Go Pro

HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE) Competitors

HarbourVest Global Private Equity logo
GBX 3,464.96 +34.96 (+1.02%)
As of 07:58 AM Eastern

HVPE vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy HarbourVest Global Private Equity stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares HarbourVest Global Private Equity with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with HarbourVest Global Private Equity include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT).

How does HarbourVest Global Private Equity compare to Schroders?

HarbourVest Global Private Equity (LON:HVPE) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. HarbourVest Global Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HarbourVest Global Private Equity£344.77M7.01£12.26M£457.007.58
Schroders£3.51B2.62£355.50M£43.5013.56

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a net margin of 168.07% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.94%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HarbourVest Global Private Equity168.07% 7.85% 2.14%
Schroders 19.94%15.55%1.86%

In the previous week, Schroders had 2 more articles in the media than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Schroders and 0 mentions for HarbourVest Global Private Equity. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
HarbourVest Global Private Equity Neutral
Schroders Positive

Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, suggesting a potential downside of 23.14%. Given Schroders' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than HarbourVest Global Private Equity.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a beta of 0.433, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.081, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

20.3% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Schroders beats HarbourVest Global Private Equity on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HarbourVest Global Private Equity compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and HarbourVest Global Private Equity (LON:HVPE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. HarbourVest Global Private Equity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M&G£21.71B0.40£166.98M£12.3029.32
HarbourVest Global Private Equity£344.77M7.01£12.26M£457.007.58

M&G presently has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, indicating a potential upside of 87.98%. Given M&G's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than HarbourVest Global Private Equity.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a net margin of 168.07% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. M&G's return on equity of 9.49% beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M&G1.73% 9.49% 0.40%
HarbourVest Global Private Equity 168.07%7.85%2.14%

In the previous week, M&G had 2 more articles in the media than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for M&G and 0 mentions for HarbourVest Global Private Equity. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
M&G Positive
HarbourVest Global Private Equity Neutral

42.9% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.3% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

M&G has a beta of 0.941, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a beta of 0.433, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

M&G beats HarbourVest Global Private Equity on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HarbourVest Global Private Equity compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

HarbourVest Global Private Equity (LON:HVPE) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

20.3% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Polar Capital Technology Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HarbourVest Global Private Equity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HarbourVest Global Private Equity£344.77M7.01£12.26M£457.007.58
Polar Capital Technology Trust£3.76B2.00£1.20B£330.422.05

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a beta of 0.433, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.8378958, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to HarbourVest Global Private Equity's net margin of 168.07%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HarbourVest Global Private Equity168.07% 7.85% 2.14%
Polar Capital Technology Trust 249.53%55.87%20.70%

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust had 1 more articles in the media than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust and 0 mentions for HarbourVest Global Private Equity. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
HarbourVest Global Private Equity Neutral
Polar Capital Technology Trust Positive

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats HarbourVest Global Private Equity on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HarbourVest Global Private Equity compare to Pershing Square?

HarbourVest Global Private Equity (LON:HVPE) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a net margin of 168.07% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HarbourVest Global Private Equity168.07% 7.85% 2.14%
Pershing Square 94.13%16.97%11.83%

In the previous week, HarbourVest Global Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pershing Square'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
HarbourVest Global Private Equity Neutral
Pershing Square Neutral

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HarbourVest Global Private Equity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HarbourVest Global Private Equity£344.77M7.01£12.26M£457.007.58
Pershing Square£2.57B2.68£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.80

20.3% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a beta of 0.433, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Pershing Square
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Pershing Square beats HarbourVest Global Private Equity on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HarbourVest Global Private Equity compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and HarbourVest Global Private Equity (LON:HVPE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
F&C Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HarbourVest Global Private Equity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.44£935.32M£75.804.52
HarbourVest Global Private Equity£344.77M7.01£12.26M£457.007.58

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.3% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, F&C Investment Trust had 3 more articles in the media than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for F&C Investment Trust and 0 mentions for HarbourVest Global Private Equity. F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's score of 0.00 indicating that F&C Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust Very Positive
HarbourVest Global Private Equity Neutral

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a net margin of 168.07% compared to F&C Investment Trust's net margin of 105.66%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 11.28% beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust105.66% 11.28% 10.80%
HarbourVest Global Private Equity 168.07%7.85%2.14%

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.795, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a beta of 0.433, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats HarbourVest Global Private Equity on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HarbourVest Global Private Equity News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HVPE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HVPE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HVPE vs. The Competition

MetricHarbourVest Global Private EquityCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.42B£5.56B£14.04B£2.85B
Dividend YieldN/A7.47%5.93%6.13%
P/E Ratio7.5836.9928.90368.50
Price / Sales7.011,124.26468.4583,557.39
Price / Cash6.3348.2238.6127.89
Price / Book0.693.713.737.18
Net Income£12.26M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.50%1.70%1.50%1.01%
1 Month Performance3.71%-0.10%1.31%0.70%
1 Year Performance29.53%7.19%13.62%74.83%

HarbourVest Global Private Equity Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HVPE
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
N/AGBX 3,464.96
+1.0%
N/A+28.5%£2.42B£344.77M7.58N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.7504 of 5 stars
GBX 588.50
+0.0%
GBX 453.33
-23.0%
+52.1%£9.18B£3.25B17.516,438
MNG
M&G
3.6446 of 5 stars
GBX 359.60
+1.0%
GBX 677.86
+88.5%
+39.9%£8.57B£21.71B29.246,101
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 637.50
+4.3%
N/A+69.4%£7.06B£2.14B3.38120
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,754
+0.9%
N/A-4.2%£6.57B£2.57B2.67N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HVPE) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners