S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
Log in
TSE:ERO

Ero Copper Competitors

C$22.45
-0.82 (-3.52 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
C$22.30
Now: C$22.45
C$23.16
50-Day Range
C$17.75
MA: C$20.88
C$24.20
52-Week Range
C$8.40
Now: C$22.45
C$25.08
Volume188,526 shs
Average Volume256,502 shs
Market CapitalizationC$1.95 billion
P/E Ratio62.19
Dividend YieldN/A
BetaN/A

Competitors

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) Vs. TRQ, HBM, NSU, CS, AYM, and CMMC

Should you be buying ERO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "copper" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ero Copper, including Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Nevsun Resources (NSU), Capstone Mining (CS), Atalaya Mining (AYM), and Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) (CMMC).

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Ero Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ero CopperN/AN/AN/A
Turquoise Hill ResourcesN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ero Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$308.52 million6.31C$31.32 millionC$0.3662.19
Turquoise Hill ResourcesC$894.54 million4.34C$359.40 millionC$1.7910.81

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Ero Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ero Copper04302.43
Turquoise Hill Resources03102.25

Ero Copper currently has a consensus target price of C$23.72, indicating a potential upside of 5.67%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus target price of C$1.64, indicating a potential downside of 91.52%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Ero Copper and Hudbay Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ero CopperN/AN/AN/A
Hudbay MineralsN/AN/AN/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ero Copper and Hudbay Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$308.52 million6.31C$31.32 millionC$0.3662.19
Hudbay MineralsC$1.09 billion2.18C$-144,483,416.00C($0.55)-16.47

Ero Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hudbay Minerals. Hudbay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Ero Copper and Hudbay Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ero Copper04302.43
Hudbay Minerals03602.67

Ero Copper currently has a consensus target price of C$23.72, indicating a potential upside of 5.67%. Hudbay Minerals has a consensus target price of C$11.44, indicating a potential upside of 25.60%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Nevsun Resources (TSE:NSU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Ero Copper and Nevsun Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ero CopperN/AN/AN/A
Nevsun ResourcesN/AN/AN/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ero Copper and Nevsun Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$308.52 million6.31C$31.32 millionC$0.3662.19
Nevsun ResourcesC$335.39 million0.00C$-36,311,160.00C($0.12)N/A

Ero Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nevsun Resources. Nevsun Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Ero Copper and Nevsun Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ero Copper04302.43
Nevsun Resources0000N/A

Ero Copper currently has a consensus target price of C$23.72, indicating a potential upside of 5.67%.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Nevsun Resources on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Capstone Mining (TSE:CS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Ero Copper and Capstone Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ero CopperN/AN/AN/A
Capstone MiningN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ero Copper and Capstone Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$308.52 million6.31C$31.32 millionC$0.3662.19
Capstone MiningC$419.23 million3.77C$-1,635,536.00C$0.00-967.50

Ero Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Mining. Capstone Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ero Copper and Capstone Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ero Copper04302.43
Capstone Mining01502.83

Ero Copper currently has a consensus target price of C$23.72, indicating a potential upside of 5.67%. Capstone Mining has a consensus target price of C$3.86, indicating a potential downside of 0.36%. Given Ero Copper's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Capstone Mining.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Capstone Mining on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Atalaya Mining (TSE:AYM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ero Copper and Atalaya Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$308.52 million6.31C$31.32 millionC$0.3662.19
Atalaya MiningC$221.44 million3.81C$37.86 millionC$0.2722.26

Atalaya Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ero Copper. Atalaya Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ero Copper and Atalaya Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ero CopperN/AN/AN/A
Atalaya MiningN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ero Copper and Atalaya Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ero Copper04302.43
Atalaya Mining0000N/A

Ero Copper currently has a consensus target price of C$23.72, indicating a potential upside of 5.67%. Given Ero Copper's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Atalaya Mining.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Atalaya Mining on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) (TSE:CMMC) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) and Ero Copper's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO)C$341.75 million1.91C$37.38 millionC$0.1817.50
Ero CopperC$308.52 million6.31C$31.32 millionC$0.3662.19

Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) and Ero Copper's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO)N/AN/AN/A
Ero CopperN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) and Ero Copper, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO)03102.25
Ero Copper04302.43

Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) currently has a consensus price target of C$2.79, indicating a potential downside of 11.56%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of C$23.72, indicating a potential upside of 5.67%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO).

Summary

Ero Copper beats Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.


Ero Copper Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Turquoise Hill Resources logo
TRQ
Turquoise Hill Resources
1.0$19.30-1.9%C$3.88 billionC$894.54 million10.81News Coverage
Hudbay Minerals logo
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
1.3$9.11-7.2%C$2.38 billionC$1.09 billion-16.47Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Nevsun Resources logo
NSU
Nevsun Resources
0.4N/AN/AC$1.86 billionC$335.39 million-50.00
Capstone Mining logo
CS
Capstone Mining
1.0$3.87-4.7%C$1.58 billionC$419.23 million-967.50Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
AYM
Atalaya Mining
0.7$6.10-1.5%C$842.90 millionC$221.44 million22.26
Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO) logo
CMMC
Copper Mountain Mining Co. (CMMC.TO)
1.1$3.15-2.9%C$654.11 millionC$341.75 million17.50Analyst Report
News Coverage
Imperial Metals logo
III
Imperial Metals
0.5$4.69-1.9%C$602.62 millionC$140.54 million-52.11
Nevada Copper Corp. (NCU.TO) logo
NCU
Nevada Copper Corp. (NCU.TO)
1.2$0.19-0.0%C$341.61 millionN/A-8.64News Coverage
Gap Up
WRN
Western Copper and Gold Co. (WRN.TO)
0.5$2.03-3.0%C$275.26 millionN/A-106.84News Coverage
Gap Down
ARG
Amerigo Resources
0.9$0.89-1.1%C$160.88 millionC$126.43 million29.67News Coverage
Gap Up
Candente Copper Corp. (DNT.TO) logo
DNT
Candente Copper Corp. (DNT.TO)
0.6$0.21-4.8%C$52.74 millionN/A-52.50News Coverage
CUU
Copper Fox Metals Inc. (CUU.V)
0.5$0.39-2.6%C$49 millionN/A-390.00News Coverage
MNR
Mason Resources
1.1N/AN/AC$30.90 millionN/A-25.00
KCC
Kincora Copper Limited (KCC.V)
0.7$0.31-16.1%C$23.45 millionN/A-0.44High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
CYP
Cypress Development
0.5$1.37-0.0%C$18.92 millionN/A-114.17News Coverage
Gap Down
HI
Highland Copper Company Inc. (HI.V)
0.5$0.11-0.0%C$11.82 millionN/A-13.75Gap Up
BAY
Aston Bay
0.6$0.06-0.0%C$11.55 millionN/A-9.17News Coverage
RCLF
Rockcliff Metals
0.5$0.12-8.3%C$9.48 millionN/A-3.43News Coverage
BCU
Bell Copper
0.5$0.20-2.6%C$6.16 millionN/A-11.47
AN
Arena Minerals Inc. (AN.V)
0.6$0.19-2.7%C$4.28 millionN/A92.50Gap Up
BXR
Blue River Resources
0.5$0.02-33.3%C$1.92 millionN/A-7.50
This page was last updated on 2/27/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.