MJ Gleeson (GLE) Competitors

GBX 240 -4.00 (-1.64%)

As of 12:39 PM Eastern

GLE vs. ABBY, TEF, CRST, SPR, and WJG

Should you buy MJ Gleeson stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MJ Gleeson with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MJ Gleeson include Abbey (ABBY), Telford Homes (TEF), Crest Nicholson (CRST), Springfield Properties (SPR), and Watkin Jones (WJG). These companies are all part of the "residential construction" industry.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Abbey?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Abbey (LON:ABBY) are both small-cap residential construction industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

43.7% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Abbey's net margin of 0.00%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Abbey's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%
Abbey	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Abbey had 1 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Abbey and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Abbey's score of 0.36 indicating that MJ Gleeson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Abbey	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Abbey. Abbey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.37	£20.04M	£24.53	9.78
Abbey	£192.13M	0.00	N/A	£125.10	N/A

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus price target of GBX 500, suggesting a potential upside of 108.33%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Abbey.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Abbey	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Abbey on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Telford Homes?

Telford Homes (LON:TEF) and MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Telford Homes. Telford Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Telford Homes	£336.12M	0.00	N/A	£44.50	N/A
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.37	£20.04M	£24.53	9.78

MJ Gleeson has a consensus target price of GBX 500, indicating a potential upside of 108.33%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Telford Homes.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Telford Homes	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

43.7% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Telford Homes' net margin of 0.00%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Telford Homes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Telford Homes	N/A	N/A	N/A
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%

Telford Homes pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Telford Homes pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson had 1 more articles in the media than Telford Homes. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson and 0 mentions for Telford Homes. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Telford Homes' score of 0.00 indicating that MJ Gleeson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Telford Homes	Neutral
MJ Gleeson	Very Positive

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Telford Homes on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Crest Nicholson?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

43.7% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.593, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.349, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus target price of GBX 500, suggesting a potential upside of 108.33%. Crest Nicholson has a consensus target price of GBX 121, suggesting a potential upside of 75.36%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Crest Nicholson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Crest Nicholson	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

In the previous week, Crest Nicholson had 2 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Crest Nicholson and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Crest Nicholson's score of 1.27 indicating that MJ Gleeson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Crest Nicholson	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of 0.36%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%
Crest Nicholson	0.36%	0.30%	0.16%

MJ Gleeson has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crest Nicholson. MJ Gleeson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crest Nicholson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.37	£20.04M	£24.53	9.78
Crest Nicholson	£610.80M	0.29	-£26.61M	£0.90	76.67

MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crest Nicholson pays out 277.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MJ Gleeson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Crest Nicholson on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Springfield Properties?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation and profitability.

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.593, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.055, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

43.7% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Springfield Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of Springfield Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson and MJ Gleeson both had 1 articles in the media. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Springfield Properties' score of -1.11 indicating that MJ Gleeson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Springfield Properties	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus target price of GBX 500, suggesting a potential upside of 108.33%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Springfield Properties.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Springfield Properties	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to MJ Gleeson's net margin of 3.76%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat MJ Gleeson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%
Springfield Properties	5.03%	8.30%	3.53%

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Springfield Properties. Springfield Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.37	£20.04M	£24.53	9.78
Springfield Properties	£282.91M	0.40	£7.57M	£11.37	8.45

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Springfield Properties on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Watkin Jones?

Watkin Jones (LON:WJG) and MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Watkin Jones. Watkin Jones is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Watkin Jones	£279.84M	0.20	-£30.76M	-£3.28	N/A
MJ Gleeson	£381.06M	0.37	£20.04M	£24.53	9.78

Watkin Jones has a beta of 1.476, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.593, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MJ Gleeson had 1 more articles in the media than Watkin Jones. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson and 0 mentions for Watkin Jones. MJ Gleeson's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Watkin Jones' score of 0.00 indicating that MJ Gleeson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Watkin Jones	Neutral
MJ Gleeson	Very Positive

22.7% of Watkin Jones shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Watkin Jones shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Watkin Jones' net margin of -3.00%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Watkin Jones' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Watkin Jones	-3.00%	-6.53%	-5.63%
MJ Gleeson	3.76%	4.67%	4.73%

Watkin Jones presently has a consensus target price of GBX 38, suggesting a potential upside of 73.91%. MJ Gleeson has a consensus target price of GBX 500, suggesting a potential upside of 108.33%. Given MJ Gleeson's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Watkin Jones.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Watkin Jones	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
MJ Gleeson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Watkin Jones on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MJ Gleeson News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GLE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GLE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MJ Gleeson	Residential Construction Industry	Cyclical Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£140.01M	£1.45B	£3.92B	£2.75B
Dividend Yield	4.63%	4.74%	3.61%	6.07%
P/E Ratio	9.78	11.25	77.32	365.90
Price / Sales	0.37	59.48	311.93	88,017.01
Price / Cash	6.06	5.20	30.87	27.89
Price / Book	0.47	0.65	3.16	7.74
Net Income	£20.04M	£521.56M	£247.50M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-4.95%	-3.34%	0.00%	0.27%
1 Month Performance	-11.11%	-5.54%	0.56%	2.05%
1 Year Performance	-53.31%	-11.38%	1.49%	86.43%

MJ Gleeson Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GLE MJ Gleeson	4.7346 of 5 stars	GBX 240 -1.6%	GBX 500 +108.3%	-52.3%	£140.01M	£381.06M	9.78	743	Positive News High Trading Volume
ABBY Abbey	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£334.03M	£192.13M	12.79	228	Gap Up High Trading Volume
TEF Telford Homes	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£265.88M	£336.12M	7.85	104,200	High Trading Volume
CRST Crest Nicholson	4.9098 of 5 stars	GBX 69.40 -4.1%	GBX 121 +74.4%	-61.5%	£178.17M	£610.80M	77.11	778	Positive News
SPR Springfield Properties	N/A	GBX 96.06 -0.5%	N/A	+1.5%	£114.46M	£282.91M	8.45	636	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GLE) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MJ Gleeson (GLE) Competitors

GLE vs. ABBY, TEF, CRST, SPR, and WJG

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Abbey?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Telford Homes?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Crest Nicholson?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Springfield Properties?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Watkin Jones?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GLE vs. The Competition

MJ Gleeson Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MJ Gleeson (GLE) Competitors

GLE vs. ABBY, TEF, CRST, SPR, and WJG

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Abbey?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GLE or ABBY?

Is GLE or ABBY more profitable?

Does the media favor GLE or ABBY?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GLE or ABBY?

Do analysts rate GLE or ABBY?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Telford Homes?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TEF or GLE?

Do analysts prefer TEF or GLE?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in TEF or GLE?

Is TEF or GLE more profitable?

Is TEF or GLE a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to TEF or GLE?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Crest Nicholson?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of GLE or CRST?

Which has more volatility and risk, GLE or CRST?

Do analysts recommend GLE or CRST?

Does the media favor GLE or CRST?

Is GLE or CRST more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GLE or CRST?

Is GLE or CRST a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Springfield Properties?

Which has more volatility & risk, GLE or SPR?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GLE or SPR?

Is GLE or SPR a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer GLE or SPR?

Do analysts recommend GLE or SPR?

Is GLE or SPR more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GLE or SPR?

Summary

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Watkin Jones?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, WJG or GLE?

Which has more volatility & risk, WJG or GLE?

Does the media prefer WJG or GLE?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of WJG or GLE?

Is WJG or GLE more profitable?

Do analysts rate WJG or GLE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GLE vs. The Competition

MJ Gleeson Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools