Free Trial

Ero Copper (ERO) Competitors

Ero Copper logo
C$35.81 -6.88 (-16.12%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

ERO vs. HBM, NXE, TRQ, PVG, and IE

Should you buy Ero Copper stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ero Copper with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ero Copper include Hudbay Minerals (HBM), NexGen Energy (NXE), Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ), Pretium Resources (PVG), and Ivanhoe Electric (IE). These companies are all part of the "non-metallic and industrial metal mining" industry.

How does Ero Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.55% compared to Hudbay Minerals' net margin of 27.86%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 31.19% beat Hudbay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ero Copper31.55% 31.19% 3.46%
Hudbay Minerals 27.86%20.70%4.78%

Ero Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$45.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.66%. Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of C$39.22, indicating a potential upside of 9.79%. Given Ero Copper's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.15

59.7% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.5% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.767113, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.236157, meaning that its share price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$923.93M4.04C$10.88MC$2.8012.79
Hudbay MineralsC$2.37B5.98C$69.59MC$1.6721.39

In the previous week, Hudbay Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Hudbay Minerals and 0 mentions for Ero Copper. Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper Neutral
Hudbay Minerals Positive

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ero Copper compare to NexGen Energy?

NexGen Energy (TSE:NXE) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both non-metallic and industrial metal mining companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

NexGen Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ero Copper. NexGen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NexGen EnergyN/AN/AC$148.05M-C$0.68N/A
Ero CopperC$923.93M4.04C$10.88MC$2.8012.79

30.4% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.7% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, NexGen Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NexGen Energy and 0 mentions for Ero Copper. NexGen Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that NexGen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NexGen Energy Positive
Ero Copper Neutral

NexGen Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$19.18, indicating a potential upside of 33.67%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of C$45.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.66%. Given NexGen Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NexGen Energy is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NexGen Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

NexGen Energy has a beta of 1.204127, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.767113, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.55% compared to NexGen Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 31.19% beat NexGen Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NexGen EnergyN/A -30.30% -4.99%
Ero Copper 31.55%31.19%3.46%

Summary

Ero Copper beats NexGen Energy on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ero Copper compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Turquoise Hill Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ero Copper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Turquoise Hill Resources Neutral
Ero Copper Neutral

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill ResourcesC$1.65B0.00C$730.47MC$3.63N/A
Ero CopperC$923.93M4.04C$10.88MC$2.8012.79

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.55% compared to Turquoise Hill Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 31.19% beat Turquoise Hill Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Turquoise Hill ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Ero Copper 31.55%31.19%3.46%

59.7% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ero Copper has a consensus price target of C$45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.66%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Summary

Ero Copper beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ero Copper compare to Pretium Resources?

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Pretium Resources (TSE:PVG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.55% compared to Pretium Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 31.19% beat Pretium Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ero Copper31.55% 31.19% 3.46%
Pretium Resources N/A N/A N/A

Ero Copper presently has a consensus target price of C$45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.66%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Pretium Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Pretium Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

59.7% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pretium Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper Neutral
Pretium Resources Neutral

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Pretium Resources. Pretium Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$923.93M4.04C$10.88MC$2.8012.79
Pretium ResourcesC$611.14M0.00-C$46.98M-C$0.25N/A

Summary

Ero Copper beats Pretium Resources on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ero Copper compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Ivanhoe Electric (TSE:IE) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Ero Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$923.93M4.04C$10.88MC$2.8012.79
Ivanhoe ElectricC$3.37M749.38-C$137.37M-C$0.29N/A

Ero Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.66%. Ivanhoe Electric has a consensus price target of C$26.25, suggesting a potential upside of 64.68%. Given Ivanhoe Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ivanhoe Electric is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Ivanhoe Electric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, Ivanhoe Electric had 1 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ivanhoe Electric and 0 mentions for Ero Copper. Ero Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ivanhoe Electric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper Neutral
Ivanhoe Electric Neutral

59.7% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.5% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.1% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 31.55% compared to Ivanhoe Electric's net margin of -1,002.45%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 31.19% beat Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ero Copper31.55% 31.19% 3.46%
Ivanhoe Electric -1,002.45%-8.83%-34.41%

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.767113, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 2.427083, meaning that its share price is 143% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Ivanhoe Electric on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ero Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ERO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ERO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ERO vs. The Competition

MetricEro CopperCopper IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$4.45BC$6.02BC$4.88BC$12.29B
Dividend YieldN/A4.06%4.96%6.20%
P/E Ratio12.7922.7522.5436.72
Price / Sales4.044,471.097,026.6410.42
Price / Cash8.9431.3627.2182.29
Price / Book3.393.429.124.41
Net IncomeC$10.88M-C$78.74MC$156.62MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-14.76%-6.48%-4.36%-2.51%
1 Month Performance1.91%4.18%-2.03%-0.59%
1 Year Performance64.64%110.85%60.03%45.26%

Ero Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ERO
Ero Copper
2.7842 of 5 stars
C$35.81
-16.1%
C$45.00
+25.7%
+96.5%C$4.45BC$923.93M12.792,460
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
2.6456 of 5 stars
C$44.07
+4.0%
C$39.22
-11.0%
+226.9%C$16.83BC$2.37B26.392,500
NXE
NexGen Energy
2.1559 of 5 stars
C$17.18
+8.6%
C$19.18
+11.7%
+81.3%C$10.47BN/AN/A77
TRQ
Turquoise Hill Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$8.65BC$1.65B11.843,480
PVG
Pretium Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$3.60BC$611.14MN/A112

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:ERO) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners