Free Trial

New Commerce Split Fund (YCM) Competitors

C$10.00 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026

YCM vs. PWI, WCM.A, ICL, INC.UN, and MMP.UN

Should you buy New Commerce Split Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares New Commerce Split Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with New Commerce Split Fund include Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (PWI), Wilmington Capital Management (WCM.A), Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V) (ICL), Income Financial Trust (INC.UN), and Precious Metals And Mng Unt (MMP.UN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does New Commerce Split Fund compare to Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split?

New Commerce Split Fund (TSE:YCM) and Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split (TSE:PWI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, New Commerce Split Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
New Commerce Split Fund Neutral
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split Neutral

3.1% of New Commerce Split Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has higher revenue and earnings than New Commerce Split Fund. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Commerce Split Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Commerce Split FundC$2.01M4.91-C$989.73KC$1.297.75
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure SplitC$9.36M4.37C$5.05MC$2.115.97

New Commerce Split Fund has a beta of 2.774128, suggesting that its share price is 177% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a beta of 1.971144, suggesting that its share price is 97% more volatile than the broader market.

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split has a net margin of 348,529.16% compared to New Commerce Split Fund's net margin of 119.19%. Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split's return on equity of 26.15% beat New Commerce Split Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Commerce Split Fund119.19% -71.95% N/A
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split 348,529.16%26.15%N/A

Summary

Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split beats New Commerce Split Fund on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Commerce Split Fund compare to Wilmington Capital Management?

Wilmington Capital Management (TSE:WCM.A) and New Commerce Split Fund (TSE:YCM) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

Wilmington Capital Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Commerce Split Fund. New Commerce Split Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wilmington Capital Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wilmington Capital ManagementC$1.12M30.82C$3.29MC$0.1716.18
New Commerce Split FundC$2.01M4.91-C$989.73KC$1.297.75

New Commerce Split Fund has a net margin of 119.19% compared to Wilmington Capital Management's net margin of 97.05%. Wilmington Capital Management's return on equity of 6.26% beat New Commerce Split Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wilmington Capital Management97.05% 6.26% 0.75%
New Commerce Split Fund 119.19%-71.95%N/A

Wilmington Capital Management has a beta of 0.084061, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Commerce Split Fund has a beta of 2.774128, suggesting that its share price is 177% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Wilmington Capital Management's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled New Commerce Split Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wilmington Capital Management Neutral
New Commerce Split Fund Neutral

12.5% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of New Commerce Split Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 64.6% of Wilmington Capital Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Wilmington Capital Management beats New Commerce Split Fund on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Commerce Split Fund compare to Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V)?

New Commerce Split Fund (TSE:YCM) and Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V) (CVE:ICL) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Commerce Split Fund. Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Commerce Split Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Commerce Split FundC$2.01M4.91-C$989.73KC$1.297.75
Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V)N/AN/AN/A-C$0.04N/A

In the previous week, New Commerce Split Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
New Commerce Split Fund Neutral
Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V) Neutral

3.1% of New Commerce Split Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

New Commerce Split Fund has a net margin of 119.19% compared to Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V)'s net margin of 0.00%. Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat New Commerce Split Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Commerce Split Fund119.19% -71.95% N/A
Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V) N/A N/A N/A

Summary

New Commerce Split Fund beats Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V) on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Commerce Split Fund compare to Income Financial Trust?

Income Financial Trust (TSE:INC.UN) and New Commerce Split Fund (TSE:YCM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Income Financial Trust has a beta of 0.319275, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Commerce Split Fund has a beta of 2.774128, indicating that its stock price is 177% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Income Financial Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of New Commerce Split Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

New Commerce Split Fund has a net margin of 119.19% compared to Income Financial Trust's net margin of 91.79%. Income Financial Trust's return on equity of 19.88% beat New Commerce Split Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Income Financial Trust91.79% 19.88% 12.30%
New Commerce Split Fund 119.19%-71.95%N/A

Income Financial Trust has higher revenue and earnings than New Commerce Split Fund. Income Financial Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Commerce Split Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Income Financial TrustC$6.69M4.75C$4.69MC$1.955.12
New Commerce Split FundC$2.01M4.91-C$989.73KC$1.297.75

In the previous week, Income Financial Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled New Commerce Split Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Income Financial Trust Neutral
New Commerce Split Fund Neutral

Summary

Income Financial Trust and New Commerce Split Fund tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Commerce Split Fund compare to Precious Metals And Mng Unt?

Precious Metals And Mng Unt (TSE:MMP.UN) and New Commerce Split Fund (TSE:YCM) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Precious Metals And Mng Unt's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled New Commerce Split Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Precious Metals And Mng Unt Neutral
New Commerce Split Fund Neutral

New Commerce Split Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Precious Metals And Mng Unt. Precious Metals And Mng Unt is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Commerce Split Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Precious Metals And Mng UntC$8.50M4.58-C$3.29MC$0.814.77
New Commerce Split FundC$2.01M4.91-C$989.73KC$1.297.75

Precious Metals And Mng Unt has a beta of 0.843557, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Commerce Split Fund has a beta of 2.774128, indicating that its stock price is 177% more volatile than the broader market.

3.1% of New Commerce Split Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

New Commerce Split Fund has a net margin of 119.19% compared to Precious Metals And Mng Unt's net margin of 0.00%. Precious Metals And Mng Unt's return on equity of -14.96% beat New Commerce Split Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Precious Metals And Mng UntN/A -14.96% -9.19%
New Commerce Split Fund 119.19%-71.95%N/A

Summary

New Commerce Split Fund beats Precious Metals And Mng Unt on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get New Commerce Split Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for YCM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

YCM vs. The Competition

MetricNew Commerce Split FundAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$9.86MC$2.45BC$5.92BC$12.19B
Dividend Yield6.34%6.04%5.29%6.19%
P/E Ratio7.7525.8416.3936.94
Price / Sales4.912,087.721,398.7510.45
Price / CashN/A60.3348.7782.29
Price / Book14.291.386.584.47
Net Income-C$989.73KC$265.36MC$1.13BC$299.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.77%1.18%0.65%
1 Month PerformanceN/A1.14%1.64%-0.08%
1 Year PerformanceN/A11.45%20.66%41.90%

New Commerce Split Fund Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
YCM
New Commerce Split Fund
N/AC$10.00
flat
N/AN/AC$9.86MC$2.01M7.75N/A
PWI
Sustainable Power & Infrastructure Split
N/AC$12.50
-1.3%
N/A+36.4%C$40.68MC$9.36M5.93N/A
WCM.A
Wilmington Capital Management
N/AC$2.75
flat
N/AN/AC$34.36MC$1.12M16.18N/A
ICL
Itasca Capital Ltd. (ICL.V)
N/AC$1.44
-2.0%
N/A+0.0%C$34.29MN/AN/A13,200
INC.UN
Income Financial Trust
N/AC$9.78
+1.8%
N/A+20.2%C$31.14MC$6.69M5.02N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:YCM) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners