Free Trial

Gulf Marine Services (GMS) Competitors

Gulf Marine Services logo
GBX 17.93 -0.07 (-0.37%)
As of 07:29 AM Eastern

GMS vs. FERG, NTG, ASY, VP, and AA4

Should you buy Gulf Marine Services stock or one of its competitors? Gulf Marine Services's main competitors and comparable companies include Ferguson (FERG), Northgate (NTG), Andrews Sykes Group (ASY), VP (VP), and Amedeo Air Four Plus (AA4). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "trading companies & distributors" industry.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to Ferguson?

Ferguson (LON:FERG) and Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

64.7% of Ferguson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferguson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferguson has a net margin of 6.55% compared to Gulf Marine Services' net margin of 0.31%. Ferguson's return on equity of 35.11% beat Gulf Marine Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferguson6.55% 35.11% 10.15%
Gulf Marine Services 0.31%0.14%5.32%

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Marine Services. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferguson£31.32B0.01£2.10B£1.02 thousand0.23
Gulf Marine Services£180.54M1.15£48.19M£0.011,800.00

Ferguson has a beta of 1.118, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.646, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 7 more articles in the media than Gulf Marine Services. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ferguson and 2 mentions for Gulf Marine Services. Gulf Marine Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ferguson's score of -0.02 indicating that Gulf Marine Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ferguson
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gulf Marine Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Ferguson beats Gulf Marine Services on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to Northgate?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Northgate (LON:NTG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Gulf Marine Services had 2 more articles in the media than Northgate. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Gulf Marine Services and 0 mentions for Northgate. Gulf Marine Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Northgate'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services Neutral
Northgate Neutral

8.0% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 0.31% compared to Northgate's net margin of 0.00%. Gulf Marine Services' return on equity of 0.14% beat Northgate's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services0.31% 0.14% 5.32%
Northgate N/A N/A N/A

Gulf Marine Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Northgate. Northgate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services£180.54M1.15£48.19M£0.011,800.00
Northgate£729.28M0.00N/A£35.50N/A

Summary

Gulf Marine Services beats Northgate on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to Andrews Sykes Group?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Andrews Sykes Group (LON:ASY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

8.0% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gulf Marine Services has higher revenue and earnings than Andrews Sykes Group. Andrews Sykes Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services£180.54M1.15£48.19M£0.011,800.00
Andrews Sykes Group£79.42M2.69£17.31M£43.0311.88

In the previous week, Gulf Marine Services had 1 more articles in the media than Andrews Sykes Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Gulf Marine Services and 1 mentions for Andrews Sykes Group. Gulf Marine Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Andrews Sykes Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Andrews Sykes Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Andrews Sykes Group has a net margin of 22.68% compared to Gulf Marine Services' net margin of 0.31%. Andrews Sykes Group's return on equity of 33.18% beat Gulf Marine Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services0.31% 0.14% 5.32%
Andrews Sykes Group 22.68%33.18%16.52%

Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.646, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Andrews Sykes Group has a beta of 0.296, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gulf Marine Services and Andrews Sykes Group tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to VP?

VP (LON:VP) and Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

31.5% of VP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.5% of VP shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

VP presently has a consensus target price of GBX 575, indicating a potential upside of 8.90%. Given VP's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe VP is more favorable than Gulf Marine Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
VP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gulf Marine Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

VP has a beta of 0.347, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.646, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, VP had 25 more articles in the media than Gulf Marine Services. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for VP and 2 mentions for Gulf Marine Services. VP's average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Gulf Marine Services' score of 0.00 indicating that VP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
VP
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
19 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gulf Marine Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gulf Marine Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than VP. VP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VP£368.77M0.56-£5.38M-£13.63N/A
Gulf Marine Services£180.54M1.15£48.19M£0.011,800.00

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 0.31% compared to VP's net margin of -1.52%. Gulf Marine Services' return on equity of 0.14% beat VP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VP-1.52% -3.89% 9.45%
Gulf Marine Services 0.31%0.14%5.32%

Summary

VP beats Gulf Marine Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to Amedeo Air Four Plus?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Amedeo Air Four Plus (LON:AA4) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Gulf Marine Services had 2 more articles in the media than Amedeo Air Four Plus. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Gulf Marine Services and 0 mentions for Amedeo Air Four Plus. Gulf Marine Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Amedeo Air Four Plus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services Neutral
Amedeo Air Four Plus Neutral

8.0% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Amedeo Air Four Plus has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Gulf Marine Services' net margin of 0.31%. Amedeo Air Four Plus' return on equity of 4.33% beat Gulf Marine Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services0.31% 0.14% 5.32%
Amedeo Air Four Plus 10.03%4.33%N/A

Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.646, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amedeo Air Four Plus has a beta of 0.42011246, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Gulf Marine Services has higher revenue and earnings than Amedeo Air Four Plus. Amedeo Air Four Plus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services£180.54M1.15£48.19M£0.011,800.00
Amedeo Air Four Plus£143.46M1.31£25.96M£8.218.82

Summary

Gulf Marine Services and Amedeo Air Four Plus tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gulf Marine Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GMS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GMS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GMS vs. The Competition

MetricGulf Marine ServicesTrading Companies & Distributors IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£206.63M£9.46B£10.10B£2.82B
Dividend Yield6.86%3.41%96.63%6.26%
P/E Ratio1,793.4045.3824.25366.75
Price / Sales1.1422.86275.4188,673.67
Price / Cash4.7050.5223.8427.83
Price / Book0.573.784.656.94
Net Income£48.19M£377.83M£614.62M£5.88B
7 Day Performance1.90%0.92%-2.15%0.55%
1 Month Performance-1.35%1.82%-3.66%-0.17%
1 Year Performance19.56%9.53%-0.22%22.20%

Gulf Marine Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GMS
Gulf Marine Services
N/AGBX 17.93
-0.4%
N/A+19.2%£206.63M£180.54M1,793.405,480
FERG
Ferguson
N/AGBX 234.33
flat
N/A-98.7%£454.46M£31.32B0.2336,000
NTG
Northgate
N/AN/AN/AN/A£333.08M£729.28M7.043,000
ASY
Andrews Sykes Group
N/AGBX 530
+2.4%
N/A+1.2%£216.62M£79.42M12.32500
VP
VP
2.1969 of 5 stars
GBX 512
-3.8%
GBX 650
+27.0%
-4.5%£202.04M£368.77MN/A2,753

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GMS) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners