Free Trial
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free FAS Stock Alerts

Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) Competitors

Fidelity Asian Values logo
GBX 602 +14.00 (+2.38%)
As of 12:00 PM Eastern
Compare

FAS vs. BHMG, FSV, BNKR, JMG, and ASHM

Should you buy Fidelity Asian Values stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fidelity Asian Values with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fidelity Asian Values include BH Macro GBP (BHMG), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), JPMorgan Emerging Markets (JMG), and Ashmore Group (ASHM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to BH Macro GBP?

BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, BH Macro GBP's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Asian Values'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BH Macro GBP Neutral
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BH Macro GBP£277.60M5.07£53.77M£45.689.39
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.97£11.42M£110.005.47

1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BH Macro GBP has a net margin of 173.32% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BH Macro GBP173.32% 13.24% -0.31%
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.08712986, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.374, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats BH Macro GBP on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values Neutral

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.97£11.42M£110.005.47
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M3.96£223.72M£109.343.96

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.374, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.2719399, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a net margin of 95.92% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values 95.92%25.87%0.33%

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Fidelity Asian Values on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Bankers Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.97£11.42M£110.005.47
The Bankers Investment Trust£221.50M6.31£218.53M£20.257.44

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.374, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.605, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to The Bankers Investment Trust's net margin of -551.87%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
The Bankers Investment Trust -551.87%16.08%6.13%

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 13.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The Bankers Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
The Bankers Investment Trust Neutral

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats Fidelity Asian Values on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to JPMorgan Emerging Markets?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets (LON:JMG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Emerging Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.97£11.42M£110.005.47
JPMorgan Emerging Markets£56.31M23.64£80.10M£4.6329.33

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity Asian Values is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a net margin of 95.26% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' return on equity of 19.61% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets 95.26%19.61%1.55%

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.374, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, JPMorgan Emerging Markets had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity Asian Values. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan Emerging Markets and 0 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Emerging Markets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Emerging Markets beats Fidelity Asian Values on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Ashmore Group?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Ashmore Group has a consensus price target of GBX 150, suggesting a potential downside of 26.54%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Fidelity Asian Values.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity Asian Values
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Ashmore Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.374, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.961, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ashmore Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
Ashmore Group Neutral

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ashmore Group has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.97£11.42M£110.005.47
Ashmore Group£135.90M9.77£94.67M£16.5412.35

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Fidelity Asian Values on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fidelity Asian Values News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFidelity Asian ValuesAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£381.87M£2.47B£5.92B£2.80B
Dividend Yield3.58%6.05%5.29%6.18%
P/E Ratio5.4725.8416.34366.94
Price / Sales4.972,123.601,295.0986,476.21
Price / Cash13.8660.1648.6727.85
Price / Book1.091.386.567.77
Net Income£11.42M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.74%0.93%1.67%0.76%
1 Month Performance-1.63%1.31%2.11%1.84%
1 Year Performance14.89%11.40%21.14%73.86%

Fidelity Asian Values Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAS
Fidelity Asian Values
N/AGBX 602
+2.4%		N/A+12.6%£381.87M£76.78M5.47N/A
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 424.50
-1.0%		N/A+8.0%£1.39B£277.60M9.29N/A
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 419.30
-1.0%		N/A+20.0%£1.36B£354.63M3.8325,000
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 145.80
-1.5%		N/A+26.7%£1.35B£221.50M7.20N/A
JMG
JPMorgan Emerging Markets
N/AGBX 135.80
-0.9%		N/A+20.4%£1.33B£56.31M29.33N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FAS) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Is SpaceX really worth 1.78 Trillion?
With SpaceX approaching a near-$2 trillion valuation, most investors are focused on the IPO itself - but analy...
InvestPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is chump change compared to Elon’s $20T ‘iPhone’
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
The roadshow starts Monday. This stock isn't ready.
The SpaceX roadshow kicks off June 8. Goldman Sachs, the lead underwriter, will present the full S-1 to the wo...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel