Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free PCFT Stock Alerts

Polar Capital Global Financials (PCFT) Competitors

Polar Capital Global Financials logo
GBX 252 +1.00 (+0.40%)
As of 12:01 PM Eastern
Compare

PCFT vs. BRW, PIN, SSON, FSV, and SNN

Should you buy Polar Capital Global Financials stock or one of its competitors? Polar Capital Global Financials's main competitors and comparable companies include Brewin Dolphin (BRW), Pantheon International (PIN), Smithson Investment Trust (SSON), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), and Sanne Group (SNN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Brewin Dolphin?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Brewin Dolphin (LON:BRW) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Brewin Dolphin pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.16 per share. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brewin Dolphin pays out 92.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Polar Capital Global Financials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials had 3 more articles in the media than Brewin Dolphin. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials and 0 mentions for Brewin Dolphin. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Brewin Dolphin's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive
Brewin Dolphin Neutral

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Brewin Dolphin's net margin of 0.00%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Brewin Dolphin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
Brewin Dolphin N/A N/A N/A

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brewin Dolphin. Brewin Dolphin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.88£115.21M£25.269.98
Brewin Dolphin£415.46M0.00N/A£0.17N/A

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Brewin Dolphin on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Pantheon International?

Pantheon International (LON:PIN) and Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

1.8% of Pantheon International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pantheon International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Pantheon International's net margin of 43.75%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Pantheon International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pantheon International43.75% 1.52% 1.05%
Polar Capital Global Financials 611.08%12.90%12.59%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pantheon International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Polar Capital Global Financials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher revenue and earnings than Pantheon International. Polar Capital Global Financials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pantheon International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pantheon International£43.18M36.60£31.00M£8.1949.21
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.88£115.21M£25.269.98

Pantheon International has a beta of 0.814, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials had 1 more articles in the media than Pantheon International. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials and 2 mentions for Pantheon International. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Pantheon International's score of 1.05 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pantheon International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Polar Capital Global Financials
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Pantheon International on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Smithson Investment Trust?

Smithson Investment Trust (LON:SSON) and Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials had 3 more articles in the media than Smithson Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials and 0 mentions for Smithson Investment Trust. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Smithson Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smithson Investment Trust Neutral
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive

Smithson Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Smithson Investment Trust pays out -1.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Smithson Investment Trust's net margin of -34.17%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Smithson Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smithson Investment Trust-34.17% -3.46% N/A
Polar Capital Global Financials 611.08%12.90%12.59%

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher revenue and earnings than Smithson Investment Trust. Smithson Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smithson Investment Trust-£58.23M-26.53-£42.74M-£53.80N/A
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.88£115.21M£25.269.98

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Smithson Investment Trust on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' net margin of 95.92%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values 95.92%25.87%0.33%

Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials had 3 more articles in the media than Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials and 0 mentions for Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values Neutral

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Global Financials. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.88£115.21M£25.269.98
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M4.33£223.72M£109.344.33

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Polar Capital Global Financials compare to Sanne Group?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Sanne Group (LON:SNN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Sanne Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.10 per share. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanne Group pays out -2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sanne Group. Sanne Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£50.22M7.88£115.21M£25.269.98
Sanne Group£194.16M0.00N/A-£4.50N/A

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 611.08% compared to Sanne Group's net margin of 0.00%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 12.90% beat Sanne Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials611.08% 12.90% 12.59%
Sanne Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Polar Capital Global Financials had 3 more articles in the media than Sanne Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials and 0 mentions for Sanne Group. Polar Capital Global Financials' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Sanne Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Global Financials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials Positive
Sanne Group Neutral

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Sanne Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Polar Capital Global Financials News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCFT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PCFT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPolar Capital Global FinancialsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£395.67M£5.60B£14.04B£2.88B
Dividend Yield1.88%7.40%5.89%6.09%
P/E Ratio9.9838.1329.21368.35
Price / Sales7.881,237.99511.6583,691.32
Price / Cash14.2948.2838.6827.89
Price / Book1.373.703.687.32
Net Income£115.21M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.40%0.47%0.00%1.51%
1 Month Performance4.13%0.41%0.95%2.50%
1 Year Performance18.31%8.01%13.24%73.97%

Polar Capital Global Financials Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PCFT
Polar Capital Global Financials
N/AGBX 252
+0.4%		N/A+18.4%£395.67M£50.22M9.98N/A
BRW
Brewin Dolphin
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.56B£415.46M3,029.412,186
PIN
Pantheon International
1.7413 of 5 stars		GBX 395
+0.4%		N/A+23.3%£1.55B£43.18M48.23455
SSON
Smithson Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,438
flat		N/AN/A£1.54B-£58.23MN/AN/A
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 463.50
-0.3%		N/A+24.5%£1.51B£354.63M4.2425,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PCFT) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel