Go Pro

McEwen Mining (MUX) Competitors

McEwen Mining logo
C$26.62 +0.80 (+3.10%)
As of 07/2/2026 04:19 PM Eastern

MUX vs. ORL, PVG, COP, AZ, and FOM

Should you buy McEwen Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares McEwen Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with McEwen Mining include Orocobre (ORL), Pretium Resources (PVG), Coro Mining (COP), Arizona Mining (AZ), and Foran Mining (FOM). These companies are all part of the "industrial metals & minerals" industry.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Orocobre?

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and Orocobre (TSE:ORL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

28.9% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

McEwen Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Orocobre. Orocobre is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen MiningC$235.91M6.74C$74.94MC$1.1822.56
OrocobreC$84.76M0.00-C$146.63M-C$0.23N/A

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 31.39% compared to Orocobre's net margin of 0.00%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 13.64% beat Orocobre's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McEwen Mining31.39% 13.64% -3.02%
Orocobre N/A N/A N/A

Given Orocobre's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Orocobre is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Orocobre
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Orocobre's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McEwen Mining Positive
Orocobre Neutral

Summary

McEwen Mining beats Orocobre on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Pretium Resources?

Pretium Resources (TSE:PVG) and McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

McEwen Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pretium Resources. Pretium Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pretium ResourcesC$611.14M0.00-C$46.98M-C$0.25N/A
McEwen MiningC$235.91M6.74C$74.94MC$1.1822.56

In the previous week, McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Pretium Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pretium Resources Neutral
McEwen Mining Positive

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 31.39% compared to Pretium Resources' net margin of 0.00%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 13.64% beat Pretium Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pretium ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
McEwen Mining 31.39%13.64%-3.02%

28.9% of McEwen Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Given Pretium Resources' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Pretium Resources is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pretium Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Summary

McEwen Mining beats Pretium Resources on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Coro Mining?

Coro Mining (TSE:COP) and McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 31.39% compared to Coro Mining's net margin of 0.00%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 13.64% beat Coro Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coro MiningN/A N/A N/A
McEwen Mining 31.39%13.64%-3.02%

McEwen Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Coro Mining. Coro Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coro MiningN/AN/AN/A-C$0.01N/A
McEwen MiningC$235.91M6.74C$74.94MC$1.1822.56

28.9% of McEwen Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Given Coro Mining's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Coro Mining is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Coro Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

In the previous week, McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Coro Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Coro Mining Neutral
McEwen Mining Positive

Summary

McEwen Mining beats Coro Mining on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Arizona Mining?

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and Arizona Mining (TSE:AZ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Given Arizona Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Arizona Mining is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Arizona Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Arizona Mining had 1 more articles in the media than McEwen Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Arizona Mining and 0 mentions for McEwen Mining. McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Arizona Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McEwen Mining Positive
Arizona Mining Neutral

McEwen Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Arizona Mining.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen MiningC$235.91M6.74C$74.94MC$1.1822.56
Arizona MiningN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 31.39% compared to Arizona Mining's net margin of 0.00%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 13.64% beat Arizona Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McEwen Mining31.39% 13.64% -3.02%
Arizona Mining N/A N/A N/A

28.9% of McEwen Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

McEwen Mining beats Arizona Mining on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Foran Mining?

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and Foran Mining (CVE:FOM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Foran Mining has a consensus target price of C$6.34, suggesting a potential upside of 96.34%. Given Foran Mining's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Foran Mining is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Foran Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

McEwen Mining has a beta of 2.222831, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foran Mining has a beta of 3.68, meaning that its share price is 268% more volatile than the broader market.

28.9% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Foran Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Foran Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Foran Mining had 1 more articles in the media than McEwen Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Foran Mining and 0 mentions for McEwen Mining. Foran Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat McEwen Mining's score of 0.67 indicating that Foran Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McEwen Mining Positive
Foran Mining Positive

McEwen Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Foran Mining. Foran Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen MiningC$235.91M6.74C$74.94MC$1.1822.56
Foran MiningN/AN/A-C$8.82M-C$0.01N/A

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 31.39% compared to Foran Mining's net margin of 0.00%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 13.64% beat Foran Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McEwen Mining31.39% 13.64% -3.02%
Foran Mining N/A -5.72%-3.01%

Summary

McEwen Mining beats Foran Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McEwen Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MUX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MUX vs. The Competition

MetricMcEwen MiningIndustrial Metals & Minerals IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.54BC$329.94MC$4.59BC$12.43B
Dividend Yield0.55%10.16%5.03%6.18%
P/E Ratio22.564.4123.0836.20
Price / Sales6.74422.266,056.9210.11
Price / Cash6.1648.7426.8182.29
Price / Book2.416.738.654.47
Net IncomeC$74.94MC$82.66MC$157.26MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance4.68%0.79%0.97%0.85%
1 Month Performance-8.11%-1.04%-5.54%-1.49%
1 Year Performance73.99%3.64%46.36%35.24%

McEwen Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MUX
McEwen Mining
0.173 of 5 stars
C$26.62
+3.1%
N/A+78.1%C$1.54BC$235.91M22.56427
ORL
Orocobre
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.28BC$84.76MN/A548
PVG
Pretium Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$3.60BC$611.14MN/A112
COP
Coro Mining
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$2.41BN/AN/A9,500
AZ
Arizona Mining
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.94BN/AN/A60

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:MUX) was last updated on 7/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners