CLS (CLI) Competitors

GBX 50.50 +0.50 (+1.00%)

As of 12:14 PM Eastern

CLI vs. WKP, RGL, DLN, GPE, and SHED

Should you be buying CLS stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of CLS include Workspace Group (WKP), Regional REIT (RGL), Derwent London (DLN), Great Portland Estates (GPE), and Urban Logistics REIT (SHED). These companies are all part of the "real estate" sector.

How does CLS compare to Workspace Group?

Workspace Group (LON:WKP) and CLS (LON:CLI) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

: Workspace Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 479.20, indicating a potential upside of 36.84%. CLS has a consensus price target of GBX 64, indicating a potential upside of 26.73%. Given Workspace Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Workspace Group is more favorable than CLS.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Workspace Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)

4 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)

1 Hold rating(s)

1 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
: Workspace Group has higher revenue and earnings than CLS. Workspace Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CLS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Workspace Group £182.90M 3.68 -£192.71M -£39.50 N/A
CLS £139.70M 1.44 -£207.36M -£12.60 N/A
: CLS has a net margin of -36.01% compared to Workspace Group's net margin of -41.50%. Workspace Group's return on equity of -5.24% beat CLS's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Workspace Group -41.50% -5.24% 2.35%
CLS -36.01% -6.67% 2.30%
: Workspace Group has a beta of 1.148, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CLS has a beta of 0.994, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: Workspace Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 28.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Workspace Group pays out -71.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Workspace Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
: 40.9% of Workspace Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.6% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Workspace Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.6% of CLS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
: In the previous week, CLS had 2 more articles in the media than Workspace Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CLS and 1 mentions for Workspace Group. CLS's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Workspace Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CLS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Workspace Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Workspace Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
CLS	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Workspace Group	£182.90M	3.68	-£192.71M	-£39.50	N/A
CLS	£139.70M	1.44	-£207.36M	-£12.60	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Workspace Group	-41.50%	-5.24%	2.35%
CLS	-36.01%	-6.67%	2.30%

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Workspace Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
CLS	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Workspace Group beats CLS on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Regional REIT?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Regional REIT (LON:RGL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

: Regional REIT has a net margin of -20.80% compared to CLS's net margin of -36.01%. Regional REIT's return on equity of -4.99% beat CLS's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS -36.01% -6.67% 2.30%
Regional REIT -20.80% -4.99% 3.19%
: In the previous week, CLS had 3 more articles in the media than Regional REIT. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CLS and 0 mentions for Regional REIT. CLS's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Regional REIT's score of 0.00 indicating that CLS is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Overall Sentiment
CLS Positive
Regional REIT Neutral
: CLS has higher revenue and earnings than Regional REIT. Regional REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CLS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
CLS £139.70M 1.44 -£207.36M -£12.60 N/A
Regional REIT -£11.01M -12.66 -£258.36M -£10.10 N/A
: 8.6% of CLS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.3% of Regional REIT shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.6% of CLS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Regional REIT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
: CLS has a beta of 0.994, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Regional REIT has a beta of 0.634, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: CLS presently has a consensus target price of GBX 64, suggesting a potential upside of 26.73%. Regional REIT has a consensus target price of GBX 140, suggesting a potential upside of 62.79%. Given Regional REIT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Regional REIT is more favorable than CLS.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)

1 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Regional REIT
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

1 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
: CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Regional REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional REIT pays out -96.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regional REIT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CLS	-36.01%	-6.67%	2.30%
Regional REIT	-20.80%	-4.99%	3.19%

Company	Overall Sentiment
CLS	Positive
Regional REIT	Neutral

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CLS	£139.70M	1.44	-£207.36M	-£12.60	N/A
Regional REIT	-£11.01M	-12.66	-£258.36M	-£10.10	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CLS	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Regional REIT	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Regional REIT beats CLS on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Derwent London?

Derwent London (LON:DLN) and CLS (LON:CLI) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

: In the previous week, CLS had 3 more articles in the media than Derwent London. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CLS and 0 mentions for Derwent London. CLS's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Derwent London's score of 0.00 indicating that CLS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Derwent London Neutral
CLS Positive
: Derwent London currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,085, suggesting a potential upside of 18.19%. CLS has a consensus target price of GBX 64, suggesting a potential upside of 26.73%. Given CLS's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CLS is more favorable than Derwent London.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Derwent London
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)

4 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)

1 Hold rating(s)

1 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
: CLS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Derwent London. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Derwent London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Derwent London £388.70M 5.10 -£359.76M £143.51 12.29
CLS £139.70M 1.44 -£207.36M -£12.60 N/A
: 56.8% of Derwent London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.6% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Derwent London shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.6% of CLS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
: Derwent London has a net margin of 40.73% compared to CLS's net margin of -36.01%. Derwent London's return on equity of 4.48% beat CLS's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Derwent London 40.73% 4.48% 1.96%
CLS -36.01% -6.67% 2.30%
: Derwent London has a beta of 1.183, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CLS has a beta of 0.994, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: Derwent London pays an annual dividend of GBX 81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Derwent London pays out 56.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Derwent London	Neutral
CLS	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Derwent London	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
CLS	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Derwent London	£388.70M	5.10	-£359.76M	£143.51	12.29
CLS	£139.70M	1.44	-£207.36M	-£12.60	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Derwent London	40.73%	4.48%	1.96%
CLS	-36.01%	-6.67%	2.30%

Summary

Derwent London beats CLS on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Great Portland Estates?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Great Portland Estates (LON:GPE) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

: Great Portland Estates has a net margin of 138.95% compared to CLS's net margin of -36.01%. Great Portland Estates' return on equity of 7.18% beat CLS's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS -36.01% -6.67% 2.30%
Great Portland Estates 138.95% 7.18% 0.79%
: CLS presently has a consensus target price of GBX 64, indicating a potential upside of 26.73%. Great Portland Estates has a consensus target price of GBX 400.88, indicating a potential upside of 28.07%. Given Great Portland Estates' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Great Portland Estates is more favorable than CLS.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)

1 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Great Portland Estates
0 Sell rating(s)

4 Hold rating(s)

4 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
: CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Great Portland Estates pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Portland Estates pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
: 8.6% of CLS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.1% of Great Portland Estates shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.6% of CLS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Great Portland Estates shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
: In the previous week, Great Portland Estates had 2 more articles in the media than CLS. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Great Portland Estates and 3 mentions for CLS. Great Portland Estates' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat CLS's score of 0.88 indicating that Great Portland Estates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Great Portland Estates
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
: CLS has a beta of 0.994, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Great Portland Estates has a beta of 0.896, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: Great Portland Estates has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CLS. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Portland Estates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
CLS £139.70M 1.44 -£207.36M -£12.60 N/A
Great Portland Estates £103.90M 12.15 £398.10M £36.50 8.58

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CLS	-36.01%	-6.67%	2.30%
Great Portland Estates	138.95%	7.18%	0.79%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CLS	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Great Portland Estates	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CLS	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Great Portland Estates	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CLS	£139.70M	1.44	-£207.36M	-£12.60	N/A
Great Portland Estates	£103.90M	12.15	£398.10M	£36.50	8.58

Summary

Great Portland Estates beats CLS on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Urban Logistics REIT?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Urban Logistics REIT (LON:SHED) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

: CLS has a beta of 0.994, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Urban Logistics REIT has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: 8.6% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of Urban Logistics REIT shares are held by institutional investors. 60.6% of CLS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Urban Logistics REIT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
: CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.9%. Urban Logistics REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Urban Logistics REIT pays out 152.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
: Urban Logistics REIT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CLS. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Urban Logistics REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
CLS £139.70M 1.44 -£207.36M -£12.60 N/A
Urban Logistics REIT £58.96M 12.28 £24.33M £5.25 29.70
: CLS currently has a consensus price target of GBX 64, suggesting a potential upside of 26.73%. Given CLS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe CLS is more favorable than Urban Logistics REIT.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)

1 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Urban Logistics REIT
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
: Urban Logistics REIT has a net margin of 41.17% compared to CLS's net margin of -36.01%. Urban Logistics REIT's return on equity of 3.24% beat CLS's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS -36.01% -6.67% 2.30%
Urban Logistics REIT 41.17% 3.24% 2.62%
: In the previous week, CLS had 3 more articles in the media than Urban Logistics REIT. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CLS and 0 mentions for Urban Logistics REIT. CLS's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Urban Logistics REIT's score of 0.00 indicating that CLS is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Overall Sentiment
CLS Positive
Urban Logistics REIT Neutral

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CLS	£139.70M	1.44	-£207.36M	-£12.60	N/A
Urban Logistics REIT	£58.96M	12.28	£24.33M	£5.25	29.70

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CLS	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Urban Logistics REIT	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CLS	-36.01%	-6.67%	2.30%
Urban Logistics REIT	41.17%	3.24%	2.62%

Company	Overall Sentiment
CLS	Positive
Urban Logistics REIT	Neutral

Summary

CLS beats Urban Logistics REIT on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CLS News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CLI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	CLS	REIT Industry	Real Estate Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£201.05M	£672.01M	£1.92B	£2.78B
Dividend Yield	8.16%	9.64%	7.29%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	-4.01	2.64	15.83	366.08
Price / Sales	1.44	225.43	372.32	88,266.78
Price / Cash	5.62	63.07	68.04	27.89
Price / Book	0.24	0.39	1.31	7.70
Net Income	-£207.36M	-£181.49M	-£124.57M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	3.06%	0.41%	0.29%	8.59%
1 Month Performance	4.23%	0.42%	2.35%	6.05%
1 Year Performance	-20.35%	-1.87%	5.48%	91.13%

CLS Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CLI CLS	3.9339 of 5 stars	GBX 50.50 +1.0%	GBX 64 +26.7%	-21.5%	£201.05M	£139.70M	N/A	118	News Coverage Analyst Forecast High Trading Volume
WKP Workspace Group	2.5393 of 5 stars	GBX 334.80 -1.5%	GBX 479.20 +43.1%	-23.6%	£643.78M	£182.90M	N/A	293
RGL Regional REIT	N/A	GBX 86.30 -0.6%	GBX 140 +62.2%	-27.1%	£139.88M	-£11.01M	N/A	N/A	Gap Up
DLN Derwent London	3.2167 of 5 stars	GBX 1,698 -2.5%	GBX 2,085 +22.8%	-12.2%	£1.91B	£388.70M	11.83	199
GPE Great Portland Estates	4.8006 of 5 stars	GBX 307.80 -1.5%	GBX 400.88 +30.2%	-3.4%	£1.24B	£103.90M	8.43	134	Positive News Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CLI) was last updated on 5/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

CLS (CLI) Competitors