Free Trial

Halma (HLMA) Competitors

Halma logo
GBX 4,876 +76.00 (+1.58%)
As of 12:14 PM Eastern

HLMA vs. CGEO, MSI, JAR, JARB, and RFX

Should you buy Halma stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Halma with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Halma include Georgia Capital (CGEO), MS INTERNATIONAL (MSI), Jardine Matheson (JAR), Jardine Matheson (JARB), and Ramsdens (RFX). These companies are all part of the "conglomerates" industry.

How does Halma compare to Georgia Capital?

Halma (LON:HLMA) and Georgia Capital (LON:CGEO) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Halma has a beta of 0.956, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Georgia Capital has a beta of 0.641, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Georgia Capital has a net margin of 99.61% compared to Halma's net margin of 14.63%. Georgia Capital's return on equity of 39.19% beat Halma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Halma14.63% 13.73% 8.13%
Georgia Capital 99.61%39.19%3.51%

In the previous week, Georgia Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Halma. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Georgia Capital and 1 mentions for Halma. Georgia Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Halma's score of 0.00 indicating that Georgia Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Halma
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Georgia Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Halma currently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,737.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.35%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Halma is more favorable than Georgia Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Halma
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Georgia Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than Georgia Capital. Georgia Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halma£2.41B7.64£268.37M£91.4553.32
Georgia Capital£1.91B0.66£157.49M£4.53 thousand0.89

57.7% of Halma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of Georgia Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Halma shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Georgia Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Halma beats Georgia Capital on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Halma compare to MS INTERNATIONAL?

MS INTERNATIONAL (LON:MSI) and Halma (LON:HLMA) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

MS INTERNATIONAL pays an annual dividend of GBX 23 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Halma pays an annual dividend of GBX 23.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. MS INTERNATIONAL pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halma pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

4.6% of MS INTERNATIONAL shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Halma shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.7% of MS INTERNATIONAL shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Halma shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MS INTERNATIONAL has a beta of 0.04, suggesting that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.956, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Halma had 1 more articles in the media than MS INTERNATIONAL. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Halma and 0 mentions for MS INTERNATIONAL. MS INTERNATIONAL's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Halma'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
MS INTERNATIONAL Neutral
Halma Neutral

Halma has a net margin of 14.63% compared to MS INTERNATIONAL's net margin of 12.10%. MS INTERNATIONAL's return on equity of 22.79% beat Halma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MS INTERNATIONAL12.10% 22.79% 8.03%
Halma 14.63%13.73%8.13%

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than MS INTERNATIONAL. MS INTERNATIONAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MS INTERNATIONAL£118.60M2.21£11.24M£86.3018.52
Halma£2.41B7.64£268.37M£91.4553.32

Halma has a consensus price target of GBX 3,737.50, indicating a potential downside of 23.35%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Halma is more favorable than MS INTERNATIONAL.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MS INTERNATIONAL
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Halma
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Halma beats MS INTERNATIONAL on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Halma compare to Jardine Matheson?

Halma (LON:HLMA) and Jardine Matheson (LON:JAR) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Halma currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,737.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.35%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Halma is more favorable than Jardine Matheson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Halma
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Jardine Matheson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Jardine Matheson had 2 more articles in the media than Halma. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Jardine Matheson and 1 mentions for Halma. Jardine Matheson's average media sentiment score of 0.09 beat Halma's score of 0.00 indicating that Jardine Matheson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Halma
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Jardine Matheson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Halma has a net margin of 14.63% compared to Jardine Matheson's net margin of 3.24%. Halma's return on equity of 13.73% beat Jardine Matheson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Halma14.63% 13.73% 8.13%
Jardine Matheson 3.24%3.86%2.53%

Halma has a beta of 0.956, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jardine Matheson has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Jardine Matheson has higher revenue and earnings than Halma. Jardine Matheson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halma£2.41B7.64£268.37M£91.4553.32
Jardine Matheson£34.22B0.01£5.21B£377.000.17

Halma pays an annual dividend of GBX 23.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Jardine Matheson pays an annual dividend of GBX 219.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 350.8%. Halma pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jardine Matheson pays out 58.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

57.7% of Halma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of Jardine Matheson shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Halma shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 55.9% of Jardine Matheson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Halma beats Jardine Matheson on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Halma compare to Jardine Matheson?

Halma (LON:HLMA) and Jardine Matheson (LON:JARB) are both conglomerates industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Halma has a beta of 0.956, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jardine Matheson has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

57.7% of Halma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of Jardine Matheson shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Halma shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 33.5% of Jardine Matheson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Halma and Halma both had 1 articles in the media. Halma's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Jardine Matheson's score of -0.49 indicating that Halma is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Halma
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Jardine Matheson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Halma has a net margin of 14.63% compared to Jardine Matheson's net margin of 0.23%. Halma's return on equity of 13.73% beat Jardine Matheson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Halma14.63% 13.73% 8.13%
Jardine Matheson 0.23%2.40%2.53%

Halma presently has a consensus target price of GBX 3,737.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.35%. Given Jardine Matheson's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Jardine Matheson is more favorable than Halma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Halma
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Jardine Matheson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Halma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jardine Matheson. Jardine Matheson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halma£2.41B7.64£268.37M£91.4553.32
Jardine Matheson£35.12B0.00£80M£6.01N/A

Summary

Halma beats Jardine Matheson on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Halma compare to Ramsdens?

Ramsdens (LON:RFX) and Halma (LON:HLMA) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Ramsdens and Ramsdens both had 1 articles in the media. Ramsdens' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Halma'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ramsdens Neutral
Halma Neutral

Halma has higher revenue and earnings than Ramsdens. Ramsdens is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ramsdens£116.80M1.37£7.85M£36.0013.69
Halma£2.41B7.64£268.37M£91.4553.32

Halma has a net margin of 14.63% compared to Ramsdens' net margin of 10.18%. Ramsdens' return on equity of 20.23% beat Halma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ramsdens10.18% 20.23% 10.23%
Halma 14.63%13.73%8.13%

Ramsdens has a beta of 0.581, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.956, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Halma has a consensus target price of GBX 3,737.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.35%. Given Halma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Halma is more favorable than Ramsdens.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ramsdens
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Halma
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

3.9% of Ramsdens shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Halma shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of Ramsdens shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Halma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ramsdens pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Halma pays an annual dividend of GBX 23.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ramsdens pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Halma pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Halma beats Ramsdens on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Halma News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HLMA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HLMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HLMA vs. The Competition

MetricHalmaConglomerates IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£18.42B£2.68B£9.62B£2.78B
Dividend Yield0.51%4.16%3.54%6.13%
P/E Ratio53.322.7425.18364.73
Price / Sales7.64106.225,101.4187,561.71
Price / Cash38.0214.8128.2027.85
Price / Book10.595.085.087.74
Net Income£268.37M£480.34M£794.09M£5.88B
7 Day Performance5.18%-0.50%0.65%6.46%
1 Month Performance8.12%-0.18%2.55%9.67%
1 Year Performance67.79%20.89%30.75%75.31%

Halma Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HLMA
Halma
0.1728 of 5 stars
GBX 4,876
+1.6%
GBX 3,737.50
-23.3%
+64.8%£18.42B£2.41B53.328,000
CGEO
Georgia Capital
N/AGBX 4,030
+0.1%
N/A+121.9%£1.26B£1.91B0.8919,815
MSI
MS INTERNATIONAL
N/AGBX 1,641
+0.1%
N/A+35.9%£269.62M£118.60M19.02455
JAR
Jardine Matheson
N/AGBX 62.50
flat
N/A+43.6%£183.05M£34.22B0.17425,000
JARB
Jardine Matheson
N/AN/AN/AN/A£151.19M£35.12B6.71443,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HLMA) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners