Go Pro

MJ Gleeson (GLE) Competitors

MJ Gleeson logo
GBX 276 -3.00 (-1.08%)
As of 12:19 PM Eastern

GLE vs. ABBY, TEF, CRST, SPR, and WJG

Should you buy MJ Gleeson stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MJ Gleeson with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MJ Gleeson include Abbey (ABBY), Telford Homes (TEF), Crest Nicholson (CRST), Springfield Properties (SPR), and Watkin Jones (WJG).

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Abbey?

Abbey (LON:ABBY) and MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

MJ Gleeson has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 12.32%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Abbey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Abbey
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
MJ Gleeson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Abbey. Abbey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Abbey£192.13M0.00N/A£125.10N/A
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.42£20.04M£24.5311.25

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Abbey's net margin of 0.00%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Abbey's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AbbeyN/A N/A N/A
MJ Gleeson 3.76%4.67%4.73%

41.9% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Abbey had 5 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Abbey and 0 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Abbey's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Abbey is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Abbey Neutral
MJ Gleeson Neutral

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Abbey on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Telford Homes?

Telford Homes (LON:TEF) and MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Telford Homes pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Telford Homes pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Telford Homes' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled MJ Gleeson'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Telford Homes Neutral
MJ Gleeson Neutral

41.9% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson has a consensus price target of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 12.32%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Telford Homes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Telford Homes
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
MJ Gleeson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Telford Homes. Telford Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Telford Homes£336.12M0.00N/A£44.50N/A
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.42£20.04M£24.5311.25

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Telford Homes' net margin of 0.00%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Telford Homes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Telford HomesN/A N/A N/A
MJ Gleeson 3.76%4.67%4.73%

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Telford Homes on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Crest Nicholson?

Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) and MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Crest Nicholson had 1 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Crest Nicholson and 0 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Crest Nicholson's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Crest Nicholson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Crest Nicholson Positive
MJ Gleeson Neutral

60.8% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Crest Nicholson presently has a consensus price target of GBX 109.57, suggesting a potential upside of 72.93%. MJ Gleeson has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 12.32%. Given Crest Nicholson's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than MJ Gleeson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crest Nicholson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
MJ Gleeson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.334, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.609, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of -5.44%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crest Nicholson-5.44% -4.32% 0.16%
MJ Gleeson 3.76%4.67%4.73%

MJ Gleeson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crest Nicholson. Crest Nicholson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crest Nicholson£558.90M0.29-£26.61M£8.407.54
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.42£20.04M£24.5311.25

Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Crest Nicholson pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crest Nicholson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Crest Nicholson and MJ Gleeson tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Springfield Properties?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

MJ Gleeson currently has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 12.32%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Springfield Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MJ Gleeson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Springfield Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to MJ Gleeson's net margin of 3.76%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat MJ Gleeson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson3.76% 4.67% 4.73%
Springfield Properties 5.03%8.30%3.53%

MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.609, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.072, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

41.9% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Springfield Properties. Springfield Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.42£20.04M£24.5311.25
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.43£7.57M£11.379.06

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 3 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Springfield Properties and 0 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson Neutral
Springfield Properties Neutral

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Springfield Properties on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MJ Gleeson compare to Watkin Jones?

MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) and Watkin Jones (LON:WJG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

41.9% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Watkin Jones shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Watkin Jones shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MJ Gleeson has a net margin of 3.76% compared to Watkin Jones' net margin of -3.43%. MJ Gleeson's return on equity of 4.67% beat Watkin Jones' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MJ Gleeson3.76% 4.67% 4.73%
Watkin Jones -3.43%-6.89%-5.63%

MJ Gleeson presently has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 12.32%. Watkin Jones has a consensus target price of GBX 38, suggesting a potential upside of 112.53%. Given Watkin Jones' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Watkin Jones is more favorable than MJ Gleeson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MJ Gleeson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Watkin Jones
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Watkin Jones had 1 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Watkin Jones and 0 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Watkin Jones' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Watkin Jones is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MJ Gleeson Neutral
Watkin Jones Positive

MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.609, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Watkin Jones has a beta of 1.378, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Watkin Jones. Watkin Jones is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.42£20.04M£24.5311.25
Watkin Jones£250.83M0.18-£30.76M-£3.35N/A

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Watkin Jones on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MJ Gleeson News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GLE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GLE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GLE vs. The Competition

MetricMJ GleesonHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£161.01M£5.37B£13.26B£2.86B
Dividend Yield4.09%3.52%53.31%6.13%
P/E Ratio11.2530.0547.94368.57
Price / Sales0.4269.1687.7183,546.76
Price / Cash6.069.3224.6927.89
Price / Book0.543.914.587.14
Net Income£20.04M£273.19M£444.55M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.91%3.19%1.26%1.00%
1 Month Performance10.62%1.10%1.45%0.67%
1 Year Performance-22.25%0.49%3.39%74.90%

MJ Gleeson Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GLE
MJ Gleeson
3.4521 of 5 stars
GBX 276
-1.1%
GBX 310
+12.3%
-22.3%£161.01M£381.06M11.25743
ABBY
Abbey
N/AN/AN/AN/A£334.03M£192.13M12.79228
TEF
Telford Homes
N/AN/AN/AN/A£265.88M£336.12M7.85104,200
CRST
Crest Nicholson
4.7253 of 5 stars
GBX 62.10
-0.2%
GBX 109.57
+76.4%
-65.2%£159.44M£610.80M69.00778
SPR
Springfield Properties
N/AGBX 100.10
+1.1%
N/A+2.1%£119.54M£282.91M8.80636

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GLE) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners