Free Trial

Regional REIT (RGL) Competitors

Regional REIT logo
GBX 87.20 +0.30 (+0.35%)
As of 11:59 AM Eastern

RGL vs. CLI, DLN, GPE, WKP, and ESP

Should you buy Regional REIT stock or one of its competitors? Regional REIT's main competitors and comparable companies include CLS (CLI), Derwent London (DLN), Great Portland Estates (GPE), Workspace Group (WKP), and Empiric Student Property (ESP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "real estate" sector.

How does Regional REIT compare to CLS?

Regional REIT (LON:RGL) and CLS (LON:CLI) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

CLS has higher revenue and earnings than Regional REIT. Regional REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CLS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regional REIT-£6.08M-23.16-£258.36M-£7.00N/A
CLS£132.10M1.31-£207.36M-£24.00N/A

Regional REIT has a net margin of -15.53% compared to CLS's net margin of -72.29%. Regional REIT's return on equity of -3.61% beat CLS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regional REIT-15.53% -3.61% 3.19%
CLS -72.29%-13.63%2.30%

Regional REIT has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CLS has a beta of 1.011, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

CLS has a consensus price target of GBX 48, suggesting a potential upside of 11.76%. Given CLS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CLS is more favorable than Regional REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regional REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CLS
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Regional REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. CLS pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Regional REIT pays out -135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CLS pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regional REIT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

9.8% of Regional REIT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of CLS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Regional REIT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.1% of CLS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Regional REIT and Regional REIT both had 3 articles in the media. Regional REIT's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat CLS's score of 0.13 indicating that Regional REIT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regional REIT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CLS
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

CLS beats Regional REIT on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional REIT compare to Derwent London?

Derwent London (LON:DLN) and Regional REIT (LON:RGL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Regional REIT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Derwent London. Regional REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Derwent London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Derwent London£396.20M4.90-£359.76M£42.7641.27
Regional REIT-£6.08M-23.16-£258.36M-£7.00N/A

Derwent London has a beta of 1.186, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional REIT has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Derwent London pays an annual dividend of GBX 81.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Regional REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Derwent London pays out 190.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regional REIT pays out -135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional REIT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Regional REIT had 3 more articles in the media than Derwent London. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Regional REIT and 0 mentions for Derwent London. Regional REIT's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Derwent London's score of 0.67 indicating that Regional REIT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Derwent London Positive
Regional REIT Positive

56.8% of Derwent London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Regional REIT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Derwent London shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Regional REIT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Derwent London presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,889, indicating a potential upside of 7.04%. Given Derwent London's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Derwent London is more favorable than Regional REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Derwent London
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Regional REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Derwent London has a net margin of 11.97% compared to Regional REIT's net margin of -15.53%. Derwent London's return on equity of 1.35% beat Regional REIT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Derwent London11.97% 1.35% 1.96%
Regional REIT -15.53%-3.61%3.19%

Summary

Derwent London beats Regional REIT on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional REIT compare to Great Portland Estates?

Great Portland Estates (LON:GPE) and Regional REIT (LON:RGL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Great Portland Estates has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional REIT has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Great Portland Estates had 4 more articles in the media than Regional REIT. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Great Portland Estates and 3 mentions for Regional REIT. Regional REIT's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Great Portland Estates' score of 0.72 indicating that Regional REIT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Portland Estates
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Regional REIT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

50.9% of Great Portland Estates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Regional REIT shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Great Portland Estates shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Regional REIT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Portland Estates pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Regional REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Great Portland Estates pays out 20.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional REIT pays out -135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regional REIT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Great Portland Estates has a net margin of 131.04% compared to Regional REIT's net margin of -15.53%. Great Portland Estates' return on equity of 7.41% beat Regional REIT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Portland Estates131.04% 7.41% 0.79%
Regional REIT -15.53%-3.61%3.19%

Great Portland Estates presently has a consensus price target of GBX 373, indicating a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Great Portland Estates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Great Portland Estates is more favorable than Regional REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Portland Estates
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Regional REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Great Portland Estates has higher revenue and earnings than Regional REIT. Regional REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Portland Estates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Portland Estates£117.90M10.44£398.10M£38.108.01
Regional REIT-£6.08M-23.16-£258.36M-£7.00N/A

Summary

Great Portland Estates beats Regional REIT on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional REIT compare to Workspace Group?

Workspace Group (LON:WKP) and Regional REIT (LON:RGL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Regional REIT has a net margin of -15.53% compared to Workspace Group's net margin of -66.32%. Regional REIT's return on equity of -3.61% beat Workspace Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Workspace Group-66.32% -8.83% 2.35%
Regional REIT -15.53%-3.61%3.19%

Workspace Group has higher revenue and earnings than Regional REIT. Regional REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workspace Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Workspace Group£181.40M3.79-£192.71M-£62.60N/A
Regional REIT-£6.08M-23.16-£258.36M-£7.00N/A

40.9% of Workspace Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Regional REIT shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Workspace Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Regional REIT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Workspace Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 415.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.58%. Given Workspace Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Workspace Group is more favorable than Regional REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Workspace Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Regional REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Regional REIT had 3 more articles in the media than Workspace Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Regional REIT and 0 mentions for Workspace Group. Regional REIT's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Workspace Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Regional REIT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Workspace Group Neutral
Regional REIT Positive

Workspace Group has a beta of 1.087, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional REIT has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Workspace Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 28.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Regional REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Workspace Group pays out -45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional REIT pays out -135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regional REIT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Workspace Group beats Regional REIT on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional REIT compare to Empiric Student Property?

Regional REIT (LON:RGL) and Empiric Student Property (LON:ESP) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Empiric Student Property has a net margin of 40.86% compared to Regional REIT's net margin of -15.53%. Empiric Student Property's return on equity of 4.48% beat Regional REIT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regional REIT-15.53% -3.61% 3.19%
Empiric Student Property 40.86%4.48%2.26%

Regional REIT pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.9%. Empiric Student Property pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Regional REIT pays out -135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Empiric Student Property pays out 87.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regional REIT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Regional REIT has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Empiric Student Property has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Regional REIT had 3 more articles in the media than Empiric Student Property. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Regional REIT and 0 mentions for Empiric Student Property. Regional REIT's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Empiric Student Property's score of 0.00 indicating that Regional REIT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Regional REIT Positive
Empiric Student Property Neutral

9.8% of Regional REIT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.3% of Empiric Student Property shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Regional REIT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Empiric Student Property shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Empiric Student Property has higher revenue and earnings than Regional REIT. Regional REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empiric Student Property, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regional REIT-£6.08M-23.16-£258.36M-£7.00N/A
Empiric Student Property£85.60M6.21£58.84M£4.3018.60

Summary

Empiric Student Property beats Regional REIT on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Regional REIT News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RGL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RGL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RGL vs. The Competition

MetricRegional REITOffice REITs IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£141.34M£1.53B£5.14B£2.83B
Dividend Yield9.31%7.78%6.75%6.26%
P/E Ratio-12.4688.8627.01366.37
Price / Sales-23.2470.99117.2989,071.63
Price / Cash6.7433.6633.7127.89
Price / Book0.170.621.746.96
Net Income-£258.36M-£44.70M-£73.72M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.02%0.65%-1.29%-0.62%
1 Month Performance-6.24%-6.75%-5.06%-1.07%
1 Year Performance-24.31%141.92%6.08%22.84%

Regional REIT Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RGL
Regional REIT
N/AGBX 87.20
+0.3%
N/A-25.1%£141.34M-£6.08MN/AN/A
CLI
CLS
2.3158 of 5 stars
GBX 44.70
-0.9%
GBX 48
+7.4%
-30.0%£179.46M£132.10MN/A118
DLN
Derwent London
1.4807 of 5 stars
GBX 1,778
+0.6%
GBX 1,889
+6.2%
-0.3%£1.96B£396.20M41.58206
GPE
Great Portland Estates
3.752 of 5 stars
GBX 307.80
+2.3%
GBX 373
+21.2%
-7.3%£1.24B£117.90M8.08134
WKP
Workspace Group
N/AGBX 359
+0.3%
GBX 415.50
+15.7%
-11.5%£691.61M£181.40MN/A293

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:RGL) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners