Free Trial

Gresham House Energy Storage (GRID) Competitors

Gresham House Energy Storage logo
GBX 74.40 +0.60 (+0.81%)
As of 05/15/2026 12:39 PM Eastern

GRID vs. PNL, HGT, PIN, TRIG, and WTAN

Should you buy Gresham House Energy Storage stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gresham House Energy Storage with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gresham House Energy Storage include Personal Assets (PNL), HgCapital Trust (HGT), Pantheon International (PIN), The Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG), and Witan Investment Trust (WTAN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Personal Assets?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and Personal Assets (LON:PNL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Assets pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.010851523, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33023465, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Personal Assets has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Gresham House Energy Storage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M16.32-£196.22M£4.1018.15
Personal Assets£89.00M18.74£124.81M£29.1118.38

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage and Gresham House Energy Storage both had 1 articles in the media. Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.00 indicating that Personal Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Personal Assets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Personal Assets has a net margin of 156.09% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. Personal Assets' return on equity of 9.23% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
Personal Assets 156.09%9.23%1.96%

Gresham House Energy Storage currently has a consensus price target of GBX 7,500, suggesting a potential upside of 9,980.65%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Personal Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Personal Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Personal Assets beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to HgCapital Trust?

HgCapital Trust (LON:HGT) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus price target of GBX 7,500, suggesting a potential upside of 9,980.65%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than HgCapital Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HgCapital Trust
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

HgCapital Trust has a beta of 0.228, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.010851523, suggesting that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

HgCapital Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. HgCapital Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HgCapital Trust£109.29M14.51£284.58M£21.4916.29
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M16.32-£196.22M£4.1018.15

18.1% of HgCapital Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of HgCapital Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, HgCapital Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for HgCapital Trust and 1 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. HgCapital Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.00 indicating that HgCapital Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HgCapital Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gresham House Energy Storage
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to HgCapital Trust's net margin of 88.67%. HgCapital Trust's return on equity of 3.90% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HgCapital Trust88.67% 3.90% 6.88%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

HgCapital Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. HgCapital Trust pays out 25.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

HgCapital Trust beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Pantheon International?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and Pantheon International (LON:PIN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Pantheon International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Pantheon International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Pantheon International's net margin of -18.42%. Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity of 3.71% beat Pantheon International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
Pantheon International -18.42%-0.30%1.05%

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.010851523, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pantheon International has a beta of 0.8224822, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Gresham House Energy Storage currently has a consensus price target of GBX 7,500, suggesting a potential upside of 9,980.65%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Pantheon International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Pantheon International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pantheon International has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Gresham House Energy Storage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pantheon International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M16.32-£196.22M£4.1018.15
Pantheon International£43.18M39.44£31.00M£8.1948.96

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage and Gresham House Energy Storage both had 1 articles in the media. Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pantheon International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral
Pantheon International Neutral

Summary

Pantheon International beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to The Renewables Infrastructure Group?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity of 3.71% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.09%-1.63%

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.010851523, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.374, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Gresham House Energy Storage currently has a consensus price target of GBX 7,500, suggesting a potential upside of 9,980.65%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 41.84%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than The Renewables Infrastructure Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M16.32-£196.22M£4.1018.15
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-13.46-£37.22M-£5.40N/A

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage and Gresham House Energy Storage both had 1 articles in the media. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral

Summary

The Renewables Infrastructure Group beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Witan Investment Trust?

Witan Investment Trust (LON:WTAN) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

Witan Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Witan Investment Trust pays out 1,666.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Witan Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Witan Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Witan Investment Trust£246.38M0.00£220.34M£0.36N/A
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M16.32-£196.22M£4.1018.15

8.5% of Witan Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Witan Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus price target of GBX 7,500, indicating a potential upside of 9,980.65%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Witan Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Witan Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Witan Investment Trust has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.010851523, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage had 1 more articles in the media than Witan Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage and 0 mentions for Witan Investment Trust. Witan Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gresham House Energy Storage'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Witan Investment Trust Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage Neutral

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Witan Investment Trust's net margin of 89.43%. Witan Investment Trust's return on equity of 13.68% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Witan Investment Trust89.43% 13.68% 7.95%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

Summary

Gresham House Energy Storage beats Witan Investment Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gresham House Energy Storage News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRID and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRID and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRID vs. The Competition

MetricGresham House Energy StorageAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£423.38M£2.35B£5.16B£2.60B
Dividend Yield0.59%5.97%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio18.1525.1415.92365.91
Price / Sales16.322,063.60996.1688,030.08
Price / Cash4.1060.1790.2527.89
Price / Book0.681.356.597.74
Net Income-£196.22M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.80%-0.71%-0.26%0.21%
1 Month Performance-0.27%1.69%1.19%1.56%
1 Year Performance17.35%12.04%18.11%77.95%

Gresham House Energy Storage Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRID
Gresham House Energy Storage
2.101 of 5 stars
GBX 74.40
+0.8%
GBX 7,500
+9,980.6%
+14.5%£423.38M£25.94M18.15N/A
PNL
Personal Assets
N/AGBX 537.04
-0.3%
N/A+4.1%£1.67B£89.00M18.45N/A
HGT
HgCapital Trust
1.5551 of 5 stars
GBX 368
-0.7%
N/A-29.7%£1.67B£109.29M17.12N/A
PIN
Pantheon International
0.3175 of 5 stars
GBX 387.53
+0.1%
N/A+32.1%£1.65B£43.18M47.32455
TRIG
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
3.0454 of 5 stars
GBX 69.01
+0.0%
GBX 100
+44.9%
-7.8%£1.63B-£123.70MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GRID) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners