HFG vs. CWK, TATE, PFD, BAKK, GNC, DCG, BD15, ZAM, PURE, and BMK
Should you be buying Hilton Food Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Hilton Food Group include Cranswick (CWK), Tate & Lyle (TATE), Premier Foods (PFD), Bakkavor Group (BAKK), Greencore Group (GNC), Dairy Crest Group (DCG), Tate & Lyle (BD15), Zambeef Products (ZAM), PureCircle (PURE), and Benchmark (BMK). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods" industry.
Hilton Food Group vs. Its Competitors
Cranswick (LON:CWK) and Hilton Food Group (LON:HFG) are both consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.
In the previous week, Cranswick had 7 more articles in the media than Hilton Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for Hilton Food Group. Cranswick's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Hilton Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cranswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Cranswick presently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,370, indicating a potential upside of 1.32%. Hilton Food Group has a consensus price target of GBX 1,091.67, indicating a potential upside of 29.96%. Given Hilton Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hilton Food Group is more favorable than Cranswick.
Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Hilton Food Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 33 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Cranswick pays out 42.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hilton Food Group pays out 63.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.
84.6% of Cranswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.3% of Hilton Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Cranswick shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Hilton Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Cranswick has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hilton Food Group. Hilton Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Cranswick has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hilton Food Group has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Cranswick has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Hilton Food Group's net margin of 1.22%. Hilton Food Group's return on equity of 15.15% beat Cranswick's return on equity.
Summary
Cranswick beats Hilton Food Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Hilton Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HFG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HFG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Hilton Food Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:HFG) was last updated on 8/3/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free HFG Stock Alerts