Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) Competitors

Fidelity Asian Values logo
GBX 604 +6.00 (+1.00%)
As of 05/22/2026 11:26 AM Eastern

FAS vs. BRW, LWDB, FCIT, SSON, and SNN

Should you buy Fidelity Asian Values stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fidelity Asian Values with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fidelity Asian Values include Brewin Dolphin (BRW), Law Debenture (LWDB), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), Smithson Investment Trust (SSON), and Sanne Group (SNN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Brewin Dolphin?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Brewin Dolphin (LON:BRW) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

3.9% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Brewin Dolphin's net margin of 0.00%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Brewin Dolphin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Brewin Dolphin N/A N/A N/A

Fidelity Asian Values has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brewin Dolphin. Brewin Dolphin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.99£11.42M£110.005.49
Brewin Dolphin£415.46M0.00N/A£0.17N/A

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Brewin Dolphin pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.16 per share. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brewin Dolphin pays out 92.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelity Asian Values is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Brewin Dolphin'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
Brewin Dolphin Neutral

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Brewin Dolphin on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Law Debenture?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Law Debenture (LON:LWDB) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Law Debenture has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Law Debenture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.99£11.42M£110.005.49
Law Debenture£366.00M4.39£142.39M£229.505.25

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Law Debenture pays an annual dividend of GBX 34.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Law Debenture pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Law Debenture's net margin of 81.41%. Law Debenture's return on equity of 26.88% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Law Debenture 81.41%26.88%8.76%

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.374, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Law Debenture has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

3.9% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Law Debenture shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Law Debenture shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Law Debenture'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
Law Debenture Neutral

Summary

Law Debenture beats Fidelity Asian Values on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M2.31£935.32M£138.562.42
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.99£11.42M£110.005.49

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. F&C Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 90.89% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat F&C Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust90.89% 11.28% 10.80%
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

In the previous week, F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Asian Values'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust Neutral
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.7951089, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.374, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats Fidelity Asian Values on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Smithson Investment Trust?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Smithson Investment Trust (LON:SSON) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Smithson Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
Smithson Investment Trust Neutral

Fidelity Asian Values has higher revenue and earnings than Smithson Investment Trust. Smithson Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.99£11.42M£110.005.49
Smithson Investment Trust-£58.23M-26.53-£42.74M-£53.80N/A

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Smithson Investment Trust's net margin of -34.17%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Smithson Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Smithson Investment Trust -34.17%-3.46%N/A

3.9% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Smithson Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Smithson Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Smithson Investment Trust pays out -1.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Smithson Investment Trust on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Sanne Group?

Sanne Group (LON:SNN) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Fidelity Asian Values has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sanne Group. Sanne Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanne Group£194.16M0.00N/A-£4.50N/A
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.99£11.42M£110.005.49

In the previous week, Sanne Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Asian Values'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanne Group Neutral
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral

Sanne Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.10 per share. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Sanne Group pays out -2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

3.9% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Sanne Group's net margin of 0.00%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Sanne Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanne GroupN/A N/A N/A
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Sanne Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fidelity Asian Values News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAS vs. The Competition

MetricFidelity Asian ValuesAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£379.47M£2.40B£5.87B£3.04B
Dividend Yield3.43%5.94%5.22%6.10%
P/E Ratio5.4925.2715.88365.89
Price / Sales4.991,970.46982.4687,843.39
Price / Cash13.8660.1793.3527.89
Price / Book1.091.386.577.69
Net Income£11.42M£265.53M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.31%0.51%0.66%8.05%
1 Month Performance-3.51%1.71%1.71%2.82%
1 Year Performance19.37%13.07%19.78%77.61%

Fidelity Asian Values Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAS
Fidelity Asian Values
N/AGBX 604
+1.0%
N/A+19.8%£379.47M£76.78M5.49N/A
BRW
Brewin Dolphin
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.56B£415.46M3,029.412,186
LWDB
Law Debenture
N/AGBX 1,170.78
-0.3%
N/A+27.9%£1.56B£366.00M5.10260
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 328.60
-0.1%
N/A+24.0%£1.55B£683.36M2.37N/A
SSON
Smithson Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,438
flat
N/AN/A£1.54B-£58.23MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FAS) was last updated on 5/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners