Free Trial

Premium Brands (PBH) Competitors

Premium Brands logo
C$70.61 -0.21 (-0.30%)
As of 10/9/2026 04:29 PM Eastern

PBH vs. MFI, LAS.A, SOY, RSI, and HLF

Should you buy Premium Brands stock or one of its competitors? Premium Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Maple Leaf Foods (MFI), Lassonde Industries (LAS.A), SunOpta (SOY), Rogers Sugar (RSI), and High Liner Foods (HLF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "packaged foods & meats" industry.

How does Premium Brands compare to Maple Leaf Foods?

Maple Leaf Foods (TSE:MFI) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Maple Leaf Foods has a beta of 0.256752, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Brands has a beta of 0.841242, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Maple Leaf Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Maple Leaf Foods pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Premium Brands pays out 207.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Maple Leaf Foods had 1 more articles in the media than Premium Brands. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Maple Leaf Foods and 4 mentions for Premium Brands. Premium Brands' average media sentiment score of -0.31 beat Maple Leaf Foods' score of -0.45 indicating that Premium Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Premium Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Maple Leaf Foods has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 1.01%. Maple Leaf Foods' return on equity of 36.83% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maple Leaf Foods13.08% 36.83% 2.85%
Premium Brands 1.01%4.19%3.61%

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Maple Leaf Foods. Maple Leaf Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maple Leaf FoodsC$3.98B0.77C$34.28MC$4.076.08
Premium BrandsC$8.38B0.44C$99.56MC$1.6443.05

Maple Leaf Foods currently has a consensus price target of C$36.08, suggesting a potential upside of 45.85%. Premium Brands has a consensus price target of C$116.25, suggesting a potential upside of 64.64%. Given Premium Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Maple Leaf Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Maple Leaf Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.09
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

33.1% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.6% of Premium Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.9% of Maple Leaf Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Maple Leaf Foods and Premium Brands tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Lassonde Industries?

Lassonde Industries (TSE:LAS.A) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Lassonde Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Premium Brands. Lassonde Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lassonde IndustriesC$2.89B0.55C$102.69MC$22.6410.23
Premium BrandsC$8.38B0.44C$99.56MC$1.6443.05

Lassonde Industries has a net margin of 4.31% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 1.01%. Lassonde Industries' return on equity of 10.05% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lassonde Industries4.31% 10.05% 5.66%
Premium Brands 1.01%4.19%3.61%

Lassonde Industries pays an annual dividend of C$4.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Lassonde Industries pays out 20.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Premium Brands pays out 207.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

17.8% of Lassonde Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.6% of Premium Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Lassonde Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lassonde Industries presently has a consensus price target of C$278.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.07%. Premium Brands has a consensus price target of C$116.25, suggesting a potential upside of 64.64%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Lassonde Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lassonde Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 4 more articles in the media than Lassonde Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Premium Brands and 0 mentions for Lassonde Industries. Lassonde Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.31 indicating that Lassonde Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lassonde Industries Neutral
Premium Brands Neutral

Lassonde Industries has a beta of -0.202947, suggesting that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Brands has a beta of 0.841242, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Premium Brands beats Lassonde Industries on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to SunOpta?

SunOpta (TSE:SOY) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

SunOpta has a beta of 2.692156, indicating that its stock price is 169% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Brands has a beta of 0.841242, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 4 more articles in the media than SunOpta. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Premium Brands and 0 mentions for SunOpta. SunOpta's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.31 indicating that SunOpta is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
SunOpta Neutral
Premium Brands Neutral

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than SunOpta. Premium Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SunOpta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SunOptaC$817.72M1.28-C$12.73MC$0.1368.00
Premium BrandsC$8.38B0.44C$99.56MC$1.6443.05

Premium Brands has a consensus price target of C$116.25, indicating a potential upside of 64.64%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than SunOpta.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SunOpta
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

SunOpta has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 1.01%. SunOpta's return on equity of 6.27% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SunOpta1.78% 6.27% 2.68%
Premium Brands 1.01%4.19%3.61%

25.9% of SunOpta shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.6% of Premium Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of SunOpta shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Premium Brands beats SunOpta on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to Rogers Sugar?

Rogers Sugar (TSE:RSI) and Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Rogers Sugar has a net margin of 5.48% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 1.01%. Rogers Sugar's return on equity of 14.14% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rogers Sugar5.48% 14.14% 5.50%
Premium Brands 1.01%4.19%3.61%

6.6% of Rogers Sugar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.6% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Rogers Sugar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Rogers Sugar. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Premium Brands and 2 mentions for Rogers Sugar. Rogers Sugar's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.31 indicating that Rogers Sugar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rogers Sugar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Premium Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Rogers Sugar. Rogers Sugar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rogers SugarC$1.20B0.70C$55.53MC$0.5212.56
Premium BrandsC$8.38B0.44C$99.56MC$1.6443.05

Rogers Sugar pays an annual dividend of C$0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Rogers Sugar pays out 69.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Premium Brands pays out 207.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Rogers Sugar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Rogers Sugar presently has a consensus target price of C$6.75, suggesting a potential upside of 3.37%. Premium Brands has a consensus target price of C$116.25, suggesting a potential upside of 64.64%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than Rogers Sugar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rogers Sugar
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Rogers Sugar has a beta of 0.673383, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premium Brands has a beta of 0.841242, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Premium Brands beats Rogers Sugar on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Premium Brands compare to High Liner Foods?

Premium Brands (TSE:PBH) and High Liner Foods (TSE:HLF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Premium Brands has higher revenue and earnings than High Liner Foods. High Liner Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premium Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premium BrandsC$8.38B0.44C$99.56MC$1.6443.05
High Liner FoodsC$1.12B0.36C$41.70MC$0.8816.53

Premium Brands has a beta of 0.841242, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, High Liner Foods has a beta of 0.569385, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Premium Brands presently has a consensus price target of C$116.25, indicating a potential upside of 64.64%. High Liner Foods has a consensus price target of C$16.70, indicating a potential upside of 14.78%. Given Premium Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Premium Brands is more favorable than High Liner Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premium Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
High Liner Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

31.6% of Premium Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of High Liner Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Premium Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.3% of High Liner Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Premium Brands had 4 more articles in the media than High Liner Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Premium Brands and 0 mentions for High Liner Foods. High Liner Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Premium Brands' score of -0.31 indicating that High Liner Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premium Brands Neutral
High Liner Foods Positive

High Liner Foods has a net margin of 2.30% compared to Premium Brands' net margin of 1.01%. High Liner Foods' return on equity of 6.30% beat Premium Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premium Brands1.01% 4.19% 3.61%
High Liner Foods 2.30%6.30%5.30%

Premium Brands pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. High Liner Foods pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Premium Brands pays out 207.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. High Liner Foods pays out 57.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Premium Brands beats High Liner Foods on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Premium Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PBH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PBH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PBH vs. The Competition

MetricPremium BrandsFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$3.67BC$5.35BC$15.86BC$12.70B
Dividend Yield4.83%3.27%3.31%6.35%
P/E Ratio43.0513.2613.8838.68
Price / Sales0.4483.17265,659.249.04
Price / Cash97.88111.9757.0482.29
Price / Book1.553.694.344.47
Net IncomeC$99.56MC$772.49MC$844.17MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance1.03%0.57%0.85%0.02%
1 Month Performance-7.32%-4.26%-2.53%-1.31%
1 Year Performance-26.29%33.77%9.74%17.51%

Premium Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PBH
Premium Brands
2.8847 of 5 stars
C$70.61
-0.3%
C$116.25
+64.6%
-26.1%C$3.67BC$8.38B43.05540
MFI
Maple Leaf Foods
4.2644 of 5 stars
C$24.50
+0.1%
C$36.33
+48.3%
-12.1%C$3.06BC$3.98B6.029,600
LAS.A
Lassonde Industries
N/AC$232.50
-0.2%
C$278.00
+19.6%
+9.7%C$1.59BC$2.89B10.272,200
SOY
SunOpta
N/AC$8.84
flat
N/AN/AC$1.05BC$817.72M68.001,450
RSI
Rogers Sugar
1.4477 of 5 stars
C$6.47
+0.3%
C$6.75
+4.3%
+4.5%C$831.68MC$1.20B12.44944

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PBH) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners