Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free PWI Stock Alerts

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (PWI) Competitors

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split logo
C$12.97 +0.02 (+0.15%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern
Compare

PWI vs. KTN, LPC, FCF, ECF.UN, and PTF

Should you buy Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split stock or one of its competitors? Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's main competitors and comparable companies include Kootenay Silver (KTN), Lorne Park Capital Partners (LPC), Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (FCF), East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt (ECF.UN), and Pender Growth Fund (PTF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to Kootenay Silver?

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) and Kootenay Silver (CVE:KTN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Kootenay Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Kootenay Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has higher revenue and earnings than Kootenay Silver. Kootenay Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$9.36M4.51C$5.05MC$2.116.15
Kootenay SilverN/AN/A-C$4.27M-C$0.09N/A

In the previous week, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kootenay Silver'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral
Kootenay Silver Neutral

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 348,529.16% compared to Kootenay Silver's net margin of 0.00%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 26.15% beat Kootenay Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split348,529.16% 26.15% N/A
Kootenay Silver N/A -11.77%-9.35%

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a beta of 2.077624, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kootenay Silver has a beta of 3.069093, indicating that its share price is 207% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats Kootenay Silver on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to Lorne Park Capital Partners?

Lorne Park Capital Partners (CVE:LPC) and Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 348,529.16% compared to Lorne Park Capital Partners' net margin of 4.93%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 26.15% beat Lorne Park Capital Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lorne Park Capital Partners4.93% 6.55% 4.60%
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split 348,529.16%26.15%N/A

1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.8% of Lorne Park Capital Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lorne Park Capital Partners. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lorne Park Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lorne Park Capital PartnersC$38.86M3.13C$1.78MC$0.0638.28
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$9.36M4.51C$5.05MC$2.116.15

Lorne Park Capital Partners has a beta of 0.273417, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a beta of 2.077624, meaning that its share price is 108% more volatile than the broader market.

Lorne Park Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split pays an annual dividend of C$1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Lorne Park Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lorne Park Capital Partners Neutral
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats Lorne Park Capital Partners on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)?

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) and Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (CVE:FCF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) Neutral

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 348,529.16% compared to Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'s net margin of 0.00%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 26.15% beat Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split348,529.16% 26.15% N/A
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) N/A N/A N/A

1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V). Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$9.36M4.51C$5.05MC$2.116.15
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)C$81.50M1.47-C$761.66K-C$0.02N/A

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt?

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) and East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt (TSE:ECF.UN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split pays an annual dividend of C$1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 348,529.16% compared to East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's net margin of 0.00%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 26.15% beat East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split348,529.16% 26.15% N/A
East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt N/A N/A N/A

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has higher revenue and earnings than East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$9.36M4.51C$5.05MC$2.116.15
East Coast Investment Grade Inc UntN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral
East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt Neutral

1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to Pender Growth Fund?

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) and Pender Growth Fund (CVE:PTF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Pender Growth Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Pender Growth Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pender Growth Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pender Growth Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$9.36M4.51C$5.05MC$2.116.15
Pender Growth FundC$2.20M47.55C$44.92MC$0.1884.44

In the previous week, Pender Growth Fund had 2 more articles in the media than Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pender Growth Fund and 0 mentions for Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split. Pender Growth Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's score of 0.00 indicating that Pender Growth Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral
Pender Growth Fund Positive

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a beta of 2.077624, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pender Growth Fund has a beta of 0.097921, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 348,529.16% compared to Pender Growth Fund's net margin of 5.86%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 26.15% beat Pender Growth Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split348,529.16% 26.15% N/A
Pender Growth Fund 5.86%1.16%25.87%

Summary

Pender Growth Fund beats Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PWI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PWI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$42.20MC$5.67BC$14.09BC$12.54B
Dividend Yield9.62%7.39%5.87%6.20%
P/E Ratio6.1538.1529.3430.69
Price / Sales4.511,194.95507.179.75
Price / CashN/A48.3339.9782.29
Price / BookN/A3.733.704.64
Net IncomeC$5.05MC$417.15MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance1.09%0.58%0.74%0.94%
1 Month Performance2.37%0.99%1.77%3.90%
1 Year Performance28.54%7.75%12.26%36.05%

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PWI
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split
N/AC$12.97
+0.2%		N/A+29.5%C$42.20MC$9.36M6.15N/A
KTN
Kootenay Silver
N/AC$1.35
+1.5%		N/A+3.3%C$138.66MN/AN/A147,000
LPC
Lorne Park Capital Partners
N/AC$2.22
+0.5%		N/A+0.9%C$121.56MC$38.86M38.28N/A
FCF
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)
N/AC$3.15
flat		N/A+0.0%C$119.96MC$81.50MN/A1,400
ECF.UN
East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$111.12MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PWI) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy These Stocks Before August 31st
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research platform, now used by 180,000 investors worldwi...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win: “Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown”
In 2016, major election models gave Hillary Clinton a 99% chance of winning - but former CIA and Pentagon advi...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street is staring at the wrong AI trade
Anthropic just signed a 9.1 billion dollar, 20 year data center agreement covering 191 megawatts of capacity, ...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your Opinion of Trump Won't Matter After November 27
Forensic accountant Joel Litman, who called the 2008 crisis and the 2020 COVID bottom, says a $10 trillion shi...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Who Really Gets Rich from IPOs?
Peter Thiel turned a $500,000 stake in Meta into nearly $1 billion by investing eight years before its IPO. Tr...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel