Go Pro
→ Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free CLIG Stock Alerts

City of London Investment Group (CLIG) Competitors

City of London Investment Group logo
GBX 488 +6.78 (+1.41%)
As of 08:14 AM Eastern
Compare

CLIG vs. SLPE, VEIL, MUT, CORD, and APAX

Should you buy City of London Investment Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares City of London Investment Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with City of London Investment Group include Standard Life Private Equity Trust (SLPE), Vietnam Enterprise (VEIL), Murray Income Trust (MUT), Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), and Apax Global Alpha (APAX).

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

Standard Life Private Equity Trust (LON:SLPE) and City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Standard Life Private Equity Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled City of London Investment Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Standard Life Private Equity Trust Neutral
City of London Investment Group Neutral

17.9% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

City of London Investment Group has a net margin of 27.87% compared to Standard Life Private Equity Trust's net margin of 0.00%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Standard Life Private Equity TrustN/A N/A N/A
City of London Investment Group 27.87%14.29%7.65%

Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

City of London Investment Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. Standard Life Private Equity Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Standard Life Private Equity Trust£289.51M3.24N/A£186.203.28
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.21£15.02M£42.1011.59

Summary

City of London Investment Group beats Standard Life Private Equity Trust on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Vietnam Enterprise?

Vietnam Enterprise (LON:VEIL) and City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Vietnam Enterprise has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London Investment Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vietnam Enterprise. Vietnam Enterprise is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vietnam Enterprise£369.38M2.67-£4.24M£208.003.45
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.21£15.02M£42.1011.59

In the previous week, Vietnam Enterprise had 1 more articles in the media than City of London Investment Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Vietnam Enterprise and 0 mentions for City of London Investment Group. Vietnam Enterprise's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat City of London Investment Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Vietnam Enterprise is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vietnam Enterprise Positive
City of London Investment Group Neutral

Vietnam Enterprise has a net margin of 96.37% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. Vietnam Enterprise's return on equity of 19.70% beat City of London Investment Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vietnam Enterprise96.37% 19.70% -7.53%
City of London Investment Group 27.87%14.29%7.65%

37.0% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Vietnam Enterprise shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vietnam Enterprise beats City of London Investment Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Murray Income Trust?

City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) and Murray Income Trust (LON:MUT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.3% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murray Income Trust has a beta of 1.1767806, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Murray Income Trust had 1 more articles in the media than City of London Investment Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Murray Income Trust and 0 mentions for City of London Investment Group. Murray Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat City of London Investment Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Murray Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Investment Group Neutral
Murray Income Trust Positive

Murray Income Trust has a net margin of 93.90% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Murray Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London Investment Group27.87% 14.29% 7.65%
Murray Income Trust 93.90%12.73%4.65%

Murray Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than City of London Investment Group. Murray Income Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.21£15.02M£42.1011.59
Murray Income Trust£120.88M7.87£90.45M£119.708.52

City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Murray Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Murray Income Trust pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Murray Income Trust beats City of London Investment Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) and Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (LON:CORD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Cordiant Digital Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than City of London Investment Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cordiant Digital Infrastructure and 0 mentions for City of London Investment Group. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat City of London Investment Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cordiant Digital Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Investment Group Neutral
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure Positive

12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than City of London Investment Group. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.21£15.02M£42.1011.59
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure£163.11M5.84£846.28M£20.815.98

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a net margin of 432.24% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's return on equity of 14.55% beat City of London Investment Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London Investment Group27.87% 14.29% 7.65%
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure 432.24%14.55%5.89%

City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure beats City of London Investment Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) and City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Apax Global Alpha's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled City of London Investment Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Apax Global Alpha Neutral
City of London Investment Group Neutral

Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Apax Global Alpha has a net margin of 57.27% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Apax Global Alpha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Apax Global Alpha57.27% 0.67% 2.57%
City of London Investment Group 27.87%14.29%7.65%

Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

City of London Investment Group has higher revenue and earnings than Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.21£15.02M£42.1011.59

Summary

City of London Investment Group beats Apax Global Alpha on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get City of London Investment Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLIG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCity of London Investment GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£240.94M£5.46B£13.88B£2.83B
Dividend Yield6.80%7.51%5.95%6.15%
P/E Ratio11.5936.7928.68368.44
Price / Sales3.211,124.19464.9583,500.07
Price / Cash9.1884.8844.5027.89
Price / Book2.003.693.687.10
Net Income£15.02M£417.14M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.83%7.71%3.63%6.34%
1 Month Performance6.55%-1.12%0.15%0.22%
1 Year Performance35.56%5.79%13.06%64.16%

City of London Investment Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLIG
City of London Investment Group
N/AGBX 488
+1.4%		N/A+32.2%£240.94M£75.14M11.59120
SLPE
Standard Life Private Equity Trust
N/AGBX 618
-1.0%		N/A+11.5%£950.15M£289.51M3.32N/A
VEIL
Vietnam Enterprise
N/AGBX 689
-0.4%		N/A+2.6%£946.94M£369.38M3.31N/A
MUT
Murray Income Trust
N/AGBX 1,008
+0.9%		N/A+16.2%£940.61M£120.88M8.42147,000
CORD
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure
N/AGBX 122.01
+0.4%		N/A+29.7%£934.25M£163.11M5.86N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CLIG) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
“The unseen winner of the AI race” is not SpaceX
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before its historic run - says a tech firm labeled 'the unseen wi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel