Go Pro

Hudbay Minerals (HBM) Competitors

Hudbay Minerals logo
C$36.99 +0.15 (+0.41%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

HBM vs. FM, LUN, CS, KAT, and ERO

Should you buy Hudbay Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Hudbay Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include First Quantum Minerals (FM), Lundin Mining (LUN), Capstone Copper (CS), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Ero Copper (ERO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Hudbay Minerals compare to First Quantum Minerals?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Hudbay Minerals presently has a consensus price target of C$40.91, suggesting a potential upside of 10.59%. First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of C$44.68, suggesting a potential upside of 2.35%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
First Quantum Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Hudbay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B6.66C$69.59MC$1.6322.72
First Quantum MineralsC$5.75B6.34-C$1.05B-C$0.09N/A

In the previous week, Hudbay Minerals and Hudbay Minerals both had 2 articles in the media. Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.04 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
First Quantum Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

46.0% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.31136, indicating that its share price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.377459, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.22% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 18.41% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals27.22% 18.41% 4.78%
First Quantum Minerals -1.44%-0.73%2.31%

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats First Quantum Minerals on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hudbay Minerals compare to Lundin Mining?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Lundin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Hudbay Minerals. Lundin Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B6.66C$69.59MC$1.6322.72
Lundin MiningC$4.63B6.50C$216.85MC$1.7520.18

In the previous week, Lundin Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lundin Mining and 2 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Lundin Mining's score of -0.50 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lundin Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Hudbay Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Lundin Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Hudbay Minerals pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Mining pays out 4.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hudbay Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$40.91, suggesting a potential upside of 10.59%. Lundin Mining has a consensus price target of C$39.64, suggesting a potential upside of 12.23%. Given Lundin Mining's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lundin Mining is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
Lundin Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

46.0% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Lundin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.11% compared to Hudbay Minerals' net margin of 27.22%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 22.97% beat Hudbay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals27.22% 18.41% 4.78%
Lundin Mining 35.11%22.97%4.56%

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.31136, meaning that its share price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.300308, meaning that its share price is 130% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lundin Mining beats Hudbay Minerals on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hudbay Minerals compare to Capstone Copper?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

Hudbay Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capstone Copper. Hudbay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.31-C$14.64MC$0.6224.35
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B6.66C$69.59MC$1.6322.72

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.172553, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.31136, suggesting that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market.

Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Hudbay Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hudbay Minerals pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capstone Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$16.35, indicating a potential upside of 8.28%. Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of C$40.91, indicating a potential upside of 10.59%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Capstone Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08

36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 18.41% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Hudbay Minerals 27.22%18.41%4.78%

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Capstone Copper and 2 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Capstone Copper's score of 0.86 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hudbay Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Capstone Copper on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hudbay Minerals compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

46.0% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 18.41% beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals27.22% 18.41% 4.78%
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Hudbay Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hudbay Minerals and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals Positive
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) Neutral

Hudbay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B6.66C$69.59MC$1.6322.72
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)C$1.39B0.00-C$11.75B-C$0.19N/A

Hudbay Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$40.91, indicating a potential upside of 10.59%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hudbay Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.72% compared to Hudbay Minerals' net margin of 27.22%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.09% beat Hudbay Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ero Copper29.72% 30.09% 3.46%
Hudbay Minerals 27.22%18.41%4.78%

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ero Copper and 2 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.57 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hudbay Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ero Copper presently has a consensus price target of C$47.63, suggesting a potential upside of 1.52%. Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of C$40.91, suggesting a potential upside of 10.59%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.746136, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.31136, indicating that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ero CopperC$1.04B4.68C$10.88MC$2.9515.91
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B6.66C$69.59MC$1.6322.72

65.8% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Ero Copper on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hudbay Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HBM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HBM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HBM vs. The Competition

MetricHudbay MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$16.43BC$3.77BC$4.84BC$12.54B
Dividend Yield0.10%5.23%4.71%6.20%
P/E Ratio22.7220.2519.7730.69
Price / Sales6.667,611.494,522.149.75
Price / Cash6.5029.6227.0582.29
Price / Book2.8210.388.824.60
Net IncomeC$69.59MC$122.18MC$154.16MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.75%1.36%1.01%0.94%
1 Month Performance17.09%7.90%6.62%3.90%
1 Year Performance143.20%56.00%44.31%36.05%

Hudbay Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
2.6926 of 5 stars
C$36.99
+0.4%
C$40.91
+10.6%
+136.5%C$16.43BC$2.47B22.722,500
FM
First Quantum Minerals
1.7782 of 5 stars
C$41.73
+7.4%
C$44.68
+7.1%
+81.6%C$34.81BC$5.75BN/A20,000
LUN
Lundin Mining
2.6378 of 5 stars
C$36.94
+6.4%
C$39.69
+7.4%
+122.4%C$31.54BC$4.29B22.126,019
CS
Capstone Copper
2.5736 of 5 stars
C$14.41
+8.3%
C$16.35
+13.5%
+63.6%C$11.01BC$2.68B23.241,049
KAT
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$9.79BC$1.39BN/A4,457

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:HBM) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners