GRID vs. WWH, SNN, BHMU, N91, PIN, FGT, BNKR, FCSS, VEIL, and LWDB
Should you be buying Gresham House Energy Storage stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Gresham House Energy Storage include Worldwide Healthcare (WWH), Sanne Group (SNN), BH Macro USD (BHMU), Ninety One Group (N91), Pantheon International (PIN), Finsbury Growth & Income (FGT), The Bankers Investment Trust (BNKR), Fidelity China Special (FCSS), Vietnam Enterprise (VEIL), and Law Debenture (LWDB). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Gresham House Energy Storage vs.
Worldwide Healthcare (LON:WWH) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, community ranking, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.
Worldwide Healthcare has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Worldwide Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.8%. Worldwide Healthcare pays out 7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out -20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gresham House Energy Storage is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 105.20% compared to Worldwide Healthcare's net margin of 92.78%. Worldwide Healthcare's return on equity of 11.22% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.
Worldwide Healthcare has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Gresham House Energy Storage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Worldwide Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Worldwide Healthcare received 70 more outperform votes than Gresham House Energy Storage when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 67.29% of users gave Worldwide Healthcare an outperform vote while only 66.67% of users gave Gresham House Energy Storage an outperform vote.
73.6% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Worldwide Healthcare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, Worldwide Healthcare had 2 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Worldwide Healthcare and 0 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. Worldwide Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.99 indicating that Worldwide Healthcare is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Worldwide Healthcare beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Gresham House Energy Storage News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRID and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Gresham House Energy Storage Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:GRID) was last updated on 5/23/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
