Go Pro

Brunner (BUT) Competitors

Brunner logo
GBX 1,510.12 +0.12 (+0.01%)
As of 07/22/2026 11:58 AM Eastern

BUT vs. BPT, HICL, INPP, MNKS, and ATT

Should you buy Brunner stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Brunner with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Brunner include Bridgepoint Group (BPT), HICL Infrastructure (HICL), International Public Partnerships (INPP), Monks (MNKS), and Allianz Technology Trust (ATT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Brunner compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Brunner has a net margin of 94.80% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Brunner's return on equity of 8.72% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group4.18% 2.71% 3.47%
Brunner 94.80%8.72%11.63%

Brunner has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bridgepoint Group. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£476M5.95£45.58M£4.9066.00
Brunner£57.55M11.28£105.32M£128.4811.75

Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Bridgepoint Group pays out 189.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

27.1% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.368, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.8294022, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 3 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 4 mentions for Brunner. Brunner's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Bridgepoint Group's score of 0.37 indicating that Brunner is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brunner
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Bridgepoint Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 405, indicating a potential upside of 25.23%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Brunner.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Brunner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Brunner on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to HICL Infrastructure?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

28.5% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunner has a net margin of 94.80% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 88.60%. HICL Infrastructure's return on equity of 8.82% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure88.60% 8.82% 0.58%
Brunner 94.80%8.72%11.63%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Brunner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.49655584, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.8294022, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Brunner has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HICL Infrastructure. HICL Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M9.10£101.36M£13.809.80
Brunner£57.55M11.28£105.32M£128.4811.75

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 3 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 4 mentions for Brunner. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Brunner's score of 1.02 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Brunner
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Brunner beats HICL Infrastructure on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to International Public Partnerships?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Brunner had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Brunner and 3 mentions for International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Brunner's score of 1.02 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunner
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
International Public Partnerships
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

5.1% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunner has higher earnings, but lower revenue than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£57.55M11.28£105.32M£128.4811.75
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.44£43.53M£14.289.89

Brunner has a beta of 0.8294022, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.359, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 9.61% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner94.80% 8.72% 11.63%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Brunner beats International Public Partnerships on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to Monks?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner94.80% 8.72% 11.63%
Monks 96.74%24.22%9.21%

In the previous week, Monks had 5 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Monks and 4 mentions for Brunner. Brunner's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Monks' score of 0.57 indicating that Brunner is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunner
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Monks
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Brunner has a beta of 0.8294022, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

5.1% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Monks has higher revenue and earnings than Brunner. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£57.55M11.28£105.32M£128.4811.75
Monks£635.93M3.87£589.71M£368.554.33

Summary

Monks beats Brunner on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to Allianz Technology Trust?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Allianz Technology Trust (LON:ATT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Brunner had 4 more articles in the media than Allianz Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Brunner and 0 mentions for Allianz Technology Trust. Allianz Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Brunner's score of 1.02 indicating that Allianz Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunner Positive
Allianz Technology Trust Positive

Allianz Technology Trust has a net margin of 96.52% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. Allianz Technology Trust's return on equity of 21.46% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner94.80% 8.72% 11.63%
Allianz Technology Trust 96.52%21.46%22.44%

Brunner has a beta of 0.8294022, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allianz Technology Trust has a beta of 0.68265253, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

5.1% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Allianz Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Allianz Technology Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Allianz Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Brunner. Allianz Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£57.55M11.28£105.32M£128.4811.75
Allianz Technology Trust£409.28M5.77£502.74M£109.396.38

Summary

Allianz Technology Trust beats Brunner on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brunner News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BUT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BUT vs. The Competition

MetricBrunnerAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£649.31M£2.46B£6.17B£2.88B
Dividend Yield1.80%6.02%5.25%6.16%
P/E Ratio11.7561.7429.54368.27
Price / Sales11.281,766.111,127.5684,379.67
Price / Cash110.5760.50114.2927.89
Price / Book1.091.316.597.61
Net Income£105.32M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.27%-0.30%-0.24%0.38%
1 Month Performance2.59%0.21%0.10%0.27%
1 Year Performance6.05%6.77%13.77%67.66%

Brunner Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BUT
Brunner
N/AGBX 1,510.12
+0.0%
N/A+6.9%£649.31M£57.55M11.75N/A
BPT
Bridgepoint Group
2.8222 of 5 stars
GBX 292.20
+1.9%
GBX 385
+31.8%
+2.0%£2.56B£476M59.63391
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
1.7018 of 5 stars
GBX 134.60
-0.1%
N/A+9.6%£2.51B£277.40M9.75N/A
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 140
+0.3%
N/A+11.5%£2.51B£267.76M9.80N/A
MNKS
Monks
N/AGBX 1,626
-0.6%
N/A+21.3%£2.51B£635.93M4.41N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BUT) was last updated on 7/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners