Go Pro
→ ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow! (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free FGT Stock Alerts

Finsbury Growth & Income (FGT) Competitors

Finsbury Growth & Income logo
GBX 836 +1.00 (+0.12%)
As of 11:58 AM Eastern
Compare

FGT vs. RCP, CTY, BPT, TEM, and QLT

Should you buy Finsbury Growth & Income stock or one of its competitors? Finsbury Growth & Income's main competitors and comparable companies include RIT Capital Partners (RCP), City of London (CTY), Bridgepoint Group (BPT), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), and Quilter (QLT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to RIT Capital Partners?

RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) and Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 2,025.88% compared to Finsbury Growth & Income's net margin of 966.53%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 16.54% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RIT Capital Partners2,025.88% 16.54% 4.22%
Finsbury Growth & Income 966.53%-19.34%4.42%

RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Finsbury Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Finsbury Growth & Income had 2 more articles in the media than RIT Capital Partners. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income and 1 mentions for RIT Capital Partners. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat RIT Capital Partners' score of 0.75 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RIT Capital Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Finsbury Growth & Income
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.7545988, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.772, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.9% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Finsbury Growth & Income. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RIT Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RIT Capital Partners£730.20M4.40£167.81M£327.007.94
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-4.23£90.54M-£162.40N/A

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Finsbury Growth & Income. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M5.36£294.08M£113.995.19
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-4.23£90.54M-£162.40N/A

City of London has a beta of 0.869, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.772, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Finsbury Growth & Income 966.53%-19.34%4.42%

In the previous week, Finsbury Growth & Income had 3 more articles in the media than City of London. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income and 0 mentions for City of London. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Neutral
Finsbury Growth & Income Very Positive

Summary

City of London beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Bridgepoint Group pays out 313.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Bridgepoint Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 22.33%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Finsbury Growth & Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Finsbury Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Finsbury Growth & Income had 3 more articles in the media than Bridgepoint Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income and 0 mentions for Bridgepoint Group. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Bridgepoint Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group Neutral
Finsbury Growth & Income Very Positive

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Bridgepoint Group's return on equity of 2.71% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group4.18% 2.71% 3.47%
Finsbury Growth & Income 966.53%-19.34%4.42%

Finsbury Growth & Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bridgepoint Group. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£583.70M4.81£45.58M£3.00106.27
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-4.23£90.54M-£162.40N/A

27.1% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.388, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.772, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Finsbury Growth & Income. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.75£130.50M£77.544.10
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-4.23£90.54M-£162.40N/A

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Finsbury Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.772, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust both had 3 articles in the media. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's score of 0.80 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Finsbury Growth & Income
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Finsbury Growth & Income 966.53%-19.34%4.42%

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Finsbury Growth & Income compare to Quilter?

Finsbury Growth & Income (LON:FGT) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Finsbury Growth & Income has a net margin of 966.53% compared to Quilter's net margin of 0.88%. Quilter's return on equity of 8.39% beat Finsbury Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Finsbury Growth & Income966.53% -19.34% 4.42%
Quilter 0.88%8.39%0.21%

15.3% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Finsbury Growth & Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Finsbury Growth & Income has a beta of 0.772, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.824, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Quilter has a consensus target price of GBX 210.86, suggesting a potential upside of 8.56%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quilter is more favorable than Finsbury Growth & Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Finsbury Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Finsbury Growth & Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quilter. Finsbury Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Finsbury Growth & Income-£198.53M-4.23£90.54M-£162.40N/A
Quilter£13.46B0.20£49.61M£8.6022.58

Finsbury Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Finsbury Growth & Income pays out -12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Finsbury Growth & Income had 2 more articles in the media than Quilter. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Finsbury Growth & Income and 1 mentions for Quilter. Finsbury Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat Quilter's score of 0.67 indicating that Finsbury Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Finsbury Growth & Income
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Quilter
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Quilter beats Finsbury Growth & Income on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Finsbury Growth & Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FGT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FGT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFinsbury Growth & IncomeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£839.09M£5.74B£14.06B£2.92B
Dividend Yield2.44%7.39%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio-5.1539.0729.63367.27
Price / Sales-4.231,215.67514.3283,460.67
Price / Cash229.4648.3130.7327.89
Price / Book0.943.772.887.12
Net Income£90.54M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.07%0.81%1.37%0.74%
1 Month Performance8.71%2.36%2.98%3.13%
1 Year Performance-8.06%7.76%11.65%22.34%

Finsbury Growth & Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FGT
Finsbury Growth & Income
N/AGBX 836
+0.1%		N/A-8.2%£839.09M-£198.53MN/AN/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,625
flat		N/A+28.6%£3.25B£730.20M8.0362
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 591
+0.2%		N/A+15.9%£3.05B£568.96M5.18N/A
BPT
Bridgepoint Group
N/AGBX 340.71
+1.0%		GBX 390
+14.5%		-5.8%£3.00B£583.70M113.57391
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 320.31
-0.2%		N/A+57.4%£2.95B£781.18M4.13N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FGT) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel