Go Pro

CLS (CLI) Competitors

CLS logo
GBX 46.75 -0.25 (-0.53%)
As of 11:53 AM Eastern

CLI vs. WKP, RGL, DLN, GPE, and SHED

Should you buy CLS stock or one of its competitors? CLS's main competitors and comparable companies include Workspace Group (WKP), Regional REIT (RGL), Derwent London (DLN), Great Portland Estates (GPE), and Urban Logistics REIT (SHED). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "real estate" sector.

How does CLS compare to Workspace Group?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Workspace Group (LON:WKP) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

CLS currently has a consensus target price of GBX 48, indicating a potential upside of 2.67%. Workspace Group has a consensus target price of GBX 415.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.73%. Given Workspace Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Workspace Group is more favorable than CLS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Workspace Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

CLS has a beta of 1.011, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Workspace Group has a beta of 1.087, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Workspace Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 28.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. CLS pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Workspace Group pays out -45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, CLS had 1 more articles in the media than Workspace Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CLS and 0 mentions for Workspace Group. CLS's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Workspace Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CLS Neutral
Workspace Group Neutral

6.5% of CLS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Workspace Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.1% of CLS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Workspace Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Workspace Group has a net margin of -66.32% compared to CLS's net margin of -72.29%. Workspace Group's return on equity of -8.83% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS-72.29% -13.63% 2.30%
Workspace Group -66.32%-8.83%2.35%

Workspace Group has higher revenue and earnings than CLS. Workspace Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CLS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CLS£132.10M1.42-£207.36M-£24.00N/A
Workspace Group£181.40M3.88-£192.71M-£62.60N/A

Summary

Workspace Group beats CLS on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Regional REIT?

Regional REIT (LON:RGL) and CLS (LON:CLI) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Regional REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Regional REIT pays out -96.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CLS pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regional REIT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

9.8% of Regional REIT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Regional REIT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.1% of CLS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Regional REIT has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CLS has a beta of 1.011, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Regional REIT has a net margin of -20.80% compared to CLS's net margin of -72.29%. Regional REIT's return on equity of -4.99% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regional REIT-20.80% -4.99% 3.19%
CLS -72.29%-13.63%2.30%

CLS has higher revenue and earnings than Regional REIT. Regional REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CLS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regional REIT-£11.01M-13.89-£258.36M-£10.10N/A
CLS£132.10M1.42-£207.36M-£24.00N/A

Regional REIT currently has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 48.31%. CLS has a consensus target price of GBX 48, indicating a potential upside of 2.67%. Given Regional REIT's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Regional REIT is more favorable than CLS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regional REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CLS
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Regional REIT and Regional REIT both had 1 articles in the media. Regional REIT's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CLS's score of 0.00 indicating that Regional REIT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regional REIT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Regional REIT beats CLS on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Derwent London?

Derwent London (LON:DLN) and CLS (LON:CLI) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

CLS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Derwent London. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Derwent London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Derwent London£396.20M5.41-£359.76M£42.7645.58
CLS£132.10M1.42-£207.36M-£24.00N/A

Derwent London has a net margin of 11.97% compared to CLS's net margin of -72.29%. Derwent London's return on equity of 1.35% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Derwent London11.97% 1.35% 1.96%
CLS -72.29%-13.63%2.30%

Derwent London currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,956.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.40%. CLS has a consensus price target of GBX 48, suggesting a potential upside of 2.67%. Given CLS's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CLS is more favorable than Derwent London.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Derwent London
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
CLS
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Derwent London has a beta of 1.186, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CLS has a beta of 1.011, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Derwent London had 1 more articles in the media than CLS. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Derwent London and 1 mentions for CLS. Derwent London's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat CLS's score of 0.00 indicating that Derwent London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Derwent London
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

56.8% of Derwent London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of CLS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Derwent London shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 60.1% of CLS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Derwent London pays an annual dividend of GBX 81.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Derwent London pays out 190.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CLS pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Derwent London beats CLS on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Great Portland Estates?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Great Portland Estates (LON:GPE) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

CLS has a beta of 1.011, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Portland Estates has a beta of 0.913, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Great Portland Estates had 8 more articles in the media than CLS. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Great Portland Estates and 1 mentions for CLS. Great Portland Estates' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat CLS's score of 0.00 indicating that Great Portland Estates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Great Portland Estates
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

6.5% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of Great Portland Estates shares are held by institutional investors. 60.1% of CLS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Great Portland Estates shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Portland Estates has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CLS. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Portland Estates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CLS£132.10M1.42-£207.36M-£24.00N/A
Great Portland Estates£117.90M11.22£398.10M£38.108.60

CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Great Portland Estates pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. CLS pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Portland Estates pays out 20.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Great Portland Estates has a net margin of 131.04% compared to CLS's net margin of -72.29%. Great Portland Estates' return on equity of 7.41% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS-72.29% -13.63% 2.30%
Great Portland Estates 131.04%7.41%0.79%

CLS currently has a consensus price target of GBX 48, suggesting a potential upside of 2.67%. Great Portland Estates has a consensus price target of GBX 373, suggesting a potential upside of 13.79%. Given Great Portland Estates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Great Portland Estates is more favorable than CLS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Great Portland Estates
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Great Portland Estates beats CLS on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Urban Logistics REIT?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Urban Logistics REIT (LON:SHED) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

CLS presently has a consensus price target of GBX 48, indicating a potential upside of 2.67%. Given CLS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CLS is more favorable than Urban Logistics REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Urban Logistics REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Urban Logistics REIT has a net margin of 41.17% compared to CLS's net margin of -72.29%. Urban Logistics REIT's return on equity of 3.24% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS-72.29% -13.63% 2.30%
Urban Logistics REIT 41.17%3.24%2.62%

In the previous week, CLS had 1 more articles in the media than Urban Logistics REIT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CLS and 0 mentions for Urban Logistics REIT. CLS's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Urban Logistics REIT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CLS Neutral
Urban Logistics REIT Neutral

CLS has a beta of 1.011, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Urban Logistics REIT has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Urban Logistics REIT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CLS. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Urban Logistics REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CLS£132.10M1.42-£207.36M-£24.00N/A
Urban Logistics REIT£58.96M12.28£24.33M£5.2529.70

6.5% of CLS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of Urban Logistics REIT shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.1% of CLS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Urban Logistics REIT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Urban Logistics REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. CLS pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Urban Logistics REIT pays out 152.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

CLS beats Urban Logistics REIT on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CLS News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLI vs. The Competition

MetricCLSOffice REITs IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£187.69M£1.67B£5.54B£2.91B
Dividend Yield8.47%7.34%6.42%6.22%
P/E Ratio-1.9595.6428.72366.79
Price / Sales1.4275.19127.7783,772.69
Price / Cash5.6234.1534.2427.89
Price / Book0.220.671.866.72
Net Income-£207.36M-£44.97M-£64.10M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.95%-0.72%-0.58%11.89%
1 Month Performance-4.79%-3.75%-2.11%1.30%
1 Year Performance-17.12%144.00%8.83%21.51%

CLS Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLI
CLS
1.138 of 5 stars
GBX 46.75
-0.5%
GBX 48
+2.7%
-16.7%£187.69M£132.10MN/A118
WKP
Workspace Group
N/AGBX 362
+0.1%
GBX 415.50
+14.8%
-7.7%£697.39M£181.40MN/A293
RGL
Regional REIT
2.817 of 5 stars
GBX 94.40
+1.3%
GBX 140
+48.3%
-24.4%£153.01M-£11.01MN/AN/A
DLN
Derwent London
1.1909 of 5 stars
GBX 1,931
-2.0%
GBX 1,956.50
+1.3%
+17.1%£2.14B£396.20M13.46199
GPE
Great Portland Estates
3.5722 of 5 stars
GBX 325
-0.9%
GBX 388.22
+19.5%
+11.7%£1.31B£117.90M8.53134

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CLI) was last updated on 9/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners