Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Four winners over 400%. Here's #5 (From Golden Portfolio) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGT Stock Alerts

Capital Gearing (CGT) Competitors

Capital Gearing logo
GBX 5,140 -20.00 (-0.39%)
As of 06/23/2026 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

CGT vs. JGGI, EMG, RCP, CTY, and TEM

Should you buy Capital Gearing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capital Gearing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capital Gearing include JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), Man Group (EMG), RIT Capital Partners (RCP), City of London (CTY), and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Capital Gearing compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.54£45.77M£227.4122.60
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M12.80£625.87M£41.8114.31

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.7929957, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan Global Growth & Income and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that JPMorgan Global Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Positive

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's net margin of 91.40%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity of 7.63% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income 91.40%7.63%10.62%

Summary

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income beats Capital Gearing on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Man Group?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Man Group (LON:EMG) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Man Group has a consensus price target of GBX 267.25, indicating a potential downside of 10.08%. Given Man Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Man Group is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Man Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Man Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Man Group's net margin of 12.23%. Man Group's return on equity of 11.51% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Man Group 12.23%11.51%4.61%

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Man Group has a beta of 0.637, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Man Group pays out 115.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Man Group has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Man Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.54£45.77M£227.4122.60
Man Group£1.41B2.36£382.68M£15.0019.81

In the previous week, Capital Gearing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Man Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Man Group Neutral

Summary

Man Group beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to RIT Capital Partners?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.316, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.54£45.77M£227.4122.60
RIT Capital Partners£500.60M6.18£167.81M£327.006.97

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 277.36% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 130.53%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 11.79% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
RIT Capital Partners 277.36%11.79%4.22%

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Capital Gearing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled RIT Capital Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
RIT Capital Partners Neutral

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Capital Gearing on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, City of London had 4 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. City of London's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Very Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

City of London has a beta of 0.8610782, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M5.03£294.08M£113.994.90
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.54£45.77M£227.4122.60

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

City of London beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Capital Gearing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Neutral
Capital Gearing Neutral

11.1% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.73£130.50M£77.544.29
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.54£45.77M£227.4122.60

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0844169, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Capital Gearing on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Gearing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCapital GearingAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£804.26M£2.45B£6.07B£2.78B
Dividend Yield1.27%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio22.6025.8716.31365.72
Price / Sales19.542,081.971,100.8786,253.69
Price / Cash29.7660.1684.9827.85
Price / Book1.131.376.637.92
Net Income£45.77M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.58%-0.51%-0.23%-0.93%
1 Month Performance0.39%-0.17%1.00%-0.76%
1 Year Performance7.31%9.71%19.70%69.29%

Capital Gearing Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGT
Capital Gearing
N/AGBX 5,140
-0.4%		N/A+7.4%£804.26M£41.15M22.60N/A
JGGI
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AGBX 596
+1.5%		N/A+13.4%£3.20B£255.23M14.25N/A
EMG
Man Group
1.5235 of 5 stars		GBX 289.80
+2.8%		GBX 267.25
-7.8%		+75.3%£3.15B£1.41B19.321,790
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,347.97
+2.5%		N/A+21.0%£3.10B£500.60M7.1862
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 569
+0.9%		N/A+15.1%£2.90B£568.96M4.99N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGT) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Nearly 40% of Americans now hold a positive view of socialism - and former hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson s...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Quick favor to ask you
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book at no charge - the same book that sells for $...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Top Banks Warn: A Strange Day is Coming to America
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are warning clients about a developing crisis that could suppress portfolio g...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
A drilling crew just broke a record nobody expected
A drilling crew in Beaver County, Utah hit 15,765 feet of solid granite in 16 days - a job the Department of E...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Read this before you touch SPCX
SPCX is live on Nasdaq - but a market expert who called AMD before it climbed as high as 7,100% says buying th...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire trader who went 13-for-13 on Trump in 2025 now turns his attention to Elon.
Hedge fund trader Larry Benedict went 13-for-13 in Q1 2025 - not a single losing trade - and finished the year...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Karp just filed Form 144
On May 12, 2026, Palantir CEO Alex Karp filed to sell 585,000 shares - roughly $95.93 million. Combined with f...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel