Go Pro
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free SPR Stock Alerts

Springfield Properties (SPR) Competitors

Springfield Properties logo
GBX 112.80 +5.80 (+5.42%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:13 PM Eastern
Compare

SPR vs. DFS, ABBY, TEF, CRST, and GLE

Should you buy Springfield Properties stock or one of its competitors? Springfield Properties's main competitors and comparable companies include DFS Furniture (DFS), Abbey (ABBY), Telford Homes (TEF), Crest Nicholson (CRST), and MJ Gleeson (GLE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Springfield Properties compare to DFS Furniture?

Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) and DFS Furniture (LON:DFS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to DFS Furniture's net margin of 3.27%. DFS Furniture's return on equity of 13.23% beat Springfield Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Springfield Properties5.03% 8.30% 3.53%
DFS Furniture 3.27%13.23%3.00%

DFS Furniture has a consensus target price of GBX 208.33, suggesting a potential upside of 29.80%. Given DFS Furniture's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than Springfield Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Springfield Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
DFS Furniture
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.072, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.443, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 2 more articles in the media than DFS Furniture. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Springfield Properties and 1 mentions for DFS Furniture. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat DFS Furniture's score of 0.00 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Springfield Properties
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
DFS Furniture
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of DFS Furniture shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Springfield Properties has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DFS Furniture. Springfield Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DFS Furniture, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.48£7.57M£11.379.92
DFS Furniture£1.07B0.35-£4.30M£15.0010.70

Summary

DFS Furniture beats Springfield Properties on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Springfield Properties compare to Abbey?

Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) and Abbey (LON:ABBY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to Abbey's net margin of 0.00%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat Abbey's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Springfield Properties5.03% 8.30% 3.53%
Abbey N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Abbey had 14 more articles in the media than Springfield Properties. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Abbey and 3 mentions for Springfield Properties. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Abbey's score of -0.06 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Springfield Properties
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Abbey
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Springfield Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Abbey. Abbey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Springfield Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.48£7.57M£11.379.92
Abbey£192.13M0.00N/A£125.10N/A

7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Springfield Properties beats Abbey on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Springfield Properties compare to Telford Homes?

Telford Homes (LON:TEF) and Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Springfield Properties has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Telford Homes. Telford Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Springfield Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Telford Homes£336.12M0.00N/A£44.50N/A
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.48£7.57M£11.379.92

7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Telford Homes pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Telford Homes pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to Telford Homes' net margin of 0.00%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat Telford Homes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Telford HomesN/A N/A N/A
Springfield Properties 5.03%8.30%3.53%

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 3 more articles in the media than Telford Homes. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Springfield Properties and 0 mentions for Telford Homes. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Telford Homes' score of 0.00 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Telford Homes Neutral
Springfield Properties Positive

Summary

Springfield Properties beats Telford Homes on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Springfield Properties compare to Crest Nicholson?

Crest Nicholson (LON:CRST) and Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Springfield Properties has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crest Nicholson. Crest Nicholson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Springfield Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crest Nicholson£558.90M0.31-£26.61M£8.408.07
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.48£7.57M£11.379.92

61.0% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Crest Nicholson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crest Nicholson has a beta of 1.316, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.072, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Crest Nicholson pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Crest Nicholson pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 1 more articles in the media than Crest Nicholson. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Springfield Properties and 2 mentions for Crest Nicholson. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Crest Nicholson's score of 0.34 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crest Nicholson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Springfield Properties
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Crest Nicholson currently has a consensus target price of GBX 108.86, suggesting a potential upside of 60.56%. Given Crest Nicholson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Crest Nicholson is more favorable than Springfield Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crest Nicholson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Springfield Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to Crest Nicholson's net margin of -5.44%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat Crest Nicholson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crest Nicholson-5.44% -4.32% 0.16%
Springfield Properties 5.03%8.30%3.53%

Summary

Springfield Properties beats Crest Nicholson on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Springfield Properties compare to MJ Gleeson?

Springfield Properties (LON:SPR) and MJ Gleeson (LON:GLE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and risk.

MJ Gleeson has a consensus target price of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 13.14%. Given MJ Gleeson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MJ Gleeson is more favorable than Springfield Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Springfield Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
MJ Gleeson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

MJ Gleeson has higher revenue and earnings than Springfield Properties. Springfield Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MJ Gleeson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Springfield Properties£282.91M0.48£7.57M£11.379.92
MJ Gleeson£381.06M0.42£20.04M£24.5311.17

Springfield Properties has a beta of 1.072, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MJ Gleeson has a beta of 0.621, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Springfield Properties had 2 more articles in the media than MJ Gleeson. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Springfield Properties and 1 mentions for MJ Gleeson. Springfield Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat MJ Gleeson's score of 0.00 indicating that Springfield Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Springfield Properties
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MJ Gleeson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Springfield Properties has a net margin of 5.03% compared to MJ Gleeson's net margin of 3.76%. Springfield Properties' return on equity of 8.30% beat MJ Gleeson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Springfield Properties5.03% 8.30% 3.53%
MJ Gleeson 3.76%4.67%4.73%

7.6% of Springfield Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.6% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Springfield Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of MJ Gleeson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Springfield Properties pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. MJ Gleeson pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Springfield Properties pays out 17.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MJ Gleeson pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

MJ Gleeson beats Springfield Properties on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Springfield Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SPR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SPR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SPR vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSpringfield PropertiesHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£134.95M£5.45B£13.21B£2.54B
Dividend Yield1.77%3.49%56.57%6.17%
P/E Ratio9.9217.6146.96367.57
Price / Sales0.4863.7088.6683,481.74
Price / Cash6.529.4429.1327.89
Price / Book0.852.823.937.19
Net Income£7.57M£273.04M£445.72M£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.44%-0.98%-0.26%0.30%
1 Month Performance15.80%3.88%2.74%3.31%
1 Year Performance13.70%-4.01%-1.57%22.13%

Springfield Properties Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SPR
Springfield Properties
N/AGBX 112.80
+5.4%		N/A+13.7%£134.95M£282.91M9.92636
DFS
DFS Furniture
3.0266 of 5 stars		GBX 158.50
flat		GBX 208.33
+31.4%		+1.9%£366.95M£1.07B10.5720,200
ABBY
Abbey
N/AN/AN/AN/A£334.03M£192.13M12.79228
TEF
Telford Homes
N/AN/AN/AN/A£265.88M£336.12M7.85104,200
CRST
Crest Nicholson
4.8831 of 5 stars		GBX 70.60
flat		GBX 108.86
+54.2%		-60.1%£181.48M£558.90M8.40778

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SPR) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel