Go Pro
→ Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free FAS Stock Alerts

Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) Competitors

Fidelity Asian Values logo
GBX 590 +2.00 (+0.34%)
As of 11:52 AM Eastern
Compare

FAS vs. HRI, WWH, BNKR, BHMG, and ASHM

Should you buy Fidelity Asian Values stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fidelity Asian Values with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fidelity Asian Values include Herald (HRI), Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), and Ashmore Group (ASHM).

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Herald?

Herald (LON:HRI) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Herald has a net margin of 101.77% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. Herald's return on equity of 29.18% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Herald101.77% 29.18% 9.22%
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

In the previous week, Herald had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity Asian Values. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Herald and 0 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Herald's score of -0.99 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Herald Negative
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral

Herald has a beta of 0.977886, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Herald has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Herald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Herald£101.21M14.00£175.20M£199.0114.87
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.85£11.42M£110.005.36

6.4% of Herald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Herald shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Herald beats Fidelity Asian Values on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.37£227.88M£26.7013.99
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.85£11.42M£110.005.36

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.266, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

8.0% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 2 more articles in the media than Fidelity Asian Values. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Fidelity Asian Values' score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Worldwide Healthcare on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Bankers Investment Trust1,132.30% 22.55% 6.13%
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

In the previous week, The Bankers Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity Asian Values. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values. The Bankers Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Fidelity Asian Values' score of 0.00 indicating that The Bankers Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Bankers Investment Trust Positive
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral

The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.9636718, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.28£218.53M£30.134.96
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.85£11.42M£110.005.36

Summary

The Bankers Investment Trust beats Fidelity Asian Values on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to BH Macro GBP?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.85£11.42M£110.005.36
BH Macro GBP£277.60M4.86£53.77M£45.689.12

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.14339958, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
BH Macro GBP 54.44%7.42%-0.31%

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BH Macro GBP'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
BH Macro GBP Neutral

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats BH Macro GBP on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Ashmore Group?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 155, suggesting a potential downside of 26.08%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Fidelity Asian Values.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity Asian Values
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ashmore Group
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Ashmore Group's net margin of 78.55%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Ashmore Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Ashmore Group 78.55%14.60%4.52%

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ashmore Group has a beta of 0.962, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ashmore Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Neutral
Ashmore Group Neutral

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashmore Group pays out 102.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Ashmore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Ashmore Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ashmore Group has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.85£11.42M£110.005.36
Ashmore Group£135.90M10.03£94.67M£16.5412.68

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Fidelity Asian Values on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fidelity Asian Values News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFidelity Asian ValuesCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£372.57M£5.52B£13.97B£2.83B
Dividend Yield3.51%7.51%5.96%6.15%
P/E Ratio5.3636.8828.78368.41
Price / Sales4.851,120.23465.0083,654.70
Price / Cash13.8648.0429.9527.89
Price / Book1.073.723.717.06
Net Income£11.42M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.68%0.64%0.80%0.21%
1 Month Performance3.51%-0.61%0.79%0.22%
1 Year Performance5.86%6.37%13.78%64.12%

Fidelity Asian Values Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAS
Fidelity Asian Values
N/AGBX 590
+0.3%		N/A+5.5%£372.57M£76.78M5.36N/A
HRI
Herald
N/AGBX 2,965
-0.5%		N/A+20.9%£1.42B£101.21M14.906,600
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare
N/AGBX 391.35
+0.7%		N/A+19.4%£1.41B£118.16M14.66N/A
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 147
-0.3%		N/A+21.5%£1.36B£322.40M4.88N/A
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 415
-0.5%		N/A+5.7%£1.35B£277.60M9.08N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FAS) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
“The unseen winner of the AI race” is not SpaceX
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before its historic run - says a tech firm labeled 'the unseen wi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel