846, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund pays an annual dividend of C$0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund pays out 67.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's return on equity of 19.73% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund7.85% 19.73% 7.26%
Neo Performance Materials -2.03%-2.63%1.87%

7.4% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund beats Neo Performance Materials on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund compare to AirBoss of America?

AirBoss of America (TSE:BOS) and Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (TSE:CHE.UN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

AirBoss of America pays an annual dividend of C$0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund pays an annual dividend of C$0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. AirBoss of America pays out -46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund pays out 67.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, AirBoss of America had 1 more articles in the media than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for AirBoss of America and 2 mentions for Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat AirBoss of America's score of 0.25 indicating that Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AirBoss of America
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

AirBoss of America has a beta of 0.591489, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a beta of 0.878679, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than AirBoss of America. AirBoss of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AirBoss of AmericaC$410.86M0.48-C$36.03M-C$0.22N/A
Chemtrade Logistics Income FundC$2.03B0.91C$139.02MC$1.0316.00

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a net margin of 7.85% compared to AirBoss of America's net margin of -1.53%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's return on equity of 19.73% beat AirBoss of America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AirBoss of America-1.53% -5.18% -7.33%
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund 7.85%19.73%7.26%

AirBoss of America currently has a consensus price target of C$8.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.74%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a consensus price target of C$19.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.81%. Given Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is more favorable than AirBoss of America.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AirBoss of America
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

1.4% of AirBoss of America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.9% of AirBoss of America shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund beats AirBoss of America on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund compare to EcoSynthetix?

EcoSynthetix (TSE:ECO) and Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (TSE:CHE.UN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

EcoSynthetix has a beta of 0.735428, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a beta of 0.878679, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than EcoSynthetix. EcoSynthetix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EcoSynthetixC$20.53M7.88-C$1.21M-C$0.01N/A
Chemtrade Logistics Income FundC$2.03B0.91C$139.02MC$1.0316.00

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a net margin of 7.85% compared to EcoSynthetix's net margin of -1.98%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's return on equity of 19.73% beat EcoSynthetix's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EcoSynthetix-1.98% -1.06% -6.26%
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund 7.85%19.73%7.26%

0.3% of EcoSynthetix shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 14.5% of EcoSynthetix shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a consensus price target of C$19.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.81%. Given Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is more favorable than EcoSynthetix.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EcoSynthetix
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund had 2 more articles in the media than EcoSynthetix. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund and 0 mentions for EcoSynthetix. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat EcoSynthetix's score of 0.00 indicating that Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EcoSynthetix Neutral
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund Neutral

Summary

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund beats EcoSynthetix on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund compare to Nano One Materials?

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (TSE:CHE.UN) and Nano One Materials (TSE:NANO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Nano One Materials. Nano One Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chemtrade Logistics Income FundC$2.03B0.91C$139.02MC$1.0316.00
Nano One MaterialsN/AN/AN/A-C$0.13N/A

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a beta of 0.878679, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nano One Materials has a beta of 0.177809, suggesting that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund currently has a consensus price target of C$19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.81%. Given Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is more favorable than Nano One Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Nano One Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Nano One Materials' net margin of 0.00%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's return on equity of 19.73% beat Nano One Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund7.85% 19.73% 7.26%
Nano One Materials N/A N/A N/A

7.4% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.4% of Nano One Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Nano One Materials. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund and 1 mentions for Nano One Materials. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Nano One Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Nano One Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund beats Nano One Materials on 14 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHE.UN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHE.UN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHE.UN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChemtrade Logistics Income FundSpecialty Chemicals IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.87BC$8.44BC$4.55BC$12.48B
Dividend Yield4.35%3.34%5.02%6.19%
P/E Ratio16.0015.4820.9836.95
Price / Sales0.91125.675,752.339.44
Price / Cash30.1619.6126.3382.29
Price / Book2.603.508.574.39
Net IncomeC$139.02MC$213.62MC$157.08MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.24%0.56%1.19%0.61%
1 Month Performance2.62%1.69%-1.28%1.06%
1 Year Performance47.41%22.76%35.80%30.89%

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHE.UN
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
3.1 of 5 stars		C$16.48
-0.5%		C$19.25
+16.8%		+47.1%C$1.87BC$2.03B16.001,525
VNP
5N Plus
3.3488 of 5 stars		C$35.41
+7.2%		C$46.69
+31.8%		+188.5%C$3.18BC$420.07M54.48780
NEO
Neo Performance Materials
2.2675 of 5 stars		C$39.40
+0.8%		C$50.50
+28.2%		+128.6%C$1.81BC$512.15MN/A2,100
BOS
AirBoss of America
2.1056 of 5 stars		C$6.27
-1.1%		C$8.33
+32.9%		+43.4%C$170.34MC$410.86MN/A1,197
ECO
EcoSynthetix
N/AC$2.65
-1.9%		N/A-35.3%C$155.94MC$20.53MN/A25

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CHE.UN) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Mysterious stock market “glitch” revealed
Jason Bodner, a quantitative analyst and former Wall Street insider, says a rare market anomaly he calls the '...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The 38% Crash Warning Every Retirement Saver Needs to Read Right Now
The AI trade has pushed stocks to record highs, everyone feels good, and retirement accounts look great on pap...
Golden Crest Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
Tomorrow morning's stock alert
Our research analysts are set to release their next stock idea tomorrow morning just before 12:00 PM Eastern. ...
The Early Bird | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your account status
Your $100 MarketBeat account credit expires in less than twelve hours. Upgrade to MarketBeat All Access today ...
MarketBeattc pixel
Final Weeks to Invest
Frontieras has patented technology that reforms coal into hydrogen and other commodities without burning it - ...
Frontieras | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
You Won’t Get a Warning Before This Correction Hits
Gold just broke another record - a classic flight-to-safety signal that the smartest money on Wall Street is a...
StockEarnings | Sponsoredtc pixel