Go Pro
→ Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free FAS Stock Alerts

Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) Competitors

Fidelity Asian Values logo
GBX 624 +6.00 (+0.97%)
As of 08/21/2026 11:55 AM Eastern
Compare

FAS vs. FSV, SNN, ASHM, WWH, and BNKR

Should you buy Fidelity Asian Values stock or one of its competitors? Fidelity Asian Values's main competitors and comparable companies include Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), Sanne Group (SNN), Ashmore Group (ASHM), Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), and The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values and Fidelity Asian Values both had 1 articles in the media. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Fidelity Asian Values' score of 0.87 indicating that Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.11£11.42M£110.005.67
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M4.31£223.72M£109.344.31

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.632, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.292, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a net margin of 95.92% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values 95.92%25.87%0.33%

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Fidelity Asian Values on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Sanne Group?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Sanne Group (LON:SNN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Sanne Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.10 per share. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanne Group pays out -2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fidelity Asian Values has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sanne Group. Sanne Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.11£11.42M£110.005.67
Sanne Group£194.16M0.00N/A-£4.50N/A

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Sanne Group's net margin of 0.00%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Sanne Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Sanne Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than Sanne Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for Sanne Group. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Sanne Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Positive
Sanne Group Neutral

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Sanne Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Ashmore Group?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Ashmore Group has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.11£11.42M£110.005.67
Ashmore Group£135.90M10.82£94.67M£16.5413.68

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Ashmore Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

Ashmore Group has a consensus price target of GBX 140, suggesting a potential downside of 38.11%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Fidelity Asian Values.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity Asian Values
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than Ashmore Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for Ashmore Group. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Ashmore Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Positive
Ashmore Group Neutral

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.632, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Fidelity Asian Values on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.632, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare and Worldwide Healthcare both had 1 articles in the media. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Fidelity Asian Values' score of 0.87 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Fidelity Asian Values
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

7.9% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M12.02£227.88M£26.7014.83
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.11£11.42M£110.005.67

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Worldwide Healthcare on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.632, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.613, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than The Bankers Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat The Bankers Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Positive
The Bankers Investment Trust Neutral

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M5.11£11.42M£110.005.67
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.25£218.53M£30.134.95

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats The Bankers Investment Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fidelity Asian Values News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFidelity Asian ValuesCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£387.62M£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield3.32%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio5.6739.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales5.111,258.00520.1483,481.74
Price / Cash13.8648.3130.7127.89
Price / Book1.133.752.847.19
Net Income£11.42M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.30%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance7.59%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance9.09%5.71%9.68%22.13%

Fidelity Asian Values Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAS
Fidelity Asian Values
N/AGBX 624
+1.0%		N/A+9.1%£387.62M£76.78M5.67N/A
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 471
-0.1%		N/A+21.2%£1.53B£354.63M4.3125,000
SNN
Sanne Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.50B£194.16MN/A20,100
ASHM
Ashmore Group
0.6634 of 5 stars		GBX 222.60
-1.9%		GBX 140
-37.1%		+26.9%£1.45B£135.90M13.46283
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare
N/AGBX 386.81
+0.7%		N/A+18.9%£1.39B£118.16M14.49N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FAS) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel