Does the media favor FM or LUN?

In the previous week, Lundin Mining had 14 more articles in the media than First Quantum Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lundin Mining and 3 mentions for First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Lundin Mining's score of -0.37 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment First Quantum Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lundin Mining 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor FM or HBM?

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 2 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Hudbay Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment First Quantum Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hudbay Minerals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor FM or CS?

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals and First Quantum Minerals both had 3 articles in the media. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Capstone Copper's score of 0.53 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment First Quantum Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Capstone Copper 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend FM or KAT?

First Quantum Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$44.68, indicating a potential downside of 6.22%. Given Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score First Quantum Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 10 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.92 Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to ERO or FM?

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 1 more articles in the media than First Quantum Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ero Copper and 3 mentions for First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.39 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ero Copper 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral First Quantum Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

First Quantum Minerals (FM) Competitors

C$47.64 +0.13 (+0.27%)

As of 08/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

FM vs. LUN, HBM, CS, KAT, and ERO

Should you buy First Quantum Minerals stock or one of its competitors? First Quantum Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Lundin Mining (LUN), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Capstone Copper (CS), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Ero Copper (ERO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Lundin Mining?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.11% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 22.97% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals	-1.44%	-0.73%	2.31%
Lundin Mining	35.11%	22.97%	4.56%

Lundin Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.75B	6.92	-C$1.05B	-C$0.09	N/A
Lundin Mining	C$4.63B	7.01	C$216.85M	C$1.75	21.77

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.377459, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.300308, suggesting that its stock price is 130% more volatile than the broader market.

First Quantum Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$44.68, indicating a potential downside of 6.22%. Lundin Mining has a consensus price target of C$39.72, indicating a potential upside of 4.24%. Given Lundin Mining's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lundin Mining is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Lundin Mining	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47

70.2% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Lundin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lundin Mining had 14 more articles in the media than First Quantum Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lundin Mining and 3 mentions for First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Lundin Mining's score of -0.37 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lundin Mining	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Lundin Mining beats First Quantum Minerals on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Hudbay Minerals?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.377459, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.31136, meaning that its share price is 131% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.22% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 18.41% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals	-1.44%	-0.73%	2.31%
Hudbay Minerals	27.22%	18.41%	4.78%

Hudbay Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.75B	6.92	-C$1.05B	-C$0.09	N/A
Hudbay Minerals	C$2.47B	7.38	C$69.59M	C$1.63	25.20

First Quantum Minerals currently has a consensus price target of C$44.68, indicating a potential downside of 6.22%. Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of C$40.91, indicating a potential downside of 0.28%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Hudbay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.08

70.2% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 2 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Hudbay Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hudbay Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats First Quantum Minerals on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Capstone Copper?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.377459, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.172553, meaning that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market.

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals	-1.44%	-0.73%	2.31%
Capstone Copper	17.67%	13.69%	0.47%

First Quantum Minerals presently has a consensus price target of C$44.68, indicating a potential downside of 6.22%. Capstone Copper has a consensus price target of C$16.35, indicating a potential downside of 1.62%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Capstone Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Capstone Copper has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.75B	6.92	-C$1.05B	-C$0.09	N/A
Capstone Copper	C$2.68B	4.75	-C$14.64M	C$0.62	26.81

70.2% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals and First Quantum Minerals both had 3 articles in the media. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Capstone Copper's score of 0.53 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Capstone Copper	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Capstone Copper beats First Quantum Minerals on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) and Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

70.2% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

First Quantum Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$44.68, indicating a potential downside of 6.22%. Given Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

First Quantum Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.75B	6.92	-C$1.05B	-C$0.09	N/A
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	C$1.39B	0.00	-C$11.75B	-C$0.19	N/A

Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Quantum Minerals	-1.44%	-0.73%	2.31%
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, First Quantum Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for First Quantum Minerals and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
First Quantum Minerals	Positive
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	Neutral

Summary

First Quantum Minerals beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Ero Copper presently has a consensus price target of C$47.63, suggesting a potential downside of 10.83%. First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of C$44.68, suggesting a potential downside of 6.22%. Given First Quantum Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe First Quantum Minerals is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ero Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
First Quantum Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 1 more articles in the media than First Quantum Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ero Copper and 3 mentions for First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.39 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ero Copper	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
First Quantum Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ero Copper has a beta of 1.746136, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.377459, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

66.4% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.2% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ero Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ero Copper	C$1.04B	5.33	C$10.88M	C$2.95	18.11
First Quantum Minerals	C$5.75B	6.92	-C$1.05B	-C$0.09	N/A

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.72% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.09% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ero Copper	29.72%	30.09%	3.46%
First Quantum Minerals	-1.44%	-0.73%	2.31%

Summary

Ero Copper beats First Quantum Minerals on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get First Quantum Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	First Quantum Minerals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$39.74B	C$4.13B	C$5.14B	C$12.58B
Dividend Yield	1.57%	5.18%	4.68%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	-529.33	25.94	26.57	38.95
Price / Sales	6.92	8,001.27	4,760.01	10.07
Price / Cash	12.35	26.68	24.71	82.29
Price / Book	3.42	10.93	9.19	4.79
Net Income	-C$1.05B	C$122.81M	C$154.52M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	9.62%	7.90%	6.20%	1.50%
1 Month Performance	23.68%	16.89%	13.28%	5.29%
1 Year Performance	102.04%	58.29%	45.85%	34.83%

First Quantum Minerals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FM First Quantum Minerals	1.7272 of 5 stars	C$47.64 +0.3%	C$44.68 -6.2%	+103.0%	C$39.74B	C$5.75B	N/A	20,000
LUN Lundin Mining	1.8643 of 5 stars	C$35.53 -1.8%	C$39.64 +11.6%	+142.8%	C$30.25B	C$4.63B	20.30	6,019	Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
HBM Hudbay Minerals	1.5827 of 5 stars	C$36.58 -3.7%	C$40.91 +11.8%	+152.0%	C$16.25B	C$2.47B	22.47	2,500	Gap Down
CS Capstone Copper	1.584 of 5 stars	C$14.76 -2.5%	C$16.35 +10.8%	+72.0%	C$11.28B	C$2.68B	23.81	1,049	Positive News
KAT Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$9.79B	C$1.39B	N/A	4,457	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:FM) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

First Quantum Minerals (FM) Competitors

FM vs. LUN, HBM, CS, KAT, and ERO

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Lundin Mining?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Capstone Copper?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FM vs. The Competition

First Quantum Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

First Quantum Minerals (FM) Competitors

FM vs. LUN, HBM, CS, KAT, and ERO

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Lundin Mining?

Is FM or LUN more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FM or LUN?

Which has more volatility & risk, FM or LUN?

Do analysts prefer FM or LUN?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FM or LUN?

Does the media favor FM or LUN?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Which has more risk and volatility, FM or HBM?

Is FM or HBM more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, FM or HBM?

Do analysts rate FM or HBM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FM or HBM?

Does the media favor FM or HBM?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Capstone Copper?

Which has more volatility and risk, FM or CS?

Is FM or CS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend FM or CS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FM or CS?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FM or CS?

Does the media favor FM or CS?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FM or KAT?

Do analysts recommend FM or KAT?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FM or KAT?

Is FM or KAT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to FM or KAT?

Summary

How does First Quantum Minerals compare to Ero Copper?

Do analysts prefer ERO or FM?

Does the media refer more to ERO or FM?

Which has more volatility & risk, ERO or FM?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ERO or FM?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ERO or FM?

Is ERO or FM more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FM vs. The Competition

First Quantum Minerals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools