Free Trial

EMV Capital (EMVC) Competitors

GBX 45.76 +0.76 (+1.69%)
As of 10:26 AM Eastern

EMVC vs. SBSI, SWEF, JGC, OFG, and JARA

Should you buy EMV Capital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares EMV Capital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with EMV Capital include Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI), Starwood European Real Estate Finance (SWEF), Jupiter Green (JGC), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), and JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets (JARA). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does EMV Capital compare to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust?

EMV Capital (LON:EMVC) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to EMV Capital's net margin of -105.85%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat EMV Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMV Capital-105.85% -16.69% -9.65%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

In the previous week, EMV Capital and EMV Capital both had 1 articles in the media. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat EMV Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EMV Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

EMV Capital has a beta of 0.494, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EMV Capital. EMV Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMV Capital£2.36M5.43-£2.97M-£9.60N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M21.74£1.04M£2.1529.77

59.0% of EMV Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of EMV Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats EMV Capital on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EMV Capital compare to Starwood European Real Estate Finance?

EMV Capital (LON:EMVC) and Starwood European Real Estate Finance (LON:SWEF) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Starwood European Real Estate Finance has a net margin of 38.35% compared to EMV Capital's net margin of -105.85%. Starwood European Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 2.92% beat EMV Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMV Capital-105.85% -16.69% -9.65%
Starwood European Real Estate Finance 38.35%2.92%N/A

In the previous week, EMV Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Starwood European Real Estate Finance. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for EMV Capital and 0 mentions for Starwood European Real Estate Finance. EMV Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Starwood European Real Estate Finance'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
EMV Capital Neutral
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Neutral

59.0% of EMV Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.9% of Starwood European Real Estate Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of EMV Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Starwood European Real Estate Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Starwood European Real Estate Finance has higher revenue and earnings than EMV Capital. Starwood European Real Estate Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EMV Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMV Capital£2.36M5.43-£2.97M-£9.60N/A
Starwood European Real Estate Finance£15.24M3.26£18.07M-£0.64N/A

Summary

Starwood European Real Estate Finance beats EMV Capital on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EMV Capital compare to Jupiter Green?

Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) and EMV Capital (LON:EMVC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than EMV Capital. EMV Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A
EMV Capital£2.36M5.43-£2.97M-£9.60N/A

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to EMV Capital's net margin of -105.85%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat EMV Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Green-26.72% -0.45% 0.15%
EMV Capital -105.85%-16.69%-9.65%

In the previous week, EMV Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Green. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for EMV Capital and 0 mentions for Jupiter Green. Jupiter Green's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled EMV Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Green Neutral
EMV Capital Neutral

Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EMV Capital has a beta of 0.494, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of EMV Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.2% of EMV Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jupiter Green beats EMV Capital on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EMV Capital compare to Octopus Future Generations VCT?

EMV Capital (LON:EMVC) and Octopus Future Generations VCT (LON:OFG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Octopus Future Generations VCT has a net margin of 0.00% compared to EMV Capital's net margin of -105.85%. Octopus Future Generations VCT's return on equity of 0.00% beat EMV Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMV Capital-105.85% -16.69% -9.65%
Octopus Future Generations VCT N/A N/A N/A

59.0% of EMV Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of EMV Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Octopus Future Generations VCT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Octopus Future Generations VCT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EMV Capital. Octopus Future Generations VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EMV Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMV Capital£2.36M5.43-£2.97M-£9.60N/A
Octopus Future Generations VCT-£767K-63.38N/A-£2.30N/A

In the previous week, Octopus Future Generations VCT had 1 more articles in the media than EMV Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Octopus Future Generations VCT and 1 mentions for EMV Capital. EMV Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus Future Generations VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EMV Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Octopus Future Generations VCT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

EMV Capital and Octopus Future Generations VCT tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does EMV Capital compare to JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets?

EMV Capital (LON:EMVC) and JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets (LON:JARA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets had 4 more articles in the media than EMV Capital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets and 1 mentions for EMV Capital. EMV Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets' score of -0.57 indicating that EMV Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EMV Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets has a net margin of 77.28% compared to EMV Capital's net margin of -105.85%. JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets' return on equity of 5.64% beat EMV Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMV Capital-105.85% -16.69% -9.65%
JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets 77.28%5.64%-3.14%

EMV Capital has a beta of 0.494, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets has a beta of 0.087, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

59.0% of EMV Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.2% of EMV Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

EMV Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets. EMV Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMV Capital£2.36M5.43-£2.97M-£9.60N/A
JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets£8.07M5.18-£4.51M£2.1935.62

Summary

JPMorgan Global Core Real Assets beats EMV Capital on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get EMV Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EMVC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EMVC vs. The Competition

MetricEMV CapitalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£12.80M£2.36B£5.64B£2.79B
Dividend YieldN/A5.99%5.27%6.09%
P/E Ratio-4.7725.2315.77366.07
Price / Sales5.431,956.92926.6288,440.80
Price / CashN/A60.1790.3227.89
Price / Book0.581.354.397.73
Net Income-£2.97M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.25%0.04%0.58%
1 Month Performance-8.48%2.27%1.86%2.57%
1 Year Performance12.43%13.33%21.45%87.36%

EMV Capital Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EMVC
EMV Capital
N/AGBX 45.76
+1.7%
N/A+20.2%£12.80M£2.36MN/A29
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 64.25
+0.4%
N/A-15.8%£50.60M£2.32M29.88810
SWEF
Starwood European Real Estate Finance
N/AGBX 91.50
flat
N/AN/A£49.61M£15.24MN/AN/A
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AGBX 77
flat
N/AN/A£46.00M-£166KN/A2,250

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:EMVC) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners