NASDAQ:SEAT Vivid Seats Q2 2025 Earnings Report $17.93 -7.75 (-30.18%) Closing price 08/7/2025 04:00 PM EasternExtended Trading$17.92 -0.01 (-0.06%) As of 08/7/2025 07:58 PM Eastern Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Polygon.io. Learn more. ProfileEarnings HistoryForecast Vivid Seats EPS ResultsActual EPS$0.28Consensus EPS -$0.04Beat/MissBeat by +$0.32One Year Ago EPSN/AVivid Seats Revenue ResultsActual Revenue$143.57 millionExpected Revenue$154.31 millionBeat/MissMissed by -$10.74 millionYoY Revenue GrowthN/AVivid Seats Announcement DetailsQuarterQ2 2025Date8/5/2025TimeBefore Market OpensConference Call DateTuesday, August 5, 2025Conference Call Time8:30AM ETConference Call ResourcesConference Call AudioConference Call TranscriptSlide DeckPress Release (8-K)Quarterly Report (10-Q)Earnings HistoryCompany ProfileSlide DeckFull Screen Slide DeckPowered by Vivid Seats Q2 2025 Earnings Call TranscriptProvided by QuartrAugust 5, 2025 ShareLink copied to clipboard.Key Takeaways Positive Sentiment: Vivint Seats has launched a strategic cost reduction program targeting $25 million in annualized savings by year-end 2025, with over $5 million already realized. Negative Sentiment: Second-quarter performance was challenged, with Marketplace GOV of $685 million down 31% year-over-year, revenues of $144 million down 28%, and adjusted EBITDA of $14 million. Positive Sentiment: The company expanded into four European countries, and its international business is net contribution positive in 2025 while exceeding margin expectations. Positive Sentiment: Vivint Seats expects to generate positive cash flow in Q3 due to seasonality and atypical June softness, and it completed a one-for-20 reverse stock split to enhance stock marketability. Neutral Sentiment: The non-core Vivid Picks platform will be shuttered over the next few months to streamline operations and sharpen focus on the core marketplace business. AI Generated. May Contain Errors.Conference Call Audio Live Call not available Earnings Conference CallVivid Seats Q2 202500:00 / 00:00Speed:1x1.25x1.5x2xThere are 14 speakers on the call. Operator00:00:00Good morning, and welcome to the Vivis Seat Second Quarter twenty twenty five Earnings Conference Call. Following management's prepared remarks, we will open the call for Q and A. I would now like to turn the call over to Kate Africk. Speaker 100:00:17Good morning, and welcome to Vivint Seat's second quarter twenty twenty five earnings conference call. I'm Kate Africk, Head of Investor Relations at Vivint Seat. Joining me today to discuss Vivint Seats results are Stan Chia, chief executive officer and Larry Fey, chief financial officer. By now, everyone should have access to our second quarter earnings press release, which was issued earlier this morning. The press release as well as supplemental earnings slides are available on the Investor Relations page of our website at investors.vividseat.com. Speaker 100:00:52During the course of today's call, we may make forward looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including the risks and uncertainties described in our earnings press release, our most recent annual report on Form 10 ks, and our other filings with the SEC. On today's call, we will refer to adjusted EBITDA, which is a non GAAP financial measure that provides useful information for our investors. A reconciliation of this non GAAP financial measure to its corresponding GAAP financial measure can be found in our earnings press release and supplemental earnings slides. And now I would like to turn the call over to Stan. Speaker 200:01:36Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Today, I'll walk through our second quarter results, provide context on the broader industry environment and detail a strategic cost reduction program that we are executing against. This initiative is designed to right size our cost structure, improve operating leverage and better position Vivid Seats to capitalize on long term growth opportunities. Then I'll turn it over to Larry to share our financial results in more detail. In the second quarter, we delivered $685,000,000 of Marketplace GOV, dollars 144,000,000 of revenues and $14,000,000 of adjusted EBITDA. Speaker 200:02:18The industry and competitive landscape continue to present a challenging near term operating environment, but we nonetheless continue to have conviction in the tailwinds driving live event growth on a long term basis. Similar to Q1, in Q2, we saw industry growth to start the quarter that gave way to double digit industry declines across categories in June. While some amount of monthly oscillation is to be expected due to event mix, the degree of monthly volatility has been elevated thus far in 2025, which we attribute to a combination of economic uncertainty and the implementation of the FTC's all in pricing mandate. The sports category was particularly weak and down double digits in Q2, with underwhelming playoff matchups, challenging comps and NFL schedule release occurring just two days after the all in pricing rollout. Meanwhile, the Concerts category was up low single digits in Q2 but down double digits in June. Speaker 200:03:22Recent industry trends, including the switch to all in pricing, do not change our view that live events remain an attractive long term opportunity supported by durable supply and demand tailwinds. Despite this long term confidence, the current operating environment is highly competitive, so we are taking deliberate action designed to enhance efficiency, strengthen our foundation for the future, and most importantly, to return to sustainable long term growth. Today, we announced a cost reduction program targeting $25,000,000 in annualized operating expense savings to be actioned upon by year end. We are focused on increasing efficiency without compromising the experience we deliver to our fans or sellers. To date, we have realized over $5,000,000 in annualized savings. Speaker 200:04:10In line with our focus on operational efficiency, we have chosen to shut down Vivid Picks, with savings to come over the next several months as that business winds down. We expect to realize the remaining savings under the program as we finish the year through additional technology and AI enabled efficiencies, as well as targeted reductions in G and A and marketing. These actions are part of a broader commitment to ensure near term competitive challenges do not threaten long term value creation. Following the execution of these efficiency efforts, Vivint Seats will operate with greater agility, deliver more impact and drive durable growth. Importantly, we do not believe these cost reductions will impact our ability to innovate across our core strategic initiatives. Speaker 200:04:58As we've shared, our industry leading ERP Skybox is utilized by over half of professional sellers to run their businesses. This quarter, we rolled out incremental analytical capabilities within Skybox that were well received, and we are excited about additional Skybox functionality in our product pipeline. Internationally, I'm pleased to share that we are now live in four European countries. Our international business is demonstrating strong growth, albeit from a small base, and is exceeding our margin expectations. While our initial target was to breakeven on a contribution basis while growing international revenues, we have been net contribution positive thus far in 2025. Speaker 200:05:41We look forward to further diligent expansion abroad. To conclude, the second quarter was challenging, but we remain confident that better industry conditions will return. We are keenly focused on reigniting sustainable growth through best in class efficiency and differentiation on both sides of our marketplace. With that, I will turn it over to Larry for a more detailed financial review of the quarter. Speaker 300:06:07Thank you, Stan. We generated $685,000,000 of Marketplace GOV in Q2, which was down 31 year over year. Total Marketplace orders were down approximately 30% year over year, while average order size was down 2%. We generated $144,000,000 of revenues in Q2, which was down 28% year over year. Our Q2 Marketplace take rate was 16.7%, down slightly year over year. Speaker 300:06:37While we expect some degree of continued take rate variability, we anticipate near term take rate will remain in the 16% range. Q2 twenty twenty five adjusted EBITDA was 14,000,000 down substantially from the prior year due primarily to lower volume and negative operating leverage. Performance marketing intensity continues unabated and will continue to pressure results. Despite this pressure, we remain focused on creating a path to return to sustainable growth. We will drive additional efficiency through our cost reduction program and will utilize a portion of these savings to offer a leading value proposition to buyers while remaining competitive across relevant marketing channels as we look to stabilize top line in 2026 and beyond. Speaker 300:07:25We ended Q2 with $392,000,000 of debt and $153,000,000 of cash with net debt of $239,000,000 In the quarter, we utilized approximately $9,000,000 in cash to purchase approximately 4,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock at an average price of $2.34 As Stan noted, due to industry volumes were quite soft even relative to typical seasonality. Our quarter end cash balance is driven by volume trends as we exit the quarter, which resulted in continued pressure on cash balances in Q2. We anticipate positive cash flow in Q3 due to a combination of typical seasonality improvements and a belief that the degree of June softness was atypical. Lastly, please note that our planned one for 20 reverse stock split, which was announced yesterday, will become effective after market close today. Our second quarter financial statements reflect share counts and per share amounts before the reverse stock split, but subsequent periods will be reported on a post split basis. Speaker 300:08:31We believe the reverse stock split will, among other things, enhance the marketability of our common stock. I'll now hand it back to Stan for concluding remarks. Speaker 200:08:40Thanks, Larry. While industry challenges continued in the second quarter, our long term thesis on live events persists. Our aim is to remain lean, agile, and well positioned to capture opportunity as the environment evolves and ultimately return to sustainable long term growth. And with that, operator, open up the line for questions. Operator00:09:05Thank you. At this time, we will conduct a question and answer session. A reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press 11 again. Also, we are only allowing two questions. Operator00:09:33Our first question comes from Dan Kurnos at The Benchmark Company. Speaker 400:09:38Yeah, good morning guys. A couple from me, maybe just kind of high level thoughts on take rate was a little higher in the quarter. I don't know if that was just you know, in anticipation of you guys implementing the cost controls. So I guess, you know, do we think that you guys are looking at the way the market is transpiring right now and going, okay. There's maybe smaller TAM on GOV, but we can be more profitable and more nimble within that, or once these cost savings get implemented, I know you talked in the prepared remarks, Stan, about being more competitive in the back half of the year. Speaker 400:10:18But, you know, there's obviously an intelligent way to do it. So maybe kind of just walk us through threading that needle. Speaker 500:10:23Yeah. Hey, Dan, thanks for that. I'll take the first part. And then certainly, Larry can talk a little bit more about the take rate moves. But yeah, I think when you look at certainly in the environment and how we're positioning ourselves, we are still continue to be really focused and honing our unit economics and really plan on emerging much leaner and using that as a mechanism to drive sustainable growth really, you know, into 2026. Speaker 500:10:48Lots of activity now as we continue to optimize our cost structure that we think will, you know, allow us to really push that growth as we drive acquisition and to have lots of leverage on that kind of moving again, forward with our eyes towards '26 post some of these cost reductions. Speaker 300:11:04And and Dan on the take rate itself, I would not read into that if we actually increase pricing. There's some mix shifts across some of our different relationship types, namely marketplace and the private label. And so if anything, if you think about the two competitive levers, the two primary competitive levers out there with marketing expense and take rate, I think the intent and focus is on sustaining, if not increasing competitiveness across both those levers this year and moving forward. Speaker 400:11:42Got it. And Larry, can you just give us some color on the buckets of the annualized savings plan? Speaker 300:11:50Yeah, I would think of all of the numbers that we're referencing when we talk about savings as fixed expense. So we're not taking credit for anything that would be variable. So volume goes down, you spend less on credit cards. Volume goes down, you spend less on paid search. That is not being captured in there. Speaker 300:12:11So what is in there though is what I'd call fixed marketing, I. E. Like longer duration brand type marketing is on the block and then g and a. Our g and a is primarily people and software expense. So you can think of this as additional efficiency across those two categories. Speaker 300:12:34As we look at the targets, the majority is expected to come out of G and A. Speaker 600:12:41Got it. Thanks guys. Appreciate it. Operator00:12:47Our next question comes from Ralph Schackart at William Blair. Speaker 700:12:53Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just in terms of kind of looking back at the quarter, think you called out consumer spending, obviously, as well as competitive pressures. Any way you could split that out and give a sense maybe which one was having a bigger impact during the quarter? I know it's difficult, but just any color there. Speaker 700:13:10Then I have a follow-up. Speaker 300:13:13Yes, Ralph. It's hard to be precise. But the best proxy I think that we have, recognizing that Vegas isn't directly analogous to all of our markets, you do get, I think, the cleanest read on underlying trends with the transient nature of Vegas. And we saw kind of throughout the first half consistent year over year declines, I think, in the mid to high single digits in terms of some combination of visitors, hotel occupancy, price points. I think there was a fair amount of chatter recently on the either June or July data coming out showing Vegas was down double digits. Speaker 300:13:56So, think the headline is certainly the competitive intensity, but the consumer softness is probably a couple of 100 basis points of underlying headwind. Speaker 700:14:08Great. And just in terms of Europe, sounds like obviously off a small base, as you noted, but it's exceeding your margin expectations. I know you have a lot going on right now. But just as you sort of get through this period of transition, does that sort of reshape your thoughts on your rollout plan or the number of countries? Maybe kind of speak to what you're thinking about that market as the calendar turns into 2026. Speaker 700:14:30Would it allow you to potentially accelerate that growth? Any perspective, that'd be great. Thank you. Speaker 200:14:35Yeah. Hey, Ralph. Yeah, I think we've been Speaker 500:14:38pretty pleased by what we've seen internationally, as we've talked about probably ahead of schedule in terms of number of countries that we're in and ahead of schedule in terms of what we're seeing from a contribution margin perspective. So I think as we continue to see that dynamic, you know, I think we are excited and continue to be thoughtful, but willing to accelerate investment as we see that as certainly TAM accretive and margin accretive in the future. And we'll continue to, think, look to make investments to grow that part of our business. Speaker 700:15:08Okay. Great. Thanks, Dan. Thanks, sir. Our Operator00:15:15next question comes from Cameron Maison Peroni at Morgan Stanley. Speaker 800:15:21Thank you. Morning, team. First, I wanted to ask, you know, Google on their earnings call this quarter, you talked a bit about activity, search activity shifting into more towards AI mode. I was wondering if I could get your thoughts or thinking about how as search activity changes in that regard, how that might impact your SEO and performance marketing channels? And any read through as you're thinking about it in terms of how that impacts the secondary ticketing industry more broadly? Speaker 800:15:55And then second on the savings opportunity, Larry, I was wondering if just a housekeeping question, but is the $25,000,000 is that in period savings? Is it an annualized kind of exit rate at year end '25? Just a little bit more specificity there would be helpful. Thanks. Speaker 500:16:12Yeah. Hey, Cameron, I'll take the first part and then I'll hand it over to Larry on the savings. But yeah, look, I mean, certainly, I think I'd start by framing, you know, as we look at how consumer discovery continues to evolve. I mean, it's it's clear and we're we're we're certainly an example of how much consumer discovery flows through the Google funnel, which today I think has a lot of opportunity for cost and spend based funneling of traffic. I think certainly as AI overviews is coming through, you know, I think you see I think expected behavior there where I think you're getting, you know, a lot of perhaps relevancy overspend that's showing up. Speaker 500:16:54And certainly as we think about that adaptation of how consumers discovery AI overviews as it pertains to search and other evolving, and emerging channels. We continue to look at that and really position our platform to be discoverable, and and ready to take advantage of those channels. So lots of stuff, I think, changing in that world. I think certainly on the Google front, we're paying close attention and deeply in partnership with them as some of that search experience evolves. Speaker 300:17:25And on the cost reduction question, the number we put forward, think of that as a full year annualized figure that we will expect to have fully actioned by the end of this calendar year. And so incremental to 2026 results in full. But as you look at the back half of '25, I'd say they are in flight and they will layer in over the coming months. And so not a particularly significant immediate benefit, but it'll scale quickly as we fully action the identified savings. Speaker 800:18:07Got it. That's helpful. Thank you both. Operator00:18:14Our next question comes from Ryan Sigdahl at Craig Hallum. Speaker 900:18:19Hey, thanks. This is Matthew Robb on for Ryan. On industry volume, Larry, you gave a little color on the cadence of the quarter, gave a little insight into June. Can you maybe talk a little bit more about the all in pricing change and how that's changed the market from a consumer perspective? And then I don't know if I caught it, did the June softness continue into Q3? Speaker 300:18:42Yeah, so I'd say the story is not yet fully written on all in pricing. Yeah, we've seen this before the national rollout play out at several states. The Maryland, California, Tennessee had previously moved to all in pricing. And what we did see was a decline in those states in conversion that persisted for a couple months and then largely normalized, which would generally fit with what we've seen across various testings where conversion is generally higher if you do utilize lower price upfront with fees shown in the checkout versus an all in price. I think the part that's we have the data points from the prior state examples, but now we have a lot more states flowing through and it's TBD on will that, you know, recovery that we saw in those other states fully flow through at the national level. Speaker 300:19:45But broadly, it's tracking. And I think there is a digestion period that we're certainly working through and we'll see as we approach kind of next year's calendar. If the flow through and cascade properly works with its way through the system or if there's another kind of digestion period as the industry recalibrates kind of up and down the chain. Speaker 900:20:08Okay. And then on just the June softness, did that continue into Q3? Speaker 300:20:13Yeah. So I think we noted on Q1 month to month volatility, noted again in Q2 month to month volatility. I'd say volatility continues. So we've actually seen July revert to being up year over year. Now July is a softer period. Speaker 300:20:30So all of the caveats that I would put on a already volatile year where that volatility continues, but we are seeing July return to positive. Speaker 900:20:42Okay. Thanks, guys. Operator00:20:48Our next question comes from Andrew Maroc at Raymond James. Speaker 600:20:53Hi, thanks for taking my question. On the cost savings again, you mentioned shutting down Vivid Picks. But are there any other of those kind of emerging areas or investment initiatives that might come under review in the cost reduction program? Or is that kind of mostly aimed, like you said, at the core, the legacy business and the OpEx involved in that? Then I have a follow-up. Speaker 500:21:15Hey, Andrew. Yeah, I think we're continuing to, you know, I think, put our lens on all areas, you know, I think that can be really streamlined and enable us to be as lean and nimble, you know, I think as possible as we look to really drive investment into growth. So I think our portfolio of investments, I think, is completely under review. But certainly, our focus is on, I think, our large G and A base, which I think we believe we can significantly streamline by the end of the year. Speaker 600:21:44Appreciate it. And then maybe a quick one on 2Q. So I heard that the poor playoff matchups were one of the reasons that sports came in a bit below in the quarter. Is there any way to quantify the contribution of a poor playoff slate versus a good one or just kind of the range of outcomes that we should be thinking about in like a typical playoff season? Thank you. Speaker 300:22:06Yeah, the sports comp, I would characterize as a pile of issues that summed up to the headwinds. Last year, we had the Copa America that drove pretty significant volume in soccer. This year, we did have the FIFA World Cup, but that came in considerably smaller than Copa. So we had a tough soccer comp. You know, last year, I'd say Caitlin Clark fever was at its peak. Speaker 300:22:34So we saw some headwinds on all things women's basketball on a year over year basis. And then as you noted, some matchup softness. That if I were to put a rough number on, know, call it an NBA finals between two small market teams versus the NBA finals between the Lakers and Celtics. I would probably say in the quarter that type of series guardrails are like a percent of GLD. So a fraction of a percent when you think of it on a full year basis, there's just such diversity in events. Speaker 300:23:11Any one won't make or break but when it's part of a contributing series of issues we like to call it out. Speaker 600:23:21Understood. Thank you. Operator00:23:27Our next question comes from Curtis Nagle at Bank of America. Speaker 1000:23:32Great. Just a quick one for me. On the $25,000,000 expense reductions, could we just go through, I guess, the balance of flow through versus reinvestment and where were those reinvested dollars primarily go? Speaker 300:23:47Yeah, I think some level of reserve judgment on exactly what the ratios will be based on what we see in the competitive landscape. But I think we've touched on the two major, call it competitive levers in the P and L are the value proposition you're offering customers on the top line and then the marketing expense on the cost side. I will reiterate our view that the incremental yield on marketing spend in this current environment is difficult to put it politely. And so you can imagine reinvestment focusing on the other lever with exact form and channel to be fully resolved as we continue to evaluate exactly where we want to go and how. But if you think about base pricing, loyalty, promos, that portfolio of offers, I think is where you would most likely reinvest it. Speaker 300:24:50And really, if you think about a call it LTV to cap paradigm, focus on enhancing LTV in a world where CAC is under severe pressure. Speaker 1000:25:03Okay, understood. Thank you very much. Operator00:25:08Our next question comes from Maria Ritz at Canaccord. Speaker 1100:25:14Great, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So understanding competitive intensity on the marketing side, are there any alternative customer acquisition channels that you may be exploring where competition is more manageable? Speaker 300:25:29Yeah, I mean, Maria, we're always looking. There are complementary channels to be had, but they are all a fraction of what the paid search and performance channels are today. So if you think about paid social as an example, a lot of time spent on Meta, on Reddit, on TikTok, but the transactional mindset is less. You're scrolling through pictures, you're having a chat versus you go into Google and you say I want tickets to X event. So we continue to find paid searches today by far the largest channel. Speaker 300:26:16Hence the comment earlier where if you think about the other lever in retaining customers driving LTV through retention and repeat approach, I think that's the likely near term focus that we'll pursue. And then we have the broader questions on the longer term top of funnel. Think that's a question that spans not only our industry, but many others. Speaker 1100:26:42Got it. That's very helpful. And then can you maybe help us understand some of the dynamics between owned properties versus private label revenue in Q2? I guess, what's driving this accelerated pressure within the private label segment? Speaker 500:26:57Yeah, hey, Maria. Yeah, you know, when you think about our private label business, you know, I think it's made up of a multitude and of numerous distribution partners. And as you can imagine, some, they vary largely in size as well. You know, I'd say for us, as you look at the disproportionate decline in private label, you know, I think unfortunately, of our largest partners, made a change and it resulted in us seeing, some substantially smaller volume from that partner and thus the accelerated or sort of disproportionate decline in in that segment of our business. Speaker 1100:27:33Great. Thanks so much. Operator00:27:40Our next question comes from Benjamin Black at Deutsche Bank. Speaker 1200:27:46Great. Thank you for taking my questions. Can you maybe talk about the decision to invest internationally instead of sort of supporting The US market with more capital just given the the the challenges that you're seeing here. So let's maybe talk a little bit about the rationale there. And Speaker 800:28:02maybe on the other side Speaker 1200:28:02of the marketplace, you know, how has the the competition evolved on the seller side of the equation? You know, have you seen any impact on your supply at all? You know, how how how professional brokers responding to sort of the challenging end market? Thank you. Speaker 300:28:16Thanks, Ben. Yeah. I'll speak to international. Take the sellers. Yeah, on the international business, I think of it as an analysis around the incremental contribution that we can realistically get in the near term. Speaker 300:28:32And we talked about the J curve in getting international off the ground. We incurred most of that in 2024. And then I think in 2025, while the top line in absolute figures and as a percentage of our total business remains small, we are now through that contribution margin curve and are positive on contribution margin. There's some incremental G and A. But as we look at the landscape and the ability to generate volume at structurally sound economics from what we've seen to date, the opportunity internationally remains healthy and robust and more consistent with what we would have seen in North America prior to the behavior of the last few years. Speaker 300:29:20And so it continues to feel like an attractive pursuit where it's still going to be a much smaller piece of the business for any reasonable timeframe than North America, but can still be a positive needle mover with absolute impact on on our GOV and profitability. Speaker 500:29:37On the sell side, Ben, know, I think sellers look for, you know, both a combination of distribution channels, as well as I think technology providers that allow them to efficiently and effectively run and grow their businesses. You know, on the distribution side, you know, I think we remain a significant source of volume from them. And so I think we continue to look at better ways to serve that. And then certainly on the infrastructure and technology side, our marketplace continues to build out components on Skybox that we believe are quite retentive and accretive to sellers. We talked about in the prepared remarks launching analytics tool sets for them, you know, this quarter, as well as, know, I think enhancing some of the mobile user experiences we have for our for our sell side continue to be ways that we build and innovate on behalf of the sell side of the marketplace. Speaker 1200:30:30Great. Thank you very much. Operator00:30:36Our next question comes from Brad Erickson at RBC Capital Markets. Speaker 700:30:41Hey, guys. Thanks. I guess, first, just as you think about all this competitive intensity happening you keep talking about, I would be curious if you could just maybe break that down for us a bit more what's actually going on kind of industry wide now? Why is that so persistent and kind of what levers you think you can pull there to help try and address? And then second, just on the supply environment, maybe just anything you can share in terms of what you're embedding and you're thinking for the second half of the year? Speaker 700:31:11Thanks. Speaker 300:31:14Yeah, on competitive landscape, I think we've spoken about the meaningful increase in aggressiveness in performance channels. And think of that as it's a Google or a Bing auction where someone, when you type in a search for Toronto Blue Jays tickets, someone is showing up in the first, second, third spot. That's an open auction and the price people are willing to pay will influence who shows up at the top of that search. And, you know, there's data out there across industries that most often customers will click on the first link if they're going to click on any link. And so as folks are willing to bid more for that first link, they can really take a meaningful portion of the available surface area. Speaker 300:32:14And if they're able to effectively monopolize customer awareness by consistently showing up at the top spot, they will get disproportionate traffic flow. And whether their value proposition is most compelling or not, they'll continue to see that traffic. By our map, that incremental bid is uneconomic. And I think you've seen across several industry players or if you kind of follow the industry chatter, that has proven out that this incremental spend is uneconomic, but different folks have different strategic objectives. And I think some folks are really focused on demonstrating top line growth, even if that's disruptive to the industry profitability pool. Speaker 300:33:01Frankly, coming into 2025, we thought that that story was a unfortunate, but perhaps constrained to 2024 story. And to our disappointment, it seems to continue unabated. The why and the end game in all of this is less clear because it seems like we're well past the bounds of any reasonable corporate finance framework that you could employ. And then supply for the back half of the year. Yeah, I think from our side, we had touched on last quarter, you know, saying that we think at the industry level, expect flat, maybe down a little bit for the year. Speaker 300:33:49We saw Q2 come in roughly flat, albeit volatile. Q3 off to a positive start with relatively easy comps year over year. Q4, tougher comps year over year. So at this point, not really changing that perspective that flattish is probably the right paradigm from an industry standpoint. But to make a call on call it the q four on sale calendar and what that'll mean for 2026, bit premature. Speaker 300:34:20But for the next, you know, quarter and a half, the concert calendar is pretty locked. I think we feel fine about it. Not too much volatility there. Yeah. Speaker 500:34:29Yeah, I think the only other one thing, you know, Brad, of circling back as you think about the broad industry dynamics, you know, certainly very aligned sort of with what we look to position, you know, ourselves to be able to do is, you certainly got a lot of marketing pressure. And I think the structural changes that we are certainly embarking on will better position us to be aggressive on that front as things return to I think, a period of growth for us. But certainly, you know, when you look at the industry profit pool, it's not just the CAC dynamic from a marketing perspective, that's under pressure, there's certainly take rate pressure, as well that exists, you know, I think as we continue to see broadly, you know, I think what we believe to be financially irrationally irrational moves on that front. And so as we look at, again, positioning ourselves for the future, you know, I think our goal is to be able to compete whether it's on marketing, or the take rate pressures that we're seeing with a lot of nimbleness and agility that we believe we can get as we lean out our cost structure. Speaker 700:35:33That's helpful. Thanks, guys. Operator00:35:40Our last question comes from Tom Ford of Maxim Group LLC. Speaker 1300:35:46Great, thanks. So first Dan, Larry, best of luck navigating a challenging environment. One question and one follow-up. Shuttering vivid picks, why shutter vivid picks? It wasn't driving engagement as expected, competitive set, relative margin versus remainder of business, regulatory environment. Speaker 1300:36:05Just additional thoughts there would be appreciated. Speaker 200:36:09Hey, Tom, you know, I Speaker 500:36:10think certainly, probably the right answer is a combination of all of the above, right? I'd start with, you know, we certainly had great aspirations and saw, you know, great early reads on potential engagement vehicles for the product that we had. You know, I think as we look to focus in, know, I think certainly that that was an area that took focus away from from the core business. And we wanted to make sure as we, you know, thought about, again, the platform and the cost structure that allowed us to really move nimbly that that was one that fell a little bit outside the bounds of that. Similarly, as you talk about, you know, I think there were in that space and continue to be increasing regulatory components that are unique and distinct from our core business. Speaker 500:36:57And so as we looked at the overall impact, you know, made the decision that it was more of a distraction than it was something that would enable the business and so decided to shut that down. Speaker 1300:37:08Yeah, thanks, Dan. Speaker 300:37:09We just really quick. We tried our darnedest to crack the cap code. And we just weren't able to do it at scale. And so we sort of became stuck as a subscale provider with unit economics that just didn't create a pathway to becoming something other than a subscale provider. Gave It it a multi year effort, tried a bunch of different approaches. Speaker 300:37:33And once it became evident that we weren't able to unlock a more sustainable unit economic profile, decided to call it. Speaker 1300:37:42Thanks, Larry. So for my follow-up, can you give your current thoughts on adjusted EBITDA cash conversion for the remainder of the year? And then to the extent you're able to provide your thoughts on your cash flow expectations for 2025 and 2026? Speaker 300:37:59Yeah, I think it continues to be a cash generation story driven primarily by two things. Where EBITDA shakes out and then two, if we're able to return to sequential GOV growth. So year over year trends likely to remain under pressure for the next several quarters. But if you can get sequential improvement, that will show up in the balance sheet. So I do think we expect to be cash flow positive in Q3. Speaker 300:38:34There's seasonal strength in Q3 relative to Q2, particularly if you compare September to June, which determines the end of quarter cash balance. Our resale business, we spend money in the first half acquiring inventory, generally move that inventory in the second half, so some tailwinds there as well. And then moving into next year, yeah, think that the core objectives is to or are to one, return to growth and to generate sustainable positive cash flow. And those two statements are very closely linked, especially with where our EBITDA has been running relative to our interest expense and our CapEx without positive working capital contribution. Significant positive cash generation will be difficult to deliver in this environment. Speaker 300:39:24So getting back to top line growth is key and is the focus as we head into 2026. Speaker 1300:39:31Great. Thanks, Dan. Thanks, Larry. Operator00:39:39This concludes the question and answer session. Thank you for your participation in today's conference. You may now disconnect.Read morePowered by Earnings DocumentsSlide DeckPress Release(8-K)Quarterly report(10-Q) Vivid Seats Earnings HeadlinesCraig Hallum Downgrades Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) to HoldAugust 7 at 3:31 AM | americanbankingnews.comWhat to Expect from Vivid Seats's EarningsAugust 6 at 12:57 AM | benzinga.comThe End of Elon Musk…?The End of Elon Musk? Don't make him laugh. Jeff Brown has been hearing this same tired story for years, and he's been proven right time and time again. And now, while the media focuses on Tesla's "demise," he's uncovered an AI breakthrough that's about to make Elon's doubters eat their words yet again. According to his research, if you listen to the media and miss out on Elon's newest breakthrough, it's going to cost you the fortune of a lifetime. | Brownstone Research (Ad)Vivid Seats Ticket Pre-sales Drop 900,000 in Brutal Q2—Is This A Sign of Things To Come?August 6 at 12:57 AM | msn.comVivid Seats stock plunges on Q2 results miss, growth concernsAugust 6 at 2:45 AM | msn.comVivid Seats targets $25M cost savings and international growth amid challenging industry dynamicsAugust 6 at 2:45 AM | msn.comSee More Vivid Seats Headlines Get Earnings Announcements in your inboxWant to stay updated on the latest earnings announcements and upcoming reports for companies like Vivid Seats? Sign up for Earnings360's daily newsletter to receive timely earnings updates on Vivid Seats and other key companies, straight to your email. Email Address About Vivid SeatsVivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) operates an online ticket marketplace in the United States, Canada, and Japan. The company operates in two segments, Marketplace and Resale. The Marketplace segment acts as an intermediary between event ticket buyers and sellers; processes ticket sales on its website and mobile applications through its distribution partners; and sells tickets for sports, concerts, theater events, and other live events. This segment offers Skybox, a proprietary enterprise resource planning tool that helps ticket sellers manage ticket inventories, adjust pricing, and fulfill orders across multiple ticket resale marketplaces; and Vivid Picks daily fantasy sports that allows users to partake in contests by making picks from various sport and player matchups. The Resale segment acquires tickets to resell on secondary ticket marketplaces; and provides internal research and development support for Skybox and to deliver seller software and tools. The company was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.View Vivid Seats ProfileRead more More Earnings Resources from MarketBeat Earnings Tools Today's Earnings Tomorrow's Earnings Next Week's Earnings Upcoming Earnings Calls Earnings Newsletter Earnings Call Transcripts Earnings Beats & Misses Corporate Guidance Earnings Screener Earnings By Country U.S. Earnings Reports Canadian Earnings Reports U.K. Earnings Reports Latest Articles Constellation Energy’s Earnings Beat Signals a New EraRealty Income Rallies Post-Earnings Miss—Here’s What Drove ItDon't Mix the Signal for Noise in Super Micro Computer's EarningsWhy Monolithic Power's Earnings and Guidance Ignited a RallyRivian Takes Earnings Hit—R2 Could Be the Stock's 2026 LifelinePalantir Stock Soars After Blowout Earnings ReportVertical Aerospace's New Deal and Earnings De-Risk Production Upcoming Earnings SEA (8/12/2025)Cisco Systems (8/13/2025)Alibaba Group (8/13/2025)Applied Materials (8/14/2025)NetEase (8/14/2025)Deere & Company (8/14/2025)NU (8/14/2025)Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.- Petrobras (8/14/2025)Palo Alto Networks (8/18/2025)Home Depot (8/19/2025) Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free Sign up for MarketBeat All Access to gain access to MarketBeat's full suite of research tools. Start Your 30-Day Trial MarketBeat All Access Features Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring Get personalized stock ideas. Compare portfolio to indices. Check stock news, ratings, SEC filings, and more. Stock Ideas and Recommendations See daily stock ideas from top analysts. Receive short-term trading ideas from MarketBeat. Identify trending stocks on social media. Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools Use our seven stock screeners to find suitable stocks. Stay informed with MarketBeat's real-time news. Export data to Excel for personal analysis. Sign in to your free account to enjoy these benefits In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies. Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more. Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter. Sign in to your free account to enjoy all that MarketBeat has to offer. Sign In Create Account Your Email Address: Email Address Required Your Password: Password Required Log In or Sign in with Facebook Sign in with Google Forgot your password? Your Email Address: Please enter your email address. Please enter a valid email address Choose a Password: Please enter your password. Your password must be at least 8 characters long and contain at least 1 number, 1 letter, and 1 special character. Create My Account (Free) or Sign in with Facebook Sign in with Google By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
There are 14 speakers on the call. Operator00:00:00Good morning, and welcome to the Vivis Seat Second Quarter twenty twenty five Earnings Conference Call. Following management's prepared remarks, we will open the call for Q and A. I would now like to turn the call over to Kate Africk. Speaker 100:00:17Good morning, and welcome to Vivint Seat's second quarter twenty twenty five earnings conference call. I'm Kate Africk, Head of Investor Relations at Vivint Seat. Joining me today to discuss Vivint Seats results are Stan Chia, chief executive officer and Larry Fey, chief financial officer. By now, everyone should have access to our second quarter earnings press release, which was issued earlier this morning. The press release as well as supplemental earnings slides are available on the Investor Relations page of our website at investors.vividseat.com. Speaker 100:00:52During the course of today's call, we may make forward looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including the risks and uncertainties described in our earnings press release, our most recent annual report on Form 10 ks, and our other filings with the SEC. On today's call, we will refer to adjusted EBITDA, which is a non GAAP financial measure that provides useful information for our investors. A reconciliation of this non GAAP financial measure to its corresponding GAAP financial measure can be found in our earnings press release and supplemental earnings slides. And now I would like to turn the call over to Stan. Speaker 200:01:36Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Today, I'll walk through our second quarter results, provide context on the broader industry environment and detail a strategic cost reduction program that we are executing against. This initiative is designed to right size our cost structure, improve operating leverage and better position Vivid Seats to capitalize on long term growth opportunities. Then I'll turn it over to Larry to share our financial results in more detail. In the second quarter, we delivered $685,000,000 of Marketplace GOV, dollars 144,000,000 of revenues and $14,000,000 of adjusted EBITDA. Speaker 200:02:18The industry and competitive landscape continue to present a challenging near term operating environment, but we nonetheless continue to have conviction in the tailwinds driving live event growth on a long term basis. Similar to Q1, in Q2, we saw industry growth to start the quarter that gave way to double digit industry declines across categories in June. While some amount of monthly oscillation is to be expected due to event mix, the degree of monthly volatility has been elevated thus far in 2025, which we attribute to a combination of economic uncertainty and the implementation of the FTC's all in pricing mandate. The sports category was particularly weak and down double digits in Q2, with underwhelming playoff matchups, challenging comps and NFL schedule release occurring just two days after the all in pricing rollout. Meanwhile, the Concerts category was up low single digits in Q2 but down double digits in June. Speaker 200:03:22Recent industry trends, including the switch to all in pricing, do not change our view that live events remain an attractive long term opportunity supported by durable supply and demand tailwinds. Despite this long term confidence, the current operating environment is highly competitive, so we are taking deliberate action designed to enhance efficiency, strengthen our foundation for the future, and most importantly, to return to sustainable long term growth. Today, we announced a cost reduction program targeting $25,000,000 in annualized operating expense savings to be actioned upon by year end. We are focused on increasing efficiency without compromising the experience we deliver to our fans or sellers. To date, we have realized over $5,000,000 in annualized savings. Speaker 200:04:10In line with our focus on operational efficiency, we have chosen to shut down Vivid Picks, with savings to come over the next several months as that business winds down. We expect to realize the remaining savings under the program as we finish the year through additional technology and AI enabled efficiencies, as well as targeted reductions in G and A and marketing. These actions are part of a broader commitment to ensure near term competitive challenges do not threaten long term value creation. Following the execution of these efficiency efforts, Vivint Seats will operate with greater agility, deliver more impact and drive durable growth. Importantly, we do not believe these cost reductions will impact our ability to innovate across our core strategic initiatives. Speaker 200:04:58As we've shared, our industry leading ERP Skybox is utilized by over half of professional sellers to run their businesses. This quarter, we rolled out incremental analytical capabilities within Skybox that were well received, and we are excited about additional Skybox functionality in our product pipeline. Internationally, I'm pleased to share that we are now live in four European countries. Our international business is demonstrating strong growth, albeit from a small base, and is exceeding our margin expectations. While our initial target was to breakeven on a contribution basis while growing international revenues, we have been net contribution positive thus far in 2025. Speaker 200:05:41We look forward to further diligent expansion abroad. To conclude, the second quarter was challenging, but we remain confident that better industry conditions will return. We are keenly focused on reigniting sustainable growth through best in class efficiency and differentiation on both sides of our marketplace. With that, I will turn it over to Larry for a more detailed financial review of the quarter. Speaker 300:06:07Thank you, Stan. We generated $685,000,000 of Marketplace GOV in Q2, which was down 31 year over year. Total Marketplace orders were down approximately 30% year over year, while average order size was down 2%. We generated $144,000,000 of revenues in Q2, which was down 28% year over year. Our Q2 Marketplace take rate was 16.7%, down slightly year over year. Speaker 300:06:37While we expect some degree of continued take rate variability, we anticipate near term take rate will remain in the 16% range. Q2 twenty twenty five adjusted EBITDA was 14,000,000 down substantially from the prior year due primarily to lower volume and negative operating leverage. Performance marketing intensity continues unabated and will continue to pressure results. Despite this pressure, we remain focused on creating a path to return to sustainable growth. We will drive additional efficiency through our cost reduction program and will utilize a portion of these savings to offer a leading value proposition to buyers while remaining competitive across relevant marketing channels as we look to stabilize top line in 2026 and beyond. Speaker 300:07:25We ended Q2 with $392,000,000 of debt and $153,000,000 of cash with net debt of $239,000,000 In the quarter, we utilized approximately $9,000,000 in cash to purchase approximately 4,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock at an average price of $2.34 As Stan noted, due to industry volumes were quite soft even relative to typical seasonality. Our quarter end cash balance is driven by volume trends as we exit the quarter, which resulted in continued pressure on cash balances in Q2. We anticipate positive cash flow in Q3 due to a combination of typical seasonality improvements and a belief that the degree of June softness was atypical. Lastly, please note that our planned one for 20 reverse stock split, which was announced yesterday, will become effective after market close today. Our second quarter financial statements reflect share counts and per share amounts before the reverse stock split, but subsequent periods will be reported on a post split basis. Speaker 300:08:31We believe the reverse stock split will, among other things, enhance the marketability of our common stock. I'll now hand it back to Stan for concluding remarks. Speaker 200:08:40Thanks, Larry. While industry challenges continued in the second quarter, our long term thesis on live events persists. Our aim is to remain lean, agile, and well positioned to capture opportunity as the environment evolves and ultimately return to sustainable long term growth. And with that, operator, open up the line for questions. Operator00:09:05Thank you. At this time, we will conduct a question and answer session. A reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press 11 again. Also, we are only allowing two questions. Operator00:09:33Our first question comes from Dan Kurnos at The Benchmark Company. Speaker 400:09:38Yeah, good morning guys. A couple from me, maybe just kind of high level thoughts on take rate was a little higher in the quarter. I don't know if that was just you know, in anticipation of you guys implementing the cost controls. So I guess, you know, do we think that you guys are looking at the way the market is transpiring right now and going, okay. There's maybe smaller TAM on GOV, but we can be more profitable and more nimble within that, or once these cost savings get implemented, I know you talked in the prepared remarks, Stan, about being more competitive in the back half of the year. Speaker 400:10:18But, you know, there's obviously an intelligent way to do it. So maybe kind of just walk us through threading that needle. Speaker 500:10:23Yeah. Hey, Dan, thanks for that. I'll take the first part. And then certainly, Larry can talk a little bit more about the take rate moves. But yeah, I think when you look at certainly in the environment and how we're positioning ourselves, we are still continue to be really focused and honing our unit economics and really plan on emerging much leaner and using that as a mechanism to drive sustainable growth really, you know, into 2026. Speaker 500:10:48Lots of activity now as we continue to optimize our cost structure that we think will, you know, allow us to really push that growth as we drive acquisition and to have lots of leverage on that kind of moving again, forward with our eyes towards '26 post some of these cost reductions. Speaker 300:11:04And and Dan on the take rate itself, I would not read into that if we actually increase pricing. There's some mix shifts across some of our different relationship types, namely marketplace and the private label. And so if anything, if you think about the two competitive levers, the two primary competitive levers out there with marketing expense and take rate, I think the intent and focus is on sustaining, if not increasing competitiveness across both those levers this year and moving forward. Speaker 400:11:42Got it. And Larry, can you just give us some color on the buckets of the annualized savings plan? Speaker 300:11:50Yeah, I would think of all of the numbers that we're referencing when we talk about savings as fixed expense. So we're not taking credit for anything that would be variable. So volume goes down, you spend less on credit cards. Volume goes down, you spend less on paid search. That is not being captured in there. Speaker 300:12:11So what is in there though is what I'd call fixed marketing, I. E. Like longer duration brand type marketing is on the block and then g and a. Our g and a is primarily people and software expense. So you can think of this as additional efficiency across those two categories. Speaker 300:12:34As we look at the targets, the majority is expected to come out of G and A. Speaker 600:12:41Got it. Thanks guys. Appreciate it. Operator00:12:47Our next question comes from Ralph Schackart at William Blair. Speaker 700:12:53Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just in terms of kind of looking back at the quarter, think you called out consumer spending, obviously, as well as competitive pressures. Any way you could split that out and give a sense maybe which one was having a bigger impact during the quarter? I know it's difficult, but just any color there. Speaker 700:13:10Then I have a follow-up. Speaker 300:13:13Yes, Ralph. It's hard to be precise. But the best proxy I think that we have, recognizing that Vegas isn't directly analogous to all of our markets, you do get, I think, the cleanest read on underlying trends with the transient nature of Vegas. And we saw kind of throughout the first half consistent year over year declines, I think, in the mid to high single digits in terms of some combination of visitors, hotel occupancy, price points. I think there was a fair amount of chatter recently on the either June or July data coming out showing Vegas was down double digits. Speaker 300:13:56So, think the headline is certainly the competitive intensity, but the consumer softness is probably a couple of 100 basis points of underlying headwind. Speaker 700:14:08Great. And just in terms of Europe, sounds like obviously off a small base, as you noted, but it's exceeding your margin expectations. I know you have a lot going on right now. But just as you sort of get through this period of transition, does that sort of reshape your thoughts on your rollout plan or the number of countries? Maybe kind of speak to what you're thinking about that market as the calendar turns into 2026. Speaker 700:14:30Would it allow you to potentially accelerate that growth? Any perspective, that'd be great. Thank you. Speaker 200:14:35Yeah. Hey, Ralph. Yeah, I think we've been Speaker 500:14:38pretty pleased by what we've seen internationally, as we've talked about probably ahead of schedule in terms of number of countries that we're in and ahead of schedule in terms of what we're seeing from a contribution margin perspective. So I think as we continue to see that dynamic, you know, I think we are excited and continue to be thoughtful, but willing to accelerate investment as we see that as certainly TAM accretive and margin accretive in the future. And we'll continue to, think, look to make investments to grow that part of our business. Speaker 700:15:08Okay. Great. Thanks, Dan. Thanks, sir. Our Operator00:15:15next question comes from Cameron Maison Peroni at Morgan Stanley. Speaker 800:15:21Thank you. Morning, team. First, I wanted to ask, you know, Google on their earnings call this quarter, you talked a bit about activity, search activity shifting into more towards AI mode. I was wondering if I could get your thoughts or thinking about how as search activity changes in that regard, how that might impact your SEO and performance marketing channels? And any read through as you're thinking about it in terms of how that impacts the secondary ticketing industry more broadly? Speaker 800:15:55And then second on the savings opportunity, Larry, I was wondering if just a housekeeping question, but is the $25,000,000 is that in period savings? Is it an annualized kind of exit rate at year end '25? Just a little bit more specificity there would be helpful. Thanks. Speaker 500:16:12Yeah. Hey, Cameron, I'll take the first part and then I'll hand it over to Larry on the savings. But yeah, look, I mean, certainly, I think I'd start by framing, you know, as we look at how consumer discovery continues to evolve. I mean, it's it's clear and we're we're we're certainly an example of how much consumer discovery flows through the Google funnel, which today I think has a lot of opportunity for cost and spend based funneling of traffic. I think certainly as AI overviews is coming through, you know, I think you see I think expected behavior there where I think you're getting, you know, a lot of perhaps relevancy overspend that's showing up. Speaker 500:16:54And certainly as we think about that adaptation of how consumers discovery AI overviews as it pertains to search and other evolving, and emerging channels. We continue to look at that and really position our platform to be discoverable, and and ready to take advantage of those channels. So lots of stuff, I think, changing in that world. I think certainly on the Google front, we're paying close attention and deeply in partnership with them as some of that search experience evolves. Speaker 300:17:25And on the cost reduction question, the number we put forward, think of that as a full year annualized figure that we will expect to have fully actioned by the end of this calendar year. And so incremental to 2026 results in full. But as you look at the back half of '25, I'd say they are in flight and they will layer in over the coming months. And so not a particularly significant immediate benefit, but it'll scale quickly as we fully action the identified savings. Speaker 800:18:07Got it. That's helpful. Thank you both. Operator00:18:14Our next question comes from Ryan Sigdahl at Craig Hallum. Speaker 900:18:19Hey, thanks. This is Matthew Robb on for Ryan. On industry volume, Larry, you gave a little color on the cadence of the quarter, gave a little insight into June. Can you maybe talk a little bit more about the all in pricing change and how that's changed the market from a consumer perspective? And then I don't know if I caught it, did the June softness continue into Q3? Speaker 300:18:42Yeah, so I'd say the story is not yet fully written on all in pricing. Yeah, we've seen this before the national rollout play out at several states. The Maryland, California, Tennessee had previously moved to all in pricing. And what we did see was a decline in those states in conversion that persisted for a couple months and then largely normalized, which would generally fit with what we've seen across various testings where conversion is generally higher if you do utilize lower price upfront with fees shown in the checkout versus an all in price. I think the part that's we have the data points from the prior state examples, but now we have a lot more states flowing through and it's TBD on will that, you know, recovery that we saw in those other states fully flow through at the national level. Speaker 300:19:45But broadly, it's tracking. And I think there is a digestion period that we're certainly working through and we'll see as we approach kind of next year's calendar. If the flow through and cascade properly works with its way through the system or if there's another kind of digestion period as the industry recalibrates kind of up and down the chain. Speaker 900:20:08Okay. And then on just the June softness, did that continue into Q3? Speaker 300:20:13Yeah. So I think we noted on Q1 month to month volatility, noted again in Q2 month to month volatility. I'd say volatility continues. So we've actually seen July revert to being up year over year. Now July is a softer period. Speaker 300:20:30So all of the caveats that I would put on a already volatile year where that volatility continues, but we are seeing July return to positive. Speaker 900:20:42Okay. Thanks, guys. Operator00:20:48Our next question comes from Andrew Maroc at Raymond James. Speaker 600:20:53Hi, thanks for taking my question. On the cost savings again, you mentioned shutting down Vivid Picks. But are there any other of those kind of emerging areas or investment initiatives that might come under review in the cost reduction program? Or is that kind of mostly aimed, like you said, at the core, the legacy business and the OpEx involved in that? Then I have a follow-up. Speaker 500:21:15Hey, Andrew. Yeah, I think we're continuing to, you know, I think, put our lens on all areas, you know, I think that can be really streamlined and enable us to be as lean and nimble, you know, I think as possible as we look to really drive investment into growth. So I think our portfolio of investments, I think, is completely under review. But certainly, our focus is on, I think, our large G and A base, which I think we believe we can significantly streamline by the end of the year. Speaker 600:21:44Appreciate it. And then maybe a quick one on 2Q. So I heard that the poor playoff matchups were one of the reasons that sports came in a bit below in the quarter. Is there any way to quantify the contribution of a poor playoff slate versus a good one or just kind of the range of outcomes that we should be thinking about in like a typical playoff season? Thank you. Speaker 300:22:06Yeah, the sports comp, I would characterize as a pile of issues that summed up to the headwinds. Last year, we had the Copa America that drove pretty significant volume in soccer. This year, we did have the FIFA World Cup, but that came in considerably smaller than Copa. So we had a tough soccer comp. You know, last year, I'd say Caitlin Clark fever was at its peak. Speaker 300:22:34So we saw some headwinds on all things women's basketball on a year over year basis. And then as you noted, some matchup softness. That if I were to put a rough number on, know, call it an NBA finals between two small market teams versus the NBA finals between the Lakers and Celtics. I would probably say in the quarter that type of series guardrails are like a percent of GLD. So a fraction of a percent when you think of it on a full year basis, there's just such diversity in events. Speaker 300:23:11Any one won't make or break but when it's part of a contributing series of issues we like to call it out. Speaker 600:23:21Understood. Thank you. Operator00:23:27Our next question comes from Curtis Nagle at Bank of America. Speaker 1000:23:32Great. Just a quick one for me. On the $25,000,000 expense reductions, could we just go through, I guess, the balance of flow through versus reinvestment and where were those reinvested dollars primarily go? Speaker 300:23:47Yeah, I think some level of reserve judgment on exactly what the ratios will be based on what we see in the competitive landscape. But I think we've touched on the two major, call it competitive levers in the P and L are the value proposition you're offering customers on the top line and then the marketing expense on the cost side. I will reiterate our view that the incremental yield on marketing spend in this current environment is difficult to put it politely. And so you can imagine reinvestment focusing on the other lever with exact form and channel to be fully resolved as we continue to evaluate exactly where we want to go and how. But if you think about base pricing, loyalty, promos, that portfolio of offers, I think is where you would most likely reinvest it. Speaker 300:24:50And really, if you think about a call it LTV to cap paradigm, focus on enhancing LTV in a world where CAC is under severe pressure. Speaker 1000:25:03Okay, understood. Thank you very much. Operator00:25:08Our next question comes from Maria Ritz at Canaccord. Speaker 1100:25:14Great, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So understanding competitive intensity on the marketing side, are there any alternative customer acquisition channels that you may be exploring where competition is more manageable? Speaker 300:25:29Yeah, I mean, Maria, we're always looking. There are complementary channels to be had, but they are all a fraction of what the paid search and performance channels are today. So if you think about paid social as an example, a lot of time spent on Meta, on Reddit, on TikTok, but the transactional mindset is less. You're scrolling through pictures, you're having a chat versus you go into Google and you say I want tickets to X event. So we continue to find paid searches today by far the largest channel. Speaker 300:26:16Hence the comment earlier where if you think about the other lever in retaining customers driving LTV through retention and repeat approach, I think that's the likely near term focus that we'll pursue. And then we have the broader questions on the longer term top of funnel. Think that's a question that spans not only our industry, but many others. Speaker 1100:26:42Got it. That's very helpful. And then can you maybe help us understand some of the dynamics between owned properties versus private label revenue in Q2? I guess, what's driving this accelerated pressure within the private label segment? Speaker 500:26:57Yeah, hey, Maria. Yeah, you know, when you think about our private label business, you know, I think it's made up of a multitude and of numerous distribution partners. And as you can imagine, some, they vary largely in size as well. You know, I'd say for us, as you look at the disproportionate decline in private label, you know, I think unfortunately, of our largest partners, made a change and it resulted in us seeing, some substantially smaller volume from that partner and thus the accelerated or sort of disproportionate decline in in that segment of our business. Speaker 1100:27:33Great. Thanks so much. Operator00:27:40Our next question comes from Benjamin Black at Deutsche Bank. Speaker 1200:27:46Great. Thank you for taking my questions. Can you maybe talk about the decision to invest internationally instead of sort of supporting The US market with more capital just given the the the challenges that you're seeing here. So let's maybe talk a little bit about the rationale there. And Speaker 800:28:02maybe on the other side Speaker 1200:28:02of the marketplace, you know, how has the the competition evolved on the seller side of the equation? You know, have you seen any impact on your supply at all? You know, how how how professional brokers responding to sort of the challenging end market? Thank you. Speaker 300:28:16Thanks, Ben. Yeah. I'll speak to international. Take the sellers. Yeah, on the international business, I think of it as an analysis around the incremental contribution that we can realistically get in the near term. Speaker 300:28:32And we talked about the J curve in getting international off the ground. We incurred most of that in 2024. And then I think in 2025, while the top line in absolute figures and as a percentage of our total business remains small, we are now through that contribution margin curve and are positive on contribution margin. There's some incremental G and A. But as we look at the landscape and the ability to generate volume at structurally sound economics from what we've seen to date, the opportunity internationally remains healthy and robust and more consistent with what we would have seen in North America prior to the behavior of the last few years. Speaker 300:29:20And so it continues to feel like an attractive pursuit where it's still going to be a much smaller piece of the business for any reasonable timeframe than North America, but can still be a positive needle mover with absolute impact on on our GOV and profitability. Speaker 500:29:37On the sell side, Ben, know, I think sellers look for, you know, both a combination of distribution channels, as well as I think technology providers that allow them to efficiently and effectively run and grow their businesses. You know, on the distribution side, you know, I think we remain a significant source of volume from them. And so I think we continue to look at better ways to serve that. And then certainly on the infrastructure and technology side, our marketplace continues to build out components on Skybox that we believe are quite retentive and accretive to sellers. We talked about in the prepared remarks launching analytics tool sets for them, you know, this quarter, as well as, know, I think enhancing some of the mobile user experiences we have for our for our sell side continue to be ways that we build and innovate on behalf of the sell side of the marketplace. Speaker 1200:30:30Great. Thank you very much. Operator00:30:36Our next question comes from Brad Erickson at RBC Capital Markets. Speaker 700:30:41Hey, guys. Thanks. I guess, first, just as you think about all this competitive intensity happening you keep talking about, I would be curious if you could just maybe break that down for us a bit more what's actually going on kind of industry wide now? Why is that so persistent and kind of what levers you think you can pull there to help try and address? And then second, just on the supply environment, maybe just anything you can share in terms of what you're embedding and you're thinking for the second half of the year? Speaker 700:31:11Thanks. Speaker 300:31:14Yeah, on competitive landscape, I think we've spoken about the meaningful increase in aggressiveness in performance channels. And think of that as it's a Google or a Bing auction where someone, when you type in a search for Toronto Blue Jays tickets, someone is showing up in the first, second, third spot. That's an open auction and the price people are willing to pay will influence who shows up at the top of that search. And, you know, there's data out there across industries that most often customers will click on the first link if they're going to click on any link. And so as folks are willing to bid more for that first link, they can really take a meaningful portion of the available surface area. Speaker 300:32:14And if they're able to effectively monopolize customer awareness by consistently showing up at the top spot, they will get disproportionate traffic flow. And whether their value proposition is most compelling or not, they'll continue to see that traffic. By our map, that incremental bid is uneconomic. And I think you've seen across several industry players or if you kind of follow the industry chatter, that has proven out that this incremental spend is uneconomic, but different folks have different strategic objectives. And I think some folks are really focused on demonstrating top line growth, even if that's disruptive to the industry profitability pool. Speaker 300:33:01Frankly, coming into 2025, we thought that that story was a unfortunate, but perhaps constrained to 2024 story. And to our disappointment, it seems to continue unabated. The why and the end game in all of this is less clear because it seems like we're well past the bounds of any reasonable corporate finance framework that you could employ. And then supply for the back half of the year. Yeah, I think from our side, we had touched on last quarter, you know, saying that we think at the industry level, expect flat, maybe down a little bit for the year. Speaker 300:33:49We saw Q2 come in roughly flat, albeit volatile. Q3 off to a positive start with relatively easy comps year over year. Q4, tougher comps year over year. So at this point, not really changing that perspective that flattish is probably the right paradigm from an industry standpoint. But to make a call on call it the q four on sale calendar and what that'll mean for 2026, bit premature. Speaker 300:34:20But for the next, you know, quarter and a half, the concert calendar is pretty locked. I think we feel fine about it. Not too much volatility there. Yeah. Speaker 500:34:29Yeah, I think the only other one thing, you know, Brad, of circling back as you think about the broad industry dynamics, you know, certainly very aligned sort of with what we look to position, you know, ourselves to be able to do is, you certainly got a lot of marketing pressure. And I think the structural changes that we are certainly embarking on will better position us to be aggressive on that front as things return to I think, a period of growth for us. But certainly, you know, when you look at the industry profit pool, it's not just the CAC dynamic from a marketing perspective, that's under pressure, there's certainly take rate pressure, as well that exists, you know, I think as we continue to see broadly, you know, I think what we believe to be financially irrationally irrational moves on that front. And so as we look at, again, positioning ourselves for the future, you know, I think our goal is to be able to compete whether it's on marketing, or the take rate pressures that we're seeing with a lot of nimbleness and agility that we believe we can get as we lean out our cost structure. Speaker 700:35:33That's helpful. Thanks, guys. Operator00:35:40Our last question comes from Tom Ford of Maxim Group LLC. Speaker 1300:35:46Great, thanks. So first Dan, Larry, best of luck navigating a challenging environment. One question and one follow-up. Shuttering vivid picks, why shutter vivid picks? It wasn't driving engagement as expected, competitive set, relative margin versus remainder of business, regulatory environment. Speaker 1300:36:05Just additional thoughts there would be appreciated. Speaker 200:36:09Hey, Tom, you know, I Speaker 500:36:10think certainly, probably the right answer is a combination of all of the above, right? I'd start with, you know, we certainly had great aspirations and saw, you know, great early reads on potential engagement vehicles for the product that we had. You know, I think as we look to focus in, know, I think certainly that that was an area that took focus away from from the core business. And we wanted to make sure as we, you know, thought about, again, the platform and the cost structure that allowed us to really move nimbly that that was one that fell a little bit outside the bounds of that. Similarly, as you talk about, you know, I think there were in that space and continue to be increasing regulatory components that are unique and distinct from our core business. Speaker 500:36:57And so as we looked at the overall impact, you know, made the decision that it was more of a distraction than it was something that would enable the business and so decided to shut that down. Speaker 1300:37:08Yeah, thanks, Dan. Speaker 300:37:09We just really quick. We tried our darnedest to crack the cap code. And we just weren't able to do it at scale. And so we sort of became stuck as a subscale provider with unit economics that just didn't create a pathway to becoming something other than a subscale provider. Gave It it a multi year effort, tried a bunch of different approaches. Speaker 300:37:33And once it became evident that we weren't able to unlock a more sustainable unit economic profile, decided to call it. Speaker 1300:37:42Thanks, Larry. So for my follow-up, can you give your current thoughts on adjusted EBITDA cash conversion for the remainder of the year? And then to the extent you're able to provide your thoughts on your cash flow expectations for 2025 and 2026? Speaker 300:37:59Yeah, I think it continues to be a cash generation story driven primarily by two things. Where EBITDA shakes out and then two, if we're able to return to sequential GOV growth. So year over year trends likely to remain under pressure for the next several quarters. But if you can get sequential improvement, that will show up in the balance sheet. So I do think we expect to be cash flow positive in Q3. Speaker 300:38:34There's seasonal strength in Q3 relative to Q2, particularly if you compare September to June, which determines the end of quarter cash balance. Our resale business, we spend money in the first half acquiring inventory, generally move that inventory in the second half, so some tailwinds there as well. And then moving into next year, yeah, think that the core objectives is to or are to one, return to growth and to generate sustainable positive cash flow. And those two statements are very closely linked, especially with where our EBITDA has been running relative to our interest expense and our CapEx without positive working capital contribution. Significant positive cash generation will be difficult to deliver in this environment. Speaker 300:39:24So getting back to top line growth is key and is the focus as we head into 2026. Speaker 1300:39:31Great. Thanks, Dan. Thanks, Larry. Operator00:39:39This concludes the question and answer session. Thank you for your participation in today's conference. You may now disconnect.Read morePowered by