Go Pro

Pinewood Technologies Group (PINE) Competitors

Pinewood Technologies Group logo
GBX 297.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05:22 AM Eastern

PINE vs. SAFE, CLIN, GROW, SAGA, and BGSC

Should you buy Pinewood Technologies Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pinewood Technologies Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pinewood Technologies Group include Safestore (SAFE), Clinigen Group (CLIN), Molten Ventures (GROW), Saga (SAGA), and BMO Global Smaller Companies (BGSC). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Safestore?

Safestore (LON:SAFE) and Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Safestore has a beta of 1.149, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

57.4% of Safestore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.9% of Safestore shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Safestore has higher revenue and earnings than Pinewood Technologies Group. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safestore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safestore£242.10M5.30£263.67M£29.7019.78
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M8.45£45.24M£48.006.20

In the previous week, Safestore had 3 more articles in the media than Pinewood Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Safestore and 0 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group. Safestore's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Pinewood Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Safestore is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Safestore Neutral
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral

Safestore presently has a consensus price target of GBX 762.67, indicating a potential upside of 29.82%. Pinewood Technologies Group has a consensus price target of GBX 585, indicating a potential upside of 96.64%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Safestore.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safestore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Safestore's net margin of 26.93%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat Safestore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safestore26.93% 2.86% 2.81%
Pinewood Technologies Group 124.20%35.39%4.17%

Summary

Safestore beats Pinewood Technologies Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Clinigen Group?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and Clinigen Group (LON:CLIN) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Clinigen Group's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Pinewood Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Clinigen Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral
Clinigen Group Positive

Pinewood Technologies Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Clinigen Group. Clinigen Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinewood Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M8.45£45.24M£48.006.20
Clinigen Group£565.60M0.00N/A£14.30N/A

15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Clinigen Group's net margin of 0.00%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat Clinigen Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group124.20% 35.39% 4.17%
Clinigen Group N/A N/A N/A

Pinewood Technologies Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 96.64%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Clinigen Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Clinigen Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Clinigen Group on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Molten Ventures?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Pinewood Technologies Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Molten Ventures. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Molten Ventures, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M8.45£45.24M£48.006.20
Molten Ventures£148M7.03-£33.58M£69.008.76

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Molten Ventures' net margin of 75.09%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat Molten Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group124.20% 35.39% 4.17%
Molten Ventures 75.09%9.21%-3.46%

Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9573506, suggesting that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.0% of Molten Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinewood Technologies Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 96.64%. Molten Ventures has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential upside of 5.65%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Molten Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Molten Ventures'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral
Molten Ventures Neutral

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Molten Ventures on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to Saga?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and Saga (LON:SAGA) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Pinewood Technologies Group has a beta of 0.571, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Saga has a beta of 2.021, meaning that its share price is 102% more volatile than the broader market.

Pinewood Technologies Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 585, suggesting a potential upside of 96.64%. Saga has a consensus price target of GBX 910, suggesting a potential upside of 44.47%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than Saga.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Saga
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to Saga's net margin of -1.53%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat Saga's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group124.20% 35.39% 4.17%
Saga -1.53%-15.72%2.90%

15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of Saga shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.4% of Saga shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinewood Technologies Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Saga. Pinewood Technologies Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saga, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M8.45£45.24M£48.006.20
Saga£660M1.39-£147.23M£2.40262.45

In the previous week, Saga had 5 more articles in the media than Pinewood Technologies Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Saga and 0 mentions for Pinewood Technologies Group. Saga's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Pinewood Technologies Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Saga is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral
Saga Neutral

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats Saga on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pinewood Technologies Group compare to BMO Global Smaller Companies?

Pinewood Technologies Group (LON:PINE) and BMO Global Smaller Companies (LON:BGSC) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Pinewood Technologies Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BMO Global Smaller Companies. BMO Global Smaller Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinewood Technologies Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinewood Technologies Group£40.50M8.45£45.24M£48.006.20
BMO Global Smaller Companies£303.85M0.00N/A£50.70N/A

Pinewood Technologies Group has a net margin of 124.20% compared to BMO Global Smaller Companies' net margin of 0.00%. Pinewood Technologies Group's return on equity of 35.39% beat BMO Global Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pinewood Technologies Group124.20% 35.39% 4.17%
BMO Global Smaller Companies N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Pinewood Technologies Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BMO Global Smaller Companies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pinewood Technologies Group Neutral
BMO Global Smaller Companies Neutral

15.4% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by institutional investors. 41.5% of Pinewood Technologies Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinewood Technologies Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 585, indicating a potential upside of 96.64%. Given Pinewood Technologies Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Pinewood Technologies Group is more favorable than BMO Global Smaller Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pinewood Technologies Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
BMO Global Smaller Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Pinewood Technologies Group beats BMO Global Smaller Companies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pinewood Technologies Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PINE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PINE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PINE vs. The Competition

MetricPinewood Technologies GroupAuto & Truck Dealerships IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£342.41M£652.94M£3.87B£2.76B
Dividend Yield0.07%2.71%3.49%6.16%
P/E Ratio6.2010.7777.29368.06
Price / Sales8.45150.02318.7384,617.43
Price / CashN/A9.5030.8227.87
Price / Book0.571.423.517.48
Net Income£45.24M£41.67M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.88%-0.84%0.17%-0.40%
1 Month Performance21.43%1.96%5.65%-1.17%
1 Year Performance-38.91%-13.52%3.44%61.57%

Pinewood Technologies Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PINE
Pinewood Technologies Group
2.6164 of 5 stars
GBX 297.50
flat
GBX 585
+96.6%
-38.1%£342.41M£40.50M6.205,334
SAFE
Safestore
4.5574 of 5 stars
GBX 608
-1.0%
GBX 824
+35.5%
-11.6%£1.33B£242.10M12.02120
CLIN
Clinigen Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.23B£565.60M64.691,000
GROW
Molten Ventures
1.2809 of 5 stars
GBX 592
+1.7%
GBX 638.67
+7.9%
+75.5%£1.02B£125.60M9.6120
SAGA
Saga
3.0359 of 5 stars
GBX 670
+1.4%
GBX 795
+18.7%
+254.3%£974.11M£660M279.173,682

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PINE) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners