Go Pro
→ Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGT Stock Alerts

Capital Gearing (CGT) Competitors

Capital Gearing logo
GBX 524 -1.00 (-0.19%)
As of 08/21/2026 11:55 AM Eastern
Compare

CGT vs. RCP, CTY, TEM, BPT, and QLT

Should you buy Capital Gearing stock or one of its competitors? Capital Gearing's main competitors and comparable companies include RIT Capital Partners (RCP), City of London (CTY), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), Bridgepoint Group (BPT), and Quilter (QLT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Capital Gearing compare to RIT Capital Partners?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, RIT Capital Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for RIT Capital Partners and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that RIT Capital Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
RIT Capital Partners Positive

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.445, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.7545988, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.49£45.77M£27.1719.29
RIT Capital Partners£730.20M4.38£167.81M£327.007.89

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 2,025.88% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 130.53%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 16.54% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
RIT Capital Partners 2,025.88%16.54%4.22%

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.9% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

City of London has a beta of 0.869, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.445, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M5.32£294.08M£113.995.15
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.49£45.77M£27.1719.29

In the previous week, City of London had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. City of London's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Capital Gearing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Neutral
Capital Gearing Neutral

Summary

City of London beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.78£130.50M£77.544.13
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.49£45.77M£27.1719.29

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 4 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.445, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Capital Gearing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bridgepoint Group. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£583.70M4.85£45.58M£3.00107.00
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.49£45.77M£27.1719.29

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Bridgepoint Group's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Bridgepoint Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

Bridgepoint Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 21.50%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.388, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.445, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

27.1% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Bridgepoint Group pays out 313.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Capital Gearing's return on equity of 5.59% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group4.18% 2.71% 3.47%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Quilter?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Quilter had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Quilter Positive

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.445, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.824, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.49£45.77M£27.1719.29
Quilter£13.46B0.19£49.61M£8.6022.53

Quilter has a consensus target price of GBX 210.86, suggesting a potential upside of 8.80%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quilter is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Quilter's net margin of 0.88%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.39% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Quilter 0.88%8.39%0.21%

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Quilter beats Capital Gearing on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Gearing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCapital GearingCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£821.45M£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield1.26%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio19.2939.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales17.491,235.26516.5783,481.74
Price / Cash29.7648.3138.1927.89
Price / Book0.122.132.187.19
Net Income£45.77M£416.48M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.19%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance0.38%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance-89.24%5.71%9.68%22.13%

Capital Gearing Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGT
Capital Gearing
N/AGBX 524
-0.2%		N/A-89.2%£821.45M£46.87M19.29N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,580
+0.6%		N/A+29.1%£3.19B£730.20M7.8962
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 587
+0.2%		N/A+15.1%£3.02B£568.96M5.15N/A
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 320.50
+2.1%		N/A+60.7%£2.88B£781.18M4.13N/A
BPT
Bridgepoint Group
2.7135 of 5 stars		GBX 321
-0.7%		GBX 390
+21.5%		-5.7%£2.86B£583.70M107.00391

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGT) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel