Free Trial
→ Stop picking AI winners. Start collecting every Thursday (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free PCFT Stock Alerts

Polar Capital Global Financials (PCFT) Competitors

Polar Capital Global Financials logo
GBX 238.37 -0.13 (-0.06%)
As of 04:19 AM Eastern
Compare

PCFT vs. FSV, PIN, ASHM, BNKR, and ASL

Should you buy Polar Capital Global Financials stock or one of its competitors? Polar Capital Global Financials's main competitors and comparable companies include Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), Pantheon International (PIN), Ashmore Group (ASHM), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (ASL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) and Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Global Financials. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M4.37£223.72M£109.344.37
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.45£115.21M£25.269.44

In the previous week, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values both had 1 articles in the media. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Polar Capital Global Financials' score of 0.75 indicating that Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' net margin of 95.92%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values95.92% 25.87% 0.33%
Polar Capital Global Financials 611.08%12.90%12.59%

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.277, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.062, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Polar Capital Global Financials on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Pantheon International?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Pantheon International (LON:PIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.062, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pantheon International has a beta of 0.811, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials and Polar Capital Global Financials both had 1 articles in the media. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Pantheon International's score of 0.37 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pantheon International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pantheon International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Pantheon International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Pantheon International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Pantheon International's net margin of 47.67%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Pantheon International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
Pantheon International 47.67%2.08%1.05%

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pantheon International. Polar Capital Global Financials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pantheon International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.45£115.21M£25.269.44
Pantheon International£56.00M26.10£31.00M£10.5736.94

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Pantheon International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Ashmore Group?

Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) and Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Polar Capital Global Financials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ashmore Group. Polar Capital Global Financials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ashmore Group£144.30M10.15£94.67M£15.0414.96
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.45£115.21M£25.269.44

Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Ashmore Group pays out 112.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Ashmore Group had 3 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Global Financials. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ashmore Group and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ashmore Group's score of 0.02 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ashmore Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

43.3% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. 37.3% of Ashmore Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.062, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 73.84%. Ashmore Group's return on equity of 13.19% beat Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ashmore Group73.84% 13.19% 4.52%
Polar Capital Global Financials 611.08%12.90%12.59%

Ashmore Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 220, indicating a potential downside of 2.22%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Polar Capital Global Financials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Polar Capital Global Financials on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.062, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.613, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Global Financials. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.45£115.21M£25.269.44
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.27£218.53M£30.135.03

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, The Bankers Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Global Financials. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials. The Bankers Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Polar Capital Global Financials' score of 0.75 indicating that The Bankers Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
The Bankers Investment Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Polar Capital Global Financials' net margin of 611.08%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats Polar Capital Global Financials on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust (LON:ASL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials and Polar Capital Global Financials both had 1 articles in the media. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Polar Capital Global Financials' score of 0.75 indicating that Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 46.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polar Capital Global Financials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Global Financials. Polar Capital Global Financials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.45£115.21M£25.269.44
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust£94.68M14.90£255.01M£115.7816.06

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 63.47%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust 63.47%6.52%11.67%

Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.062, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust has a beta of 1.394, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.1% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust beats Polar Capital Global Financials on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Polar Capital Global Financials News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCFT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PCFT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPolar Capital Global FinancialsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£374.26M£5.06B£13.46B£2.83B
Dividend Yield4.14%7.64%6.11%6.26%
P/E Ratio9.4427.8622.79366.78
Price / Sales7.451,193.97488.1788,594.53
Price / Cash14.2947.4742.3427.83
Price / Book1.303.462.716.74
Net Income£115.21M£415.07M£1.32B£5.88B
7 Day Performance0.58%-0.62%-0.27%0.36%
1 Month Performance-5.41%-1.24%-1.91%-0.14%
1 Year Performance14.89%8.38%10.58%22.67%

Polar Capital Global Financials Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PCFT
Polar Capital Global Financials
N/AGBX 238.37
-0.1%		N/A+13.6%£374.26M£50.22M9.44N/A
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 461.50
-0.3%		N/A+18.6%£1.50B£354.63M4.2225,000
PIN
Pantheon International
0.5353 of 5 stars		GBX 388
+0.9%		N/A+10.7%£1.45B£56.00M36.71457
ASHM
Ashmore Group
1.3042 of 5 stars		GBX 217.60
+2.2%		GBX 220
+1.1%		+21.5%£1.42B£144.30M13.16272
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 154.80
+0.9%		N/A+17.8%£1.40B£322.40M5.14N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PCFT) was last updated on 10/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
I have publicly predicted six major American crashes, before each one happened.
Dr. Martin D. Weiss has publicly predicted six major American market crashes over his 55-year career, each war...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s issues shocking Executive Order on U.S. Dollar
Three days into his second term, President Trump signed Executive Order 14178 a move the press barely covered....
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Undiscovered Sub-$1 Gold-Silver Royalty Stock Takes Flight
A small-cap gold and silver royalty company is generating record revenue from producing mines, yet shares stil...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump goes "all-in" on Grand Canyon energy breakthrough
A drilling crew near the Grand Canyon uncovered a clean energy well producing nearly eight times the output of...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
A new income category is drawing serious money - here's why
Forbes recently called a new category of exchange-traded income funds a 'golden era,' and Bloomberg noted the ...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
INSANE DRONE FOOTAGE
New drone footage shows a mysterious factory rising at one of Elon Musk's most secure facilities, cleared and ...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
A simple options strategy that changed one trader's path
Ian Cooper went from a financially stressed, struggling journalist to a trader who discovered a repeatable opt...
TradeWins | Sponsoredtc pixel