Go Pro

CLS (CLI) Competitors

CLS logo
GBX 48.10 -1.10 (-2.24%)
As of 03:48 AM Eastern

CLI vs. WKP, RGL, DLN, GPE, and SHED

Should you buy CLS stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CLS with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CLS include Workspace Group (WKP), Regional REIT (RGL), Derwent London (DLN), Great Portland Estates (GPE), and Urban Logistics REIT (SHED). These companies are all part of the "real estate" sector.

How does CLS compare to Workspace Group?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Workspace Group (LON:WKP) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

CLS has a net margin of -36.01% compared to Workspace Group's net margin of -66.32%. CLS's return on equity of -6.67% beat Workspace Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS-36.01% -6.67% 2.30%
Workspace Group -66.32%-8.83%2.35%

8.3% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.3% of Workspace Group shares are held by institutional investors. 60.1% of CLS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Workspace Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CLS presently has a consensus price target of GBX 64, indicating a potential upside of 33.06%. Workspace Group has a consensus price target of GBX 440.50, indicating a potential upside of 34.87%. Given Workspace Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Workspace Group is more favorable than CLS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Workspace Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Workspace Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 28.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Workspace Group pays out -45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Workspace Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Workspace Group had 1 more articles in the media than CLS. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Workspace Group and 1 mentions for CLS. Workspace Group's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat CLS's score of 0.00 indicating that Workspace Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Workspace Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Workspace Group has higher revenue and earnings than CLS. Workspace Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CLS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CLS£139.70M1.37-£207.36M-£12.60N/A
Workspace Group£181.40M3.47-£192.71M-£62.60N/A

CLS has a beta of 1.001, suggesting that its share price is 0% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Workspace Group has a beta of 1.085, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Workspace Group beats CLS on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Regional REIT?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Regional REIT (LON:RGL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

CLS has a beta of 1.001, suggesting that its share price is 0% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional REIT has a beta of 0.609, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CLS had 1 more articles in the media than Regional REIT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CLS and 0 mentions for Regional REIT. Regional REIT's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CLS's score of 0.00 indicating that Regional REIT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CLS Neutral
Regional REIT Positive

8.3% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Regional REIT shares are held by institutional investors. 60.1% of CLS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Regional REIT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Regional REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional REIT pays out -96.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regional REIT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Regional REIT has a net margin of -20.80% compared to CLS's net margin of -36.01%. Regional REIT's return on equity of -4.99% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS-36.01% -6.67% 2.30%
Regional REIT -20.80%-4.99%3.19%

CLS currently has a consensus target price of GBX 64, indicating a potential upside of 33.06%. Regional REIT has a consensus target price of GBX 140, indicating a potential upside of 47.87%. Given Regional REIT's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Regional REIT is more favorable than CLS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Regional REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

CLS has higher revenue and earnings than Regional REIT. Regional REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CLS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CLS£139.70M1.37-£207.36M-£12.60N/A
Regional REIT-£11.01M-13.93-£258.36M-£10.10N/A

Summary

Regional REIT beats CLS on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Derwent London?

Derwent London (LON:DLN) and CLS (LON:CLI) are both real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

CLS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Derwent London. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Derwent London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Derwent London£388.70M5.66-£359.76M£143.5113.76
CLS£139.70M1.37-£207.36M-£12.60N/A

In the previous week, Derwent London had 1 more articles in the media than CLS. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Derwent London and 1 mentions for CLS. Derwent London's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat CLS's score of 0.00 indicating that Derwent London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Derwent London
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Derwent London has a beta of 1.185, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CLS has a beta of 1.001, meaning that its stock price is 0% more volatile than the broader market.

Derwent London presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,956.50, suggesting a potential downside of 0.94%. CLS has a consensus target price of GBX 64, suggesting a potential upside of 33.06%. Given CLS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CLS is more favorable than Derwent London.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Derwent London
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

56.8% of Derwent London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of CLS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Derwent London shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.1% of CLS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Derwent London has a net margin of 40.73% compared to CLS's net margin of -36.01%. Derwent London's return on equity of 4.48% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Derwent London40.73% 4.48% 1.96%
CLS -36.01%-6.67%2.30%

Derwent London pays an annual dividend of GBX 81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Derwent London pays out 56.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Derwent London beats CLS on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Great Portland Estates?

Great Portland Estates (LON:GPE) and CLS (LON:CLI) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Great Portland Estates currently has a consensus price target of GBX 388.22, indicating a potential upside of 17.08%. CLS has a consensus price target of GBX 64, indicating a potential upside of 33.06%. Given CLS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CLS is more favorable than Great Portland Estates.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Portland Estates
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Great Portland Estates has a net margin of 131.04% compared to CLS's net margin of -36.01%. Great Portland Estates' return on equity of 7.41% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Portland Estates131.04% 7.41% 0.79%
CLS -36.01%-6.67%2.30%

50.7% of Great Portland Estates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Great Portland Estates shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.1% of CLS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Great Portland Estates pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Great Portland Estates pays out 20.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Great Portland Estates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CLS. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Portland Estates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Portland Estates£117.90M11.35£398.10M£38.108.70
CLS£139.70M1.37-£207.36M-£12.60N/A

In the previous week, Great Portland Estates had 2 more articles in the media than CLS. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Great Portland Estates and 1 mentions for CLS. Great Portland Estates' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat CLS's score of 0.00 indicating that Great Portland Estates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Portland Estates
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Great Portland Estates has a beta of 0.911, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CLS has a beta of 1.001, meaning that its share price is 0% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Great Portland Estates beats CLS on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CLS compare to Urban Logistics REIT?

CLS (LON:CLI) and Urban Logistics REIT (LON:SHED) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Urban Logistics REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. CLS pays out -31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Urban Logistics REIT pays out 152.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CLS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CLS currently has a consensus target price of GBX 64, indicating a potential upside of 33.06%. Given CLS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CLS is more favorable than Urban Logistics REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CLS
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Urban Logistics REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Urban Logistics REIT has a net margin of 41.17% compared to CLS's net margin of -36.01%. Urban Logistics REIT's return on equity of 3.24% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CLS-36.01% -6.67% 2.30%
Urban Logistics REIT 41.17%3.24%2.62%

8.3% of CLS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of Urban Logistics REIT shares are held by institutional investors. 60.1% of CLS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Urban Logistics REIT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Urban Logistics REIT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CLS. CLS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Urban Logistics REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CLS£139.70M1.37-£207.36M-£12.60N/A
Urban Logistics REIT£58.96M12.28£24.33M£5.2529.70

In the previous week, CLS had 1 more articles in the media than Urban Logistics REIT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CLS and 0 mentions for Urban Logistics REIT. CLS's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Urban Logistics REIT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CLS Neutral
Urban Logistics REIT Neutral

CLS has a beta of 1.001, indicating that its stock price is 0% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Urban Logistics REIT has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CLS beats Urban Logistics REIT on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CLS News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLI vs. The Competition

MetricCLSREIT IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£191.49M£699.04M£2.00B£2.76B
Dividend Yield8.38%9.36%7.23%6.15%
P/E Ratio-3.822.7029.93369.56
Price / Sales1.37219.07409.9984,510.26
Price / Cash5.6263.0768.3727.87
Price / Book0.230.401.367.74
Net Income-£207.36M-£181.49M-£125.49M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.63%0.08%-0.23%-0.81%
1 Month Performance4.57%1.70%0.53%-1.04%
1 Year Performance-30.73%-8.10%-1.32%61.60%

CLS Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLI
CLS
3.0076 of 5 stars
GBX 48.10
-2.2%
GBX 64
+33.1%
-28.8%£191.49M£139.70MN/A118
WKP
Workspace Group
3.6552 of 5 stars
GBX 331
-4.1%
GBX 440.50
+33.1%
-17.7%£636.48M£181.40MN/A293
RGL
Regional REIT
3.0703 of 5 stars
GBX 94.50
+0.3%
GBX 140
+48.1%
-23.3%£153.17M-£11.01MN/AN/A
DLN
Derwent London
2.0813 of 5 stars
GBX 1,962
+0.2%
GBX 1,956.50
-0.3%
-1.4%£2.20B£388.70M13.67199
GPE
Great Portland Estates
4.5063 of 5 stars
GBX 335.07
+0.6%
GBX 388.22
+15.9%
-4.7%£1.35B£117.90M8.79134

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CLI) was last updated on 7/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners