Do analysts rate CGEO or HLMA?

Halma has a consensus price target of £6,002.95, suggesting a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Halma is more favorable than Georgia Capital. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Georgia Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Halma 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CGEO or HLMA?

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than Georgia Capital. Georgia Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Georgia Capital £1.65B 0.83 £157.49M £4.53 thousand 0.98 Halma £2.58B 5.28 £268.37M £98.17 36.77

Is CGEO or HLMA more profitable?

Georgia Capital has a net margin of 118.79% compared to Halma's net margin of 14.42%. Georgia Capital's return on equity of 35.88% beat Halma's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Georgia Capital 118.79% 35.88% 3.51% Halma 14.42% 17.92% 8.13%

Does the media favor CGEO or HLMA?

In the previous week, Georgia Capital had 6 more articles in the media than Halma. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Georgia Capital and 2 mentions for Halma. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Georgia Capital's score of 0.31 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Georgia Capital 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Halma 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer MSI or HLMA?

Halma has a consensus target price of £6,002.95, indicating a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halma is more favorable than MS INTERNATIONAL. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MS INTERNATIONAL 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Halma 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MSI or HLMA?

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than MS INTERNATIONAL. MS INTERNATIONAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MS INTERNATIONAL £115.01M 2.32 £11.24M £65.70 24.73 Halma £2.58B 5.28 £268.37M £98.17 36.77

Is MSI or HLMA more profitable?

Halma has a net margin of 14.42% compared to MS INTERNATIONAL's net margin of 9.58%. Halma's return on equity of 17.92% beat MS INTERNATIONAL's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MS INTERNATIONAL 9.58% 16.56% 8.03% Halma 14.42% 17.92% 8.13%

Do analysts prefer RFX or HLMA?

Halma has a consensus price target of £6,002.95, suggesting a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Halma is more favorable than Ramsdens. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ramsdens 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Halma 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, RFX or HLMA?

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than Ramsdens. Ramsdens is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ramsdens £148.94M 1.45 £7.85M £59.10 11.17 Halma £2.58B 5.28 £268.37M £98.17 36.77

Is RFX or HLMA more profitable?

Halma has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Ramsdens' net margin of 13.25%. Ramsdens' return on equity of 29.66% beat Halma's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ramsdens 13.25% 29.66% 10.23% Halma 14.42% 17.92% 8.13%

Do analysts recommend JAR or HLMA?

Halma has a consensus target price of £6,002.95, suggesting a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halma is more favorable than Jardine Matheson. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Jardine Matheson 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Halma 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44

Which has higher earnings and valuation, JAR or HLMA?

Jardine Matheson has higher revenue and earnings than Halma. Jardine Matheson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Jardine Matheson £33.06B 0.01 £5.21B £379.00 0.16 Halma £2.58B 5.28 £268.37M £98.17 36.77

Does the media refer more to JAR or HLMA?

In the previous week, Jardine Matheson and Jardine Matheson both had 2 articles in the media. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Jardine Matheson's score of 0.00 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Jardine Matheson 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Halma 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer JARB or HLMA?

Halma has a consensus price target of £6,002.95, indicating a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halma is more favorable than Jardine Matheson. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Jardine Matheson 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Halma 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44

Does the media favor JARB or HLMA?

In the previous week, Jardine Matheson had 2 more articles in the media than Halma. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Jardine Matheson and 2 mentions for Halma. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Jardine Matheson's score of -0.23 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Jardine Matheson 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Halma 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Halma (HLMA) Competitors

GBX 3,610.09 +18.09 (+0.50%)

As of 09/4/2026 11:57 AM Eastern

Compare

HLMA vs. CGEO, MSI, RFX, JAR, and JARB

Should you buy Halma stock or one of its competitors? Halma's main competitors and comparable companies include Georgia Capital (CGEO), MS INTERNATIONAL (MSI), Ramsdens (RFX), Jardine Matheson (JAR), and Jardine Matheson (JARB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial conglomerates" industry.

How does Halma compare to Georgia Capital?

Georgia Capital (LON:CGEO) and Halma (LON:HLMA) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Georgia Capital has a net margin of 118.79% compared to Halma's net margin of 14.42%. Georgia Capital's return on equity of 35.88% beat Halma's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Georgia Capital	118.79%	35.88%	3.51%
Halma	14.42%	17.92%	8.13%

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than Georgia Capital. Georgia Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Georgia Capital	£1.65B	0.83	£157.49M	£4.53 thousand	0.98
Halma	£2.58B	5.28	£268.37M	£98.17	36.77

23.0% of Georgia Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Halma shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Georgia Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Halma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Georgia Capital has a beta of 0.659, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.966, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Georgia Capital had 6 more articles in the media than Halma. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Georgia Capital and 2 mentions for Halma. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Georgia Capital's score of 0.31 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Georgia Capital	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Halma	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Halma has a consensus price target of £6,002.95, suggesting a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Halma is more favorable than Georgia Capital.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Georgia Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Halma	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Summary

Halma beats Georgia Capital on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Halma compare to MS INTERNATIONAL?

MS INTERNATIONAL (LON:MSI) and Halma (LON:HLMA) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Halma has a net margin of 14.42% compared to MS INTERNATIONAL's net margin of 9.58%. Halma's return on equity of 17.92% beat MS INTERNATIONAL's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MS INTERNATIONAL	9.58%	16.56%	8.03%
Halma	14.42%	17.92%	8.13%

MS INTERNATIONAL pays an annual dividend of GBX 24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Halma pays an annual dividend of GBX 23.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. MS INTERNATIONAL pays out 36.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halma pays out 24.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

MS INTERNATIONAL has a beta of 0.04, meaning that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.966, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Halma had 2 more articles in the media than MS INTERNATIONAL. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Halma and 0 mentions for MS INTERNATIONAL. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat MS INTERNATIONAL's score of 0.00 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MS INTERNATIONAL	Neutral
Halma	Neutral

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than MS INTERNATIONAL. MS INTERNATIONAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MS INTERNATIONAL	£115.01M	2.32	£11.24M	£65.70	24.73
Halma	£2.58B	5.28	£268.37M	£98.17	36.77

Halma has a consensus target price of £6,002.95, indicating a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halma is more favorable than MS INTERNATIONAL.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MS INTERNATIONAL	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Halma	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

4.5% of MS INTERNATIONAL shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Halma shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.7% of MS INTERNATIONAL shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Halma shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Halma beats MS INTERNATIONAL on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Halma compare to Ramsdens?

Ramsdens (LON:RFX) and Halma (LON:HLMA) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than Ramsdens. Ramsdens is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ramsdens	£148.94M	1.45	£7.85M	£59.10	11.17
Halma	£2.58B	5.28	£268.37M	£98.17	36.77

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ramsdens	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Halma	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Halma has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Ramsdens' net margin of 13.25%. Ramsdens' return on equity of 29.66% beat Halma's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ramsdens	13.25%	29.66%	10.23%
Halma	14.42%	17.92%	8.13%

4.5% of Ramsdens shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Halma shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of Ramsdens shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Halma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ramsdens has a beta of 0.612, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.966, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Ramsdens pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Halma pays an annual dividend of GBX 23.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Ramsdens pays out 22.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halma pays out 24.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ramsdens is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Halma had 2 more articles in the media than Ramsdens. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Halma and 0 mentions for Ramsdens. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Ramsdens' score of 0.00 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ramsdens	Neutral
Halma	Neutral

Summary

Halma beats Ramsdens on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Halma compare to Jardine Matheson?

Jardine Matheson (LON:JAR) and Halma (LON:HLMA) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

14.7% of Jardine Matheson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Halma shares are held by institutional investors. 56.4% of Jardine Matheson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Halma shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Jardine Matheson pays an annual dividend of GBX 230.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 369.1%. Halma pays an annual dividend of GBX 23.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Jardine Matheson pays out 60.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halma pays out 24.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Jardine Matheson and Jardine Matheson both had 2 articles in the media. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Jardine Matheson's score of 0.00 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Jardine Matheson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Halma	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Halma has a consensus target price of £6,002.95, suggesting a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halma is more favorable than Jardine Matheson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Jardine Matheson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Halma	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Jardine Matheson has a beta of 0.426, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.966, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Jardine Matheson has higher revenue and earnings than Halma. Jardine Matheson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Jardine Matheson	£33.06B	0.01	£5.21B	£379.00	0.16
Halma	£2.58B	5.28	£268.37M	£98.17	36.77

Halma has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Jardine Matheson's net margin of 3.40%. Halma's return on equity of 17.92% beat Jardine Matheson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Jardine Matheson	3.40%	3.90%	2.53%
Halma	14.42%	17.92%	8.13%

Summary

Halma beats Jardine Matheson on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Halma compare to Jardine Matheson?

Jardine Matheson (LON:JARB) and Halma (LON:HLMA) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Jardine Matheson had 2 more articles in the media than Halma. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Jardine Matheson and 2 mentions for Halma. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Jardine Matheson's score of -0.23 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Jardine Matheson	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Halma	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

18.9% of Jardine Matheson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Halma shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.5% of Jardine Matheson shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Halma shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Halma has a consensus price target of £6,002.95, indicating a potential upside of 16,528.27%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halma is more favorable than Jardine Matheson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Jardine Matheson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Halma	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Halma has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Jardine Matheson's net margin of 0.23%. Halma's return on equity of 17.92% beat Jardine Matheson's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Jardine Matheson	0.23%	2.40%	2.53%
Halma	14.42%	17.92%	8.13%

Jardine Matheson has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.966, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Halma has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jardine Matheson. Jardine Matheson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Jardine Matheson	£35.12B	0.00	£80M	£6.01	N/A
Halma	£2.58B	5.28	£268.37M	£98.17	36.77

Summary

Halma beats Jardine Matheson on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Halma News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HLMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HLMA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Halma	Industrial Conglomerates Industry	Industrials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£13.63B	£26.43B	£10.42B	£2.54B
Dividend Yield	0.70%	3.78%	97.15%	6.21%
P/E Ratio	36.77	5.33	26.13	367.84
Price / Sales	5.28	30.53	388.18	84,012.92
Price / Cash	38.02	14.07	24.20	27.89
Price / Book	7.84	2.99	4.99	6.72
Net Income	£268.37M	£1.53B	£612.25M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-0.60%	-0.15%	-0.71%	11.33%
1 Month Performance	-4.76%	0.72%	-1.32%	1.74%
1 Year Performance	11.29%	9.60%	9.68%	21.39%

Halma Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HLMA Halma	3.0174 of 5 stars	GBX 3,610.09 +0.5%	£6,002.95 +16,528.3%	+11.3%	£13.63B	£2.58B	36.77	8,000
CGEO Georgia Capital	N/A	GBX 4,480 +1.5%	N/A	+88.8%	£1.38B	£1.65B	0.99	19,815	News Coverage Positive News Insider Trade
MSI MS INTERNATIONAL	N/A	GBX 1,680 -0.6%	N/A	+30.8%	£276.07M	£115.01M	25.57	455
RFX Ramsdens	N/A	GBX 662.30 -0.1%	N/A	+105.9%	£216.34M	£148.94M	11.21	784
JAR Jardine Matheson	N/A	GBX 61 -2.4%	N/A	N/A	£179.31M	£33.06B	0.16	425,000	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HLMA) was last updated on 9/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Halma (HLMA) Competitors

HLMA vs. CGEO, MSI, RFX, JAR, and JARB

How does Halma compare to Georgia Capital?

Summary

How does Halma compare to MS INTERNATIONAL?

Summary

How does Halma compare to Ramsdens?

Summary

How does Halma compare to Jardine Matheson?

Summary

How does Halma compare to Jardine Matheson?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HLMA vs. The Competition

Halma Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Halma (HLMA) Competitors

HLMA vs. CGEO, MSI, RFX, JAR, and JARB

How does Halma compare to Georgia Capital?

Is CGEO or HLMA more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CGEO or HLMA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CGEO or HLMA?

Which has more volatility & risk, CGEO or HLMA?

Does the media favor CGEO or HLMA?

Do analysts rate CGEO or HLMA?

Summary

How does Halma compare to MS INTERNATIONAL?

Is MSI or HLMA more profitable?

Is MSI or HLMA a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, MSI or HLMA?

Does the media refer more to MSI or HLMA?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MSI or HLMA?

Do analysts prefer MSI or HLMA?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MSI or HLMA?

Summary

How does Halma compare to Ramsdens?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, RFX or HLMA?

Do analysts prefer RFX or HLMA?

Is RFX or HLMA more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of RFX or HLMA?

Which has more risk & volatility, RFX or HLMA?

Is RFX or HLMA a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer RFX or HLMA?

Summary

How does Halma compare to Jardine Matheson?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in JAR or HLMA?

Is JAR or HLMA a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to JAR or HLMA?

Do analysts recommend JAR or HLMA?

Which has more risk & volatility, JAR or HLMA?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, JAR or HLMA?

Is JAR or HLMA more profitable?

Summary

How does Halma compare to Jardine Matheson?

Does the media favor JARB or HLMA?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in JARB or HLMA?

Do analysts prefer JARB or HLMA?

Is JARB or HLMA more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, JARB or HLMA?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, JARB or HLMA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HLMA vs. The Competition

Halma Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools