Go Pro

Worldwide Healthcare (WWH) Competitors

Worldwide Healthcare logo
GBX 380 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/18/2026 11:57 AM Eastern

WWH vs. ABDN, ATST, 3IN, EMG, and PHLL

Should you buy Worldwide Healthcare stock or one of its competitors? Worldwide Healthcare's main competitors and comparable companies include abrdn (ABDN), Alliance Trust (ATST), 3i Infrastructure (3IN), Man Group (EMG), and Petershill Partners (PHLL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to abrdn?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and abrdn (LON:ABDN) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to abrdn's net margin of 28.07%. Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity of 8.01% beat abrdn's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
abrdn 28.07%7.37%0.68%

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn has a beta of 1.398, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. abrdn pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

abrdn has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. abrdn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.27£227.88M£26.7014.23
abrdn£1.71B2.50£316.36M£20.9011.42

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 3 more articles in the media than abrdn. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for abrdn. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat abrdn's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive
abrdn Neutral

7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of abrdn shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of abrdn shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn has a consensus price target of GBX 226.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.09%. Given abrdn's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe abrdn is more favorable than Worldwide Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
abrdn
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Summary

abrdn beats Worldwide Healthcare on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to Alliance Trust?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Alliance Trust (LON:ATST) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alliance Trust has a net margin of 92.17% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Alliance Trust's return on equity of 17.93% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Alliance Trust 92.17%17.93%10.95%

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Trust has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Alliance Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. Alliance Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.27£227.88M£26.7014.23
Alliance Trust£652.76M0.00£601.66M£2.12N/A

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 3 more articles in the media than Alliance Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Alliance Trust. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat Alliance Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive
Alliance Trust Neutral

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Alliance Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 26 per share. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliance Trust pays out 1,226.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Worldwide Healthcare is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Alliance Trust beats Worldwide Healthcare on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to 3i Infrastructure?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 14.36%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Worldwide Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3i Infrastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

3i Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.27£227.88M£26.7014.23
3i Infrastructure£301M12.06£347M£32.0012.30

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 2 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 1 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
3i Infrastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Worldwide Healthcare on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to Man Group?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Man Group (LON:EMG) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Man Group has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. Man Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.27£227.88M£26.7014.23
Man Group£1.69B2.21£382.68M£28.1011.98

In the previous week, Man Group had 1 more articles in the media than Worldwide Healthcare. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Man Group and 3 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat Man Group's score of 0.42 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Man Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Man Group has a consensus price target of GBX 304.75, indicating a potential downside of 9.50%. Given Man Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Man Group is more favorable than Worldwide Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Man Group pays out 60.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to Man Group's net margin of 18.60%. Man Group's return on equity of 20.41% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Man Group 18.60%20.41%4.61%

7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Man Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Man Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Man Group has a beta of 0.631, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Man Group beats Worldwide Healthcare on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to Petershill Partners?

Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) and Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 3 more articles in the media than Petershill Partners. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Petershill Partners. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat Petershill Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petershill Partners Neutral
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive

3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petershill Partners currently has a consensus target price of GBX 309, suggesting a potential downside of 0.48%. Given Petershill Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Petershill Partners is more favorable than Worldwide Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to Petershill Partners' net margin of 67.97%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petershill Partners67.97% 16.42% 5.95%
Worldwide Healthcare 85.46%8.01%-2.02%

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M11.27£227.88M£26.7014.23

Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Petershill Partners beats Worldwide Healthcare on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Worldwide Healthcare News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WWH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WWH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WWH vs. The Competition

MetricWorldwide HealthcareCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.33B£5.35B£13.73B£2.87B
Dividend Yield0.63%7.49%5.94%6.22%
P/E Ratio14.2329.9625.31366.66
Price / Sales11.271,238.30510.5589,823.12
Price / Cash37.5447.8530.0727.89
Price / Book1.023.522.736.34
Net Income£227.88M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.40%-0.18%-0.30%0.53%
1 Month Performance-4.04%-1.90%-0.36%-0.42%
1 Year Performance15.30%1.37%7.79%19.10%

Worldwide Healthcare Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare
N/AGBX 380
flat
N/A+15.3%£1.33B£118.16M14.23N/A
ABDN
abrdn
1.88 of 5 stars
GBX 250.27
+0.4%
GBX 226.50
-9.5%
+26.4%£4.48B£1.71B11.974,719
ATST
Alliance Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.58B£652.76M600.003
3IN
3i Infrastructure
1.5258 of 5 stars
GBX 386.50
+0.1%
GBX 450
+16.4%
+12.1%£3.56B£301M12.08N/A
EMG
Man Group
2.2747 of 5 stars
GBX 306.46
0.0%
GBX 304.75
-0.6%
+91.9%£3.40B£1.69B10.911,790

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:WWH) was last updated on 9/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners