Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GLE or DFS?

MJ Gleeson has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DFS Furniture. DFS Furniture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MJ Gleeson £381.06M 0.42 £20.04M £24.53 11.13 DFS Furniture £1.07B 0.34 -£4.30M £15.00 10.60

Does the media prefer GLE or DFS?

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson and MJ Gleeson both had 1 articles in the media. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DFS Furniture'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MJ Gleeson 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral DFS Furniture 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer GLE or ABBY?

MJ Gleeson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 13.55%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Abbey. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MJ Gleeson 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Abbey 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, GLE or ABBY?

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Abbey. Abbey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MJ Gleeson £381.06M 0.42 £20.04M £24.53 11.13 Abbey £192.13M 0.00 N/A £125.10 N/A

Is GLE or ABBY more profitable?

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Abbey's net margin of 0.00%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Abbey's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MJ Gleeson 3.76% 4.67% 4.73% Abbey N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to GLE or ABBY?

In the previous week, Abbey had 15 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Abbey and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Abbey's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Abbey is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MJ Gleeson 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Abbey 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend GLE or TEF?

MJ Gleeson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 13.55%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Telford Homes. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MJ Gleeson 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Telford Homes 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GLE or TEF?

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Telford Homes. Telford Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MJ Gleeson £381.06M 0.42 £20.04M £24.53 11.13 Telford Homes £336.12M 0.00 N/A £44.50 N/A

Does the media refer more to GLE or CRST?

In the previous week, Crest Nicholson had 1 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Crest Nicholson and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Crest Nicholson's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Crest Nicholson is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MJ Gleeson 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Crest Nicholson 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate GLE or SPR?

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 13.55%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Springfield Properties. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MJ Gleeson 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Springfield Properties 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media prefer GLE or SPR?

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 1 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Springfield Properties and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MJ Gleeson 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Springfield Properties 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

MJ Gleeson (GLE) Competitors

GBX 273 +1.00 (+0.37%)

As of 08/25/2026 11:58 AM Eastern

Compare

GLE vs. DFS, ABBY, TEF, CRST, and SPR

Should you buy MJ Gleeson stock or one of its competitors? MJ Gleeson's main competitors and comparable companies include DFS Furniture (DFS), Abbey (ABBY), Telford Homes (TEF), Crest Nicholson (CRST), and Springfield Properties (SPR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to DFS Furniture?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and DFS Furniture (LON:DFS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.621, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.443, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to DFS Furniture's net margin of 3.27%. DFS Furniture's return on equity of 13.23% beat MJ Gleeson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%
DFS Furniture	3.27%	13.23%	3.00%

MJ Gleeson has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DFS Furniture. DFS Furniture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.42	£20.04M	£24.53	11.13
DFS Furniture	£1.07B	0.34	-£4.30M	£15.00	10.60

MJ Gleeson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 13.55%. DFS Furniture has a consensus price target of GBX 208.33, indicating a potential upside of 31.03%. Given DFS Furniture's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than MJ Gleeson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
DFS Furniture	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson and MJ Gleeson both had 1 articles in the media. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DFS Furniture'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
DFS Furniture	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

42.6% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of DFS Furniture shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

DFS Furniture beats MJ Gleeson on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Abbey?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Abbey (LON:ABBY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Abbey. Abbey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.42	£20.04M	£24.53	11.13
Abbey	£192.13M	0.00	N/A	£125.10	N/A

In the previous week, Abbey had 15 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Abbey and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Abbey's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Abbey is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Abbey	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

42.6% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 13.55%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Abbey.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Abbey	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Abbey's net margin of 0.00%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Abbey's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%
Abbey	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Abbey on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Telford Homes?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Telford Homes (LON:TEF) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Telford Homes. Telford Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.42	£20.04M	£24.53	11.13
Telford Homes	£336.12M	0.00	N/A	£44.50	N/A

MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Telford Homes pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Telford Homes pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Telford Homes' net margin of 0.00%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Telford Homes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%
Telford Homes	N/A	N/A	N/A

42.6% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MJ Gleeson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 13.55%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Telford Homes.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Telford Homes	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson had 1 more articles in the media than Telford Homes. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson and 0 mentions for Telford Homes. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Telford Homes'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson	Neutral
Telford Homes	Neutral

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Telford Homes on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Crest Nicholson?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of -5.44%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%
Crest Nicholson	-5.44%	-4.32%	0.16%

MJ Gleeson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 13.55%. Crest Nicholson has a consensus price target of GBX 108.86, suggesting a potential upside of 63.94%. Given Crest Nicholson's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than MJ Gleeson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Crest Nicholson	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

42.6% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.621, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.316, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

MJ Gleeson has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crest Nicholson. Crest Nicholson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.42	£20.04M	£24.53	11.13
Crest Nicholson	£558.90M	0.31	-£26.61M	£8.40	7.90

In the previous week, Crest Nicholson had 1 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Crest Nicholson and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Crest Nicholson's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Crest Nicholson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Crest Nicholson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crest Nicholson pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crest Nicholson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

MJ Gleeson and Crest Nicholson tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Springfield Properties?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

42.6% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Springfield Properties. Springfield Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.42	£20.04M	£24.53	11.13
Springfield Properties	£282.91M	0.46	£7.57M	£11.37	9.67

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.621, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.072, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to MJ Gleeson's net margin of 3.76%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat MJ Gleeson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%
Springfield Properties	5.03%	8.30%	3.53%

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 13.55%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Springfield Properties.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Springfield Properties	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 1 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Springfield Properties and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Springfield Properties	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Springfield Properties on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MJ Gleeson News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GLE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GLE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MJ Gleeson	Household Durables Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£158.67M	£5.48B	£13.22B	£2.92B
Dividend Yield	4.04%	3.49%	56.30%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	11.13	17.27	46.69	367.27
Price / Sales	0.42	65.16	92.81	83,460.67
Price / Cash	6.06	9.41	29.11	27.89
Price / Book	0.53	2.55	6.02	7.12
Net Income	£20.04M	£273.17M	£445.73M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	1.49%	-0.08%	-0.22%	0.69%
1 Month Performance	0.55%	2.76%	2.13%	3.13%
1 Year Performance	-21.33%	-4.32%	-1.91%	21.89%

MJ Gleeson Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GLE MJ Gleeson	2.8341 of 5 stars	GBX 273 +0.4%	GBX 310 +13.6%	-22.0%	£158.67M	£381.06M	11.13	743
DFS DFS Furniture	3.0595 of 5 stars	GBX 161 +2.2%	GBX 208.33 +29.4%	+1.0%	£372.74M	£1.07B	10.73	20,200
ABBY Abbey	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£334.03M	£192.13M	12.79	228	Gap Up High Trading Volume
TEF Telford Homes	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£265.88M	£336.12M	7.85	104,200	High Trading Volume
CRST Crest Nicholson	4.8827 of 5 stars	GBX 67.89 -2.3%	GBX 108.86 +60.3%	-61.0%	£174.51M	£558.90M	8.08	778

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GLE) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MJ Gleeson (GLE) Competitors

GLE vs. DFS, ABBY, TEF, CRST, and SPR

How does MJ Gleeson compare to DFS Furniture?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Abbey?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Telford Homes?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Crest Nicholson?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Springfield Properties?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GLE vs. The Competition

MJ Gleeson Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MJ Gleeson (GLE) Competitors

GLE vs. DFS, ABBY, TEF, CRST, and SPR

How does MJ Gleeson compare to DFS Furniture?

Which has more volatility & risk, GLE or DFS?

Is GLE or DFS more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GLE or DFS?

Do analysts prefer GLE or DFS?

Does the media prefer GLE or DFS?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in GLE or DFS?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Abbey?

Which has better valuation and earnings, GLE or ABBY?

Does the media refer more to GLE or ABBY?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GLE or ABBY?

Do analysts prefer GLE or ABBY?

Is GLE or ABBY more profitable?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Telford Homes?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GLE or TEF?

Is GLE or TEF a better dividend stock?

Is GLE or TEF more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GLE or TEF?

Do analysts recommend GLE or TEF?

Does the media refer more to GLE or TEF?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Crest Nicholson?

Is GLE or CRST more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GLE or CRST?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GLE or CRST?

Which has more volatility and risk, GLE or CRST?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GLE or CRST?

Does the media refer more to GLE or CRST?

Is GLE or CRST a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Springfield Properties?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GLE or SPR?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GLE or SPR?

Which has more volatility and risk, GLE or SPR?

Is GLE or SPR more profitable?

Do analysts rate GLE or SPR?

Does the media prefer GLE or SPR?

Is GLE or SPR a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GLE vs. The Competition

MJ Gleeson Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools