GCP Asset Backed Income (GABI) Competitors

GCP Asset Backed Income (LON:GABI) and Bluefield Solar Income Fund (LON:BSIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, community ranking and profitability.

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in GABI or BSIF?

Bluefield Solar Income Fund received 49 more outperform votes than GCP Asset Backed Income when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 66.67% of users gave GCP Asset Backed Income an outperform vote while only 60.11% of users gave Bluefield Solar Income Fund an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
GCP Asset Backed Income	Outperform Votes 64 66.67%	Underperform Votes 32 33.33%
Bluefield Solar Income Fund	Outperform Votes 113 60.11%	Underperform Votes 75 39.89%

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GABI or BSIF?

GCP Asset Backed Income has higher revenue and earnings than Bluefield Solar Income Fund. Bluefield Solar Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GCP Asset Backed Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
GCP Asset Backed Income	£9.82M	14.17	£6.26M	£2.90	22.25
Bluefield Solar Income Fund	-£7.22M	-79.90	-£9.36M	-£1.57	-61.96

Which has more volatility and risk, GABI or BSIF?

GCP Asset Backed Income has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bluefield Solar Income Fund has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in GABI or BSIF?

65.6% of GCP Asset Backed Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.7% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of GCP Asset Backed Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of Bluefield Solar Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Is GABI or BSIF more profitable?

Bluefield Solar Income Fund has a net margin of 129.55% compared to GCP Asset Backed Income's net margin of 63.69%. GCP Asset Backed Income's return on equity of 3.75% beat Bluefield Solar Income Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
GCP Asset Backed Income	63.69%	3.75%	3.11%
Bluefield Solar Income Fund	129.55%	-1.19%	0.96%

Does the media favor GABI or BSIF?

In the previous week, GCP Asset Backed Income and GCP Asset Backed Income both had 1 articles in the media. GCP Asset Backed Income's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat Bluefield Solar Income Fund's score of 0.59 indicating that GCP Asset Backed Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
GCP Asset Backed Income	Very Positive
Bluefield Solar Income Fund	Positive

Is GABI or BSIF a better dividend stock?

GCP Asset Backed Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. GCP Asset Backed Income pays out 206.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bluefield Solar Income Fund pays out -574.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

GCP Asset Backed Income beats Bluefield Solar Income Fund on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.