Go Pro

Brunner (BUT) Competitors

Brunner logo
GBX 1,556 +6.00 (+0.39%)
As of 12:20 PM Eastern

BUT vs. QLT, HICL, MNKS, INPP, and AJB

Should you buy Brunner stock or one of its competitors? Brunner's main competitors and comparable companies include Quilter (QLT), HICL Infrastructure (HICL), Monks (MNKS), International Public Partnerships (INPP), and AJ Bell (AJB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Brunner compare to Quilter?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Brunner has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quilter. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£105.27M6.35£105.32M£238.786.52
Quilter£13.46B0.19£49.61M£8.6021.60

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Brunner pays out 10.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Brunner and Brunner both had 1 articles in the media. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Brunner's score of 0.45 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunner
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quilter
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

5.1% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Quilter shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quilter has a consensus price target of GBX 210.86, suggesting a potential upside of 13.49%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quilter is more favorable than Brunner.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Brunner has a beta of 0.831, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.824, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Brunner has a net margin of 96.94% compared to Quilter's net margin of 0.88%. Brunner's return on equity of 15.14% beat Quilter's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner96.94% 15.14% 11.63%
Quilter 0.88%8.39%0.21%

Summary

Brunner beats Quilter on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Brunner pays out 10.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Brunner has a net margin of 96.94% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 88.60%. Brunner's return on equity of 15.14% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner96.94% 15.14% 11.63%
HICL Infrastructure 88.60%8.82%0.58%

Brunner has a beta of 0.831, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.515, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

5.1% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunner has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HICL Infrastructure. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£105.27M6.35£105.32M£238.786.52
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M8.96£101.36M£13.809.68

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Brunner had 1 more articles in the media than HICL Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brunner and 0 mentions for HICL Infrastructure. Brunner's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat HICL Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Brunner is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunner Neutral
HICL Infrastructure Neutral

Summary

Brunner beats HICL Infrastructure on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to Monks?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

Brunner has a net margin of 96.94% compared to Monks' net margin of 96.74%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner96.94% 15.14% 11.63%
Monks 96.74%24.22%9.21%

5.1% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunner has a beta of 0.831, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.903, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Monks had 2 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Monks and 1 mentions for Brunner. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Brunner's score of 0.45 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunner
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Monks
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Monks has higher revenue and earnings than Brunner. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£105.27M6.35£105.32M£238.786.52
Monks£635.93M3.90£589.71M£368.554.38

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Brunner pays out 10.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Monks beats Brunner on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to International Public Partnerships?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

5.1% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Brunner pays out 10.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Brunner has a beta of 0.831, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brunner had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brunner and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. Brunner's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that Brunner is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunner Neutral
International Public Partnerships Neutral

Brunner has higher earnings, but lower revenue than International Public Partnerships. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£105.27M6.35£105.32M£238.786.52
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.16£43.53M£14.289.59

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Brunner's net margin of 96.94%. Brunner's return on equity of 15.14% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner96.94% 15.14% 11.63%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Summary

Brunner beats International Public Partnerships on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to AJ Bell?

AJ Bell (LON:AJB) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

AJ Bell currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,265, suggesting a potential upside of 112.78%. Given AJ Bell's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AJ Bell is more favorable than Brunner.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AJ Bell
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Brunner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

AJ Bell pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. AJ Bell pays out 47.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunner pays out 10.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, AJ Bell had 3 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for AJ Bell and 1 mentions for Brunner. Brunner's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat AJ Bell's score of 0.45 indicating that Brunner is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AJ Bell
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brunner
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

48.5% of AJ Bell shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.4% of AJ Bell shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brunner has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AJ Bell. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AJ Bell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AJ Bell£347.57M6.74£81.11M£30.3319.60
Brunner£105.27M6.35£105.32M£238.786.52

Brunner has a net margin of 96.94% compared to AJ Bell's net margin of 35.42%. AJ Bell's return on equity of 57.35% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AJ Bell35.42% 57.35% 36.07%
Brunner 96.94%15.14%11.63%

AJ Bell has a beta of 0.866, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.831, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

AJ Bell beats Brunner on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brunner News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BUT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BUT vs. The Competition

MetricBrunnerCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£668.58M£5.57B£13.96B£2.89B
Dividend Yield1.71%7.38%5.90%6.17%
P/E Ratio6.5231.3925.99364.82
Price / Sales6.351,296.54530.5783,676.90
Price / Cash110.5748.0437.9527.89
Price / Book1.121.952.116.75
Net Income£105.32M£418.14M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.14%-0.74%-0.45%-0.78%
1 Month Performance1.17%1.75%2.24%2.38%
1 Year Performance10.20%7.04%11.79%22.66%

Brunner Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BUT
Brunner
N/AGBX 1,556
+0.4%
N/A+8.1%£668.58M£105.27M6.52N/A
QLT
Quilter
2.3279 of 5 stars
GBX 194.10
flat
GBX 210.86
+8.6%
+15.5%£2.62B£13.46B22.572,983
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
1.1914 of 5 stars
GBX 137.40
flat
N/A+12.0%£2.56B£277.40M9.96N/A
MNKS
Monks
N/AGBX 1,636
flat
N/A+13.8%£2.51B£635.93M4.44N/A
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 140
flat
N/A+14.6%£2.51B£267.76M9.80N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BUT) was last updated on 9/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners