Go Pro

Premium Brands (PBH) Competitors

Premium Brands logo
C$82.77 -1.03 (-1.23%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

PBH vs. SAP, MFI, LAS.A, SOY, and RSI

Should you buy Premium Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Premium Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Premium Brands include Saputo (SAP), Maple Leaf Foods (MFI), Lassonde Industries (LAS.A), SunOpta (SOY), and Rogers Sugar (RSI). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods & meats" industry.

How does Premium Brands compare to Saputo?

Saputo (TSE:SAP) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 19 more articles in the media than Saputo. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Premium Brands and 14 mentions for Saputo. Saputo's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.52 indicating that Saputo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Saputo
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Premium Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
16 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

24.5% of Saputo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.5% of Premium Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.5% of Saputo shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Saputo pays an annual dividend of C$0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Saputo pays out 48.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Premium Brands pays out 377.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Saputo has a beta of 0.150884, indicating that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Brands has a beta of 0.904489, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Saputo has a net margin of 3.65% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 0.52%. Saputo's return on equity of 9.98% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Saputo3.65% 9.98% 4.11%
Premium Brands 0.52%2.21%3.61%

Saputo currently has a consensus target price of C$47.18, suggesting a potential upside of 12.50%. Premium Brands has a consensus target price of C$116.25, suggesting a potential upside of 40.45%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Saputo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Saputo
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Premium Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Saputo. Saputo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SaputoC$17.55B0.95-C$157.06MC$1.6325.73
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.55C$99.56MC$0.9091.97

Summary

Saputo beats Premium Brands on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Maple Leaf Foods?

Maple Leaf Foods (TSE:MFI) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Maple Leaf Foods. Maple Leaf Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maple Leaf FoodsC$3.97B0.87C$34.28MC$4.216.57
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.55C$99.56MC$0.9091.97

Maple Leaf Foods has a net margin of 12.44% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 0.52%. Maple Leaf Foods' return on equity of 36.56% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maple Leaf Foods12.44% 36.56% 2.85%
Premium Brands 0.52%2.21%3.61%

Maple Leaf Foods presently has a consensus price target of C$36.42, indicating a potential upside of 31.61%. Premium Brands has a consensus price target of C$116.25, indicating a potential upside of 40.45%. Given Premium Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Maple Leaf Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Maple Leaf Foods has a beta of 0.318975, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Brands has a beta of 0.904489, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 33 more articles in the media than Maple Leaf Foods. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Premium Brands and 0 mentions for Maple Leaf Foods. Maple Leaf Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.52 indicating that Maple Leaf Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Maple Leaf Foods Neutral
Premium Brands Negative

32.0% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.5% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 39.9% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Maple Leaf Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Maple Leaf Foods pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Premium Brands pays out 377.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Premium Brands beats Maple Leaf Foods on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Lassonde Industries?

Lassonde Industries (TSE:LAS.A) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Lassonde Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Premium Brands. Lassonde Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lassonde IndustriesC$2.90B0.53C$102.69MC$23.729.46
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.55C$99.56MC$0.9091.97

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 27 more articles in the media than Lassonde Industries. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Premium Brands and 6 mentions for Lassonde Industries. Lassonde Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.52 indicating that Lassonde Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lassonde Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Premium Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
16 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Lassonde Industries has a beta of -0.195589, meaning that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Brands has a beta of 0.904489, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Lassonde Industries currently has a consensus price target of C$278.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.84%. Premium Brands has a consensus price target of C$116.25, suggesting a potential upside of 40.45%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Lassonde Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lassonde Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Lassonde Industries has a net margin of 4.31% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 0.52%. Lassonde Industries' return on equity of 10.05% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lassonde Industries4.31% 10.05% 5.66%
Premium Brands 0.52%2.21%3.61%

Lassonde Industries pays an annual dividend of C$4.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Lassonde Industries pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Premium Brands pays out 377.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

17.7% of Lassonde Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.5% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Lassonde Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Premium Brands beats Lassonde Industries on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to SunOpta?

Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) and SunOpta (TSE:SOY) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Premium Brands currently has a consensus price target of C$116.25, suggesting a potential upside of 40.45%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than SunOpta.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
SunOpta
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 33 more articles in the media than SunOpta. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Premium Brands and 0 mentions for SunOpta. SunOpta's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.52 indicating that SunOpta is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premium Brands Negative
SunOpta Neutral

33.5% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.9% of SunOpta shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of SunOpta shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Premium Brands has a beta of 0.904489, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SunOpta has a beta of 2.692156, suggesting that its stock price is 169% more volatile than the broader market.

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than SunOpta. SunOpta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.55C$99.56MC$0.9091.97
SunOptaC$817.72M1.28-C$12.73MC$0.1368.00

SunOpta has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 0.52%. SunOpta's return on equity of 9.29% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Brands0.52% 2.21% 3.61%
SunOpta 1.93%9.29%2.68%

Summary

Premium Brands beats SunOpta on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Rogers Sugar?

Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) and Rogers Sugar (TSE:RSI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Rogers Sugar. Rogers Sugar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium BrandsC$7.88B0.55C$99.56MC$0.9091.97
Rogers SugarC$1.22B0.71C$55.53MC$0.5312.77

Rogers Sugar has a net margin of 5.58% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 0.52%. Rogers Sugar's return on equity of 14.94% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Brands0.52% 2.21% 3.61%
Rogers Sugar 5.58%14.94%5.50%

Premium Brands has a beta of 0.904489, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rogers Sugar has a beta of 0.709553, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Rogers Sugar pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Premium Brands pays out 377.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Rogers Sugar pays out 67.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rogers Sugar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 30 more articles in the media than Rogers Sugar. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Premium Brands and 3 mentions for Rogers Sugar. Rogers Sugar's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.52 indicating that Rogers Sugar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Premium Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
16 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Rogers Sugar
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Premium Brands presently has a consensus target price of C$116.25, suggesting a potential upside of 40.45%. Rogers Sugar has a consensus target price of C$6.90, suggesting a potential upside of 1.92%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Rogers Sugar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Rogers Sugar
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

33.5% of Premium Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Rogers Sugar shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Rogers Sugar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Premium Brands beats Rogers Sugar on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Premium Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PBH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PBH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PBH vs. The Competition

MetricPremium BrandsFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$4.30BC$5.78BC$16.16BC$12.63B
Dividend Yield4.06%3.14%3.20%6.20%
P/E Ratio91.9713.3314.0335.02
Price / Sales0.5583.17264,297.109.83
Price / Cash97.88111.9856.2282.29
Price / Book1.853.704.954.61
Net IncomeC$99.56MC$777.66MC$838.30MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-10.72%-0.12%0.28%4.04%
1 Month Performance-6.27%-0.35%0.12%2.87%
1 Year Performance-10.44%39.93%13.01%36.23%

Premium Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PBH
Premium Brands
2.8741 of 5 stars
C$82.77
-1.2%
C$116.25
+40.4%
-9.3%C$4.30BC$7.88B91.97540
SAP
Saputo
4.0341 of 5 stars
C$39.40
-0.1%
C$46.73
+18.6%
+26.8%C$15.78BC$17.55B24.17112,000
MFI
Maple Leaf Foods
4.1462 of 5 stars
C$29.00
+1.4%
C$36.42
+25.6%
-15.1%C$3.61BC$3.97B6.8913,500
LAS.A
Lassonde Industries
3.4128 of 5 stars
C$216.77
-0.2%
C$271.00
+25.0%
+8.0%C$1.48BC$2.90B9.142,200
SOY
SunOpta
N/AC$8.84
flat
N/AN/AC$1.05BC$817.72M68.001,450

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PBH) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners