Go Pro
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free GRID Stock Alerts

Gresham House Energy Storage (GRID) Competitors

Gresham House Energy Storage logo
GBX 94 +0.20 (+0.21%)
As of 11:48 AM Eastern
Compare

GRID vs. JAM, CLDN, TRIG, BRWM, and MRC

Should you buy Gresham House Energy Storage stock or one of its competitors? Gresham House Energy Storage's main competitors and comparable companies include JPMorgan American (JAM), Caledonia Investments (CLDN), The Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG), BlackRock World Mining Trust (BRWM), and The Mercantile Investment Trust (MRC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to JPMorgan American?

JPMorgan American (LON:JAM) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

JPMorgan American has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Gresham House Energy Storage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan American, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan American£86.07M23.92£420.73M£46.2126.96
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.62-£196.22M£4.1022.93

JPMorgan American has a beta of 0.747, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, suggesting that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

13.6% of JPMorgan American shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of JPMorgan American shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to JPMorgan American's net margin of 89.80%. JPMorgan American's return on equity of 4.28% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan American89.80% 4.28% 15.33%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

In the previous week, JPMorgan American's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gresham House Energy Storage'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan American Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus target price of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 9.57%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than JPMorgan American.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan American
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

JPMorgan American pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. JPMorgan American pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

JPMorgan American beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Caledonia Investments?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and Caledonia Investments (LON:CLDN) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Gresham House Energy Storage presently has a consensus price target of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 9.57%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Caledonia Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Caledonia Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caledonia Investments has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Caledonia Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Caledonia Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.62-£196.22M£4.1022.93
Caledonia Investments£160.50M12.72£199.92M£25.5015.69

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Caledonia Investments' net margin of 81.74%. Caledonia Investments' return on equity of 4.51% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
Caledonia Investments 81.74%4.51%4.23%

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.3% of Caledonia Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Caledonia Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Caledonia Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral
Caledonia Investments Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Caledonia Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Caledonia Investments pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Gresham House Energy Storage and Caledonia Investments tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to The Renewables Infrastructure Group?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus price target of GBX 85, suggesting a potential downside of 9.57%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than The Renewables Infrastructure Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.391, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gresham House Energy Storage. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.66-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.62-£196.22M£4.1022.93

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity of 3.71% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 2 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral

Summary

The Renewables Infrastructure Group and Gresham House Energy Storage tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to BlackRock World Mining Trust?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and BlackRock World Mining Trust (LON:BRWM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Gresham House Energy Storage currently has a consensus target price of GBX 85, suggesting a potential downside of 9.57%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than BlackRock World Mining Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
BlackRock World Mining Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

BlackRock World Mining Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. BlackRock World Mining Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.62-£196.22M£4.1022.93
BlackRock World Mining Trust£693.80M2.66-£13.42M£365.862.70

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BlackRock World Mining Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral
BlackRock World Mining Trust Neutral

BlackRock World Mining Trust has a net margin of 98.77% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. BlackRock World Mining Trust's return on equity of 52.74% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
BlackRock World Mining Trust 98.77%52.74%-0.10%

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. BlackRock World Mining Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 23 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BlackRock World Mining Trust pays out 6.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, suggesting that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock World Mining Trust has a beta of 1.684, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of BlackRock World Mining Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of BlackRock World Mining Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

BlackRock World Mining Trust beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to The Mercantile Investment Trust?

The Mercantile Investment Trust (LON:MRC) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus target price of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 9.57%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than The Mercantile Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Mercantile Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

The Mercantile Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. The Mercantile Investment Trust pays out 27.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

13.0% of The Mercantile Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of The Mercantile Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, The Mercantile Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Mercantile Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. The Mercantile Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.00 indicating that The Mercantile Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Mercantile Investment Trust Positive
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral

The Mercantile Investment Trust has a beta of 1.528, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, indicating that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

The Mercantile Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. The Mercantile Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Mercantile Investment Trust£209.68M8.61£393.55M£29.039.83
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.62-£196.22M£4.1022.93

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to The Mercantile Investment Trust's net margin of 89.90%. The Mercantile Investment Trust's return on equity of 10.56% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Mercantile Investment Trust89.90% 10.56% 2.53%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

Summary

The Mercantile Investment Trust beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gresham House Energy Storage News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRID and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRID and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRID vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGresham House Energy StorageCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£534.92M£5.64B£14.01B£2.88B
Dividend Yield0.47%7.40%5.89%6.09%
P/E Ratio22.9338.0029.21368.56
Price / Sales20.621,228.18513.2383,672.53
Price / Cash4.1048.2838.6827.89
Price / Book0.863.713.677.26
Net Income-£196.22M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.64%0.62%0.27%1.12%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.66%1.19%2.56%
1 Year Performance18.09%8.45%12.52%70.21%

Gresham House Energy Storage Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRID
Gresham House Energy Storage
0.9094 of 5 stars		GBX 94
+0.2%		GBX 85
-9.6%		+16.5%£534.92M£25.94M22.93N/A
JAM
JPMorgan American
N/AGBX 1,250
+0.5%		N/A+17.1%£2.07B£86.07M27.05N/A
CLDN
Caledonia Investments
N/AGBX 386
-0.5%		N/A+6.4%£1.97B£160.50M15.1474
TRIG
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0.8159 of 5 stars		GBX 78.10
+1.4%		GBX 100
+28.0%		-5.4%£1.82B-£123.70MN/AN/A
BRWM
BlackRock World Mining Trust
N/AGBX 968.60
+1.7%		N/A+71.0%£1.81B£693.80M2.65147,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GRID) was last updated on 8/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Iran War: What Happened at 1:11 P.M. Outside D.C.?
A source with ties to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the U.S. State Department revealed details of a potential 7 t...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
The government values gold at $42. It's really $4,800.
The U.S. Treasury still values its gold reserves at 42.22 dollars an ounce, a price set in 1973. Gold trades n...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Anthropic just dropped a $9.1 BILLION clue
Riot Platforms just signed a 20-year, 191 megawatt data center deal with Anthropic worth an estimated 9.1 bill...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
This stock mails checks
One aerospace supplier declared a 90 dollar per share special dividend last September, turning a 1,000 share p...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Man Who Called NVDA in 2005 Reveals His #1 Tech Stock
Louis Navellier first recommended Nvidia back in 2005, when a $1,000 investment would have grown to nearly $1 ...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trading strategy that works BECAUSE you have a life
Tim Sykes built a trading strategy for people who can't watch charts from 9:30 to 4:00 every day. It's not ...
Tim Sykes | Sponsoredtc pixel