Go Pro
→ A weekly dividend fund holding Nvidia and Palantir (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free GRID Stock Alerts

Gresham House Energy Storage (GRID) Competitors

Gresham House Energy Storage logo
GBX 97.29 -0.51 (-0.52%)
As of 09/1/2026 11:56 AM Eastern
Compare

GRID vs. FEV, N91, CLDN, JAM, and HGT

Should you buy Gresham House Energy Storage stock or one of its competitors? Gresham House Energy Storage's main competitors and comparable companies include Fidelity European Trust (FEV), Ninety One Group (N91), Caledonia Investments (CLDN), JPMorgan American (JAM), and HgCapital Trust (HGT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Fidelity European Trust?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and Fidelity European Trust (LON:FEV) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Fidelity European Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity European Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity European Trust has a net margin of 93.61% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. Fidelity European Trust's return on equity of 13.99% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
Fidelity European Trust 93.61%13.99%10.56%

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Fidelity European Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity European Trust pays out 15.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fidelity European Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Fidelity European Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M21.35-£196.22M£4.1023.73
Fidelity European Trust£276.56M7.66£208.32M£62.806.84

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, meaning that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity European Trust has a beta of 1.189, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Gresham House Energy Storage presently has a consensus price target of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 12.63%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Fidelity European Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Fidelity European Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage and Gresham House Energy Storage both had 1 articles in the media. Fidelity European Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.71 indicating that Fidelity European Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fidelity European Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Fidelity European Trust beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Ninety One Group?

Ninety One Group (LON:N91) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Ninety One Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 206, suggesting a potential downside of 2.00%. Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus price target of GBX 85, suggesting a potential downside of 12.63%. Given Ninety One Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ninety One Group is more favorable than Gresham House Energy Storage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ninety One Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Ninety One Group has a beta of 0.753, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Ninety One Group has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Ninety One Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ninety One Group£763.30M2.74£154.01M£17.1012.29
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M21.35-£196.22M£4.1023.73

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Ninety One Group's net margin of 19.63%. Ninety One Group's return on equity of 28.08% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ninety One Group19.63% 28.08% 1.15%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

Ninety One Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Ninety One Group pays out 74.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

11.6% of Ninety One Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Ninety One Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage had 1 more articles in the media than Ninety One Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage and 0 mentions for Ninety One Group. Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Ninety One Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Gresham House Energy Storage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ninety One Group Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage Positive

Summary

Ninety One Group and Gresham House Energy Storage tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to Caledonia Investments?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and Caledonia Investments (LON:CLDN) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, indicating that its share price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caledonia Investments has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to Caledonia Investments' net margin of 81.74%. Caledonia Investments' return on equity of 4.51% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
Caledonia Investments 81.74%4.51%4.23%

Gresham House Energy Storage currently has a consensus target price of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 12.63%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than Caledonia Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Caledonia Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Caledonia Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Caledonia Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M21.35-£196.22M£4.1023.73
Caledonia Investments£160.50M12.52£199.92M£25.5015.45

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.3% of Caledonia Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Caledonia Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Caledonia Investments had 4 more articles in the media than Gresham House Energy Storage. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Caledonia Investments and 1 mentions for Gresham House Energy Storage. Caledonia Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.71 indicating that Caledonia Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Caledonia Investments
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Caledonia Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Caledonia Investments pays out 35.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Caledonia Investments beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to JPMorgan American?

JPMorgan American (LON:JAM) and Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

JPMorgan American has a net margin of 95.43% compared to Gresham House Energy Storage's net margin of 90.03%. JPMorgan American's return on equity of 18.71% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan American95.43% 18.71% 15.33%
Gresham House Energy Storage 90.03%3.71%-8.68%

13.6% of JPMorgan American shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of JPMorgan American shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan American has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. Gresham House Energy Storage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan American, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan American£86.07M23.11£420.73M£46.2126.05
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M21.35-£196.22M£4.1023.73

In the previous week, JPMorgan American and JPMorgan American both had 1 articles in the media. Gresham House Energy Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat JPMorgan American's score of 0.00 indicating that Gresham House Energy Storage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan American
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gresham House Energy Storage has a consensus price target of GBX 85, suggesting a potential downside of 12.63%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than JPMorgan American.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan American
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

JPMorgan American pays an annual dividend of GBX 11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. JPMorgan American pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan American has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan American beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gresham House Energy Storage compare to HgCapital Trust?

Gresham House Energy Storage (LON:GRID) and HgCapital Trust (LON:HGT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

HgCapital Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Gresham House Energy Storage. HgCapital Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House Energy Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Energy Storage£25.94M21.35-£196.22M£4.1023.73
HgCapital Trust£109.29M17.53£284.58M£21.4919.68

In the previous week, Gresham House Energy Storage and Gresham House Energy Storage both had 1 articles in the media. HgCapital Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Gresham House Energy Storage's score of 0.71 indicating that HgCapital Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HgCapital Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gresham House Energy Storage has a net margin of 90.03% compared to HgCapital Trust's net margin of 88.67%. HgCapital Trust's return on equity of 3.90% beat Gresham House Energy Storage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House Energy Storage90.03% 3.71% -8.68%
HgCapital Trust 88.67%3.90%6.88%

Gresham House Energy Storage has a beta of 0.027399695, meaning that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HgCapital Trust has a beta of 0.426, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Gresham House Energy Storage pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. HgCapital Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Gresham House Energy Storage pays out 2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HgCapital Trust pays out 25.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gresham House Energy Storage presently has a consensus target price of GBX 85, indicating a potential downside of 12.63%. Given Gresham House Energy Storage's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gresham House Energy Storage is more favorable than HgCapital Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gresham House Energy Storage
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
HgCapital Trust
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

35.8% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of HgCapital Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Gresham House Energy Storage shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of HgCapital Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HgCapital Trust beats Gresham House Energy Storage on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gresham House Energy Storage News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRID and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRID vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGresham House Energy StorageCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£553.65M£5.66B£14.01B£2.90B
Dividend Yield0.45%7.36%5.88%6.17%
P/E Ratio23.7331.6226.07367.26
Price / Sales21.351,217.92514.3983,668.69
Price / Cash4.1048.1638.4627.89
Price / Book0.891.962.096.92
Net Income-£196.22M£418.14M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.72%-0.73%-0.86%-0.34%
1 Month Performance6.45%1.75%1.84%2.81%
1 Year Performance36.64%7.10%11.29%23.13%

Gresham House Energy Storage Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRID
Gresham House Energy Storage
1.2014 of 5 stars		GBX 97.29
-0.5%		GBX 85
-12.6%		+37.2%£553.65M£25.94M23.73N/A
FEV
Fidelity European Trust
N/AGBX 439
+0.3%		N/A+6.3%£2.14B£276.56M6.99N/A
N91
Ninety One Group
N/AGBX 214.40
+0.9%		GBX 206
-3.9%		+9.5%£2.04B£763.30M12.541,180
CLDN
Caledonia Investments
N/AGBX 397
flat		N/A+8.2%£2.03B£160.50M15.5774
JAM
JPMorgan American
N/AGBX 1,218
+0.2%		N/A+13.2%£2.01B£86.07M26.36N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GRID) was last updated on 9/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A Simple Guide to Options Trading While It's Still Free
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
These 3 Stocks Could Soar as Sam Altman Announces New Venture After OpenAI
Elon Musk calls it the most disruptive force in history. Sam Altman is reportedly preparing a new venture afte...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel