Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Brunner (BUT) Competitors

Brunner logo
GBX 1,475.04 -12.96 (-0.87%)
As of 12:04 PM Eastern

BUT vs. QLT, MNKS, INPP, HICL, and BPT

Should you buy Brunner stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Brunner with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Brunner include Quilter (QLT), Monks (MNKS), International Public Partnerships (INPP), HICL Infrastructure (HICL), and Bridgepoint Group (BPT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Brunner compare to Quilter?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Quilter had 2 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Brunner. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Brunner's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunner Neutral
Quilter Very Positive

Brunner has a beta of 0.565, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.802, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Brunner has a net margin of 94.80% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Brunner's return on equity of 8.72% beat Quilter's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner94.80% 8.72% 11.63%
Quilter 1.28%8.35%0.21%

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Quilter has a consensus price target of GBX 201.57, indicating a potential upside of 5.87%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quilter is more favorable than Brunner.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

5.3% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Quilter shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brunner has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quilter. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£57.55M11.04£105.32M£128.4811.48
Quilter£9.34B0.28£49.61M£8.6022.14

Summary

Quilter beats Brunner on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to Monks?

Brunner (LON:BUT) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

5.3% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Monks shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunner has a beta of 0.565, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.93763095, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Monks had 14 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for Brunner. Brunner's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Monks' score of -0.25 indicating that Brunner is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brunner Neutral
Monks Neutral

Monks has a net margin of 95.29% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. Monks' return on equity of 19.34% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunner94.80% 8.72% 11.63%
Monks 95.29%19.34%9.21%

Monks has higher revenue and earnings than Brunner. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunner£57.55M11.04£105.32M£128.4811.48
Monks£488.88M5.11£589.71M£280.985.64

Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Monks beats Brunner on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to International Public Partnerships?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 9.61% beat Brunner's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
Brunner 94.80%8.72%11.63%

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Brunner has lower revenue, but higher earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M8.77£43.53M£14.289.16
Brunner£57.55M11.04£105.32M£128.4811.48

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 2 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for Brunner. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Brunner's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Positive
Brunner Neutral

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.365, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.565, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Brunner beats International Public Partnerships on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to HICL Infrastructure?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

28.7% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5069286, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.565, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 133.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 4 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Brunner. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Brunner's score of 0.00 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure Positive
Brunner Neutral

Brunner has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure£125.10M19.23£101.36M£6.2020.58
Brunner£57.55M11.04£105.32M£128.4811.48

Brunner has a net margin of 94.80% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 43.50%. Brunner's return on equity of 8.72% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure43.50% 3.99% 0.58%
Brunner 94.80%8.72%11.63%

Summary

Brunner beats HICL Infrastructure on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brunner compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Brunner has a net margin of 94.80% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 7.68%. Brunner's return on equity of 8.72% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group7.68% 4.25% 3.47%
Brunner 94.80%8.72%11.63%

Bridgepoint Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 385, indicating a potential upside of 49.57%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Brunner.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Brunner
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Brunner'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group Neutral
Brunner Neutral

Brunner has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bridgepoint Group. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£476M4.73£45.58M£4.9052.53
Brunner£57.55M11.04£105.32M£128.4811.48

Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Bridgepoint Group pays out 189.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.358, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.565, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

25.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Brunner shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Bridgepoint Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bridgepoint Group and Brunner tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brunner News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BUT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BUT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BUT vs. The Competition

MetricBrunnerAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£635.49M£2.35B£5.83B£2.79B
Dividend Yield1.71%5.97%5.25%6.16%
P/E Ratio11.4825.2615.88365.60
Price / Sales11.041,999.691,259.6987,567.35
Price / Cash110.5760.1791.7827.89
Price / Book1.061.366.587.63
Net Income£105.32M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.34%-0.34%-0.01%-0.02%
1 Month Performance-1.53%1.47%1.27%1.06%
1 Year Performance5.97%12.31%18.99%85.15%

Brunner Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BUT
Brunner
N/AGBX 1,475.04
-0.9%
N/A+6.7%£635.49M£57.55M11.48N/A
QLT
Quilter
2.9249 of 5 stars
GBX 184.80
+0.7%
GBX 201.57
+9.1%
+23.0%£2.54B£9.34B21.492,983
MNKS
Monks
N/AGBX 1,568.77
-0.5%
N/A+27.5%£2.47B£488.88M5.58N/A
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 132.61
-0.9%
N/A+13.9%£2.38B£267.76M9.29N/A
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
N/AGBX 125.23
-1.1%
N/A+9.2%£2.36B£125.10M20.20N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BUT) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners