Go Pro
→ Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free PWI Stock Alerts

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (PWI) Competitors

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split logo
C$10.64 -0.26 (-2.39%)
As of 03:50 PM Eastern
Compare

PWI vs. KTN, LPC, FCF, ECF.UN, and PTF

Should you buy Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split stock or one of its competitors? Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's main competitors and comparable companies include Kootenay Silver (KTN), Lorne Park Capital Partners (LPC), Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (FCF), East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt (ECF.UN), and Pender Growth Fund (PTF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to Kootenay Silver?

Kootenay Silver (CVE:KTN) and Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has higher revenue and earnings than Kootenay Silver. Kootenay Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kootenay SilverN/AN/A-C$4.27M-C$0.10N/A
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$13.77M2.52C$5.05MC$4.282.49

13.8% of Kootenay Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Kootenay Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 110.58% compared to Kootenay Silver's net margin of 0.00%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 27.77% beat Kootenay Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kootenay SilverN/A -12.39% -9.35%
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split 110.58%27.77%N/A

Kootenay Silver has a beta of 3.222701, meaning that its share price is 222% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a beta of 2.057548, meaning that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kootenay Silver had 1 more articles in the media than Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Kootenay Silver and 0 mentions for Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split. Kootenay Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's score of 0.00 indicating that Kootenay Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kootenay Silver Neutral
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats Kootenay Silver on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to Lorne Park Capital Partners?

Lorne Park Capital Partners (CVE:LPC) and Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lorne Park Capital Partners. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lorne Park Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lorne Park Capital PartnersC$38.86M3.13C$1.78MC$0.0638.28
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$13.77M2.52C$5.05MC$4.282.49

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 110.58% compared to Lorne Park Capital Partners' net margin of 4.93%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 27.77% beat Lorne Park Capital Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lorne Park Capital Partners4.93% 6.55% 4.60%
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split 110.58%27.77%N/A

1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are held by institutional investors. 44.8% of Lorne Park Capital Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lorne Park Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lorne Park Capital Partners Neutral
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral

Lorne Park Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split pays an annual dividend of C$1.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.4%. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays out 58.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Lorne Park Capital Partners has a beta of 0.273417, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a beta of 2.057548, indicating that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats Lorne Park Capital Partners on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)?

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) and Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (CVE:FCF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 110.58% compared to Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'s net margin of 0.00%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 27.77% beat Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split110.58% 27.77% N/A
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) Neutral

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V). Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$13.77M2.52C$5.05MC$4.282.49
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)C$81.50M1.47-C$761.66K-C$0.02N/A

1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt?

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) and East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt (TSE:ECF.UN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 110.58% compared to East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's net margin of 0.00%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 27.77% beat East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split110.58% 27.77% N/A
East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt N/A N/A N/A

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split pays an annual dividend of C$1.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.4%. East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral
East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt Neutral

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has higher revenue and earnings than East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$13.77M2.52C$5.05MC$4.282.49
East Coast Investment Grade Inc UntN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split compare to Pender Growth Fund?

Pender Growth Fund (CVE:PTF) and Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Pender Growth Fund has a beta of -0.044545, meaning that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a beta of 2.057548, meaning that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

Pender Growth Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pender Growth FundC$714.25K142.31C$44.92MN/AN/A
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$13.77M2.52C$5.05MC$4.282.49

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 110.58% compared to Pender Growth Fund's net margin of -0.90%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 27.77% beat Pender Growth Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pender Growth Fund-0.90% -0.10% 25.87%
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split 110.58%27.77%N/A

In the previous week, Pender Growth Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pender Growth Fund Neutral
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral

1.8% of Pender Growth Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Pender Growth Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pender Growth Fund beats Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PWI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PWI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$35.47MC$5.36BC$13.77BC$12.77B
Dividend Yield11.01%7.49%5.95%6.27%
P/E Ratio2.4929.9525.2340.36
Price / Sales2.521,256.09518.369.35
Price / CashN/A47.8746.1282.29
Price / Book0.573.522.714.69
Net IncomeC$5.05MC$417.39MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.12%0.98%0.06%1.06%
1 Month Performance-16.35%-1.69%-0.79%-2.36%
1 Year Performance7.04%4.54%8.58%20.59%

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PWI
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split
N/AC$10.64
-2.4%		N/A+9.1%C$35.47MC$13.77M2.49N/A
KTN
Kootenay Silver
N/AC$1.18
-4.1%		N/A-36.4%C$126.46MN/AN/A147,000
LPC
Lorne Park Capital Partners
N/AC$2.22
+0.5%		N/A+0.5%C$121.56MC$38.86M38.28N/A
FCF
Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V)
N/AC$3.15
flat		N/A+0.0%C$119.96MC$81.50MN/A1,400
ECF.UN
East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$111.12MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PWI) was last updated on 9/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel