POLN vs. JUP, NESF, UEM, ATR, LIO, MTW, MWY, AAS, PCGH, and JEGI
Should you be buying Pollen Street Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Pollen Street Group include Jupiter Fund Management (JUP), NextEnergy Solar Fund (NESF), Utilico Emerging Markets (UEM), Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (ATR), Liontrust Asset Management (LIO), Mattioli Woods (MTW), Mid Wynd International Inv Tr (MWY), abrdn Asia Focus (AAS), Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust (PCGH), and JPMorgan European Growth & Income (JEGI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, community ranking, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.
Pollen Street Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,070, indicating a potential upside of 54.62%. Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus price target of GBX 78.67, indicating a potential upside of 3.10%. Given Pollen Street Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pollen Street Group is more favorable than Jupiter Fund Management.
Pollen Street Group has a beta of 0.24, indicating that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Pollen Street Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 52 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Pollen Street Group pays out 8,524.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jupiter Fund Management pays out -23,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Jupiter Fund Management received 606 more outperform votes than Pollen Street Group when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Pollen Street Group an outperform vote while only 60.10% of users gave Jupiter Fund Management an outperform vote.
In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 1 more articles in the media than Pollen Street Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 4 mentions for Pollen Street Group. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Pollen Street Group's score of 0.10 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
15.2% of Pollen Street Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.5% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.8% of Pollen Street Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Pollen Street Group has a net margin of 39.17% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of -3.50%. Pollen Street Group's return on equity of 6.95% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.
Pollen Street Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pollen Street Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Pollen Street Group beats Jupiter Fund Management on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Pollen Street Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for POLN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding POLN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Pollen Street Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
