Finsbury Growth & Income (FGT) Competitors

Finsbury Growth & Income logo
GBX 743.17 +0.17 (+0.02%)
As of 06/25/2026 12:44 PM Eastern

FGT vs. TEM, CTY, QLT, ATT, and MNKS

Should you buy Finsbury Growth & Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Finsbury Growth & Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Finsbury Growth & Income include Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), City of London (CTY), Quilter (QLT), Allianz Technology Trust (ATT), and Monks (MNKS). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

11.1% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Finsbury Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0844169, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.7361958, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Finsbury Growth & Income. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.73£130.50M£77.544.29
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-3.92£90.54M-£162.40N/A

In the previous week, Finsbury Growth & Income had 6 more articles in the media than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income and 0 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Neutral
Finsbury Growth & Income Very Positive

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Finsbury Growth & Income 966.53%-19.34%4.42%

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Finsbury Growth & Income. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M5.09£294.08M£113.994.97
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-3.92£90.54M-£162.40N/A

City of London has a beta of 0.8610782, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.7361958, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Finsbury Growth & Income had 3 more articles in the media than City of London. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income and 3 mentions for City of London. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat City of London's score of 1.48 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
City of London
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Finsbury Growth & Income
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Finsbury Growth & Income 966.53%-19.34%4.42%

8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

City of London beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to Quilter?

Quilter (LON:QLT) and Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

37.4% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quilter presently has a consensus price target of GBX 203.71, suggesting a potential upside of 7.50%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Quilter is more favorable than Finsbury Growth & Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Finsbury Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Quilter has a beta of 0.823, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.7361958, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Finsbury Growth & Income had 3 more articles in the media than Quilter. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income and 3 mentions for Quilter. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Quilter's score of 0.73 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quilter
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Finsbury Growth & Income
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Finsbury Growth & Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quilter. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quilter£9.34B0.28£49.61M£8.6022.03
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-3.92£90.54M-£162.40N/A

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.35% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quilter1.28% 8.35% 0.21%
Finsbury Growth & Income 966.53%-19.34%4.42%

Summary

Quilter beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to Allianz Technology Trust?

Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) and Allianz Technology Trust (LON:ATT) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Allianz Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Allianz Technology Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Finsbury Growth & Income had 6 more articles in the media than Allianz Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income and 0 mentions for Allianz Technology Trust. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Allianz Technology Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Finsbury Growth & Income Very Positive
Allianz Technology Trust Neutral

Allianz Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Finsbury Growth & Income. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allianz Technology Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-3.92£90.54M-£162.40N/A
Allianz Technology Trust£409.28M6.08£502.74M£109.396.66

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to Allianz Technology Trust's net margin of 96.52%. Allianz Technology Trust's return on equity of 21.46% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Finsbury Growth & Income966.53% -19.34% 4.42%
Allianz Technology Trust 96.52%21.46%22.44%

Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.7361958, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allianz Technology Trust has a beta of 0.67476875, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Allianz Technology Trust beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to Monks?

Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Monks has higher revenue and earnings than Finsbury Growth & Income. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-3.92£90.54M-£162.40N/A
Monks£488.88M5.21£589.71M£280.985.79

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than Finsbury Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Monks and 6 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Monks' score of 0.71 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Finsbury Growth & Income
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Monks
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Finsbury Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.7361958, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.9407833, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to Monks' net margin of 95.29%. Monks' return on equity of 19.34% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Finsbury Growth & Income966.53% -19.34% 4.42%
Monks 95.29%19.34%9.21%

Summary

Monks beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Finsbury Growth & Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FGT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FGT vs. The Competition

MetricFinsbury Growth & IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£778.55M£2.42B£13.87B£2.95B
Dividend Yield2.71%6.02%5.73%6.16%
P/E Ratio-4.5859.7220.27366.69
Price / Sales-3.922,072.00143.9386,035.73
Price / Cash229.4660.3319.3427.87
Price / Book0.841.382.237.67
Net Income£90.54M£265.27M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.70%-0.48%0.06%-0.71%
1 Month Performance-2.18%-0.50%0.53%-1.18%
1 Year Performance-16.97%9.01%14.40%66.26%

Finsbury Growth & Income Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FGT
Finsbury Growth & Income
N/AGBX 743.17
+0.0%
N/A-17.4%£778.55M-£198.53MN/AN/A
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 344.50
-0.6%
N/A+75.8%£3.02B£781.18M4.44N/A
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 557
-1.1%
N/A+16.7%£2.85B£568.96M4.89N/A
QLT
Quilter
3.4264 of 5 stars
GBX 189.10
-1.4%
GBX 203.71
+7.7%
+21.9%£2.59B£9.34B21.992,983
ATT
Allianz Technology Trust
N/AGBX 756
+0.4%
N/A+74.0%£2.59B£409.28M6.91N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FGT) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners