Go Pro
→ Bezos… DOOMED (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free TFG Stock Alerts

Tetragon Financial (TFG) Competitors

Tetragon Financial logo
GBX 13.91 -0.14 (-1.00%)
As of 09/3/2026 11:57 AM Eastern
Compare

TFG vs. JGC, VLE, TENT, FWT, and BRIG

Should you buy Tetragon Financial stock or one of its competitors? Tetragon Financial's main competitors and comparable companies include Jupiter Green (JGC), Volvere (VLE), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), Foresight Technology VCT (FWT), and BlackRock Income and Growth (BRIG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Tetragon Financial compare to Jupiter Green?

Tetragon Financial (LON:TFG) and Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Tetragon Financial has a net margin of 58.62% compared to Jupiter Green's net margin of -26.72%. Tetragon Financial's return on equity of 9.32% beat Jupiter Green's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tetragon Financial58.62% 9.32% 3.14%
Jupiter Green -26.72%-0.45%0.15%

Tetragon Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Green. Jupiter Green is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tetragon Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tetragon Financial£181.50M0.06£12.66B£158.000.09
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A

Tetragon Financial has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tetragon Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Green. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tetragon Financial and 0 mentions for Jupiter Green. Jupiter Green's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tetragon Financial's score of -0.27 indicating that Jupiter Green is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tetragon Financial Neutral
Jupiter Green Neutral

Tetragon Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 330.7%. Jupiter Green pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Tetragon Financial pays out 29.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Green pays out 2.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

0.9% of Tetragon Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of Tetragon Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Tetragon Financial beats Jupiter Green on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tetragon Financial compare to Volvere?

Tetragon Financial (LON:TFG) and Volvere (LON:VLE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Tetragon Financial has a beta of 0.08, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volvere has a beta of 0.612, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

0.9% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Volvere shares are held by institutional investors. 31.2% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.2% of Volvere shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tetragon Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Volvere. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tetragon Financial and 0 mentions for Volvere. Volvere's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tetragon Financial's score of -0.27 indicating that Volvere is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tetragon Financial Neutral
Volvere Neutral

Tetragon Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Volvere. Tetragon Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tetragon Financial£181.50M0.06£12.66B£158.000.09
Volvere£52.70M0.87£2.94M£188.8911.12

Tetragon Financial has a net margin of 58.62% compared to Volvere's net margin of 7.90%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat Tetragon Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tetragon Financial58.62% 9.32% 3.14%
Volvere 7.90%9.96%6.16%

Summary

Volvere beats Tetragon Financial on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tetragon Financial compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) and Tetragon Financial (LON:TFG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to Tetragon Financial's net margin of 58.62%. Tetragon Financial's return on equity of 9.32% beat Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Triple Point Energy Transition152.90% -7.81% -4.86%
Tetragon Financial 58.62%9.32%3.14%

Triple Point Energy Transition pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Tetragon Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 330.7%. Triple Point Energy Transition pays out -48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tetragon Financial pays out 29.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Tetragon Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. Triple Point Energy Transition is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tetragon Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A
Tetragon Financial£181.50M0.06£12.66B£158.000.09

In the previous week, Tetragon Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Triple Point Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tetragon Financial and 0 mentions for Triple Point Energy Transition. Triple Point Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tetragon Financial's score of -0.27 indicating that Triple Point Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral
Tetragon Financial Neutral

Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tetragon Financial has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tetragon Financial beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tetragon Financial compare to Foresight Technology VCT?

Foresight Technology VCT (LON:FWT) and Tetragon Financial (LON:TFG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Foresight Technology VCT has a beta of -0.25, meaning that its share price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tetragon Financial has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tetragon Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Foresight Technology VCT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tetragon Financial and 0 mentions for Foresight Technology VCT. Foresight Technology VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tetragon Financial's score of -0.27 indicating that Foresight Technology VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foresight Technology VCT Neutral
Tetragon Financial Neutral

Tetragon Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Foresight Technology VCT. Foresight Technology VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tetragon Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight Technology VCT£64K689.86£23.15M-£0.80N/A
Tetragon Financial£181.50M0.06£12.66B£158.000.09

0.9% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Foresight Technology VCT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Foresight Technology VCT has a net margin of 255.13% compared to Tetragon Financial's net margin of 58.62%. Tetragon Financial's return on equity of 9.32% beat Foresight Technology VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight Technology VCT255.13% -4.85% 3.17%
Tetragon Financial 58.62%9.32%3.14%

Summary

Tetragon Financial beats Foresight Technology VCT on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tetragon Financial compare to BlackRock Income and Growth?

Tetragon Financial (LON:TFG) and BlackRock Income and Growth (LON:BRIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Tetragon Financial has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock Income and Growth has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Income and Growth has a net margin of 88.25% compared to Tetragon Financial's net margin of 58.62%. BlackRock Income and Growth's return on equity of 14.31% beat Tetragon Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tetragon Financial58.62% 9.32% 3.14%
BlackRock Income and Growth 88.25%14.31%2.59%

In the previous week, Tetragon Financial had 1 more articles in the media than BlackRock Income and Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tetragon Financial and 0 mentions for BlackRock Income and Growth. BlackRock Income and Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tetragon Financial's score of -0.27 indicating that BlackRock Income and Growth is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tetragon Financial Neutral
BlackRock Income and Growth Neutral

0.9% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 31.2% of Tetragon Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tetragon Financial pays an annual dividend of GBX 46 per share and has a dividend yield of 330.7%. BlackRock Income and Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Tetragon Financial pays out 29.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BlackRock Income and Growth pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Tetragon Financial has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock Income and Growth. Tetragon Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Income and Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tetragon Financial£181.50M0.06£12.66B£158.000.09
BlackRock Income and Growth£7.07M6.12£6.90M£34.866.70

Summary

Tetragon Financial beats BlackRock Income and Growth on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tetragon Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TFG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

TFG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTetragon FinancialCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.64M£5.71B£14.21B£2.91B
Dividend Yield3.50%7.39%5.89%6.18%
P/E Ratio0.0931.5626.14367.42
Price / Sales0.061,251.59521.3983,891.79
Price / Cash0.0748.0638.3727.89
Price / Book0.001.982.136.75
Net Income£12.66B£419.47M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.78%-0.53%0.24%5.57%
1 Month Performance2.28%0.61%1.56%2.30%
1 Year Performance-21.38%7.62%12.05%21.81%

Tetragon Financial Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TFG
Tetragon Financial
N/AGBX 13.91
-1.0%		N/A-21.3%£11.64M£181.50M0.09N/A
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A
VLE
Volvere
N/AGBX 2,200
+3.8%		N/A+0.9%£46.43M£52.70M11.65226
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A
FWT
Foresight Technology VCT
N/AGBX 87.50
flat		N/AN/A£44.15M£64KN/A375

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TFG) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s “new Petrodollar” exposed
Trump has reportedly secured control over 65 billion barrels across 17 Venezuelan oil fields, more than the en...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Before Anthropic becomes impossible to ignore...
Riot Platforms just struck a 20-year, 191-megawatt data-center agreement tied to Anthropic, reportedly worth 9...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
They're not buying gold. They're buying this.
Bank of America raised its stake in a small gold company by 139%. Jane Street increased its position by 159%, ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk says UBI is coming. I say it's already here.
Elon Musk says AI could make money irrelevant by 2036. One income program already exists today, funded not by ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
After KDA, PRE, and OCEAN—this is the one
I’ve spent years searching for overlooked cryptos before the crowd catches on. Here are a few of our past reco...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street pays $32K for this type of stock market data. (But see this Labor Day deal now!)
The Bloomberg Terminal costs $32,000 a year and sits on the desks of more than 350,000 Wall Street traders. Mo...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel