Go Pro
→ SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years (From TradeSmith) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGT Stock Alerts

Capital Gearing (CGT) Competitors

Capital Gearing logo
GBX 5,171.44 -8.56 (-0.17%)
As of 07:56 AM Eastern
Compare

CGT vs. RCP, TEM, CTY, QLT, and BPT

Should you buy Capital Gearing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capital Gearing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capital Gearing include RIT Capital Partners (RCP), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), City of London (CTY), Quilter (QLT), and Bridgepoint Group (BPT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Capital Gearing compare to RIT Capital Partners?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 277.36% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 130.53%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 11.79% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
RIT Capital Partners 277.36%11.79%4.22%

In the previous week, RIT Capital Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for RIT Capital Partners and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that RIT Capital Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
RIT Capital Partners Positive

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£271.7019.03
RIT Capital Partners£500.60M6.56£167.81M£327.007.44

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863514, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.312, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

10.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.70£130.50M£77.544.02
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£271.7019.03

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0834277, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863514, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Capital Gearing on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to City of London?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and dividends.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863514, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.8605065, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£271.7019.03
City of London£568.96M5.16£294.08M£113.995.00

In the previous week, City of London had 12 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. City of London's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
City of London Neutral

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
City of London 97.40%22.92%4.00%

Summary

City of London beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Quilter?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Quilter has a consensus price target of GBX 203.71, suggesting a potential upside of 0.55%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quilter is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£271.7019.03
Quilter£9.34B0.29£49.61M£8.6023.56

In the previous week, Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Quilter Positive

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863514, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.4% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.35% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Quilter 1.28%8.35%0.21%

Summary

Quilter beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bridgepoint Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Bridgepoint Group Neutral

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863514, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.368, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bridgepoint Group pays out 189.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 7.68%. Capital Gearing's return on equity of 5.59% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Bridgepoint Group 7.68%4.25%3.47%

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of Bridgepoint Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bridgepoint Group has a consensus price target of GBX 385, indicating a potential upside of 36.23%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Capital Gearing has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bridgepoint Group. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£271.7019.03
Bridgepoint Group£476M5.20£45.58M£4.9057.67

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Gearing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCapital GearingAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£809.02M£2.42B£6.16B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.28%6.01%5.23%6.16%
P/E Ratio19.0361.8229.72368.08
Price / Sales17.261,856.851,184.9384,617.57
Price / Cash29.7660.3388.6427.87
Price / Book1.141.396.467.46
Net Income£45.77M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.61%-0.15%-0.18%-0.45%
1 Month Performance-1.31%0.15%0.25%-1.22%
1 Year Performance7.63%7.55%14.96%61.53%

Capital Gearing Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGT
Capital Gearing
N/AGBX 5,171.44
-0.2%		N/A+8.1%£809.02M£46.87M19.03N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,290
flat		N/A+27.9%£3.09B£500.60M7.0062
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 325.50
+1.6%		N/A+63.3%£3.02B£781.18M4.20N/A
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 577
+0.2%		N/A+16.8%£2.93B£568.96M5.06N/A
QLT
Quilter
2.6201 of 5 stars		GBX 203.40
+2.8%		GBX 203.71
+0.2%		+22.9%£2.76B£9.34B23.652,983

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGT) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Under $1 while the market panics
The new deadline for crypto’s best bill, the Clarity Act, is August 7th. That's the Senate's final session day...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win: “Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown”
In 2016, major election models gave Hillary Clinton a 99% chance of winning - but former CIA and Pentagon advi...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
BSEM Announces Major Corporate Milestone
BioStem Technologies (OTC: BSEM) has publicly filed a Form 10 registration statement with the SEC, advancing i...
Huge Alerts | Sponsoredtc pixel
The 1934 playbook
In 1934, a legal government maneuver transferred billions in wealth overnight. Most Americans never saw it com...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
American’s Biggest Threat Is Here
This feels like one of those ''where were you when Kennedy was shot'' moments. It felt like a moment in time, ...
Goldco Direct, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
They proved it worked in '76. Then buried it.
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel