Go Pro
→ My top 3 AI picks for the next decade (From The Oxford Club) (Ad)tc pixel Free PCFT Stock Alerts

Polar Capital Global Financials (PCFT) Competitors

Polar Capital Global Financials logo
GBX 250.50 -4.00 (-1.57%)
As of 11:56 AM Eastern
Compare

PCFT vs. SSON, FSV, PIN, SNN, and ASHM

Should you buy Polar Capital Global Financials stock or one of its competitors? Polar Capital Global Financials's main competitors and comparable companies include Smithson Investment Trust (SSON), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), Pantheon International (PIN), Sanne Group (SNN), and Ashmore Group (ASHM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Smithson Investment Trust?

Smithson Investment Trust (LON:SSON) and Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Smithson Investment Trust's net margin of -34.17%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Smithson Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smithson Investment Trust-34.17% -3.46% N/A
Polar Capital Global Financials 611.08%12.90%12.59%

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher revenue and earnings than Smithson Investment Trust. Smithson Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smithson Investment Trust-£58.23M-26.53-£42.74M-£53.80N/A
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.83£115.21M£25.269.92

Smithson Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Smithson Investment Trust pays out -1.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Smithson Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smithson Investment Trust Neutral
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Smithson Investment Trust on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) and Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.292, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.049, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Global Financials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Polar Capital Global Financials' score of 1.02 indicating that Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values Very Positive
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Global Financials. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M4.29£223.72M£109.344.29
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.83£115.21M£25.269.92

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' net margin of 95.92%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values95.92% 25.87% 0.33%
Polar Capital Global Financials 611.08%12.90%12.59%

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Polar Capital Global Financials on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Pantheon International?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Pantheon International (LON:PIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher revenue and earnings than Pantheon International. Polar Capital Global Financials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pantheon International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.83£115.21M£25.269.92
Pantheon International£43.18M35.55£31.00M£8.1947.80

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Pantheon International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pantheon International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pantheon International had 3 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Global Financials. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pantheon International and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Pantheon International's score of 0.28 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive
Pantheon International Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pantheon International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.049, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pantheon International has a beta of 0.814, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Pantheon International's net margin of 47.67%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Pantheon International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
Pantheon International 47.67%2.08%1.05%

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Pantheon International on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Sanne Group?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Sanne Group (LON:SNN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Sanne Group's net margin of 0.00%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Sanne Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
Sanne Group N/A N/A N/A

Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Sanne Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.10 per share. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanne Group pays out -2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Sanne Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive
Sanne Group Neutral

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sanne Group. Sanne Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.83£115.21M£25.269.92
Sanne Group£194.16M0.00N/A-£4.50N/A

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Sanne Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Ashmore Group?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Ashmore Group has a consensus price target of GBX 140, suggesting a potential downside of 35.96%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Polar Capital Global Financials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ashmore Group. Polar Capital Global Financials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.83£115.21M£25.269.92
Ashmore Group£135.90M10.46£94.67M£16.5413.22

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Ashmore Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive
Ashmore Group Neutral

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.049, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Ashmore Group's return on equity of 14.60% beat Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Polar Capital Global Financials on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Polar Capital Global Financials News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCFT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PCFT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPolar Capital Global FinancialsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£393.31M£5.61B£13.94B£2.90B
Dividend Yield1.85%7.39%5.88%6.17%
P/E Ratio9.9231.4426.09367.26
Price / Sales7.831,246.66518.4183,668.69
Price / Cash14.2948.1530.4027.89
Price / Book1.363.592.766.92
Net Income£115.21M£418.14M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.46%-0.61%-0.84%-0.15%
1 Month Performance1.62%1.88%1.92%2.81%
1 Year Performance19.57%5.10%10.03%21.71%

Polar Capital Global Financials Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PCFT
Polar Capital Global Financials
N/AGBX 250.50
-1.6%		N/A+21.5%£393.31M£50.22M9.92N/A
SSON
Smithson Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,438
flat		N/AN/A£1.54B-£58.23MN/AN/A
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 471
+0.3%		N/A+24.6%£1.53B£354.63M4.3125,000
PIN
Pantheon International
0.5855 of 5 stars		GBX 387.13
-0.7%		N/A+19.8%£1.50B£43.18M47.27455
SNN
Sanne Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.50B£194.16MN/A20,100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PCFT) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel