Free Trial

Capital Gearing (CGT) Competitors

Capital Gearing logo
GBX 5,180 +10.00 (+0.19%)
As of 11:58 AM Eastern

CGT vs. EMG, RCP, TEM, CTY, and QLT

Should you buy Capital Gearing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capital Gearing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capital Gearing include Man Group (EMG), RIT Capital Partners (RCP), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), City of London (CTY), and Quilter (QLT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Man Group?

Man Group (LON:EMG) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

47.5% of Man Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 7.8% of Man Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Man Group has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Man Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Man Group£1.41B2.29£382.68M£15.0019.13
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.75£45.77M£227.4122.78

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 89.48% compared to Man Group's net margin of 12.23%. Man Group's return on equity of 11.51% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Man Group12.23% 11.51% 4.61%
Capital Gearing 89.48%4.71%-2.63%

Man Group has a beta of 0.634, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4378515, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Man Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 267.25, indicating a potential downside of 6.88%. Given Man Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Man Group is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Man Group had 3 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Man Group and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Man Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Man Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Man Group Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Man Group pays out 115.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Man Group beats Capital Gearing on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to RIT Capital Partners?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 277.36% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 89.48%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 11.79% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing89.48% 4.71% -2.63%
RIT Capital Partners 277.36%11.79%4.22%

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4378515, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.70277125, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.75£45.77M£227.4122.78
RIT Capital Partners£500.60M6.33£167.81M£327.007.13

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Capital Gearing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled RIT Capital Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
RIT Capital Partners Neutral

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

11.1% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£519.01M6.18£130.50M£49.216.92
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.75£45.77M£227.4122.78

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 100.49% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 89.48%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.76% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust100.49% 22.76% 4.50%
Capital Gearing 89.48%4.71%-2.63%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0844169, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4378515, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 10.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

City of London has a beta of 0.8609003, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4378515, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, City of London had 4 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. City of London's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Very Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 89.48%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Capital Gearing 89.48%4.71%-2.63%

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M4.99£294.08M£113.994.89
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.75£45.77M£227.4122.78

Summary

City of London beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Quilter?

Quilter (LON:QLT) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

45.6% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Quilter shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Quilter had 5 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quilter Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Quilter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quilter£9.34B0.28£49.61M£8.6022.10
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.75£45.77M£227.4122.78

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 89.48% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.35% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quilter1.28% 8.35% 0.21%
Capital Gearing 89.48%4.71%-2.63%

Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Quilter has a beta of 0.802, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4378515, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Quilter presently has a consensus target price of GBX 203.71, indicating a potential upside of 7.17%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quilter is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Quilter beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Gearing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGT vs. The Competition

MetricCapital GearingAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£812.59M£2.40B£5.71B£2.78B
Dividend Yield1.98%6.03%5.28%6.13%
P/E Ratio22.7825.4516.15364.74
Price / Sales19.752,001.821,068.3187,565.33
Price / Cash29.7660.1595.0627.85
Price / Book1.141.376.567.71
Net Income£45.77M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.40%-0.18%0.27%0.07%
1 Month Performance2.57%0.89%1.33%3.26%
1 Year Performance7.02%11.82%19.75%75.52%

Capital Gearing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGT
Capital Gearing
N/AGBX 5,180
+0.2%
N/A+6.9%£812.59M£41.15M22.78N/A
EMG
Man Group
2.0598 of 5 stars
GBX 282.20
+0.3%
GBX 256
-9.3%
+65.3%£3.15B£1.41B18.811,790
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,229.84
0.0%
N/A+23.6%£3.03B£500.60M6.8262
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 313.58
+1.0%
N/A+97.7%£2.91B£519.01M6.37N/A
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 567
+0.5%
N/A+16.9%£2.88B£568.96M4.97N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CGT) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners