Go Pro
→ A letter from Shannon Stansberry (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGT Stock Alerts

Capital Gearing (CGT) Competitors

Capital Gearing logo
GBX 525 +4.00 (+0.77%)
As of 08:31 AM Eastern
Compare

CGT vs. CTY, TEM, BPT, QLT, and INPP

Should you buy Capital Gearing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capital Gearing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capital Gearing include City of London (CTY), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), Bridgepoint Group (BPT), Quilter (QLT), and International Public Partnerships (INPP).

How does Capital Gearing compare to City of London?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863523, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.502, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, City of London had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. City of London's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
City of London Positive

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.4%. City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M1.75£45.77M£271.701.93
City of London£568.96M5.38£294.08M£113.995.21

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
City of London 97.40%22.92%4.00%

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

City of London beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M1.75£45.77M£271.701.93
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.62£130.50M£77.543.93

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.4%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 96.24%31.30%4.50%

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863523, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0834277, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Capital Gearing's return on equity of 5.59% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group4.18% 2.71% 3.47%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

Bridgepoint Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 18.54%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Bridgepoint Group's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Bridgepoint Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group Neutral
Capital Gearing Neutral

Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.4%. Bridgepoint Group pays out 189.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.368, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863523, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

27.1% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bridgepoint Group. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£476M6.05£45.58M£4.9067.14
Capital Gearing£46.87M1.75£45.77M£271.701.93

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Quilter?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Quilter has a consensus target price of GBX 205.86, suggesting a potential upside of 5.19%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quilter is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863523, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M1.75£45.77M£271.701.93
Quilter£9.34B0.28£49.61M£8.6022.76

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.4% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quilter had 5 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Quilter Positive

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.4%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Capital Gearing is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.35% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Quilter 1.28%8.35%0.21%

Summary

Quilter beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to International Public Partnerships?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Capital Gearing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than International Public Partnerships. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.58£43.53M£14.2810.03
Capital Gearing£46.87M1.75£45.77M£271.701.93

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Capital Gearing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Neutral
Capital Gearing Neutral

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.5430729, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.43863523, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 9.61% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.4%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Capital Gearing is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

International Public Partnerships beats Capital Gearing on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Gearing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCapital GearingCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£82.13M£5.49B£13.95B£2.83B
Dividend Yield1.25%7.51%5.95%6.15%
P/E Ratio1.9336.8328.77368.44
Price / Sales1.751,112.70461.0783,484.29
Price / Cash29.7684.8844.5027.89
Price / Book0.123.713.717.09
Net Income£45.77M£417.14M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.41%7.97%4.17%6.25%
1 Month Performance-89.83%-0.86%0.66%0.13%
1 Year Performance-89.16%6.08%13.60%64.12%

Capital Gearing Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGT
Capital Gearing
N/AGBX 525
+0.8%		N/A-89.2%£82.13M£46.87M1.93N/A
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 582
+0.7%		N/A+19.9%£3.00B£568.96M5.11N/A
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 308.13
-1.2%		N/A+54.6%£2.86B£781.18M3.97N/A
BPT
Bridgepoint Group
2.3838 of 5 stars		GBX 317.60
+0.8%		GBX 390
+22.8%		-0.4%£2.78B£476M64.82391
QLT
Quilter
2.5501 of 5 stars		GBX 194.80
+0.9%		GBX 203.71
+4.6%		+16.4%£2.64B£9.34B22.652,983

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGT) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
“The unseen winner of the AI race” is not SpaceX
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before its historic run - says a tech firm labeled 'the unseen wi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
What's the Best Way to Lower RMD Taxes?
Once you turn 73, the IRS requires you to take distributions from your IRA, 401(k), and other retirement accou...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel