Free Trial

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (CYBG) Competitors

GBX 13.31 +0.03 (+0.20%)
As of 05:34 AM Eastern

CYBG vs. CCFS, CIHL, IL0A, POLR, and BGSC

Should you buy VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc include Charter Court Financial Services Grp (CCFS), Caribbean Investment (CIHL), Permanent TSB Group (IL0A), Polar Capital (POLR), and BMO Global Smaller Companies (BGSC).

How does VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc compare to Charter Court Financial Services Grp?

Charter Court Financial Services Grp (LON:CCFS) and VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (LON:CYBG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charter Court Financial Services Grp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charter Court Financial Services Grp£221.10M0.00N/A£46.30N/A
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc£1.24B0.15N/A-£7.10N/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Charter Court Financial Services GrpN/A N/A N/A
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc N/A N/A N/A

Charter Court Financial Services Grp pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.09 per share. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Charter Court Financial Services Grp pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Charter Court Financial Services Grp's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc'saverage media sentiment score.

Summary

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc beats Charter Court Financial Services Grp on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc compare to Caribbean Investment?

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (LON:CYBG) and Caribbean Investment (LON:CIHL) are both small-cap banks - regional - europe industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A AccN/A N/A N/A
Caribbean Investment N/A N/A N/A

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caribbean Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc£1.24B0.15N/A-£7.10N/A
Caribbean Investment£29.20M0.00N/A£8.60N/A

In the previous week, VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Caribbean Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc Neutral
Caribbean Investment Neutral

Summary

Caribbean Investment beats VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc compare to Permanent TSB Group?

Permanent TSB Group (LON:IL0A) and VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (LON:CYBG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Permanent TSB Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Permanent TSB Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Permanent TSB Group£406M0.00£213M£0.43N/A
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc£1.24B0.15N/A-£7.10N/A

Permanent TSB Group has a net margin of 54.93% compared to VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's net margin of 0.00%. Permanent TSB Group's return on equity of 10.65% beat VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Permanent TSB Group54.93% 10.65% 0.93%
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc N/A N/A N/A

5.4% of Permanent TSB Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 79.1% of Permanent TSB Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Permanent TSB Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Permanent TSB Group Neutral
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc Neutral

Summary

Permanent TSB Group beats VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc compare to Polar Capital?

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (LON:CYBG) and Polar Capital (LON:POLR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Polar Capital has a net margin of 16.62% compared to VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's net margin of 0.00%. Polar Capital's return on equity of 30.00% beat VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A AccN/A N/A N/A
Polar Capital 16.62%30.00%14.85%

Polar Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 848.33, indicating a potential downside of 2.71%. Given Polar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Polar Capital is more favorable than VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Polar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

32.0% of Polar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Polar Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Polar Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Polar Capital pays out 115.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Polar Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc£1.24B0.15N/A-£7.10N/A
Polar Capital£222.94M3.70£41.05M£40.0021.80

In the previous week, VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Polar Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc Neutral
Polar Capital Neutral

Summary

Polar Capital beats VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc compare to BMO Global Smaller Companies?

BMO Global Smaller Companies (LON:BGSC) and VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (LON:CYBG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BMO Global Smaller CompaniesN/A N/A N/A
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc N/A N/A N/A

BMO Global Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.02 per share. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. BMO Global Smaller Companies pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BMO Global Smaller Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BMO Global Smaller Companies£303.85M0.00N/A£50.70N/A
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc£1.24B0.15N/A-£7.10N/A

In the previous week, BMO Global Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc'saverage media sentiment score.

Summary

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc beats BMO Global Smaller Companies on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CYBG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CYBG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CYBG vs. The Competition

MetricVanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A AccBanks IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£190.96M£190.96M£13.84B£2.82B
Dividend Yield2.25%2.25%5.75%6.18%
P/E Ratio-1.87N/A20.18367.05
Price / Sales0.1515.42145.7486,551.12
Price / Cash0.130.1319.5027.87
Price / Book0.040.042.248.00
Net IncomeN/AN/A£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.40%-0.08%1.35%1.04%
1 Month Performance4.29%0.86%2.24%2.09%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-2.46%12.63%76.31%

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CYBG
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc
N/AGBX 13.31
+0.2%
N/AN/A£190.96M£1.24BN/A5,762
CCFS
Charter Court Financial Services Grp
N/AN/AN/AN/A£713.62M£221.10M6.37676
CIHL
Caribbean Investment
N/AN/AN/AN/A£35.27M£29.20M3.08N/A
IL0A
Permanent TSB Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£12.99M£406M5.532,236
POLR
Polar Capital
1.6143 of 5 stars
GBX 822
flat
GBX 848.33
+3.2%
+97.5%£776.91M£222.94M20.55135

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CYBG) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners