Free Trial

Skeena Resources (SKE) Competitors

Skeena Resources logo
C$44.86 -1.67 (-3.59%)
As of 10/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

SKE vs. LUG, AGI, EDV, EQX, and CGG

Should you buy Skeena Resources stock or one of its competitors? Skeena Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Lundin Gold (LUG), Alamos Gold (AGI), Endeavour Mining (EDV), Equinox Gold (EQX), and China Gold International Resources (CGG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Lundin Gold?

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Lundin Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lundin GoldC$2.02B11.47C$215.94MC$3.8524.86
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.07N/A

Lundin Gold has a beta of 1.68889, meaning that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.585977, meaning that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the broader market.

Lundin Gold has a net margin of 46.31% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 81.63% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lundin Gold46.31% 81.63% 17.59%
Skeena Resources N/A -166.74%-38.21%

Lundin Gold currently has a consensus target price of C$108.40, suggesting a potential upside of 13.24%. Skeena Resources has a consensus target price of C$52.83, suggesting a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Skeena Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Skeena Resources is more favorable than Lundin Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lundin Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Lundin Gold had 5 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Lundin Gold and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Lundin Gold's score of -0.02 indicating that Skeena Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lundin Gold Neutral
Skeena Resources Neutral

24.2% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.7% of Lundin Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lundin Gold beats Skeena Resources on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Alamos Gold?

Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) and Alamos Gold (TSE:AGI) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.85% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 26.10% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -166.74% -38.21%
Alamos Gold 52.85%26.10%5.85%

40.8% of Skeena Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.8% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Skeena Resources presently has a consensus target price of C$52.83, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of C$76.67, indicating a potential upside of 68.91%. Given Alamos Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Skeena Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alamos Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources Neutral
Alamos Gold Neutral

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.07N/A
Alamos GoldC$2.23B8.53C$174.87MC$2.7916.27

Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.585977, meaning that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 2.07106, meaning that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Skeena Resources on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Endeavour Mining?

Endeavour Mining (TSE:EDV) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Endeavour Mining has a net margin of 17.62% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Endeavour Mining's return on equity of 26.17% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Mining17.62% 26.17% 3.54%
Skeena Resources N/A -166.74%-38.21%

Skeena Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endeavour Mining. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour MiningC$4.75B3.95-C$239.30MC$3.4022.93
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.07N/A

Endeavour Mining has a beta of 1.892701, indicating that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.585977, indicating that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the broader market.

60.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of Endeavour Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Endeavour Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Endeavour Mining and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Endeavour Mining's score of -1.53 indicating that Skeena Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Mining Very Negative
Skeena Resources Neutral

Endeavour Mining currently has a consensus target price of C$93.50, indicating a potential upside of 19.95%. Skeena Resources has a consensus target price of C$52.83, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Endeavour Mining's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Endeavour Mining is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Endeavour Mining beats Skeena Resources on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to Equinox Gold?

Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) and Equinox Gold (TSE:EQX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Equinox Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equinox Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.07N/A
Equinox GoldC$2.90B6.22C$214.45MC$1.0814.30

Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.585977, meaning that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equinox Gold has a beta of 3.277832, meaning that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the broader market.

Equinox Gold has a net margin of 26.36% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Equinox Gold's return on equity of 13.85% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Skeena ResourcesN/A -166.74% -38.21%
Equinox Gold 26.36%13.85%0.47%

Skeena Resources currently has a consensus target price of C$52.83, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Equinox Gold has a consensus target price of C$24.50, indicating a potential upside of 58.68%. Given Equinox Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Equinox Gold is more favorable than Skeena Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Equinox Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17

In the previous week, Equinox Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Skeena Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Equinox Gold and 0 mentions for Skeena Resources. Equinox Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Skeena Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Equinox Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Skeena Resources Neutral
Equinox Gold Positive

40.8% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.9% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Equinox Gold beats Skeena Resources on 16 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Skeena Resources compare to China Gold International Resources?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Skeena Resources (TSE:SKE) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Skeena Resources' net margin of 0.00%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Skeena Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Skeena Resources N/A -166.74%-38.21%

In the previous week, China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Skeena Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Skeena Resources Neutral

Skeena Resources has a consensus price target of C$52.83, indicating a potential upside of 17.77%. Given Skeena Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Skeena Resources is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Skeena Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.259221, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 2.585977, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the broader market.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Skeena Resources. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B9.42-C$15.76MC$1.9520.00
Skeena ResourcesN/AN/A-C$185.10M-C$2.07N/A

22.3% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Skeena Resources on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Skeena Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SKE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SKE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SKE vs. The Competition

MetricSkeena ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$5.63BC$3.79BC$4.73BC$12.72B
Dividend Yield4.17%5.25%4.78%6.34%
P/E Ratio-21.6722.2621.8638.35
Price / SalesN/A25,971.3015,468.388.68
Price / Cash21.3027.0424.9082.29
Price / Book32.4911.709.734.44
Net Income-C$185.10MC$127.33MC$159.31MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance3.17%-1.02%-0.92%0.69%
1 Month Performance5.40%77.39%56.63%-1.38%
1 Year Performance66.21%12.28%11.43%15.18%

Skeena Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SKE
Skeena Resources
N/AC$44.86
-3.6%
C$52.83
+17.8%
+75.4%C$5.63BN/AN/A170
LUG
Lundin Gold
1.8453 of 5 stars
C$85.37
-1.5%
C$99.33
+16.4%
+2.9%C$20.64BC$2.02B22.171,893
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.2781 of 5 stars
C$45.16
-3.1%
C$76.67
+69.8%
-1.9%C$18.90BC$2.23B16.192,400
EDV
Endeavour Mining
1.97 of 5 stars
C$77.04
-2.8%
C$93.50
+21.4%
+34.3%C$18.57BC$4.75B22.665,659
EQX
Equinox Gold
3.1885 of 5 stars
C$15.73
-2.5%
C$24.50
+55.8%
-5.2%C$18.36BC$2.90B14.563,692

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:SKE) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners