Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Is Waiting! Get MarketBeat All Access Today
Lock In $149
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Premium Brands (PBH) Competitors

Premium Brands logo
C$88.96 +2.26 (+2.61%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

PBH vs. APHA, BHC, SLS, AUP, and CARA

Should you buy Premium Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Premium Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Premium Brands include Aphria (APHA), Bausch Health Companies (BHC), Solaris Resources (SLS), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (AUP), and Cara Operations (CARA). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does Premium Brands compare to Aphria?

Aphria (TSE:APHA) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both mid-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Aphria. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Premium Brands and 0 mentions for Aphria. Aphria's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.40 indicating that Aphria is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aphria Neutral
Premium Brands Neutral

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Aphria. Aphria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AphriaC$611.06M0.00-C$637.39M-C$2.01N/A
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.59C$99.56MC$0.9098.84

32.8% of Premium Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Premium Brands has a consensus target price of C$118.62, indicating a potential upside of 33.34%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Aphria.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aphria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Premium Brands has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Aphria's net margin of 0.00%. Premium Brands' return on equity of 2.21% beat Aphria's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AphriaN/A N/A N/A
Premium Brands 0.52%2.21%3.61%

Summary

Premium Brands beats Aphria on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Bausch Health Companies?

Bausch Health Companies (TSE:BHC) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both mid-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

10.0% of Bausch Health Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.8% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 11.3% of Bausch Health Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Premium Brands has a consensus price target of C$118.62, indicating a potential upside of 33.34%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Bausch Health Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bausch Health Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Premium Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bausch Health Companies. Bausch Health Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bausch Health CompaniesC$10.53B0.26-C$125.65M-C$3.24N/A
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.59C$99.56MC$0.9098.84

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Bausch Health Companies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Premium Brands and 0 mentions for Bausch Health Companies. Bausch Health Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.40 indicating that Bausch Health Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bausch Health Companies Neutral
Premium Brands Neutral

Premium Brands has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Bausch Health Companies' net margin of -13.54%. Bausch Health Companies' return on equity of 120.43% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bausch Health Companies-13.54% 120.43% 4.16%
Premium Brands 0.52%2.21%3.61%

Bausch Health Companies has a beta of 0.631102, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Brands has a beta of 0.801622, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Premium Brands beats Bausch Health Companies on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Solaris Resources?

Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) and Solaris Resources (TSE:SLS) are both mid-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

32.8% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of Solaris Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.6% of Solaris Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Solaris Resources. Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.59C$99.56MC$0.9098.84
Solaris ResourcesN/AN/A-C$46.49M-C$0.19N/A

Premium Brands has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Solaris Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Solaris Resources' return on equity of 60.97% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Brands0.52% 2.21% 3.61%
Solaris Resources N/A 60.97%-51.67%

Premium Brands presently has a consensus target price of C$118.62, suggesting a potential upside of 33.34%. Solaris Resources has a consensus target price of C$19.50, suggesting a potential upside of 50.58%. Given Solaris Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Solaris Resources is more favorable than Premium Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Solaris Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Premium Brands has a beta of 0.801622, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solaris Resources has a beta of 1.884686, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Premium Brands and Premium Brands both had 2 articles in the media. Solaris Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.40 indicating that Solaris Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Premium Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Solaris Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Premium Brands beats Solaris Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Aurinia Pharmaceuticals?

Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) and Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (TSE:AUP) are both mid-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Premium Brands and 0 mentions for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.40 indicating that Aurinia Pharmaceuticals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premium Brands Neutral
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Positive

Premium Brands presently has a consensus price target of C$118.62, indicating a potential upside of 33.34%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Aurinia Pharmaceuticals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Premium Brands has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Aurinia Pharmaceuticals' net margin of 0.00%. Premium Brands' return on equity of 2.21% beat Aurinia Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Brands0.52% 2.21% 3.61%
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals N/A N/A N/A

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.59C$99.56MC$0.9098.84
Aurinia PharmaceuticalsC$57.59M0.00-C$190.03M-C$1.48N/A

32.8% of Premium Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Premium Brands beats Aurinia Pharmaceuticals on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Cara Operations?

Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) and Cara Operations (TSE:CARA) are both pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Premium Brands presently has a consensus price target of C$118.62, suggesting a potential upside of 33.34%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Cara Operations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cara Operations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Premium Brands has a net margin of 0.52% compared to Cara Operations' net margin of 0.00%. Premium Brands' return on equity of 2.21% beat Cara Operations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Brands0.52% 2.21% 3.61%
Cara Operations N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Cara Operations. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Premium Brands and 1 mentions for Cara Operations. Cara Operations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.40 indicating that Cara Operations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Premium Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cara Operations
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Cara Operations.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.59C$99.56MC$0.9098.84
Cara OperationsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Cara Operations pays an annual dividend of C$0.41 per share. Premium Brands pays out 377.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

32.8% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Premium Brands beats Cara Operations on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Premium Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PBH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PBH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PBH vs. The Competition

MetricPremium BrandsPackaged Foods IndustryDefensive SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$4.62BC$5.12BC$8.47BC$11.80B
Dividend Yield3.92%2.56%3.24%6.23%
P/E Ratio98.842,849.08891.2637.14
Price / Sales0.593,431.70992,150.0311.26
Price / Cash97.88119.32140.8882.29
Price / Book1.9922.499.584.35
Net IncomeC$99.56MC$2.71BC$1.03BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance1.81%0.83%0.25%-2.22%
1 Month Performance4.13%0.26%-1.32%-1.01%
1 Year Performance7.95%782.41%273.06%53.16%

Premium Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PBH
Premium Brands
3.3356 of 5 stars
C$88.96
+2.6%
C$118.62
+33.3%
+5.2%C$4.62BC$7.88B98.84540
APHA
Aphria
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.24BC$611.06MN/A1,200
BHC
Bausch Health Companies
0.3136 of 5 stars
C$7.39
+0.8%
N/A+14.4%C$2.76BC$10.53BN/A19,900
SLS
Solaris Resources
1.9216 of 5 stars
C$14.91
+4.8%
C$19.50
+30.8%
+160.3%C$2.49BN/AN/A10
AUP
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$2.15BC$57.59MN/A300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PBH) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners