Free Trial

Capital Gearing (CGT) Competitors

Capital Gearing logo
GBX 5,140 -10.00 (-0.19%)
As of 12:00 PM Eastern

CGT vs. TEM, RCP, EMG, CTY, and QLT

Should you buy Capital Gearing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Capital Gearing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Capital Gearing include Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), RIT Capital Partners (RCP), Man Group (EMG), City of London (CTY), and Quilter (QLT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 10.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 96.24%31.30%4.50%

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.59£45.77M£227.4122.60
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.92£130.50M£49.216.60

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 2 mentions for Capital Gearing. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.54 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0844169, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Capital Gearing on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to RIT Capital Partners?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.59£45.77M£227.4122.60
RIT Capital Partners£500.60M6.26£167.81M£327.007.05

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 277.36% compared to Capital Gearing's net margin of 130.53%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 11.79% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
RIT Capital Partners 277.36%11.79%4.22%

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.7031213, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Capital Gearing had 1 more articles in the media than RIT Capital Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Capital Gearing and 1 mentions for RIT Capital Partners. Capital Gearing's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat RIT Capital Partners' score of 0.29 indicating that Capital Gearing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
RIT Capital Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Man Group?

Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) and Man Group (LON:EMG) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Capital Gearing and Capital Gearing both had 2 articles in the media. Man Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.54 indicating that Man Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital Gearing
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Man Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Man Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of Man Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Man Group has a consensus price target of GBX 267.25, suggesting a potential downside of 7.91%. Given Man Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Man Group is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Man Group's net margin of 12.23%. Man Group's return on equity of 11.51% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital Gearing130.53% 5.59% -2.63%
Man Group 12.23%11.51%4.61%

Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Man Group pays out 115.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Man Group has a beta of 0.634, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Man Group has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Man Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.59£45.77M£227.4122.60
Man Group£1.41B2.31£382.68M£15.0019.35

Summary

Man Group beats Capital Gearing on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, City of London had 3 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for City of London and 2 mentions for Capital Gearing. City of London's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.54 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
City of London
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Capital Gearing
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

City of London has a beta of 0.8610782, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M4.99£294.08M£113.994.89
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.59£45.77M£227.4122.60

Summary

City of London beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Gearing compare to Quilter?

Quilter (LON:QLT) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Quilter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Gearing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quilter£9.34B0.28£49.61M£8.6022.37
Capital Gearing£41.15M19.59£45.77M£227.4122.60

Quilter has a beta of 0.802, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Gearing has a beta of 0.4379192, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

45.6% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Capital Gearing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Quilter shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Capital Gearing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quilter presently has a consensus price target of GBX 203.71, indicating a potential upside of 5.91%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quilter is more favorable than Capital Gearing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Capital Gearing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Quilter had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quilter and 2 mentions for Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Quilter's score of 0.48 indicating that Capital Gearing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quilter
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capital Gearing
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 102 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Gearing pays out 44.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital Gearing has a net margin of 130.53% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.35% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quilter1.28% 8.35% 0.21%
Capital Gearing 130.53%5.59%-2.63%

Summary

Quilter beats Capital Gearing on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Gearing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CGT vs. The Competition

MetricCapital GearingAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£806.31M£2.51B£5.73B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.97%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio22.6025.8816.37365.21
Price / Sales19.592,084.221,111.8487,168.40
Price / Cash29.7660.1591.7827.85
Price / Book1.131.376.497.68
Net Income£45.77M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.39%-1.04%-0.75%-0.55%
1 Month Performance1.58%0.14%0.92%3.15%
1 Year Performance7.42%10.56%19.07%73.57%

Capital Gearing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CGT
Capital Gearing
N/AGBX 5,140
-0.2%
N/A+6.4%£806.31M£41.15M22.60N/A
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 331.62
+1.4%
N/A+90.4%£3.12B£519.01M6.74N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,290
+1.8%
N/A+20.8%£3.11B£500.60M7.0062
EMG
Man Group
2.1038 of 5 stars
GBX 274.80
+0.6%
GBX 256
-6.8%
+68.8%£3.08B£1.41B18.321,790
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 563
-0.4%
N/A+15.2%£2.87B£568.96M4.94N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CGT) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners