Free Trial
→ The roadshow starts Monday. This stock isn't ready. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free GRID Stock Alerts

Gresham House Energy Storage (GRID) Competitors

Gresham House Energy Storage logo
GBX 83.53 +0.13 (+0.16%)
As of 06/5/2026 11:50 AM Eastern
Compare

GRID vs. CLDN, BRWM, MRC, TRIG, and PIN

Should you buy Gresham House Energy Storage stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gresham House Energy Storage with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gresham House Energy Storage include Caledonia Investments (CLDN), BlackRock World Mining Trust (BRWM), The Mercantile Investment Trust (MRC), The Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG), and Pantheon International (PIN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Caledonia Investments?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and Caledonia Investments (LON:CLDN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Caledonia Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Caledonia Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M18.33-£196.22M£4.1020.37
Caledonia Investments£136.90M13.35£199.92M£34.5310.27

In the previous week, Caledonia Investments had 2 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Caledonia Investments and 0 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Caledonia Investments' score of -0.23 indicating that Gresham House Energy Storage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Positive
Caledonia Investments Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage currently has a consensus price target of GBX 85, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Caledonia Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Caledonia Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Caledonia Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Caledonia Investments pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Caledonia Investments' net margin of 81.74%. Caledonia Investments' return on equity of 4.51% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
Caledonia Investments 81.74%4.51%4.23%

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.3% of Caledonia Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Caledonia Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.016617963, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caledonia Investments has a beta of 1.276326, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gresham House Energy Storage and Caledonia Investments tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to BlackRock World Mining Trust?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and BlackRock World Mining Trust (LON:BRWM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

BlackRock World Mining Trust has a net margin of 98.77% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. BlackRock World Mining Trust's return on equity of 52.74% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
BlackRock World Mining Trust 98.77%52.74%-0.10%

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. BlackRock World Mining Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 23 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BlackRock World Mining Trust pays out 6.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.016617963, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock World Mining Trust has a beta of 1.732185, suggesting that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of BlackRock World Mining Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of BlackRock World Mining Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

BlackRock World Mining Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. BlackRock World Mining Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M18.33-£196.22M£4.1020.37
BlackRock World Mining Trust£693.80M2.58-£13.42M£365.862.62

In the previous week, BlackRock World Mining Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for BlackRock World Mining Trust and 0 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. BlackRock World Mining Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 1.15 indicating that BlackRock World Mining Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Positive
BlackRock World Mining Trust Positive

Gresham House Energy Storage presently has a consensus target price of GBX 85, indicating a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than BlackRock World Mining Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
BlackRock World Mining Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

BlackRock World Mining Trust beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to The Mercantile Investment Trust?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and The Mercantile Investment Trust (LON:MRC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.0% of The Mercantile Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of The Mercantile Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

The Mercantile Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. The Mercantile Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M18.33-£196.22M£4.1020.37
The Mercantile Investment Trust£209.68M8.30£393.55M£29.039.23

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat The Mercantile Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Gresham House Energy Storage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Positive
The Mercantile Investment Trust Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.016617963, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Mercantile Investment Trust has a beta of 1.5380031, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. The Mercantile Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Mercantile Investment Trust pays out 27.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to The Mercantile Investment Trust's net margin of 89.90%. The Mercantile Investment Trust's return on equity of 10.56% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
The Mercantile Investment Trust 89.90%10.56%2.53%

Gresham House Energy Storage presently has a consensus target price of GBX 85, indicating a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than The Mercantile Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
The Mercantile Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Gresham House Energy Storage beats The Mercantile Investment Trust on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to The Renewables Infrastructure Group?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.374, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.016617963, meaning that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Gresham House Energy Storage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage Positive

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gresham House Energy Storage. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.22-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M18.33-£196.22M£4.1020.37

The Renewables Infrastructure Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 34.23%. Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus price target of GBX 85, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Gresham House Energy Storage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity of 3.71% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The Renewables Infrastructure Group beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Pantheon International?

Pantheon International (LON:PIN) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Pantheon International has a beta of 0.8237807, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.016617963, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Pantheon International has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Gresham House Energy Storage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pantheon International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pantheon International£43.18M38.61£31.00M£8.1947.92
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M18.33-£196.22M£4.1020.37

In the previous week, Pantheon International had 4 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pantheon International and 0 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. Pantheon International's average media sentiment score of 1.96 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 1.15 indicating that Pantheon International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pantheon International Very Positive
Gresham House Energy Storage Positive

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus target price of GBX 85, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Pantheon International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pantheon International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

1.8% of Pantheon International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Pantheon International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Pantheon International's net margin of -18.42%. Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity of 3.71% beat Pantheon International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pantheon International-18.42% -0.30% 1.05%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

Summary

Pantheon International beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gresham House Energy Storage News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRID and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRID and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRID vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGresham House Energy StorageAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£475.34M£2.51B£5.74B£2.77B
Dividend Yield0.53%6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio20.3725.8816.37365.18
Price / Sales18.332,084.221,111.8587,168.41
Price / Cash4.1060.1591.7827.85
Price / Book0.771.376.497.68
Net Income-£196.22M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.64%-1.04%-0.86%-0.52%
1 Month Performance10.20%-0.44%0.52%2.08%
1 Year Performance16.99%10.24%18.74%72.75%

Gresham House Energy Storage Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRID
Gresham House Energy Storage
1.8762 of 5 stars		GBX 83.53
+0.2%		GBX 85
+1.8%		+16.3%£475.34M£25.94M20.37N/A
CLDN
Caledonia Investments
N/AGBX 364.50
+0.3%		N/A-90.6%£1.88B£225M10.5674
BRWM
BlackRock World Mining Trust
N/AGBX 1,006
+1.4%		N/A+85.3%£1.87B£693.80M2.75147,000
MRC
The Mercantile Investment Trust
N/AGBX 268
flat		N/A+6.9%£1.74B£209.68M9.232,800
TRIG
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
1.8558 of 5 stars		GBX 73.70
+2.2%		GBX 100
+35.7%		-9.4%£1.74B-£123.70MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GRID) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to get into the SpaceX IPO before June 12
Former tech executive and angel investor Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla, and Nvidia before their h...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Tesla. SolarCity. Twitter. This $4 stock is next.
Elon Musk has a clear pattern: when a supplier becomes mission-critical, he acquires it. He bought SolarCity f...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
She called ASTS before it ran 133%. Here's the system behind it.
Danielle Shay called AST SpaceMobile on Fox Business before it ran 133% - and found NBIS at $54 before it gapp...
Simpler Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why is this free?
Simple Options Trading For Beginners normally sells for $29.97 - but right now Bill Poulos has opened a free w...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
17,000 filings. One word kept appearing.
After reading every 10-K filed by S-P 500 companies over 30 years - 17,000 filings, 3 million pages - one word...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel