Go Pro

Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) Competitors

Fidelity Asian Values logo
GBX 617.81 -3.65 (-0.59%)
As of 11:28 AM Eastern

FAS vs. WTAN, BRW, SSON, FSV, and SNN

Should you buy Fidelity Asian Values stock or one of its competitors? Fidelity Asian Values's main competitors and comparable companies include Witan Investment Trust (WTAN), Brewin Dolphin (BRW), Smithson Investment Trust (SSON), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), and Sanne Group (SNN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Witan Investment Trust?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Witan Investment Trust (LON:WTAN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Witan Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Witan Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than Witan Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for Witan Investment Trust. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Witan Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Positive
Witan Investment Trust Neutral

Witan Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Witan Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.05£11.42M£110.005.62
Witan Investment Trust£246.38M0.00£220.34M£0.36N/A

Witan Investment Trust has a net margin of 89.43% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Witan Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Witan Investment Trust 89.43%13.68%7.95%

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.622, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Witan Investment Trust has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Witan Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Witan Investment Trust pays out 1,666.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelity Asian Values is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Witan Investment Trust beats Fidelity Asian Values on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Brewin Dolphin?

Brewin Dolphin (LON:BRW) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Brewin Dolphin's net margin of 0.00%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Brewin Dolphin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brewin DolphinN/A N/A N/A
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

Fidelity Asian Values has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brewin Dolphin. Brewin Dolphin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brewin Dolphin£415.46M0.00N/A£0.17N/A
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.05£11.42M£110.005.62

Brewin Dolphin pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.16 per share. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Brewin Dolphin pays out 92.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than Brewin Dolphin. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for Brewin Dolphin. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Brewin Dolphin's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brewin Dolphin Neutral
Fidelity Asian Values Positive

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Brewin Dolphin on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Smithson Investment Trust?

Smithson Investment Trust (LON:SSON) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Smithson Investment Trust's net margin of -34.17%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Smithson Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smithson Investment Trust-34.17% -3.46% N/A
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

Smithson Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Smithson Investment Trust pays out -1.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than Smithson Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for Smithson Investment Trust. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Smithson Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smithson Investment Trust Neutral
Fidelity Asian Values Positive

5.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity Asian Values has higher revenue and earnings than Smithson Investment Trust. Smithson Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smithson Investment Trust-£58.23M-26.53-£42.74M-£53.80N/A
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.05£11.42M£110.005.62

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Smithson Investment Trust on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values both had 1 articles in the media. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Fidelity Asian Values' score of 1.29 indicating that Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Fidelity Asian Values
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.277, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.622, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a net margin of 95.92% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values95.92% 25.87% 0.33%
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M4.22£223.72M£109.344.22
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.05£11.42M£110.005.62

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Fidelity Asian Values on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Sanne Group?

Sanne Group (LON:SNN) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Sanne Group's net margin of 0.00%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Sanne Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanne GroupN/A N/A N/A
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

Sanne Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.10 per share. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Sanne Group pays out -2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fidelity Asian Values has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sanne Group. Sanne Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanne Group£194.16M0.00N/A-£4.50N/A
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.05£11.42M£110.005.62

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than Sanne Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for Sanne Group. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Sanne Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanne Group Neutral
Fidelity Asian Values Positive

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Sanne Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fidelity Asian Values News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAS vs. The Competition

MetricFidelity Asian ValuesCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£387.49M£5.45B£13.98B£2.87B
Dividend Yield3.25%7.50%5.95%6.25%
P/E Ratio5.6230.2325.52366.99
Price / Sales5.051,236.53511.5289,778.71
Price / Cash13.8647.9230.3027.89
Price / Book1.123.522.746.24
Net Income£11.42M£417.39M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.86%-1.68%-1.29%-1.07%
1 Month Performance1.28%-2.09%-0.41%-0.66%
1 Year Performance4.01%2.20%8.14%19.51%

Fidelity Asian Values Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAS
Fidelity Asian Values
N/AGBX 617.81
-0.6%
N/A+6.1%£387.49M£76.78M5.62N/A
WTAN
Witan Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.58B£246.38M738.896
BRW
Brewin Dolphin
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.56B£415.46M3,029.412,186
SSON
Smithson Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,438
flat
N/AN/A£1.54B-£58.23MN/AN/A
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 468
+0.4%
N/A+21.4%£1.52B£354.63M4.2825,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FAS) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners