Elementis (ELM) Competitors

57.5% of Elementis shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.5% of Victrex shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Elementis shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Victrex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Elementis currently has a consensus target price of GBX 200, indicating a potential upside of 27.23%. Victrex has a consensus target price of GBX 674.29, indicating a potential downside of 4.49%. Given Elementis' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Elementis is more favorable than Victrex.

Victrex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Elementis. Victrex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Elementis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Elementis pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Victrex pays an annual dividend of GBX 59.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Elementis pays out -56.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Victrex pays out -265.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Victrex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Victrex has a net margin of -6.70% compared to Elementis' net margin of -7.58%. Victrex's return on equity of -4.95% beat Elementis' return on equity.

Elementis has a beta of 0.919, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victrex has a beta of 0.774, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Victrex had 4 more articles in the media than Elementis. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Victrex and 1 mentions for Elementis. Victrex's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Elementis' score of 0.67 indicating that Victrex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Elementis had 1 more articles in the media than Scapa Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Elementis and 0 mentions for Scapa Group. Elementis' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Scapa Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Elementis is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Scapa Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Elementis. Elementis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scapa Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Scapa Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Elementis' net margin of -7.58%. Scapa Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Elementis' return on equity.

Elementis presently has a consensus price target of GBX 200, indicating a potential upside of 27.23%. Given Elementis' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Elementis is more favorable than Scapa Group.

57.5% of Elementis shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Elementis shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Elementis has a beta of 0.919, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Essentra has a beta of 0.829, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Essentra has a net margin of 0.70% compared to Elementis' net margin of -7.58%. Essentra's return on equity of 0.79% beat Elementis' return on equity.

Essentra has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Elementis. Elementis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essentra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Elementis currently has a consensus target price of GBX 200, indicating a potential upside of 27.23%. Essentra has a consensus target price of GBX 150, indicating a potential upside of 79.00%. Given Essentra's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Essentra is more favorable than Elementis.

57.5% of Elementis shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.5% of Essentra shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Elementis shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Essentra shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Elementis pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Essentra pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Elementis pays out -56.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Essentra pays out 335.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Elementis and Elementis both had 1 articles in the media. Essentra's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Elementis' score of 0.67 indicating that Essentra is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Elementis had 1 more articles in the media than Zotefoams. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Elementis and 0 mentions for Zotefoams. Elementis' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Zotefoams' score of 0.00 indicating that Elementis is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Zotefoams has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Elementis. Elementis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zotefoams, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Elementis has a beta of 0.919, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zotefoams has a beta of 1.239, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

57.5% of Elementis shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.4% of Zotefoams shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Elementis shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Zotefoams shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Zotefoams has a net margin of 14.28% compared to Elementis' net margin of -7.58%. Zotefoams' return on equity of 18.25% beat Elementis' return on equity.

Elementis currently has a consensus target price of GBX 200, indicating a potential upside of 27.23%. Zotefoams has a consensus target price of GBX 605, indicating a potential upside of 40.37%. Given Zotefoams' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Zotefoams is more favorable than Elementis.

Elementis pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Zotefoams pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Elementis pays out -56.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Zotefoams pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Elementis is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.