Does the media refer more to PINE or DNLM?

In the previous week, Dunelm Group had 2 more articles in the media than Pinewood Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Dunelm Group and 6 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group. Dunelm Group's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Pinewood Technologies Group's score of 0.40 indicating that Dunelm Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pinewood Technologies Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Dunelm Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CURY or PINE?

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 5 more articles in the media than Currys. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 1 mentions for Currys. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Pinewood Technologies Group's score of 0.40 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Currys 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pinewood Technologies Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer PETS or PINE?

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 4 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 2 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Pets at Home Group's score of 0.37 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pets at Home Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pinewood Technologies Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Pinewood Technologies Group (PINE) Competitors

GBX 446.50 +0.50 (+0.11%)

As of 10/2/2026 12:00 PM Eastern

Compare

PINE vs. DNLM, CURY, PETS, MOON, and PDG

Should you buy Pinewood Technologies Group stock or one of its competitors? Pinewood Technologies Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Dunelm Group (DNLM), Currys (CURY), Pets at Home Group (PETS), Moonpig Group (MOON), and Pendragon (PDG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty retail" industry.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Dunelm Group?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and Dunelm Group (LON:DNLM) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Dunelm Group had 2 more articles in the media than Pinewood Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Dunelm Group and 6 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group. Dunelm Group's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Pinewood Technologies Group's score of 0.40 indicating that Dunelm Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Dunelm Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Pinewood Technologies Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 585, indicating a potential upside of 31.02%. Dunelm Group has a consensus price target of GBX 1,111.11, indicating a potential upside of 42.45%. Given Dunelm Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Dunelm Group is more favorable than Pinewood Technologies Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Dunelm Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

Dunelm Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pinewood Technologies Group. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dunelm Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group	£43.80M	11.90	£45.24M	£48.00	9.30
Dunelm Group	£1.83B	0.86	£150.85M	£73.50	10.61

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 98.86% compared to Dunelm Group's net margin of 8.52%. Dunelm Group's return on equity of 99.65% beat Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group	98.86%	21.48%	4.17%
Dunelm Group	8.52%	99.65%	19.34%

15.0% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Dunelm Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.2% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.2% of Dunelm Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dunelm Group has a beta of 0.974, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dunelm Group beats Pinewood Technologies Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Currys?

Currys (LON:CURY) and Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Pinewood Technologies Group. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Currys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Currys	£9.25B	0.16	£195.60M	£14.50	10.12
Pinewood Technologies Group	£43.80M	11.90	£45.24M	£48.00	9.30

Currys currently has a consensus target price of GBX 178.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.59%. Pinewood Technologies Group has a consensus target price of GBX 585, indicating a potential upside of 31.02%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Currys.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Currys	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pinewood Technologies Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 5 more articles in the media than Currys. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 1 mentions for Currys. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Pinewood Technologies Group's score of 0.40 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Currys	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pinewood Technologies Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

46.1% of Currys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of Currys shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.2% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Currys has a beta of 1.251, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 98.86% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.78%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 21.48% beat Currys' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Currys	1.78%	7.10%	1.54%
Pinewood Technologies Group	98.86%	21.48%	4.17%

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Currys on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Pets at Home Group?

Pets at Home Group (LON:PETS) and Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 4 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 2 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Pets at Home Group's score of 0.37 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pets at Home Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pinewood Technologies Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pets at Home Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pinewood Technologies Group. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pets at Home Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pets at Home Group	£1.47B	0.63	£75.43M	£13.60	15.59
Pinewood Technologies Group	£43.80M	11.90	£45.24M	£48.00	9.30

Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.112, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 98.86% compared to Pets at Home Group's net margin of 4.29%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 21.48% beat Pets at Home Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pets at Home Group	4.29%	6.50%	4.66%
Pinewood Technologies Group	98.86%	21.48%	4.17%

Pets at Home Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 251.25, suggesting a potential upside of 18.51%. Pinewood Technologies Group has a consensus price target of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 31.02%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Pets at Home Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pets at Home Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pinewood Technologies Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

57.0% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.2% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Pets at Home Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Moonpig Group?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and Moonpig Group (LON:MOON) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 98.86% compared to Moonpig Group's net margin of 13.87%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 21.48% beat Moonpig Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group	98.86%	21.48%	4.17%
Moonpig Group	13.87%	-99.49%	15.92%

Pinewood Technologies Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Moonpig Group. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moonpig Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group	£43.80M	11.90	£45.24M	£48.00	9.30
Moonpig Group	£372.97M	2.14	£33.88M	£15.60	17.47

Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Moonpig Group has a beta of 0.971, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 6 more articles in the media than Moonpig Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 0 mentions for Moonpig Group. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Moonpig Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group	Neutral
Moonpig Group	Neutral

Pinewood Technologies Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 31.02%. Moonpig Group has a consensus target price of GBX 289.17, suggesting a potential upside of 6.09%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Moonpig Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Moonpig Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

15.0% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of Moonpig Group shares are held by institutional investors. 41.2% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Moonpig Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Moonpig Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Pendragon?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and Pendragon (LON:PDG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Pendragon has higher revenue and earnings than Pinewood Technologies Group. Pendragon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinewood Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group	£43.80M	11.90	£45.24M	£48.00	9.30
Pendragon	£3.86B	0.00	£46M	£0.03	N/A

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 98.86% compared to Pendragon's net margin of 1.19%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 21.48% beat Pendragon's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group	98.86%	21.48%	4.17%
Pendragon	1.19%	15.86%	4.17%

Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pendragon has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

15.0% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.1% of Pendragon shares are held by institutional investors. 41.2% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.1% of Pendragon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinewood Technologies Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 31.02%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Pendragon.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pendragon	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group had 6 more articles in the media than Pendragon. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group and 0 mentions for Pendragon. Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Pendragon's score of 0.00 indicating that Pinewood Technologies Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group	Neutral
Pendragon	Neutral

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Pendragon on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pinewood Technologies Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PINE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PINE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pinewood Technologies Group	Specialty Retail Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£521.12M	£10.37B	£12.28B	£2.81B
Dividend Yield	0.07%	224.90%	71.69%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	9.30	24.79	44.32	366.16
Price / Sales	11.90	14.81	91.63	89,437.04
Price / Cash	N/A	12.93	28.21	27.89
Price / Book	0.86	5.34	3.95	6.83
Net Income	£45.24M	£441.51M	£446.73M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.45%	-0.59%	-0.87%	-0.73%
1 Month Performance	-1.00%	-3.66%	-4.46%	16.59%
1 Year Performance	11.07%	-8.31%	-7.88%	23.09%

Pinewood Technologies Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PINE Pinewood Technologies Group	3.18 of 5 stars	GBX 446.50 +0.1%	GBX 585 +31.0%	+10.0%	£521.12M	£43.80M	9.30	5,334	Earnings Report
DNLM Dunelm Group	4.7274 of 5 stars	GBX 782 +0.9%	GBX 1,111.11 +42.1%	-31.6%	£1.58B	£1.83B	10.64	12,500	Negative News Gap Up
CURY Currys	4.1204 of 5 stars	GBX 146.10 -0.5%	GBX 178.50 +22.2%	+3.9%	£1.49B	£9.25B	10.08	24,540
PETS Pets at Home Group	3.3489 of 5 stars	GBX 211.20 +2.0%	GBX 245 +16.0%	+2.1%	£918.41M	£1.47B	15.53	210
MOON Moonpig Group	N/A	GBX 262.80 +0.8%	GBX 289.17 +10.0%	+21.7%	£769.44M	£372.97M	16.85	730

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PINE) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pinewood Technologies Group (PINE) Competitors

PINE vs. DNLM, CURY, PETS, MOON, and PDG

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Dunelm Group?

Summary

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Currys?

Summary

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Pets at Home Group?

Summary

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Moonpig Group?

Summary

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Pendragon?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PINE vs. The Competition

Pinewood Technologies Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pinewood Technologies Group (PINE) Competitors

PINE vs. DNLM, CURY, PETS, MOON, and PDG

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Dunelm Group?

Does the media refer more to PINE or DNLM?

Do analysts prefer PINE or DNLM?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PINE or DNLM?

Is PINE or DNLM more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PINE or DNLM?

Which has more risk and volatility, PINE or DNLM?

Summary

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Currys?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CURY or PINE?

Do analysts recommend CURY or PINE?

Does the media refer more to CURY or PINE?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CURY or PINE?

Which has more volatility & risk, CURY or PINE?

Is CURY or PINE more profitable?

Summary

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Pets at Home Group?

Does the media prefer PETS or PINE?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PETS or PINE?

Which has more volatility and risk, PETS or PINE?

Is PETS or PINE more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PETS or PINE?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PETS or PINE?

Summary

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Moonpig Group?

Is PINE or MOON more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, PINE or MOON?

Which has more volatility and risk, PINE or MOON?

Does the media prefer PINE or MOON?

Do analysts rate PINE or MOON?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in PINE or MOON?

Summary

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Pendragon?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PINE or PDG?

Is PINE or PDG more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, PINE or PDG?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PINE or PDG?

Do analysts recommend PINE or PDG?

Does the media refer more to PINE or PDG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PINE vs. The Competition

Pinewood Technologies Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools