Go Pro

Capstone Copper (CS) Competitors

Capstone Copper logo
C$13.11 -0.24 (-1.80%)
As of 11:34 AM Eastern

CS vs. FM, LUN, HBM, KAT, and TRQ

Should you buy Capstone Copper stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capstone Copper with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capstone Copper include First Quantum Minerals (FM), Lundin Mining (LUN), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ). These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Capstone Copper compare to First Quantum Minerals?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Capstone Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.48B4.04-C$14.64MC$0.5523.84
First Quantum MineralsC$5.45B5.85-C$1.05B-C$0.24N/A

Capstone Copper presently has a consensus target price of C$16.25, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. First Quantum Minerals has a consensus target price of C$44.58, indicating a potential upside of 15.76%. Given Capstone Copper's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
First Quantum Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.198937, meaning that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.429701, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 4 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.14 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
First Quantum Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.04% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -3.69%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 12.69% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.04% 12.69% 0.47%
First Quantum Minerals -3.69%-1.78%2.31%

37.0% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.1% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Capstone Copper and First Quantum Minerals tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Lundin Mining?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper and Capstone Copper both had 4 articles in the media. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Lundin Mining's score of -0.09 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lundin Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.92% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.04%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 23.11% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.04% 12.69% 0.47%
Lundin Mining 35.92%23.11%4.56%

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.198937, meaning that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.324825, meaning that its share price is 132% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Capstone Copper. Lundin Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.48B4.04-C$14.64MC$0.5523.84
Lundin MiningC$4.29B6.89C$216.85MC$1.6720.75

37.0% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.3% of Lundin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Lundin Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Capstone Copper pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Mining pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capstone Copper presently has a consensus price target of C$16.25, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. Lundin Mining has a consensus price target of C$39.64, indicating a potential upside of 14.37%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Lundin Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Lundin Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Lundin Mining beats Capstone Copper on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Hudbay Minerals had 5 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Hudbay Minerals and 4 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Hudbay Minerals' score of -0.14 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capstone Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

45.2% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hudbay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Copper. Hudbay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay MineralsC$2.37B5.78C$69.59MC$1.6718.50
Capstone CopperC$2.48B4.04-C$14.64MC$0.5523.84

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.86% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.04%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 20.70% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals27.86% 20.70% 4.78%
Capstone Copper 17.04%12.69%0.47%

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.361891, indicating that its share price is 136% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.198937, indicating that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$40.47, indicating a potential upside of 30.97%. Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$16.25, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Capstone Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Hudbay Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Hudbay Minerals pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstone Copper pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Capstone Copper on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

37.0% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 4 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) Neutral
Capstone Copper Neutral

Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of C$16.25, indicating a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 12.69% beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)N/A N/A N/A
Capstone Copper 17.04%12.69%0.47%

Capstone Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)C$1.39B0.00-C$11.75B-C$0.19N/A
Capstone CopperC$2.48B4.04-C$14.64MC$0.5523.84

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

37.0% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$16.25, suggesting a potential upside of 23.95%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Copper. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill ResourcesC$1.65B0.00C$730.47MC$3.63N/A
Capstone CopperC$2.48B4.04-C$14.64MC$0.5523.84

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 4 more articles in the media than Turquoise Hill Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Turquoise Hill Resources. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Turquoise Hill Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Turquoise Hill Resources Neutral
Capstone Copper Neutral

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Turquoise Hill Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 12.69% beat Turquoise Hill Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Turquoise Hill ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Capstone Copper 17.04%12.69%0.47%

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capstone Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CS vs. The Competition

MetricCapstone CopperCopper IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$10.01BC$5.28BC$4.55BC$12.33B
Dividend Yield0.07%4.27%5.04%6.17%
P/E Ratio23.8423.8820.9636.42
Price / Sales4.044,277.116,520.139.73
Price / Cash16.5131.3626.4682.29
Price / Book2.533.458.884.48
Net Income-C$14.64M-C$78.74MC$157.11MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance9.43%3.67%0.48%0.45%
1 Month Performance-14.48%-6.42%-5.24%-1.19%
1 Year Performance66.79%80.96%39.06%32.47%

Capstone Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CS
Capstone Copper
3.1397 of 5 stars
C$13.11
-1.8%
C$16.25
+24.0%
+70.9%C$10.01BC$2.48B23.841,049
FM
First Quantum Minerals
3.3601 of 5 stars
C$36.67
-5.5%
C$44.24
+20.7%
+67.6%C$30.37BC$5.45BN/A20,000
LUN
Lundin Mining
2.1047 of 5 stars
C$33.58
-3.5%
C$39.74
+18.3%
+155.4%C$28.67BC$4.29B20.116,019
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
3.2234 of 5 stars
C$30.86
-6.9%
C$40.56
+31.4%
+120.3%C$13.70BC$2.37B18.482,500
KAT
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$9.79BC$1.39BN/A4,457

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CS) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners