Free Trial
→ Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free WWH Stock Alerts

Worldwide Healthcare (WWH) Competitors

Worldwide Healthcare logo
GBX 368 +10.00 (+2.79%)
As of 10/9/2026 11:57 AM Eastern
Compare

WWH vs. ABDN, ATST, 3IN, EMG, and PHLL

Should you buy Worldwide Healthcare stock or one of its competitors? Worldwide Healthcare's main competitors and comparable companies include abrdn (ABDN), Alliance Trust (ATST), 3i Infrastructure (3IN), Man Group (EMG), and Petershill Partners (PHLL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to abrdn?

abrdn (LON:ABDN) and Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for abrdn. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat abrdn's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Neutral
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to abrdn's net margin of 28.07%. Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity of 8.01% beat abrdn's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn28.07% 7.37% 0.68%
Worldwide Healthcare 85.46%8.01%-2.02%

42.1% of abrdn shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of abrdn shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. abrdn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn£1.71B2.54£316.36M£20.9011.63
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M10.65£227.88M£26.7013.78

abrdn has a beta of 1.398, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

abrdn pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. abrdn pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

abrdn currently has a consensus target price of GBX 226.50, suggesting a potential downside of 6.79%. Given abrdn's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe abrdn is more favorable than Worldwide Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

abrdn beats Worldwide Healthcare on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to Alliance Trust?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Alliance Trust (LON:ATST) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 1 more articles in the media than Alliance Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Alliance Trust. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Alliance Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive
Alliance Trust Neutral

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Trust has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Alliance Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. Alliance Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M10.65£227.88M£26.7013.78
Alliance Trust£652.76M0.00£601.66M£2.12N/A

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Alliance Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 26 per share. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliance Trust pays out 1,226.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Worldwide Healthcare is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Alliance Trust has a net margin of 92.17% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. Alliance Trust's return on equity of 17.93% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Alliance Trust 92.17%17.93%10.95%

7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Alliance Trust beats Worldwide Healthcare on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to 3i Infrastructure?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 1 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive
3i Infrastructure Neutral

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 15.98%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Worldwide Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

3i Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M10.65£227.88M£26.7013.78
3i Infrastructure£301M11.89£347M£32.0012.13

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 85.46%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Worldwide Healthcare on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to Man Group?

Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Man Group (LON:EMG) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Man Group pays out 60.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Man Group had 4 more articles in the media than Worldwide Healthcare. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Man Group and 1 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Man Group's score of 0.67 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Worldwide Healthcare
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Man Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Man Group has a beta of 0.631, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Man Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Man Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Man Group has a consensus price target of GBX 322.25, suggesting a potential downside of 5.00%. Given Man Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Man Group is more favorable than Worldwide Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Worldwide Healthcare
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to Man Group's net margin of 18.60%. Man Group's return on equity of 20.41% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Worldwide Healthcare85.46% 8.01% -2.02%
Man Group 18.60%20.41%4.61%

Man Group has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. Man Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M10.65£227.88M£26.7013.78
Man Group£1.69B2.22£382.68M£28.1012.07

Summary

Man Group beats Worldwide Healthcare on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Worldwide Healthcare compare to Petershill Partners?

Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) and Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Worldwide Healthcare has a net margin of 85.46% compared to Petershill Partners' net margin of 67.97%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petershill Partners67.97% 16.42% 5.95%
Worldwide Healthcare 85.46%8.01%-2.02%

Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.262, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 1 more articles in the media than Petershill Partners. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Petershill Partners. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Petershill Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petershill Partners Neutral
Worldwide Healthcare Very Positive

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Worldwide Healthcare. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59
Worldwide Healthcare£118.16M10.65£227.88M£26.7013.78

Summary

Worldwide Healthcare beats Petershill Partners on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Worldwide Healthcare News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WWH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WWH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WWH vs. The Competition

Export
MetricWorldwide HealthcareCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.22B£5.16B£13.16B£2.44B
Dividend Yield0.67%7.62%6.08%6.27%
P/E Ratio13.7830.0724.73367.13
Price / Sales10.651,203.68487.1788,484.04
Price / Cash37.5447.6246.6527.89
Price / Book0.993.482.717.13
Net Income£227.88M£415.02M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.32%-0.51%-0.08%
1 Month Performance-1.20%-1.81%-2.62%-0.55%
1 Year Performance5.70%9.55%10.49%22.43%

Worldwide Healthcare Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare
N/AGBX 368
+2.8%		N/A+5.7%£1.22B£118.16M13.78N/A
ABDN
abrdn
2.0091 of 5 stars		GBX 243.20
+0.3%		GBX 226.50
-6.9%		+17.5%£4.36B£1.71B11.644,719
ATST
Alliance Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.58B£652.76M600.003
3IN
3i Infrastructure
N/AGBX 387.50
-0.4%		GBX 450
+16.1%		+10.5%£3.57B£301M12.11N/A
EMG
Man Group
1.8219 of 5 stars		GBX 322.20
+1.8%		GBX 312.25
-3.1%		+79.8%£3.57B£1.69B11.471,790

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:WWH) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel