Does the media prefer FM or LUN?

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 4 more articles in the media than Lundin Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 3 mentions for Lundin Mining. Lundin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.28 indicating that Lundin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment First Quantum Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Lundin Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to HBM or FM?

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 4 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 3 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.28 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hudbay Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive First Quantum Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer CS or FM?

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 5 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.28 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Capstone Copper 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive First Quantum Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate FM or KAT?

First Quantum Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$44.24, suggesting a potential upside of 17.61%. Given First Quantum Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe First Quantum Minerals is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score First Quantum Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 11 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.73 Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer FM or TRQ?

First Quantum Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$44.24, indicating a potential upside of 17.61%. Given First Quantum Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe First Quantum Minerals is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score First Quantum Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 11 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.73 Turquoise Hill Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

First Quantum Minerals (FM) Competitors

C$37.66 -1.37 (-3.51%)

As of 10:48 AM Eastern

Compare

FM vs. LUN, HBM, CS, KAT, and TRQ

Should you buy First Quantum Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares First Quantum Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with First Quantum Minerals include Lundin Mining (LUN), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Capstone Copper (CS), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ). These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Lundin Mining?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.364622, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.237138, meaning that its share price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

69.7% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.8% of Lundin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.92% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -3.69%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 23.11% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals	-3.69%	-1.78%	2.31%
Lundin Mining	35.92%	23.11%	4.56%

First Quantum Minerals presently has a consensus price target of C$44.24, suggesting a potential upside of 17.61%. Lundin Mining has a consensus price target of C$39.73, suggesting a potential upside of 21.60%. Given Lundin Mining's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lundin Mining is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Lundin Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Lundin Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.45B	5.72	-C$1.05B	-C$0.24	N/A
Lundin Mining	C$4.29B	6.51	C$216.85M	C$1.67	19.56

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 4 more articles in the media than Lundin Mining. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 3 mentions for Lundin Mining. Lundin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.28 indicating that Lundin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Lundin Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Lundin Mining beats First Quantum Minerals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.236157, meaning that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.364622, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay Minerals	C$2.37B	5.60	C$69.59M	C$1.67	20.05
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.45B	5.72	-C$1.05B	-C$0.24	N/A

Hudbay Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$39.22, suggesting a potential upside of 17.14%. First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of C$44.24, suggesting a potential upside of 17.61%. Given First Quantum Minerals' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe First Quantum Minerals is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.15
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.86% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -3.69%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 20.70% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals	27.86%	20.70%	4.78%
First Quantum Minerals	-3.69%	-1.78%	2.31%

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 4 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 3 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. Hudbay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.28 indicating that Hudbay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
First Quantum Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

49.6% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats First Quantum Minerals on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Capstone Copper?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.10699, suggesting that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.364622, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Capstone Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capstone Copper	C$2.48B	4.08	-C$14.64M	C$0.55	24.07
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.45B	5.72	-C$1.05B	-C$0.24	N/A

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.04% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -3.69%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 12.69% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capstone Copper	17.04%	12.69%	0.47%
First Quantum Minerals	-3.69%	-1.78%	2.31%

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 5 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.28 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
First Quantum Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

36.3% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capstone Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$16.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.85%. First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of C$44.24, indicating a potential upside of 17.61%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capstone Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Summary

Capstone Copper beats First Quantum Minerals on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

First Quantum Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.45B	5.72	-C$1.05B	-C$0.24	N/A
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	C$1.39B	0.00	-C$11.75B	-C$0.19	N/A

First Quantum Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$44.24, suggesting a potential upside of 17.61%. Given First Quantum Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe First Quantum Minerals is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

69.7% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -3.69%. Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals	-3.69%	-1.78%	2.31%
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 7 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals	Neutral
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	Neutral

Summary

First Quantum Minerals beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

69.7% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

First Quantum Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$44.24, indicating a potential upside of 17.61%. Given First Quantum Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe First Quantum Minerals is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Turquoise Hill Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Turquoise Hill Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turquoise Hill Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.45B	5.72	-C$1.05B	-C$0.24	N/A
Turquoise Hill Resources	C$1.65B	0.00	C$730.47M	C$3.63	N/A

Turquoise Hill Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -3.69%. Turquoise Hill Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals	-3.69%	-1.78%	2.31%
Turquoise Hill Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 7 more articles in the media than Turquoise Hill Resources. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 0 mentions for Turquoise Hill Resources. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Turquoise Hill Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals	Neutral
Turquoise Hill Resources	Neutral

Summary

First Quantum Minerals beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get First Quantum Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	First Quantum Minerals	Copper Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$31.16B	C$5.11B	C$4.61B	C$12.17B
Dividend Yield	1.57%	4.15%	5.00%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	-156.75	21.90	22.67	35.35
Price / Sales	5.72	4,352.15	5,495.42	10.42
Price / Cash	12.35	31.36	27.05	82.29
Price / Book	2.75	3.32	8.75	4.39
Net Income	-C$1.05B	-C$78.74M	C$157.26M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-15.23%	-5.99%	-3.85%	-1.90%
1 Month Performance	2.42%	-2.78%	-4.92%	-2.11%
1 Year Performance	66.83%	101.49%	50.09%	38.12%

First Quantum Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FM First Quantum Minerals	2.4537 of 5 stars	C$37.66 -3.5%	C$44.24 +17.5%	+78.7%	C$31.19B	C$5.45B	N/A	20,000	News Coverage Analyst Revision Gap Down
LUN Lundin Mining	2.6361 of 5 stars	C$40.59 +1.9%	C$39.73 -2.1%	+152.9%	C$34.72B	C$4.29B	24.31	6,019	Analyst Revision Gap Down
HBM Hudbay Minerals	2.5901 of 5 stars	C$40.33 +0.2%	C$39.22 -2.8%	+171.0%	C$16.02B	C$2.37B	24.15	2,500
CS Capstone Copper	2.6896 of 5 stars	C$15.18 -1.0%	C$16.00 +5.4%	+77.4%	C$11.59B	C$2.48B	27.60	1,049	Analyst Revision
KAT Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$9.79B	C$1.39B	N/A	4,457	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FM) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

First Quantum Minerals (FM) Competitors

FM vs. LUN, HBM, CS, KAT, and TRQ

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Lundin Mining?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Capstone Copper?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FM vs. The Competition

First Quantum Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

First Quantum Minerals (FM) Competitors

FM vs. LUN, HBM, CS, KAT, and TRQ

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Lundin Mining?

Which has more volatility & risk, FM or LUN?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FM or LUN?

Is FM or LUN more profitable?

Do analysts recommend FM or LUN?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FM or LUN?

Does the media prefer FM or LUN?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Which has more risk and volatility, HBM or FM?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, HBM or FM?

Do analysts rate HBM or FM?

Is HBM or FM more profitable?

Does the media refer more to HBM or FM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HBM or FM?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Capstone Copper?

Which has more risk & volatility, CS or FM?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CS or FM?

Is CS or FM more profitable?

Does the media prefer CS or FM?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CS or FM?

Do analysts rate CS or FM?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FM or KAT?

Do analysts rate FM or KAT?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FM or KAT?

Is FM or KAT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to FM or KAT?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Turquoise Hill Resources?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FM or TRQ?

Do analysts prefer FM or TRQ?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FM or TRQ?

Is FM or TRQ more profitable?

Does the media prefer FM or TRQ?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FM vs. The Competition

First Quantum Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools