Go Pro

Fair Oaks Income 2021 (FAIR) Competitors

Fair Oaks Income 2021 logo
GBX 4.04 +0.03 (+0.70%)
As of 10:52 AM Eastern

FAIR vs. PU12, CYS, TV2H, MILA, and RTW

Should you buy Fair Oaks Income 2021 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fair Oaks Income 2021 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fair Oaks Income 2021 include Puma VCT 12 (PU12), Chrysalis VCT (CYS), Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs (TV2H), Mila Resources (MILA), and RTW Biotech Opportunities (RTW).

How does Fair Oaks Income 2021 compare to Puma VCT 12?

Puma VCT 12 (LON:PU12) and Fair Oaks Income 2021 (LON:FAIR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Puma VCT 12's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fair Oaks Income 2021'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Puma VCT 12 Neutral
Fair Oaks Income 2021 Neutral

23.1% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has a net margin of 97.31% compared to Puma VCT 12's net margin of 0.00%. Fair Oaks Income 2021's return on equity of 14.04% beat Puma VCT 12's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Puma VCT 12N/A N/A N/A
Fair Oaks Income 2021 97.31%14.04%N/A

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has higher revenue and earnings than Puma VCT 12. Puma VCT 12 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fair Oaks Income 2021, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Puma VCT 12£5.99M0.00N/A£0.17N/A
Fair Oaks Income 2021£12.71M0.18£2.91B£28.200.14

Puma VCT 12 pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. Fair Oaks Income 2021 pays an annual dividend of GBX 79.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,977.3%. Puma VCT 12 pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fair Oaks Income 2021 pays out 283.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Fair Oaks Income 2021 beats Puma VCT 12 on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fair Oaks Income 2021 compare to Chrysalis VCT?

Fair Oaks Income 2021 (LON:FAIR) and Chrysalis VCT (LON:CYS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has higher revenue and earnings than Chrysalis VCT. Chrysalis VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fair Oaks Income 2021, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fair Oaks Income 2021£12.71M0.18£2.91B£28.200.14
Chrysalis VCT£789K0.00N/A£0.50N/A

Fair Oaks Income 2021 pays an annual dividend of GBX 79.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,977.3%. Chrysalis VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share. Fair Oaks Income 2021 pays out 283.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chrysalis VCT pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

23.1% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has a net margin of 97.31% compared to Chrysalis VCT's net margin of 0.00%. Fair Oaks Income 2021's return on equity of 14.04% beat Chrysalis VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fair Oaks Income 202197.31% 14.04% N/A
Chrysalis VCT N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Fair Oaks Income 2021's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Chrysalis VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fair Oaks Income 2021 Neutral
Chrysalis VCT Neutral

Summary

Fair Oaks Income 2021 beats Chrysalis VCT on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fair Oaks Income 2021 compare to Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs?

Fair Oaks Income 2021 (LON:FAIR) and Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs (LON:TV2H) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Fair Oaks Income 2021's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fair Oaks Income 2021 Neutral
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs Neutral

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has higher revenue and earnings than Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs. Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fair Oaks Income 2021, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fair Oaks Income 2021£12.71M0.18£2.91B£28.200.14
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare ShsN/AN/AN/A-£0.02N/A

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has a net margin of 97.31% compared to Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs' net margin of 0.00%. Fair Oaks Income 2021's return on equity of 14.04% beat Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fair Oaks Income 202197.31% 14.04% N/A
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs N/A N/A N/A

Fair Oaks Income 2021 pays an annual dividend of GBX 79.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,977.3%. Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Fair Oaks Income 2021 pays out 283.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs pays out -5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

23.1% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fair Oaks Income 2021 beats Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fair Oaks Income 2021 compare to Mila Resources?

Fair Oaks Income 2021 (LON:FAIR) and Mila Resources (LON:MILA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has higher revenue and earnings than Mila Resources. Mila Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fair Oaks Income 2021, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fair Oaks Income 2021£12.71M0.18£2.91B£28.200.14
Mila ResourcesN/AN/A-£364.80K-£0.12N/A

In the previous week, Fair Oaks Income 2021's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mila Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fair Oaks Income 2021 Neutral
Mila Resources Neutral

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has a net margin of 97.31% compared to Mila Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Fair Oaks Income 2021's return on equity of 14.04% beat Mila Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fair Oaks Income 202197.31% 14.04% N/A
Mila Resources N/A -9.96%-5.89%

Fair Oaks Income 2021 has a beta of 0.09128701, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mila Resources has a beta of 0.262, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

23.1% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Mila Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of Mila Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fair Oaks Income 2021 beats Mila Resources on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fair Oaks Income 2021 compare to RTW Biotech Opportunities?

RTW Biotech Opportunities (LON:RTW) and Fair Oaks Income 2021 (LON:FAIR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, RTW Biotech Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fair Oaks Income 2021'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RTW Biotech Opportunities Neutral
Fair Oaks Income 2021 Neutral

2.8% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.1% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fair Oaks Income 2021 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RTW Biotech Opportunities has a beta of 0.763, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fair Oaks Income 2021 has a beta of 0.09128701, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

RTW Biotech Opportunities has a net margin of 158.61% compared to Fair Oaks Income 2021's net margin of 97.31%. RTW Biotech Opportunities' return on equity of 36.01% beat Fair Oaks Income 2021's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RTW Biotech Opportunities158.61% 36.01% -0.47%
Fair Oaks Income 2021 97.31%14.04%N/A

RTW Biotech Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than Fair Oaks Income 2021. RTW Biotech Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fair Oaks Income 2021, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RTW Biotech Opportunities£250.89M0.03£14.09B£63.000.04
Fair Oaks Income 2021£12.71M0.18£2.91B£28.200.14

Summary

RTW Biotech Opportunities beats Fair Oaks Income 2021 on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fair Oaks Income 2021 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAIR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAIR vs. The Competition

MetricFair Oaks Income 2021Capital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.35M£5.55B£14.03B£2.87B
Dividend Yield15.31%7.46%5.91%6.13%
P/E Ratio0.1438.2429.34369.49
Price / Sales0.181,242.89511.8683,955.53
Price / CashN/A48.2339.3227.89
Price / Book0.073.743.747.07
Net Income£2.91B£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.95%1.27%1.11%1.18%
1 Month Performance0.95%-0.46%0.46%0.90%
1 Year Performance650.56%6.59%13.14%75.31%

Fair Oaks Income 2021 Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAIR
Fair Oaks Income 2021
N/AGBX 4.04
+0.7%
N/A+658.5%£2.35M£12.71M0.14N/A
PU12
Puma VCT 12
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.25M£5.99M141.18N/A
CYS
Chrysalis VCT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.25M£789K65.0017
TV2H
Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs
N/AN/AN/AN/A£8.83MN/AN/AN/A
MILA
Mila Resources
N/AGBX 1.10
+3.8%
N/A+111.6%£8.11MN/AN/A4

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FAIR) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners