Go Pro
→ Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free CGT Stock Alerts

Capital Gearing (CGT) Competitors

Capital Gearing logo
GBX 516 -2.00 (-0.39%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:15 PM Eastern
Compare

CGT vs. RCP, CTY, TEM, BPT, and QLT

Should you buy Capital Gearing stock or one of its competitors? Capital Gearing's main competitors and comparable companies include RIT Capital Partners (RCP), City of London (CTY), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), Bridgepoint Group (BPT), and Quilter (QLT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Capital Gearing compare to RIT Capital Partners?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RIT Capital Partners pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, RIT Capital Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for RIT Capital Partners and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled RIT Capital Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
RIT Capital Partners Neutral

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£27.1718.99
RIT Capital Partners£730.20M4.31£167.81M£496.605.12

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 2,025.88% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 130.53%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 16.54% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
RIT Capital Partners 2,025.88%16.54%4.22%

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.442, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.7545988, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to City of London?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.442, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.874, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£27.1718.99
City of London£568.96M5.19£294.08M£113.995.02

In the previous week, City of London had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. City of London's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
City of London Neutral

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
City of London 97.40%22.92%4.00%

Summary

City of London beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.012, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.442, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.81£130.50M£77.544.21
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£27.1718.99

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Capital Gearing's return on equity of 5.59% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Bridgepoint Group 4.18%2.71%3.47%

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.442, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.387, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Bridgepoint Group has a consensus target price of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 32.56%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bridgepoint Group pays out 313.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bridgepoint Group. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£27.1718.99
Bridgepoint Group£583.70M4.49£45.58M£3.0098.07

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Bridgepoint Group's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Bridgepoint Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing Neutral
Bridgepoint Group Positive

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Quilter?

Quilter (LON:QLT) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Quilter has a beta of 0.823, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.442, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quilter£13.46B0.19£49.61M£8.5021.81
Capital Gearing£46.87M17.26£45.77M£27.1718.99

44.4% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quilter had 3 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Capital Gearing. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.00 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quilter Positive
Capital Gearing Neutral

Quilter presently has a consensus price target of GBX 210.86, indicating a potential upside of 13.73%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Quilter is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Quilter pays out 74.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Quilter's net margin of 0.88%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.39% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quilter0.88% 8.39% 0.21%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

Summary

Quilter beats Capital Gearing on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Gearing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CGT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCapital GearingCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£809.18M£5.51B£13.79B£2.51B
Dividend Yield1.28%7.48%5.94%6.25%
P/E Ratio18.9930.5425.67366.83
Price / Sales17.261,184.19501.8089,753.12
Price / Cash29.7647.9240.4527.89
Price / Book0.113.532.756.33
Net Income£45.77M£418.04M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.58%-1.39%-1.17%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-2.10%-1.78%-0.23%0.00%
1 Year Performance-89.39%2.79%8.39%19.96%

Capital Gearing Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGT
Capital Gearing
N/AGBX 516
-0.4%		N/A-89.4%£809.18M£46.87M18.99N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,515.20
-0.4%		N/A+28.3%£3.11B£730.20M7.6962
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 587
flat		N/A+14.4%£3.03B£568.96M5.15N/A
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 326.26
+1.3%		N/A+55.3%£3.01B£781.18M4.21N/A
BPT
Bridgepoint Group
2.7866 of 5 stars		GBX 305.90
+0.9%		GBX 390
+27.5%		-11.7%£2.70B£583.70M101.97391

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CGT) was last updated on 9/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel