Free Trial

Ruffer Investment (RICA) Competitors

Ruffer Investment logo
GBX 289.86 -0.14 (-0.05%)
As of 08:35 AM Eastern

RICA vs. PHLL, JGGI, RCP, TEM, and BPT

Should you buy Ruffer Investment stock or one of its competitors? Ruffer Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Petershill Partners (PHLL), JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), RIT Capital Partners (RCP), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), and Bridgepoint Group (BPT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to Petershill Partners?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Petershill Partners. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ruffer Investment and 0 mentions for Petershill Partners. Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Petershill Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Ruffer Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment Positive
Petershill Partners Neutral

7.8% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Ruffer Investment pays out 46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Petershill Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Ruffer Investment has a net margin of 121.50% compared to Petershill Partners' net margin of 67.97%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment121.50% 10.00% 0.45%
Petershill Partners 67.97%16.42%5.95%

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£42.40M19.57£8.78M£13.4621.55
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59

Summary

Petershill Partners beats Ruffer Investment on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) and Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Ruffer Investment has a net margin of 121.50% compared to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's net margin of 95.04%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity of 15.17% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income95.04% 15.17% 10.62%
Ruffer Investment 121.50%10.00%0.45%

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.778, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ruffer Investment pays out 46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income had 3 more articles in the media than Ruffer Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for JPMorgan Global Growth & Income and 1 mentions for Ruffer Investment. Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's score of 0.60 indicating that Ruffer Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ruffer Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M13.14£625.87M£41.8114.72
Ruffer Investment£42.40M19.57£8.78M£13.4621.55

Summary

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income beats Ruffer Investment on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to RIT Capital Partners?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Ruffer Investment pays out 46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RIT Capital Partners pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

7.8% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£42.40M19.57£8.78M£13.4621.55
RIT Capital Partners£730.20M4.22£167.81M£496.605.02

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment and Ruffer Investment both had 1 articles in the media. Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat RIT Capital Partners' score of 0.74 indicating that Ruffer Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
RIT Capital Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.7545988, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 2,025.88% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 121.50%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 16.54% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment121.50% 10.00% 0.45%
RIT Capital Partners 2,025.88%16.54%4.22%

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Ruffer Investment on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Ruffer Investment has a net margin of 121.50% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment121.50% 10.00% 0.45%
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 96.24%31.30%4.50%

7.8% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Ruffer Investment pays out 46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ruffer Investment and 0 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Ruffer Investment's score of 0.81 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment Positive
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£42.40M19.57£8.78M£13.4621.55
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.47£130.50M£77.544.13

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 0.986, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Ruffer Investment on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ruffer Investment compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

27.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.8% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 2 more articles in the media than Ruffer Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 1 mentions for Ruffer Investment. Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Bridgepoint Group's score of 0.24 indicating that Ruffer Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ruffer Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Bridgepoint Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ruffer Investment. Ruffer Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£583.70M6.02£45.58M£3.00130.00
Ruffer Investment£42.40M19.57£8.78M£13.4621.55

Ruffer Investment has a net margin of 121.50% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Ruffer Investment's return on equity of 10.00% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group4.18% 2.71% 3.47%
Ruffer Investment 121.50%10.00%0.45%

Bridgepoint Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 413.75, suggesting a potential upside of 6.09%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Ruffer Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ruffer Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.387, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.428, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Bridgepoint Group pays out 313.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ruffer Investment pays out 46.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Ruffer Investment on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ruffer Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RICA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RICA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RICA vs. The Competition

MetricRuffer InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£829.77M£5.15B£13.60B£2.82B
Dividend Yield2.12%7.62%6.09%6.26%
P/E Ratio21.5528.2022.94366.73
Price / Sales19.571,127.42477.8088,670.32
Price / Cash10.9947.5843.3627.83
Price / Book1.063.442.686.77
Net Income£8.78M£415.07M£1.32B£5.88B
7 Day Performance-0.51%-0.79%-0.89%0.49%
1 Month Performance-3.01%-1.93%-2.88%-0.22%
1 Year Performance-1.53%7.39%8.68%22.07%

Ruffer Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RICA
Ruffer Investment
N/AGBX 289.86
0.0%
N/A-0.9%£829.37M£42.40M21.53N/A
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
N/AN/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A
JGGI
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AGBX 609.50
+0.6%
N/A+7.8%£3.33B£255.23M14.58N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,475
-0.2%
N/A+24.1%£3.06B£730.20M4.9866
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 333
+0.9%
N/A+45.3%£3.04B£781.18M4.29N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:RICA) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners