Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free SKE Stock Alerts

Skeena Resources (SKE) Competitors

Skeena Resources logo
C$45.73 -0.53 (-1.15%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

SKE vs. LUG, AGI, EDV, CGG, and ELD

Should you buy Skeena Resources stock or one of its competitors? Skeena Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Lundin Gold (LUG), Alamos Gold (AGI), Endeavour Mining (EDV), China Gold International Resources (CGG), and Eldorado Gold (ELD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lundin Gold46.31% 81.63% 17.59%
Skeena Resources N/A -185.40%-38.21%

24.2% of Lundin Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lundin GoldC$2.02B10.82C$215.94MC$3.8523.46
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.09N/A

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.619444, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.484904, meaning that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 3 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lundin Gold and 1 mentions for Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.16 indicating that Skeena Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold Neutral
Skeena Resources Neutral

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus price target of C$101.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.21%. Skeena Resources has a consensus price target of C$47.43, indicating a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Lundin Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Skeena Resources on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 26.10% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold52.85% 26.10% 5.85%
Skeena Resources N/A -185.40%-38.21%

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos GoldC$2.23B8.60C$174.87MC$2.7916.42
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.09N/A

Alamos Gold has a beta of 1.871669, suggesting that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.484904, suggesting that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$74.70, indicating a potential upside of 63.10%. Skeena Resources has a consensus target price of C$47.43, indicating a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Alamos Gold's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

52.6% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 4 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Alamos Gold and 1 mentions for Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.37 indicating that Skeena Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold Neutral
Skeena Resources Neutral

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Skeena Resources on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Skeena Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour MiningC$4.75B3.91-C$239.30MC$3.4022.69
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.09N/A

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 6 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 1 mentions for Skeena Resources. Endeavour Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Endeavour Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining Neutral
Skeena Resources Neutral

59.5% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.817844, indicating that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.484904, indicating that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

Endeavour Mining has a net margin of 17.62% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Endeavour Mining's return on equity of 26.17% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining17.62% 26.17% 3.54%
Skeena Resources N/A -185.40%-38.21%

Endeavour Mining currently has a consensus target price of C$93.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.18%. Skeena Resources has a consensus target price of C$47.43, suggesting a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Endeavour Mining's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats Skeena Resources on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to China Gold International Resources?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Skeena Resources has a consensus price target of C$47.43, indicating a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Skeena Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Skeena Resources is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 41.16% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 27.74% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources41.16% 27.74% -1.06%
Skeena Resources N/A -185.40%-38.21%

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.49B9.10-C$15.76MC$1.5522.02
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.09N/A

In the previous week, Skeena Resources had 1 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Skeena Resources and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Skeena Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Skeena Resources Neutral

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 1.877336, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.484904, indicating that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

24.8% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Skeena Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Eldorado Gold?

Eldorado Gold (TSE:ELD) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Eldorado Gold has a net margin of 29.89% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Eldorado Gold's return on equity of 12.38% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eldorado Gold29.89% 12.38% 3.27%
Skeena Resources N/A -185.40%-38.21%

Eldorado Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eldorado Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eldorado GoldC$2.02B6.93C$194.94MC$2.8119.06
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.09N/A

In the previous week, Eldorado Gold had 6 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Eldorado Gold and 1 mentions for Skeena Resources. Eldorado Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Eldorado Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eldorado Gold Positive
Skeena Resources Neutral

Eldorado Gold has a beta of 1.425308, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.484904, indicating that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

Eldorado Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$62.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.69%. Skeena Resources has a consensus price target of C$47.43, suggesting a potential upside of 3.71%. Given Eldorado Gold's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Eldorado Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eldorado Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

61.9% of Eldorado Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Eldorado Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Eldorado Gold beats Skeena Resources on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Skeena Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SKE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SKE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SKE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSkeena ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$5.67BC$3.77BC$4.82BC$12.58B
Dividend Yield4.17%5.22%4.71%6.20%
P/E Ratio-21.8823.3521.3730.83
Price / SalesN/A8,726.985,177.579.76
Price / Cash21.3029.6827.1382.29
Price / Book30.8410.458.864.64
Net Income-C$185.10MC$122.29MC$154.60MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance5.76%3.36%2.57%1.98%
1 Month Performance24.10%8.11%6.89%4.13%
1 Year Performance110.16%54.54%43.00%34.99%

Skeena Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SKE
Skeena Resources
0.8406 of 5 stars		C$45.73
-1.1%		C$47.43
+3.7%		+111.9%C$5.67BN/AN/A60
LUG
Lundin Gold
1.9564 of 5 stars		C$85.54
+4.8%		C$102.17
+19.4%		+15.5%C$20.69BC$1.99B22.691,645
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.5114 of 5 stars		C$43.51
+7.6%		C$74.70
+71.7%		+30.7%C$18.21BC$2.23B15.592,400
EDV
Endeavour Mining
2.9135 of 5 stars		C$72.34
+6.2%		C$93.50
+29.3%		+75.1%C$17.44BC$4.75B21.283,786
CGG
China Gold International Resources
N/AC$38.19
+14.7%		N/A+177.4%C$15.14BC$1.49B24.582,089

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:SKE) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel