Free Trial
→ Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American (From American Alternative) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGT Stock Alerts

Capital Gearing (CGT) Competitors

Capital Gearing logo
GBX 5,080 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 11:52 AM Eastern
Compare

CGT vs. RCP, EMG, TEM, CTY, and QLT

Should you buy Capital Gearing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capital Gearing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capital Gearing include RIT Capital Partners (RCP), Man Group (EMG), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), City of London (CTY), and Quilter (QLT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Capital Gearing compare to RIT Capital Partners?

RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 277.36% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 89.48%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 11.79% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RIT Capital Partners277.36% 11.79% 4.22%
Capital Gearing 89.48%4.71%-2.63%

In the previous week, RIT Capital Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for RIT Capital Partners and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.29 indicating that RIT Capital Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RIT Capital Partners Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RIT Capital Partners£500.60M5.97£167.81M£327.006.72
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.36£45.77M£227.4122.34

RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.6% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.70277125, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.44242236, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Man Group?

Man Group (LON:EMG) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Man Group has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Man Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Man Group£1.41B2.27£382.68M£15.0019.04
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.36£45.77M£227.4122.34

In the previous week, Man Group had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Man Group and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Man Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.29 indicating that Man Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Man Group Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Man Group pays out 115.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 89.48% compared to Man Group's net margin of 12.23%. Man Group's return on equity of 11.51% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Man Group12.23% 11.51% 4.61%
Capital Gearing 89.48%4.71%-2.63%

Man Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 256, indicating a potential downside of 10.36%. Given Man Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Man Group is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

47.5% of Man Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.8% of Man Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Man Group has a beta of 0.634, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.44242236, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Man Group beats Capital Gearing on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.36£45.77M£227.4122.34
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£519.01M5.68£130.50M£49.216.36

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 10.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 100.49% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 89.48%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.76% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing89.48% 4.71% -2.63%
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 100.49%22.76%4.50%

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.44242236, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0788894, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.29 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Very Positive

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 89.48%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Capital Gearing 89.48%4.71%-2.63%

In the previous week, City of London had 3 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. City of London's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.29 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

City of London has a beta of 0.8609003, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.44242236, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M4.93£294.08M£113.994.82
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.36£45.77M£227.4122.34

Summary

City of London beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Quilter?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Quilter shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Quilter shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quilter has a consensus price target of GBX 201.57, suggesting a potential upside of 11.06%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quilter is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Quilter had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.29 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Quilter Positive

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.44242236, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.802, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Quilter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.36£45.77M£227.4122.34
Quilter£9.34B0.27£49.61M£8.6021.10

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 89.48% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.35% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing89.48% 4.71% -2.63%
Quilter 1.28%8.35%0.21%

Summary

Quilter beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Gearing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCapital GearingAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£796.90M£2.38B£5.76B£2.79B
Dividend Yield2.01%5.99%5.27%6.09%
P/E Ratio22.3425.2115.78366.15
Price / Sales19.361,964.78933.9888,429.84
Price / Cash29.7660.1790.3227.89
Price / Book1.121.354.397.74
Net Income£45.77M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.20%-0.14%0.41%0.82%
1 Month Performance0.00%2.38%2.25%2.78%
1 Year Performance5.50%13.43%21.87%87.90%

Capital Gearing Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGT
Capital Gearing
N/AGBX 5,080
flat		N/A+5.4%£796.90M£41.15M22.34N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,195
flat		N/A+15.1%£2.98B£500.60M6.7162
EMG
Man Group
1.7142 of 5 stars		GBX 259.80
-1.0%		GBX 256
-1.5%		+56.9%£2.91B£1.41B17.321,790
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 307
+1.0%		N/A+79.0%£2.89B£519.01M6.24N/A
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 547.43
-0.6%		N/A+15.6%£2.79B£568.96M4.80N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGT) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Before you buy SpaceX shares, consider this alternative approach
SpaceX has confidentially filed for an IPO with the SEC, targeting a June 2026 listing at a valuation exceedin...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
I’m sounding the alarm
Meta is cutting 10% of its workforce. Microsoft offered voluntary retirement to 7% of U.S. employees. Oracle, ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire warns: Move your money now
Larry Benedict, the hedge fund trader who generated $274 million in profits for clients and beat the S&P 500 b...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s Biggest Launch Ever: 15x Bigger Than SpaceX
The Man Who Called Nvidia Before It Soared 1,000% Issues New Elon Musk BUY Alert Luke Lango was ranked Amer...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
You'll buy SpaceX at $1.75 trillion. Insiders bought at $20 billion.
Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billion. Banks got in at $100 billion. By the time it hits your brokerage accoun...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The system holding the dollar together is gone…
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel