Free Trial

Molten Ventures (GROW) Competitors

Molten Ventures logo
GBX 590.50 +1.50 (+0.25%)
As of 11:51 AM Eastern

GROW vs. TW, SIR, SAFE, CLIN, and SAGA

Should you buy Molten Ventures stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Molten Ventures with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Molten Ventures include Taylor Wimpey (TW), Secure Income REIT (SIR), Safestore (SAFE), Clinigen Group (CLIN), and Saga (SAGA). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does Molten Ventures compare to Taylor Wimpey?

Taylor Wimpey (LON:TW) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Taylor Wimpey presently has a consensus price target of GBX 112, indicating a potential upside of 40.39%. Molten Ventures has a consensus price target of GBX 599.67, indicating a potential upside of 1.55%. Given Taylor Wimpey's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Taylor Wimpey is more favorable than Molten Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Taylor Wimpey
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

68.7% of Taylor Wimpey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Taylor Wimpey shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Taylor Wimpey has a beta of 1.298, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.93827, meaning that its share price is 94% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Taylor Wimpey had 3 more articles in the media than Molten Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Taylor Wimpey and 1 mentions for Molten Ventures. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Taylor Wimpey's score of 0.20 indicating that Molten Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Taylor Wimpey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Molten Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to Taylor Wimpey's net margin of 2.61%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.81% beat Taylor Wimpey's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Taylor Wimpey2.61% 2.40% 4.08%
Molten Ventures 193.06%8.81%-3.46%

Taylor Wimpey has higher revenue and earnings than Molten Ventures. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taylor Wimpey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Taylor Wimpey£3.45B0.83£250.27M£6.8511.64
Molten Ventures£125.60M8.10-£33.58M£61.609.59

Summary

Taylor Wimpey and Molten Ventures tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Molten Ventures compare to Secure Income REIT?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Secure Income REIT (LON:SIR) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Molten Ventures currently has a consensus target price of GBX 599.67, indicating a potential upside of 1.55%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Secure Income REIT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Secure Income REIT
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Secure Income REIT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Molten Ventures. Secure Income REIT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£125.60M8.10-£33.58M£61.609.59
Secure Income REIT£122.40M0.00N/A£0.62N/A

In the previous week, Molten Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than Secure Income REIT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Molten Ventures and 0 mentions for Secure Income REIT. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Secure Income REIT's score of 0.00 indicating that Molten Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures Neutral
Secure Income REIT Neutral

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to Secure Income REIT's net margin of 0.00%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.81% beat Secure Income REIT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures193.06% 8.81% -3.46%
Secure Income REIT N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Secure Income REIT on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Molten Ventures compare to Safestore?

Safestore (LON:SAFE) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to Safestore's net margin of 47.44%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.81% beat Safestore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safestore47.44% 4.88% 2.81%
Molten Ventures 193.06%8.81%-3.46%

56.9% of Safestore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Safestore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Safestore has higher revenue and earnings than Molten Ventures. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safestore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safestore£234.30M5.86£263.67M£50.6012.42
Molten Ventures£125.60M8.10-£33.58M£61.609.59

Safestore has a beta of 1.168, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.93827, suggesting that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Safestore and Safestore both had 1 articles in the media. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Safestore's score of 0.00 indicating that Molten Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safestore
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Molten Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Safestore currently has a consensus target price of GBX 751, indicating a potential upside of 19.49%. Molten Ventures has a consensus target price of GBX 599.67, indicating a potential upside of 1.55%. Given Safestore's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Safestore is more favorable than Molten Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safestore
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Safestore on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Molten Ventures compare to Clinigen Group?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Clinigen Group (LON:CLIN) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to Clinigen Group's net margin of 0.00%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.81% beat Clinigen Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures193.06% 8.81% -3.46%
Clinigen Group N/A N/A N/A

Clinigen Group has higher revenue and earnings than Molten Ventures. Clinigen Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£125.60M8.10-£33.58M£61.609.59
Clinigen Group£565.60M0.00N/A£14.30N/A

In the previous week, Molten Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than Clinigen Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Molten Ventures and 0 mentions for Clinigen Group. Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Clinigen Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Molten Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures Neutral
Clinigen Group Neutral

Molten Ventures presently has a consensus target price of GBX 599.67, indicating a potential upside of 1.55%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Clinigen Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Clinigen Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Clinigen Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Molten Ventures compare to Saga?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Saga (LON:SAGA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Saga had 2 more articles in the media than Molten Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Saga and 1 mentions for Molten Ventures. Saga's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Molten Ventures' score of 0.29 indicating that Saga is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Saga
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

41.3% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.9% of Saga shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.8% of Saga shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.93827, meaning that its share price is 94% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Saga has a beta of 2.015, meaning that its share price is 102% more volatile than the broader market.

Molten Ventures has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Saga. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saga, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£125.60M8.10-£33.58M£61.609.59
Saga£660M1.22-£147.23M£2.40232.50

Molten Ventures currently has a consensus price target of GBX 599.67, suggesting a potential upside of 1.55%. Saga has a consensus price target of GBX 600, suggesting a potential upside of 7.53%. Given Saga's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Saga is more favorable than Molten Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Saga
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Molten Ventures has a net margin of 193.06% compared to Saga's net margin of -1.53%. Molten Ventures' return on equity of 8.81% beat Saga's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures193.06% 8.81% -3.46%
Saga -1.53%-15.72%2.90%

Summary

Saga beats Molten Ventures on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Molten Ventures News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GROW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GROW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GROW vs. The Competition

MetricMolten VenturesAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.02B£2.43B£5.81B£2.80B
Dividend YieldN/A5.92%5.21%6.07%
P/E Ratio9.5925.4816.10365.58
Price / Sales8.102,016.241,028.7488,236.04
Price / Cash19.1660.1548.6327.89
Price / Book1.061.386.617.74
Net Income-£33.58M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.79%0.85%1.03%0.93%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-29.50%-3.47%N/A
1 Year Performance97.23%12.86%20.28%79.20%

Molten Ventures Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GROW
Molten Ventures
1.2318 of 5 stars
GBX 590.50
+0.3%
GBX 599.67
+1.6%
+96.7%£1.02B£125.60M9.5920
TW
Taylor Wimpey
4.6058 of 5 stars
GBX 80.94
-0.7%
GBX 112
+38.4%
-33.3%£2.91B£3.45B11.811,090
SIR
Secure Income REIT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.49B£122.40M743.55N/A
SAFE
Safestore
3.3373 of 5 stars
GBX 642
-0.8%
GBX 751
+17.0%
-2.3%£1.40B£234.30M12.69120
CLIN
Clinigen Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.23B£565.60M64.691,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GROW) was last updated on 6/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners