Free Trial

Capstone Copper (CS) Competitors

Capstone Copper logo
C$14.67 +0.24 (+1.66%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

CS vs. FM, LUN, HBM, KAT, and ERO

Should you buy Capstone Copper stock or one of its competitors? Capstone Copper's main competitors and comparable companies include First Quantum Minerals (FM), Lundin Mining (LUN), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Ero Copper (ERO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Capstone Copper compare to First Quantum Minerals?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

70.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

First Quantum Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$46.34, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$16.71, indicating a potential upside of 15.79%. Given First Quantum Minerals' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe First Quantum Minerals is more favorable than Capstone Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Capstone Copper has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum MineralsC$5.75B5.67-C$1.05B-C$0.09N/A
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.27

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals-1.44% -0.73% 2.31%
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.42897, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.21098, indicating that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 4 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 5 mentions for Capstone Copper. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Capstone Copper's score of 0.11 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Capstone Copper
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

First Quantum Minerals beats Capstone Copper on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Lundin Mining?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.11% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 22.97% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Lundin Mining 35.11%22.97%4.56%

Lundin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Capstone Copper. Lundin Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.27
Lundin MiningC$4.63B6.44C$216.85MC$1.7520.01

36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Lundin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Lundin Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Mining pays out 4.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capstone Copper presently has a consensus price target of C$16.71, indicating a potential upside of 15.79%. Lundin Mining has a consensus price target of C$39.72, indicating a potential upside of 13.44%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Lundin Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Lundin Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Lundin Mining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Capstone Copper and 3 mentions for Lundin Mining. Lundin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Capstone Copper's score of 0.11 indicating that Lundin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lundin Mining
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.21098, meaning that its share price is 121% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.226388, meaning that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lundin Mining beats Capstone Copper on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.30667, suggesting that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.21098, suggesting that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 18.41% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals27.22% 18.41% 4.78%
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

Hudbay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B6.98C$69.59MC$1.6323.82
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.27

Hudbay Minerals presently has a consensus price target of C$42.03, suggesting a potential upside of 8.38%. Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of C$16.71, suggesting a potential upside of 15.79%. Given Capstone Copper's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

44.6% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hudbay Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Hudbay Minerals pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Hudbay Minerals had 11 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Hudbay Minerals and 5 mentions for Capstone Copper. Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Capstone Copper's score of 0.11 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Capstone Copper
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Capstone Copper on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of C$16.71, indicating a potential upside of 15.79%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)N/A N/A N/A
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 5 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.11 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) Neutral
Capstone Copper Neutral

Capstone Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)C$1.39B0.00-C$11.75B-C$0.19N/A
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.27

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Ero Copper?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Ero Copper has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capstone Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.27
Ero CopperC$1.04B5.40C$10.88MC$2.9518.32

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.72% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.09% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Ero Copper 29.72%30.09%3.46%

36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.8% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.21098, suggesting that its share price is 121% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.86839, suggesting that its share price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 3 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Capstone Copper and 2 mentions for Ero Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.11 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ero Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Capstone Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$16.71, suggesting a potential upside of 15.79%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of C$48.33, suggesting a potential downside of 10.58%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Ero Copper on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capstone Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CS vs. The Competition

MetricCapstone CopperMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$11.21BC$3.77BC$4.72BC$12.56B
Dividend Yield0.07%5.24%4.76%6.33%
P/E Ratio23.6625.3125.0639.48
Price / Sales4.1927,163.6816,186.439.07
Price / Cash16.5126.3824.3982.29
Price / Book2.7611.139.304.61
Net Income-C$14.64MC$127.14MC$159.30MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance5.09%-1.43%-1.32%-0.30%
1 Month Performance-2.52%-5.15%-4.92%-2.82%
1 Year Performance16.24%20.07%17.11%16.34%

Capstone Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CS
Capstone Copper
3.176 of 5 stars
C$14.67
+1.7%
C$16.71
+13.9%
+14.3%C$11.21BC$2.68B23.661,049
FM
First Quantum Minerals
2.4597 of 5 stars
C$45.18
+0.8%
C$46.34
+2.6%
+21.7%C$37.69BC$5.75BN/A15,661
LUN
Lundin Mining
2.9538 of 5 stars
C$34.62
+0.8%
C$39.72
+14.7%
+65.5%C$29.47BC$4.63B19.786,195
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
2.4173 of 5 stars
C$38.26
+0.3%
C$41.78
+9.2%
+76.6%C$16.99BC$2.47B23.502,233
KAT
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$9.79BC$1.39BN/A4,457

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CS) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners