Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free PINE Stock Alerts

Pinewood Technologies Group (PINE) Competitors

Pinewood Technologies Group logo
GBX 427 -3.03 (-0.70%)
As of 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

PINE vs. SAFE, CLIN, GROW, SAGA, and BGSC

Should you buy Pinewood Technologies Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pinewood Technologies Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pinewood Technologies Group include Safestore (SAFE), Clinigen Group (CLIN), Molten Ventures (GROW), Saga (SAGA), and BMO Global Smaller Companies (BGSC).

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Safestore?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and Safestore (LON:SAFE) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Safestore has higher revenue and earnings than Pinewood Technologies Group. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safestore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M12.13£45.24M£48.008.90
Safestore£242.10M5.62£263.67M£29.7020.98

15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.4% of Safestore shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Safestore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Safestore's net margin of 26.93%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat Safestore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group124.20% 35.39% 4.17%
Safestore 26.93%2.86%2.81%

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 1 more articles in the media than Safestore. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 0 mentions for Safestore. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Safestore's score of 0.00 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral
Safestore Neutral

Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safestore has a beta of 1.149, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Pinewood Technologies Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 37.00%. Safestore has a consensus target price of GBX 734, suggesting a potential upside of 17.82%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Safestore.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Safestore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Safestore on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Clinigen Group?

Clinigen Group (LON:CLIN) and Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 1 more articles in the media than Clinigen Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 0 mentions for Clinigen Group. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Clinigen Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clinigen Group Neutral
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral

Pinewood Technologies Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Clinigen Group. Clinigen Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinewood Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clinigen Group£565.60M0.00N/A£14.30N/A
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M12.13£45.24M£48.008.90

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Clinigen Group's net margin of 0.00%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat Clinigen Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clinigen GroupN/A N/A N/A
Pinewood Technologies Group 124.20%35.39%4.17%

Pinewood Technologies Group has a consensus target price of GBX 585, indicating a potential upside of 37.00%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Clinigen Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clinigen Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Clinigen Group on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Molten Ventures presently has a consensus target price of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential upside of 4.02%. Pinewood Technologies Group has a consensus target price of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 37.00%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Molten Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

41.0% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.307, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Molten Ventures had 2 more articles in the media than Pinewood Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Molten Ventures and 1 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Molten Ventures' score of 0.00 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pinewood Technologies Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pinewood Technologies Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Molten Ventures. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£148M7.14-£33.58M£69.008.90
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M12.13£45.24M£48.008.90

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Molten Ventures' net margin of 75.09%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat Molten Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures75.09% 9.21% -3.46%
Pinewood Technologies Group 124.20%35.39%4.17%

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Molten Ventures on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Saga?

Saga (LON:SAGA) and Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Saga has a beta of 2.021, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

13.5% of Saga shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.4% of Saga shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Saga's net margin of -1.53%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat Saga's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Saga-1.53% -15.72% 2.90%
Pinewood Technologies Group 124.20%35.39%4.17%

Saga currently has a consensus price target of GBX 910, indicating a potential upside of 34.02%. Pinewood Technologies Group has a consensus price target of GBX 585, indicating a potential upside of 37.00%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Saga.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Saga
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pinewood Technologies Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Saga. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saga, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Saga£660M1.50-£147.23M£2.40282.92
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M12.13£45.24M£48.008.90

In the previous week, Saga had 5 more articles in the media than Pinewood Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Saga and 1 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Saga's score of 0.35 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Saga
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pinewood Technologies Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Saga on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to BMO Global Smaller Companies?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and BMO Global Smaller Companies (LON:BGSC) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Pinewood Technologies Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 585, indicating a potential upside of 37.00%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than BMO Global Smaller Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
BMO Global Smaller Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 1 more articles in the media than BMO Global Smaller Companies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 0 mentions for BMO Global Smaller Companies. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat BMO Global Smaller Companies' score of 0.00 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral
BMO Global Smaller Companies Neutral

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to BMO Global Smaller Companies' net margin of 0.00%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat BMO Global Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group124.20% 35.39% 4.17%
BMO Global Smaller Companies N/A N/A N/A

15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinewood Technologies Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BMO Global Smaller Companies. BMO Global Smaller Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinewood Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M12.13£45.24M£48.008.90
BMO Global Smaller Companies£303.85M0.00N/A£50.70N/A

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats BMO Global Smaller Companies on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pinewood Technologies Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PINE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PINE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PINE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPinewood Technologies GroupSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£491.46M£11.49B£13.29B£2.83B
Dividend Yield0.07%97.64%53.32%6.15%
P/E Ratio8.9031.1047.66368.41
Price / Sales12.1315.5090.7083,654.70
Price / CashN/A13.3318.9427.89
Price / Book0.825.954.547.06
Net Income£45.24M£439.42M£444.07M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.83%1.78%1.32%0.21%
1 Month Performance40.23%2.86%0.83%0.22%
1 Year Performance-11.23%7.80%3.74%64.12%

Pinewood Technologies Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PINE
Pinewood Technologies Group
3.119 of 5 stars		GBX 427
-0.7%		GBX 585
+37.0%		-10.6%£491.46M£40.50M8.905,334
SAFE
Safestore
3.7655 of 5 stars		GBX 615.50
+0.5%		GBX 762.67
+23.9%		-7.4%£1.34B£242.10M20.72120
CLIN
Clinigen Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.23B£565.60M64.691,000
GROW
Molten Ventures
1.5081 of 5 stars		GBX 622.50
+4.7%		GBX 638.67
+2.6%		+71.2%£1.07B£148M9.0220
SAGA
Saga
3.1371 of 5 stars		GBX 654
+2.8%		GBX 910
+39.1%		+286.6%£950.85M£660M272.503,682

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PINE) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
“The unseen winner of the AI race” is not SpaceX
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before its historic run - says a tech firm labeled 'the unseen wi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel