Go Pro

Gulf Marine Services (GMS) Competitors

Gulf Marine Services logo
GBX 19.26 +0.08 (+0.42%)
As of 11:48 AM Eastern

GMS vs. FERG, NTG, ASY, AA4, and VP

Should you buy Gulf Marine Services stock or one of its competitors? Gulf Marine Services's main competitors and comparable companies include Ferguson (FERG), Northgate (NTG), Andrews Sykes Group (ASY), Amedeo Air Four Plus (AA4), and VP (VP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "trading companies & distributors" industry.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to Ferguson?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Ferguson (LON:FERG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Ferguson had 10 more articles in the media than Gulf Marine Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Ferguson and 1 mentions for Gulf Marine Services. Ferguson's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Gulf Marine Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Ferguson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ferguson
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ferguson has higher revenue and earnings than Gulf Marine Services. Ferguson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services£188.12M1.18£48.19M£1.6411.74
Ferguson£31.32B0.01£2.10B£1.02 thousand0.23

7.6% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.7% of Ferguson shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ferguson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.651, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferguson has a beta of 1.118, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Ferguson's net margin of 6.55%. Ferguson's return on equity of 35.11% beat Gulf Marine Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services10.06% 4.61% 5.32%
Ferguson 6.55%35.11%10.15%

Summary

Ferguson beats Gulf Marine Services on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to Northgate?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Northgate (LON:NTG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Northgate's net margin of 0.00%. Gulf Marine Services' return on equity of 4.61% beat Northgate's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services10.06% 4.61% 5.32%
Northgate N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Gulf Marine Services had 1 more articles in the media than Northgate. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gulf Marine Services and 0 mentions for Northgate. Gulf Marine Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Northgate'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services Neutral
Northgate Neutral

7.6% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gulf Marine Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Northgate. Northgate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services£188.12M1.18£48.19M£1.6411.74
Northgate£729.28M0.00N/A£35.50N/A

Summary

Gulf Marine Services beats Northgate on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to Andrews Sykes Group?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Andrews Sykes Group (LON:ASY) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.651, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Andrews Sykes Group has a beta of 0.282, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Andrews Sykes Group has a net margin of 23.64% compared to Gulf Marine Services' net margin of 10.06%. Andrews Sykes Group's return on equity of 35.67% beat Gulf Marine Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services10.06% 4.61% 5.32%
Andrews Sykes Group 23.64%35.67%16.52%

Gulf Marine Services has higher revenue and earnings than Andrews Sykes Group. Gulf Marine Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Andrews Sykes Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services£188.12M1.18£48.19M£1.6411.74
Andrews Sykes Group£76.50M3.19£17.31M£43.2013.50

In the previous week, Gulf Marine Services had 1 more articles in the media than Andrews Sykes Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gulf Marine Services and 0 mentions for Andrews Sykes Group. Gulf Marine Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Andrews Sykes Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services Neutral
Andrews Sykes Group Neutral

7.6% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Andrews Sykes Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Andrews Sykes Group beats Gulf Marine Services on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to Amedeo Air Four Plus?

Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) and Amedeo Air Four Plus (LON:AA4) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

Gulf Marine Services has higher revenue and earnings than Amedeo Air Four Plus. Amedeo Air Four Plus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulf Marine Services£188.12M1.18£48.19M£1.6411.74
Amedeo Air Four Plus£143.46M1.31£25.96M£8.218.82

Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.651, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amedeo Air Four Plus has a beta of 0.42011246, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

7.6% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Amedeo Air Four Plus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Amedeo Air Four Plus has a net margin of 12.69% compared to Gulf Marine Services' net margin of 10.06%. Amedeo Air Four Plus' return on equity of 8.21% beat Gulf Marine Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulf Marine Services10.06% 4.61% 5.32%
Amedeo Air Four Plus 12.69%8.21%N/A

In the previous week, Gulf Marine Services had 1 more articles in the media than Amedeo Air Four Plus. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gulf Marine Services and 0 mentions for Amedeo Air Four Plus. Gulf Marine Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Amedeo Air Four Plus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gulf Marine Services Neutral
Amedeo Air Four Plus Neutral

Summary

Gulf Marine Services and Amedeo Air Four Plus tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gulf Marine Services compare to VP?

VP (LON:VP) and Gulf Marine Services (LON:GMS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, VP had 11 more articles in the media than Gulf Marine Services. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for VP and 1 mentions for Gulf Marine Services. VP's average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Gulf Marine Services' score of 0.00 indicating that VP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
VP
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gulf Marine Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

31.5% of VP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by institutional investors. 57.5% of VP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Gulf Marine Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

VP has a beta of 0.347, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gulf Marine Services has a beta of 0.651, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Gulf Marine Services has a net margin of 10.06% compared to VP's net margin of -1.52%. Gulf Marine Services' return on equity of 4.61% beat VP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VP-1.52% -3.89% 9.45%
Gulf Marine Services 10.06%4.61%5.32%

Gulf Marine Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than VP. VP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulf Marine Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VP£368.77M0.53-£5.38M-£13.63N/A
Gulf Marine Services£188.12M1.18£48.19M£1.6411.74

VP presently has a consensus target price of GBX 686.67, suggesting a potential upside of 39.28%. Given VP's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe VP is more favorable than Gulf Marine Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
VP
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gulf Marine Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

VP beats Gulf Marine Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gulf Marine Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GMS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GMS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GMS vs. The Competition

MetricGulf Marine ServicesTrading Companies & Distributors IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£219.60M£9.51B£10.92B£2.89B
Dividend Yield6.86%3.39%97.00%6.11%
P/E Ratio11.7425.0624.63368.55
Price / Sales1.1823.50349.6783,655.22
Price / Cash4.7048.6924.8927.89
Price / Book0.613.784.577.32
Net Income£48.19M£373.80M£607.65M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.52%1.70%1.61%1.14%
1 Month Performance1.80%4.06%3.21%2.66%
1 Year Performance-0.72%8.65%13.29%69.71%

Gulf Marine Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GMS
Gulf Marine Services
N/AGBX 19.26
+0.4%
N/A-1.8%£219.60M£188.12M11.745,480
FERG
Ferguson
N/AGBX 234.33
flat
N/A-98.6%£454.46M£31.32B0.2336,000
NTG
Northgate
N/AN/AN/AN/A£333.08M£729.28M7.043,000
ASY
Andrews Sykes Group
N/AGBX 579
+0.7%
N/A+23.0%£242.36M£76.50M13.40500
AA4
Amedeo Air Four Plus
N/AGBX 72.40
flat
N/AN/A£188.59M£143.46M8.82N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GMS) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners