Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free CLIG Stock Alerts

City of London Investment Group (CLIG) Competitors

City of London Investment Group logo
GBX 490 +5.00 (+1.03%)
As of 08/21/2026 11:55 AM Eastern
Compare

CLIG vs. CORD, MUT, SLPE, APAX, and USA

Should you buy City of London Investment Group stock or one of its competitors? City of London Investment Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), Murray Income Trust (MUT), Standard Life Private Equity Trust (SLPE), Apax Global Alpha (APAX), and Baillie Gifford US Growth (USA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (LON:CORD) and City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

39.2% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than City of London Investment Group. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure£163.11M5.80£846.28M£20.815.93
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.22£15.02M£42.1011.64

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a net margin of 432.24% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's return on equity of 14.55% beat City of London Investment Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure432.24% 14.55% 5.89%
City of London Investment Group 27.87%14.29%7.65%

In the previous week, Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled City of London Investment Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure Neutral
City of London Investment Group Neutral

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a beta of 0.819, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure beats City of London Investment Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Murray Income Trust?

Murray Income Trust (LON:MUT) and City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Murray Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Murray Income Trust pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Murray Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than City of London Investment Group. Murray Income Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Murray Income Trust£120.88M7.69£90.45M£119.708.32
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.22£15.02M£42.1011.64

10.3% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Murray Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Murray Income Trust has a beta of 1.177, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Murray Income Trust has a net margin of 93.90% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Murray Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Murray Income Trust93.90% 12.73% 4.65%
City of London Investment Group 27.87%14.29%7.65%

In the previous week, Murray Income Trust had 3 more articles in the media than City of London Investment Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Murray Income Trust and 0 mentions for City of London Investment Group. Murray Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat City of London Investment Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Murray Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Murray Income Trust Very Positive
City of London Investment Group Neutral

Summary

Murray Income Trust beats City of London Investment Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) and Standard Life Private Equity Trust (LON:SLPE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

City of London Investment Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. Standard Life Private Equity Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.22£15.02M£42.1011.64
Standard Life Private Equity Trust£289.51M3.17N/A£186.203.20

12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

City of London Investment Group has a net margin of 27.87% compared to Standard Life Private Equity Trust's net margin of 0.00%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London Investment Group27.87% 14.29% 7.65%
Standard Life Private Equity Trust N/A N/A N/A

City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, City of London Investment Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Standard Life Private Equity Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Investment Group Neutral
Standard Life Private Equity Trust Neutral

Summary

City of London Investment Group beats Standard Life Private Equity Trust on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Apax Global Alpha?

City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) and Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

City of London Investment Group has higher revenue and earnings than Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.22£15.02M£42.1011.64
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A

Apax Global Alpha has a net margin of 57.27% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Apax Global Alpha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London Investment Group27.87% 14.29% 7.65%
Apax Global Alpha 57.27%0.67%2.57%

12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, City of London Investment Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Apax Global Alpha'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Investment Group Neutral
Apax Global Alpha Neutral

City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

City of London Investment Group beats Apax Global Alpha on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London Investment Group compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) and Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a net margin of 88.83% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London Investment Group27.87% 14.29% 7.65%
Baillie Gifford US Growth 88.83%7.17%N/A

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford US Growth had 2 more articles in the media than City of London Investment Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth and 0 mentions for City of London Investment Group. Baillie Gifford US Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat City of London Investment Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Baillie Gifford US Growth is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Investment Group Neutral
Baillie Gifford US Growth Positive

Baillie Gifford US Growth has lower revenue, but higher earnings than City of London Investment Group. City of London Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.22£15.02M£42.1011.64
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M15.64£84.35M£19.8116.56

City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.631, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Baillie Gifford US Growth beats City of London Investment Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get City of London Investment Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLIG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCity of London Investment GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£239.46M£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield6.80%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio11.6439.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales3.221,262.20520.7583,481.74
Price / Cash9.1848.3130.7127.89
Price / Book2.013.752.847.19
Net Income£15.02M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.24%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance5.15%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance26.94%5.71%9.68%22.13%

City of London Investment Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLIG
City of London Investment Group
N/AGBX 490
+1.0%		N/A+26.9%£239.46M£75.14M11.64120
CORD
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure
N/AGBX 123
-0.1%		N/A+24.2%£941.83M£163.11M5.91N/A
MUT
Murray Income Trust
N/AGBX 1,000
-0.4%		N/A+9.8%£933.14M£120.88M8.35147,000
SLPE
Standard Life Private Equity Trust
N/AGBX 604
+1.0%		N/A+9.0%£928.63M£289.51M3.24N/A
APAX
Apax Global Alpha
N/AGBX 191.50
flat		N/AN/A£923.78M-£44.79MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CLIG) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel