Free Trial

McEwen Mining (MUX) Competitors

McEwen Mining logo
C$22.57 -1.38 (-5.76%)
As of 10:40 AM Eastern

MUX vs. CG, SKE, AYA, WFT, and ERO

Should you buy McEwen Mining stock or one of its competitors? McEwen Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Centerra Gold (CG), Skeena Resources (SKE), Aya Gold & Silver (AYA), West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO) (WFT), and Ero Copper (ERO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Centerra Gold?

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and Centerra Gold (TSE:CG) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

37.1% of McEwen Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.9% of Centerra Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Centerra Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Centerra Gold has a net margin of 37.72% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of 32.45%. Centerra Gold's return on equity of 30.90% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McEwen Mining32.45% 13.47% -3.02%
Centerra Gold 37.72%30.90%6.67%

McEwen Mining has a beta of 2.220297, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centerra Gold has a beta of 1.692347, indicating that its share price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, McEwen Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Centerra Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for McEwen Mining and 0 mentions for Centerra Gold. McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Centerra Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McEwen Mining Neutral
Centerra Gold Neutral

Centerra Gold has a consensus target price of C$31.43, indicating a potential upside of 1.25%. Given Centerra Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Centerra Gold is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Centerra Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

McEwen Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Centerra Gold. Centerra Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen MiningC$248.44M5.92C$74.94MC$1.2619.01
Centerra GoldC$1.72B3.52C$73.66MC$3.139.92

Summary

McEwen Mining beats Centerra Gold on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Skeena Resources?

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 32.45% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 13.47% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McEwen Mining32.45% 13.47% -3.02%
Skeena Resources N/A -166.74%-38.21%

In the previous week, McEwen Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for McEwen Mining and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McEwen Mining Neutral
Skeena Resources Neutral

37.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 2.220297, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.585977, suggesting that its share price is 159% more volatile than the broader market.

Skeena Resources has a consensus price target of C$52.83, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Skeena Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Skeena Resources is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

McEwen Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen MiningC$248.44M5.92C$74.94MC$1.2619.01
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.07N/A

Summary

McEwen Mining beats Skeena Resources on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Aya Gold & Silver?

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and Aya Gold & Silver (TSE:AYA) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Aya Gold & Silver has a net margin of 32.72% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of 32.45%. Aya Gold & Silver's return on equity of 25.26% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McEwen Mining32.45% 13.47% -3.02%
Aya Gold & Silver 32.72%25.26%0.69%

In the previous week, McEwen Mining and McEwen Mining both had 1 articles in the media. McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Aya Gold & Silver's score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McEwen Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Aya Gold & Silver
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aya Gold & Silver has a consensus target price of C$48.83, indicating a potential upside of 30.92%. Given Aya Gold & Silver's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Aya Gold & Silver is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Aya Gold & Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.14

McEwen Mining has a beta of 2.220297, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aya Gold & Silver has a beta of 3.171072, suggesting that its share price is 217% more volatile than the broader market.

McEwen Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aya Gold & Silver. McEwen Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aya Gold & Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen MiningC$248.44M5.92C$74.94MC$1.2619.01
Aya Gold & SilverC$343.72M15.63C$5.53MC$0.7748.43

37.1% of McEwen Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.3% of Aya Gold & Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Aya Gold & Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Aya Gold & Silver beats McEwen Mining on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen Mining compare to West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO)?

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO) (TSE:WFT) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Given West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO)'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO) is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO) has higher revenue and earnings than McEwen Mining. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen MiningC$248.44M5.92C$74.94MC$1.2619.01
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO)C$5.29B0.00C$368.05MC$5.36N/A

In the previous week, McEwen Mining had 1 more articles in the media than West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for McEwen Mining and 0 mentions for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO). McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
McEwen Mining Neutral
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO) Neutral

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 32.45% compared to West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 13.47% beat West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McEwen Mining32.45% 13.47% -3.02%
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO) N/A N/A N/A

37.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

McEwen Mining beats West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO) on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McEwen Mining compare to Ero Copper?

McEwen Mining (TSE:MUX) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

37.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ero Copper has a consensus target price of C$48.33, suggesting a potential downside of 7.16%. Given Ero Copper's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than McEwen Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McEwen Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

McEwen Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ero Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McEwen MiningC$248.44M5.92C$74.94MC$1.2619.01
Ero CopperC$1.04B5.20C$10.88MC$2.9517.65

McEwen Mining has a beta of 2.220297, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.576894, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 1 more articles in the media than McEwen Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ero Copper and 1 mentions for McEwen Mining. McEwen Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Ero Copper's score of -0.82 indicating that McEwen Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McEwen Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ero Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 32.45% compared to Ero Copper's net margin of 29.72%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.09% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McEwen Mining32.45% 13.47% -3.02%
Ero Copper 29.72%30.09%3.46%

Summary

Ero Copper beats McEwen Mining on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McEwen Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MUX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MUX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MUX vs. The Competition

MetricMcEwen MiningMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.38BC$3.71BC$4.68BC$12.69B
Dividend Yield0.55%5.25%4.78%6.34%
P/E Ratio17.8323.8623.6737.73
Price / Sales5.5527,141.6916,164.608.56
Price / Cash6.1627.0124.8882.29
Price / Book1.9111.699.724.40
Net IncomeC$74.94MC$127.18MC$159.17MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-7.27%-1.85%-1.56%0.29%
1 Month Performance-13.28%76.79%56.15%-1.77%
1 Year Performance-21.28%11.40%10.82%14.81%

McEwen Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MUX
McEwen Mining
0.0566 of 5 stars
C$22.57
-5.8%
N/A-9.7%C$1.38BC$248.44M17.911,864
CG
Centerra Gold
1.3654 of 5 stars
C$32.23
+3.8%
C$31.43
-2.5%
+95.7%C$6.30BC$1.72B10.303,650
SKE
Skeena Resources
N/AC$46.79
+4.6%
C$52.83
+12.9%
+75.4%C$5.87BN/AN/A170
AYA
Aya Gold & Silver
2.6917 of 5 stars
C$39.44
+5.6%
C$48.83
+23.8%
+138.0%C$5.68BC$343.72M51.2019,000
WFT
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFT.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.63BC$5.29B15.298,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:MUX) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners