Aura Minerals (ORA) Competitors

Aura Minerals (TSE:ORA) and Brookfield Renewable (TSE:BEPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Is ORA or BEPC a better dividend stock?

Aura Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.89 per share. Brookfield Renewable pays an annual dividend of C$1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Aura Minerals pays out -108.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield Renewable pays out -19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Does the media refer more to ORA or BEPC?

In the previous week, Aura Minerals and Aura Minerals both had 2 articles in the media. Aura Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Brookfield Renewable's score of 0.00 indicating that Aura Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aura Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Brookfield Renewable	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, ORA or BEPC?

Aura Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aura Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aura Minerals	C$679.91M	0.00	-C$37.81M	-C$0.82	N/A
Brookfield Renewable	C$3.89B	2.59	-C$144.17M	-C$7.34	-7.63

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ORA or BEPC?

2.7% of Aura Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by institutional investors. 58.0% of Aura Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Which has more volatility and risk, ORA or BEPC?

Aura Minerals has a beta of 1.190396, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 1.224419, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do analysts prefer ORA or BEPC?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aura Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Brookfield Renewable	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Is ORA or BEPC more profitable?

Aura Minerals has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of -16.64%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of -9.33% beat Aura Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aura Minerals	-9.66%	-19.25%	8.95%
Brookfield Renewable	-16.64%	-9.33%	2.20%

Summary

Aura Minerals beats Brookfield Renewable on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.