Capstone Copper (CS) Competitors

C$12.84 -1.12 (-8.02%)

As of 05/15/2026 04:42 PM Eastern

CS vs. LUN, FM, HBM, KAT, and TRQ

Should you buy Capstone Copper stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capstone Copper with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capstone Copper include Lundin Mining (LUN), First Quantum Minerals (FM), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ). These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Lundin Mining?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.92% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.04%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 23.11% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capstone Copper	17.04%	12.69%	0.47%
Lundin Mining	35.92%	23.11%	4.56%

Capstone Copper currently has a consensus target price of C$16.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.61%. Lundin Mining has a consensus target price of C$38.30, indicating a potential downside of 0.91%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Lundin Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capstone Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Lundin Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Lundin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Capstone Copper. Lundin Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capstone Copper	C$2.48B	3.96	-C$14.64M	C$0.55	23.35
Lundin Mining	C$4.29B	7.70	C$216.85M	C$1.67	23.14

35.6% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Lundin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.180713, meaning that its share price is 118% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.246666, meaning that its share price is 125% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Lundin Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capstone Copper and 5 mentions for Lundin Mining. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Lundin Mining's score of 0.39 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Lundin Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Lundin Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Capstone Copper pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Mining pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Lundin Mining beats Capstone Copper on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to First Quantum Minerals?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.04% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -3.69%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 12.69% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals	-3.69%	-1.78%	2.31%
Capstone Copper	17.04%	12.69%	0.47%

First Quantum Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$42.66, indicating a potential upside of 22.45%. Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$16.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.61%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Capstone Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Capstone Copper has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.45B	5.29	-C$1.05B	-C$0.24	N/A
Capstone Copper	C$2.48B	3.96	-C$14.64M	C$0.55	23.35

69.7% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.6% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.492958, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.180713, indicating that its stock price is 118% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 3 more articles in the media than First Quantum Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capstone Copper and 4 mentions for First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Capstone Copper's score of 0.40 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Capstone Copper	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Capstone Copper beats First Quantum Minerals on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

49.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.6% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.86% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.04%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 20.70% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals	27.86%	20.70%	4.78%
Capstone Copper	17.04%	12.69%	0.47%

Hudbay Minerals presently has a consensus target price of C$39.10, indicating a potential upside of 13.83%. Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$16.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.61%. Given Capstone Copper's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.08
Capstone Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Hudbay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Copper. Hudbay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay Minerals	C$2.37B	5.75	C$69.59M	C$1.67	20.57
Capstone Copper	C$2.48B	3.96	-C$14.64M	C$0.55	23.35

Hudbay Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Hudbay Minerals pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstone Copper pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.33802, meaning that its share price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.180713, meaning that its share price is 118% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 6 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capstone Copper and 1 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Hudbay Minerals' score of 0.14 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Capstone Copper	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Capstone Copper on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

35.6% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 12.69% beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A
Capstone Copper	17.04%	12.69%	0.47%

Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$16.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.61%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Capstone Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Capstone Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	C$1.39B	0.00	-C$11.75B	-C$0.19	N/A
Capstone Copper	C$2.48B	3.96	-C$14.64M	C$0.55	23.35

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 7 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	Neutral
Capstone Copper	Neutral

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Capstone Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 7 more articles in the media than Turquoise Hill Resources. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Turquoise Hill Resources. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Turquoise Hill Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Turquoise Hill Resources	Neutral
Capstone Copper	Neutral

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Copper. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources	C$1.65B	0.00	C$730.47M	C$3.63	N/A
Capstone Copper	C$2.48B	3.96	-C$14.64M	C$0.55	23.35

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Turquoise Hill Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 12.69% beat Turquoise Hill Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Capstone Copper	17.04%	12.69%	0.47%

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capstone Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Capstone Copper	Copper Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$9.81B	C$5.33B	C$4.91B	C$11.87B
Dividend Yield	0.07%	4.06%	4.97%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	23.35	19.93	22.95	37.15
Price / Sales	3.96	4,177.29	6,704.77	11.47
Price / Cash	16.51	31.36	27.37	82.42
Price / Book	2.48	3.50	6.84	4.42
Net Income	-C$14.64M	-C$78.74M	C$159.01M	C$299.62M
7 Day Performance	1.74%	2.21%	-1.12%	-0.79%
1 Month Performance	1.18%	0.16%	0.12%	0.21%
1 Year Performance	94.55%	140.46%	81.74%	55.41%

Capstone Copper Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CS Capstone Copper	3.4893 of 5 stars	C$12.84 -8.0%	C$16.00 +24.6%	+88.0%	C$9.81B	C$2.48B	23.35	1,049	News Coverage Insider Trade Gap Down
LUN Lundin Mining	1.5318 of 5 stars	C$39.51 +2.0%	C$38.30 -3.1%	+206.7%	C$33.81B	C$4.29B	23.66	6,019	Analyst Revision
FM First Quantum Minerals	3.1309 of 5 stars	C$35.23 +0.9%	C$42.49 +20.6%	+73.4%	C$29.18B	C$5.45B	N/A	20,000	Analyst Forecast
HBM Hudbay Minerals	3.0012 of 5 stars	C$35.62 +2.1%	C$39.10 +9.8%	+194.8%	C$14.15B	C$2.37B	21.33	2,500
KAT Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$9.79B	C$1.39B	N/A	4,457	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:CS) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Capstone Copper (CS) Competitors

CS vs. LUN, FM, HBM, KAT, and TRQ

How does Capstone Copper compare to Lundin Mining?

Summary

How does Capstone Copper compare to First Quantum Minerals?

Summary

How does Capstone Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Summary

How does Capstone Copper compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Summary

How does Capstone Copper compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CS vs. The Competition

Capstone Copper Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Capstone Copper (CS) Competitors

CS vs. LUN, FM, HBM, KAT, and TRQ

How does Capstone Copper compare to Lundin Mining?

Is CS or LUN more profitable?

Do analysts rate CS or LUN?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CS or LUN?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CS or LUN?

Which has more volatility and risk, CS or LUN?

Does the media refer more to CS or LUN?

Is CS or LUN a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Capstone Copper compare to First Quantum Minerals?

Is FM or CS more profitable?

Do analysts rate FM or CS?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FM or CS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FM or CS?

Which has more risk & volatility, FM or CS?

Does the media refer more to FM or CS?

Summary

How does Capstone Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HBM or CS?

Is HBM or CS more profitable?

Do analysts rate HBM or CS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HBM or CS?

Is HBM or CS a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, HBM or CS?

Does the media favor HBM or CS?

Summary

How does Capstone Copper compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in KAT or CS?

Is KAT or CS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend KAT or CS?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, KAT or CS?

Does the media favor KAT or CS?

Summary

How does Capstone Copper compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Do analysts recommend TRQ or CS?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TRQ or CS?

Does the media favor TRQ or CS?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TRQ or CS?

Is TRQ or CS more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CS vs. The Competition

Capstone Copper Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools