Go Pro

Ruffer Investment (RICA) Competitors

Ruffer Investment logo
GBX 298 -1.50 (-0.50%)
As of 12:30 PM Eastern

RICA vs. PHLL, JGGI, RCP, CTY, and BPT

Should you buy Ruffer Investment stock or one of its competitors? Ruffer Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Petershill Partners (PHLL), JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), RIT Capital Partners (RCP), City of London (CTY), and Bridgepoint Group (BPT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to Petershill Partners?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£91.91M9.50£8.78M£28.3510.51
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Petershill Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petershill Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment Neutral
Petershill Partners Neutral

7.6% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Petershill Partners has a consensus price target of GBX 309, indicating a potential downside of 0.48%. Given Petershill Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Petershill Partners is more favorable than Ruffer Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ruffer Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Petershill Partners has a net margin of 67.97% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment62.53% 4.37% 0.45%
Petershill Partners 67.97%16.42%5.95%

Summary

Petershill Partners beats Ruffer Investment on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a net margin of 91.40% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity of 7.63% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment62.53% 4.37% 0.45%
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income 91.40%7.63%10.62%

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Global Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment Neutral
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. Ruffer Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£91.91M9.50£8.78M£28.3510.51
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M13.55£625.87M£41.8115.15

7.6% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.783, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income beats Ruffer Investment on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to RIT Capital Partners?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, RIT Capital Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Ruffer Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for RIT Capital Partners and 0 mentions for Ruffer Investment. RIT Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Ruffer Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that RIT Capital Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment Neutral
RIT Capital Partners Positive

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£91.91M9.50£8.78M£28.3510.51
RIT Capital Partners£730.20M4.45£167.81M£327.008.03

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.7545988, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

7.6% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.9% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 2,025.88% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 16.54% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment62.53% 4.37% 0.45%
RIT Capital Partners 2,025.88%16.54%4.22%

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Ruffer Investment on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Ruffer Investment 62.53%4.37%0.45%

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M5.35£294.08M£113.995.18
Ruffer Investment£91.91M9.50£8.78M£28.3510.51

City of London has a beta of 0.869, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, City of London's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ruffer Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Neutral
Ruffer Investment Neutral

Summary

City of London beats Ruffer Investment on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

27.1% of Bridgepoint Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ruffer Investment has a net margin of 62.53% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Ruffer Investment's return on equity of 4.37% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group4.18% 2.71% 3.47%
Ruffer Investment 62.53%4.37%0.45%

Bridgepoint Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. Ruffer Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£583.70M5.11£45.58M£3.00112.87
Ruffer Investment£91.91M9.50£8.78M£28.3510.51

Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Bridgepoint Group pays out 313.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.388, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 2 more articles in the media than Ruffer Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 0 mentions for Ruffer Investment. Bridgepoint Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ruffer Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group Neutral
Ruffer Investment Neutral

Bridgepoint Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 15.18%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Ruffer Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ruffer Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Ruffer Investment on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ruffer Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RICA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RICA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RICA vs. The Competition

MetricRuffer InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£873.33M£5.64B£14.01B£2.88B
Dividend Yield2.07%7.40%5.89%6.09%
P/E Ratio10.5138.0029.21368.56
Price / Sales9.501,226.15512.9283,672.53
Price / Cash10.9948.2838.6827.89
Price / Book1.093.713.677.26
Net Income£8.78M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.53%0.62%0.27%1.12%
1 Month Performance2.20%0.66%1.19%2.56%
1 Year Performance4.75%8.45%12.52%70.21%

Ruffer Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RICA
Ruffer Investment
N/AGBX 298
-0.5%
N/A+4.6%£873.33M£91.91M10.51N/A
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
GBX 307
-1.1%
N/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A
JGGI
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AGBX 609
+0.8%
N/A+10.3%£3.31B£255.23M14.57N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,565
flat
N/A+33.7%£3.18B£500.60M7.8462
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 593
+0.2%
N/A+19.1%£3.07B£568.96M5.20N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:RICA) was last updated on 8/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners