Free Trial

Wilmington Capital Management (WCM.A) Competitors

C$2.40 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/1/2026

WCM.A vs. ECF.UN, PTF, GMN, FAP, and HYI

Should you be buying Wilmington Capital Management stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Wilmington Capital Management include East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt (ECF.UN), Pender Growth Fund (PTF), GobiMin (GMN), abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP), and Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common (HYI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Wilmington Capital Management compare to East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt?

East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt (TSE:ECF.UN) and Wilmington Capital Management (TSE:WCM.A) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Wilmington Capital Management has higher revenue and earnings than East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
East Coast Investment Grade Inc UntN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Wilmington Capital ManagementC$1.25M23.93C$3.29M-C$0.04N/A

In the previous week, East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wilmington Capital Management'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt Neutral
Wilmington Capital Management Neutral

12.5% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. 64.6% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wilmington Capital Management has a net margin of 97.05% compared to East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's net margin of 0.00%. Wilmington Capital Management's return on equity of 6.26% beat East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
East Coast Investment Grade Inc UntN/A N/A N/A
Wilmington Capital Management 97.05%6.26%0.75%

Summary

Wilmington Capital Management beats East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt on 6 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wilmington Capital Management compare to Pender Growth Fund?

Pender Growth Fund (CVE:PTF) and Wilmington Capital Management (TSE:WCM.A) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Pender Growth Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Wilmington Capital Management. Wilmington Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pender Growth Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pender Growth Fund-C$4.13M-25.61C$44.92M-C$0.69N/A
Wilmington Capital ManagementC$1.25M23.93C$3.29M-C$0.04N/A

In the previous week, Pender Growth Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Wilmington Capital Management. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pender Growth Fund and 0 mentions for Wilmington Capital Management. Pender Growth Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Wilmington Capital Management's score of 0.00 indicating that Pender Growth Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pender Growth Fund Positive
Wilmington Capital Management Neutral

3.4% of Pender Growth Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.5% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Pender Growth Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.6% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pender Growth Fund has a beta of -0.057962, indicating that its share price is 106% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wilmington Capital Management has a beta of 0.107679, indicating that its share price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Wilmington Capital Management has a net margin of 97.05% compared to Pender Growth Fund's net margin of -40.31%. Wilmington Capital Management's return on equity of 6.26% beat Pender Growth Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pender Growth Fund-40.31% -4.07% 25.87%
Wilmington Capital Management 97.05%6.26%0.75%

Summary

Wilmington Capital Management beats Pender Growth Fund on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wilmington Capital Management compare to GobiMin?

Wilmington Capital Management (TSE:WCM.A) and GobiMin (CVE:GMN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Wilmington Capital Management has higher revenue and earnings than GobiMin. Wilmington Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GobiMin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wilmington Capital ManagementC$1.25M23.93C$3.29M-C$0.04N/A
GobiMinC$28.61K3,137.84-C$10.43M-C$0.29N/A

In the previous week, Wilmington Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GobiMin'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wilmington Capital Management Neutral
GobiMin Neutral

12.5% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.6% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wilmington Capital Management has a beta of 0.107679, meaning that its share price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GobiMin has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

GobiMin has a net margin of 83,354.28% compared to Wilmington Capital Management's net margin of 97.05%. Wilmington Capital Management's return on equity of 6.26% beat GobiMin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wilmington Capital Management97.05% 6.26% 0.75%
GobiMin 83,354.28%-13.01%-3.82%

Summary

Wilmington Capital Management beats GobiMin on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wilmington Capital Management compare to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC?

Wilmington Capital Management (TSE:WCM.A) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

12.5% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.6% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wilmington Capital Management has a net margin of 97.05% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's net margin of 63.36%. Wilmington Capital Management's return on equity of 6.26% beat abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wilmington Capital Management97.05% 6.26% 0.75%
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC 63.36%5.14%2.92%

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has higher revenue and earnings than Wilmington Capital Management. Wilmington Capital Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wilmington Capital ManagementC$1.25M23.93C$3.29M-C$0.04N/A
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCCC$7.08M12.41C$11.23MC$0.1617.03

In the previous week, Wilmington Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wilmington Capital Management Neutral
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC Neutral

Wilmington Capital Management has a beta of 0.107679, meaning that its share price is 89% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC has a beta of 0.204778, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC beats Wilmington Capital Management on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wilmington Capital Management compare to Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common?

Wilmington Capital Management (TSE:WCM.A) and Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common (TSE:HYI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

12.5% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.6% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wilmington Capital Management has a net margin of 97.05% compared to Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common's net margin of 0.00%. Wilmington Capital Management's return on equity of 6.26% beat Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wilmington Capital Management97.05% 6.26% 0.75%
Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common N/A N/A N/A

Wilmington Capital Management has higher revenue and earnings than Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wilmington Capital ManagementC$1.25M23.93C$3.29M-C$0.04N/A
Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF CommonN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Wilmington Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common'saverage media sentiment score.

Summary

Wilmington Capital Management beats Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common on 6 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wilmington Capital Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WCM.A and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WCM.A vs. The Competition

MetricWilmington Capital ManagementAsset Management IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$29.99MC$2.32BC$13.34BC$11.72B
Dividend Yield50.00%5.98%5.80%6.22%
P/E Ratio-60.0025.6522.4423.83
Price / Sales23.932,043.85181.6813.46
Price / Cash1.4360.1820.2482.69
Price / Book0.811.353.434.48
Net IncomeC$3.29MC$265.53MC$1.11BC$300.68M
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.71%0.03%0.12%
1 Month PerformanceN/A5.35%4.66%2.88%
1 Year PerformanceN/A14.75%13.62%57.78%

Wilmington Capital Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WCM.A
Wilmington Capital Management
N/AC$2.40
flat
N/AN/AC$29.99MC$1.25MN/AN/A
ECF.UN
East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$111.12MN/AN/AN/A
PTF
Pender Growth Fund
N/AC$15.50
flat
N/AN/AC$107.46M-C$4.13MN/AN/A
GMN
GobiMin
N/AC$1.83
flat
N/AN/AC$89.78MC$28.61KN/AN/A
FAP
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC
N/AC$2.66
flat
N/AN/AC$88.57MC$7.08M17.16N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:WCM.A) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners