Go Pro
→ Elon’s New Currency (BUY NOW) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free FAS Stock Alerts

Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) Competitors

Fidelity Asian Values logo
GBX 572 +2.00 (+0.35%)
As of 11:55 AM Eastern
Compare

FAS vs. WWH, BNKR, BHMG, FSV, and JMG

Should you buy Fidelity Asian Values stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fidelity Asian Values with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fidelity Asian Values include Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), BH Macro GBP (BHMG), Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), and JPMorgan Emerging Markets (JMG). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Worldwide Healthcare?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Fidelity Asian Values 87.46%17.85%0.25%

Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M12.00£227.88M£26.7014.63
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.73£11.42M£110.005.20

8.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 4 more articles in the media than Fidelity Asian Values. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Worldwide Healthcare's score of 0.79 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fidelity Asian Values
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.5198687, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats Worldwide Healthcare on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to The Bankers Investment Trust?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and The Bankers Investment Trust (LON:BNKR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than The Bankers Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for The Bankers Investment Trust. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat The Bankers Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Positive
The Bankers Investment Trust Neutral

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Bankers Investment Trust has a beta of 0.618, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. The Bankers Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Bankers Investment Trust pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

The Bankers Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,132.30% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. The Bankers Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.55% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
The Bankers Investment Trust 1,132.30%22.55%6.13%

The Bankers Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. The Bankers Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.73£11.42M£110.005.20
The Bankers Investment Trust£322.40M4.35£218.53M£30.135.01

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Bankers Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats The Bankers Investment Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to BH Macro GBP?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and BH Macro GBP (LON:BHMG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BH Macro GBP has a beta of 0.14339958, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of BH Macro GBP shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values and Fidelity Asian Values both had 1 articles in the media. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat BH Macro GBP's score of 0.75 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BH Macro GBP
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to BH Macro GBP's net margin of 54.44%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat BH Macro GBP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
BH Macro GBP 54.44%7.42%-0.31%

BH Macro GBP has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BH Macro GBP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.73£11.42M£110.005.20
BH Macro GBP£277.60M5.03£53.77M£45.689.31

Summary

Fidelity Asian Values beats BH Macro GBP on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Positive
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values Neutral

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.2700156, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a net margin of 95.92% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values 95.92%25.87%0.33%

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.73£11.42M£110.005.20
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M3.94£223.72M£109.343.94

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values beats Fidelity Asian Values on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fidelity Asian Values compare to JPMorgan Emerging Markets?

Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets (LON:JMG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity Asian Values. Fidelity Asian Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Emerging Markets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Asian Values£76.78M4.73£11.42M£110.005.20
JPMorgan Emerging Markets£56.31M23.64£80.10M£4.6329.33

Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.61886996, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out 18.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Emerging Markets pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity Asian Values is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

8.4% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of JPMorgan Emerging Markets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets has a net margin of 95.26% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of 87.46%. JPMorgan Emerging Markets' return on equity of 19.61% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Asian Values87.46% 17.85% 0.25%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets 95.26%19.61%1.55%

In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values had 1 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Emerging Markets. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity Asian Values and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Emerging Markets. Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat JPMorgan Emerging Markets' score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity Asian Values is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Asian Values Positive
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Emerging Markets beats Fidelity Asian Values on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fidelity Asian Values News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFidelity Asian ValuesAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£362.84M£2.44B£6.19B£2.83B
Dividend Yield3.60%5.99%5.23%6.15%
P/E Ratio5.2060.9429.52368.87
Price / Sales4.731,740.141,327.3886,044.72
Price / Cash13.8660.3388.7427.87
Price / Book1.041.416.707.89
Net Income£11.42M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.78%0.78%0.77%0.85%
1 Month Performance0.35%1.03%1.88%-0.48%
1 Year Performance6.72%24.32%25.12%70.69%

Fidelity Asian Values Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAS
Fidelity Asian Values
N/AGBX 572
+0.4%		N/A+6.3%£362.84M£76.78M5.20N/A
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare
N/AGBX 387.69
+0.4%		N/A+30.6%£1.41B-£164.31MN/AN/A
BNKR
The Bankers Investment Trust
N/AGBX 151.20
+1.6%		N/A+23.3%£1.40B£221.50M7.47N/A
BHMG
BH Macro GBP
N/AGBX 426.97
+0.1%		N/A+7.2%£1.40B£277.60M9.35N/A
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 425.50
-0.4%		N/A+18.5%£1.38B£354.63M3.8925,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FAS) was last updated on 7/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
J.P. Morgan is betting on this coin
While crypto investors panic-sell amid some of the most extreme fear levels since the 2022 bear market… J.P. M...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
FINAL HOURS: $9 Income ETF Access VANISHES at MIDNIGHT
Tim Plaehn's income ETF research service is available at 82% off - but the Independence Day deal expires at mi...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Are you leaving Social Security money on the table?
Most retirement plans still have gaps in them... The quiet ones that don't show up until it's too late to fix....
Money Pickle | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Midterm Trap That Could Ruin Your 401(k)
For investors within 5 to 10 years of retirement, midterm election volatility isn't a distant concern - it's a...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
You must do this before the OpenAI IPO
OpenAI - the company behind ChatGPT - has begun filing confidential paperwork for what could be the largest IP...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy the “unseen winner of the AI race” before July 22
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before a 45,000% surge - says one overlooked AI stock could split...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel