Go Pro

Capstone Copper (CS) Competitors

Capstone Copper logo
C$14.44 +1.13 (+8.49%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

CS vs. FM, LUN, HBM, KAT, and TRQ

Should you buy Capstone Copper stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capstone Copper with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capstone Copper include First Quantum Minerals (FM), Lundin Mining (LUN), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ).

How does Capstone Copper compare to First Quantum Minerals?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals-1.44% -0.73% 2.31%
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.429701, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.198937, indicating that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 6 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of -0.10 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capstone Copper
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

70.2% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.6% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Capstone Copper has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum MineralsC$5.75B6.11-C$1.05B-C$0.09N/A
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.29

First Quantum Minerals presently has a consensus price target of C$44.68, indicating a potential upside of 6.07%. Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of C$16.35, indicating a potential upside of 13.23%. Given Capstone Copper's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Summary

First Quantum Minerals and Capstone Copper tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Lundin Mining?

Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Lundin Mining presently has a consensus price target of C$39.69, suggesting a potential upside of 5.28%. Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of C$16.35, suggesting a potential upside of 13.23%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Lundin Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lundin Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 5 more articles in the media than Lundin Mining. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Capstone Copper and 1 mentions for Lundin Mining. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Lundin Mining's score of -0.13 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lundin Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capstone Copper
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.92% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 23.11% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lundin Mining35.92% 23.11% 4.56%
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

Lundin Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Lundin Mining pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.324825, suggesting that its share price is 132% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.198937, suggesting that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

61.1% of Lundin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.6% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Capstone Copper. Lundin Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lundin MiningC$4.29B7.50C$216.85MC$1.6722.57
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.29

Summary

Lundin Mining beats Capstone Copper on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.361891, indicating that its share price is 136% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.198937, indicating that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$40.91, indicating a potential upside of 17.58%. Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of C$16.35, indicating a potential upside of 13.23%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Capstone Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Hudbay Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Hudbay Minerals pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

49.6% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.6% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hudbay Minerals had 12 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Hudbay Minerals and 6 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Hudbay Minerals' score of -0.17 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
7 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capstone Copper
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hudbay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Copper. Hudbay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B6.26C$69.59MC$1.6321.37
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.29

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 18.41% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals27.22% 18.41% 4.78%
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Capstone Copper on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 6 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper Positive
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) Neutral

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) N/A N/A N/A

Capstone Copper presently has a consensus target price of C$16.35, suggesting a potential upside of 13.23%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

36.6% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capstone Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.29
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)C$1.39B0.00-C$11.75B-C$0.19N/A

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Turquoise Hill Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capstone Copper. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.12-C$14.64MC$0.6223.29
Turquoise Hill ResourcesC$1.65B0.00C$730.47MC$3.63N/A

36.6% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 6 more articles in the media than Turquoise Hill Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Turquoise Hill Resources. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Turquoise Hill Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper Positive
Turquoise Hill Resources Neutral

Capstone Copper presently has a consensus price target of C$16.35, indicating a potential upside of 13.23%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Turquoise Hill Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to Turquoise Hill Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat Turquoise Hill Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Turquoise Hill Resources N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capstone Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CS vs. The Competition

MetricCapstone CopperMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$11.03BC$3.62BC$4.71BC$12.47B
Dividend Yield0.07%5.29%4.76%6.20%
P/E Ratio23.2922.0220.6233.99
Price / Sales4.128,394.054,990.619.61
Price / Cash16.5126.2724.3582.29
Price / Book2.729.858.364.45
Net Income-C$14.64MC$122.62MC$155.10MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance10.14%2.86%2.34%1.44%
1 Month Performance8.98%-2.24%-1.41%-0.27%
1 Year Performance76.74%51.27%41.15%35.07%

Capstone Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CS
Capstone Copper
2.7474 of 5 stars
C$14.44
+8.5%
C$16.35
+13.2%
+62.9%C$11.03BC$2.68B23.291,049
FM
First Quantum Minerals
2.2073 of 5 stars
C$37.40
-2.6%
C$44.96
+20.2%
+75.2%C$30.97BC$5.45BN/A20,000
LUN
Lundin Mining
1.8397 of 5 stars
C$34.69
-2.8%
C$39.69
+14.4%
+149.5%C$29.62BC$4.29B20.776,019
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
2.5932 of 5 stars
C$30.64
-2.9%
C$40.84
+33.3%
+154.3%C$13.60BC$2.37B18.352,500
KAT
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$9.79BC$1.39BN/A4,457

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CS) was last updated on 8/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners