Go Pro
→ SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years (From TradeSmith) (Ad)tc pixel Free GRID Stock Alerts

Gresham House Energy Storage (GRID) Competitors

Gresham House Energy Storage logo
GBX 94.60 +0.60 (+0.63%)
As of 07/22/2026 11:49 AM Eastern
Compare

GRID vs. MYI, N91, FEV, JAM, and CLDN

Should you buy Gresham House Energy Storage stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gresham House Energy Storage with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gresham House Energy Storage include Murray International (MYI), Ninety One Group (N91), Fidelity European Trust (FEV), JPMorgan American (JAM), and Caledonia Investments (CLDN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Murray International?

Murray International (LON:MYI) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

5.6% of Murray International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Murray International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Murray International has a net margin of 94.44% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. Murray International's return on equity of 19.22% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Murray International94.44% 19.22% 6.89%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

Murray International pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Murray International pays out 20.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus price target of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 10.14%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Murray International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Murray International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Murray International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gresham House Energy Storage'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Murray International Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral

Murray International has a beta of 0.535, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.015994927, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Murray International has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Murray International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Murray International£358.82M6.01£178.39M£58.706.18
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.75-£196.22M£4.1023.07

Summary

Murray International and Gresham House Energy Storage tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Ninety One Group?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and Ninety One Group (LON:N91) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.6% of Ninety One Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ninety One Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Ninety One Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ninety One Group pays out 74.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Ninety One Group had 1 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ninety One Group and 0 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. Ninety One Group's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.00 indicating that Ninety One Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral
Ninety One Group Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage presently has a consensus price target of GBX 85, suggesting a potential downside of 10.14%. Ninety One Group has a consensus price target of GBX 206, suggesting a potential downside of 2.18%. Given Ninety One Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ninety One Group is more favorable than Gresham House Energy Storage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Ninety One Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.015994927, indicating that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ninety One Group has a beta of 0.763, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Ninety One Group's net margin of 19.63%. Ninety One Group's return on equity of 28.08% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
Ninety One Group 19.63%28.08%1.15%

Ninety One Group has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Ninety One Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.75-£196.22M£4.1023.07
Ninety One Group£763.30M2.66£154.01M£17.1012.32

Summary

Ninety One Group beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Fidelity European Trust?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and Fidelity European Trust (LON:FEV) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Fidelity European Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Fidelity European Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.75-£196.22M£4.1023.07
Fidelity European Trust£276.56M7.58£208.32M£62.806.76

Fidelity European Trust has a net margin of 93.61% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. Fidelity European Trust's return on equity of 13.99% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
Fidelity European Trust 93.61%13.99%10.56%

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Fidelity European Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity European Trust pays out 15.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Fidelity European Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity European Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.015994927, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity European Trust has a beta of 1.2138318, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity European Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral
Fidelity European Trust Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage presently has a consensus target price of GBX 85, suggesting a potential downside of 10.14%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Fidelity European Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Fidelity European Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Gresham House Energy Storage and Fidelity European Trust tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to JPMorgan American?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and JPMorgan American (LON:JAM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. JPMorgan American pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan American pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage currently has a consensus target price of GBX 85, suggesting a potential downside of 10.14%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than JPMorgan American.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
JPMorgan American
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.015994927, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan American has a beta of 0.7474138, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan American'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral
JPMorgan American Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to JPMorgan American's net margin of 89.80%. JPMorgan American's return on equity of 4.28% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
JPMorgan American 89.80%4.28%15.33%

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of JPMorgan American shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan American shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JPMorgan American has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Gresham House Energy Storage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan American, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.75-£196.22M£4.1023.07
JPMorgan American£86.07M23.47£420.73M£46.2126.36

Summary

JPMorgan American beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Caledonia Investments?

Caledonia Investments (LON:CLDN) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Caledonia Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Caledonia Investments pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus price target of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 10.14%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Caledonia Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caledonia Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Caledonia Investments has a beta of 1.2835008, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.015994927, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

7.3% of Caledonia Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Caledonia Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Caledonia Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gresham House Energy Storage'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Caledonia Investments Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Caledonia Investments' net margin of 81.74%. Caledonia Investments' return on equity of 4.51% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caledonia Investments81.74% 4.51% 4.23%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

Caledonia Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Caledonia Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caledonia Investments£160.50M12.07£199.92M£25.5014.86
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M20.75-£196.22M£4.1023.07

Summary

Caledonia Investments and Gresham House Energy Storage tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gresham House Energy Storage News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRID and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRID vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGresham House Energy StorageAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£534.92M£2.46B£6.19B£2.88B
Dividend Yield0.47%6.02%5.25%6.16%
P/E Ratio23.0761.7429.54368.29
Price / Sales20.751,766.111,127.5684,379.69
Price / Cash4.1060.50114.2927.89
Price / Book0.871.316.647.61
Net Income-£196.22M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.84%-0.31%-0.24%0.38%
1 Month Performance15.36%0.21%0.10%0.28%
1 Year Performance21.28%6.77%13.78%67.67%

Gresham House Energy Storage Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRID
Gresham House Energy Storage
1.1127 of 5 stars		GBX 94.60
+0.6%		GBX 85
-10.1%		+20.5%£534.92M£25.94M23.07N/A
MYI
Murray International
N/AGBX 357
flat		N/A+28.3%£2.12B£358.82M6.08N/A
N91
Ninety One Group
1.4813 of 5 stars		GBX 215.40
-2.3%		GBX 206
-4.4%		+8.4%£2.07B£763.30M12.601,180
FEV
Fidelity European Trust
N/AGBX 419
-1.4%		N/A+5.2%£2.07B£276.56M6.67N/A
JAM
JPMorgan American
N/AGBX 1,202
-1.6%		N/A+16.9%£1.99B£86.07M26.01N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GRID) was last updated on 7/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s new "tollbooth"
The SpaceX IPO was valued at $1.75 trillion. But one analyst says fighting over those shares may be the wrong ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel