Go Pro

Jupiter Fund Management (JUP) Competitors

Jupiter Fund Management logo
GBX 163.03 +1.03 (+0.64%)
As of 08/14/2026 12:36 PM Eastern

JUP vs. CTY, BPT, TEM, QLT, and HICL

Should you buy Jupiter Fund Management stock or one of its competitors? Jupiter Fund Management's main competitors and comparable companies include City of London (CTY), Bridgepoint Group (BPT), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), Quilter (QLT), and HICL Infrastructure (HICL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to City of London?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

37.8% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.869, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, City of London had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Fund Management. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral
City of London Neutral

Jupiter Fund Management currently has a consensus target price of GBX 173, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than City of London.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
City of London
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
City of London 97.40%22.92%4.00%

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.56-£8.84M£18.508.81
City of London£568.96M5.35£294.08M£113.995.18

Summary

City of London beats Jupiter Fund Management on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

37.8% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.1% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jupiter Fund Management has a net margin of 19.32% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity of 11.59% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
Bridgepoint Group 4.18%2.71%3.47%

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.388, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Fund Management. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 0 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management. Bridgepoint Group's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Jupiter Fund Management's score of 0.42 indicating that Bridgepoint Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral
Bridgepoint Group Very Positive

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Bridgepoint Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bridgepoint Group pays out 313.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 173, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Bridgepoint Group has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential upside of 14.47%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Jupiter Fund Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Bridgepoint Group has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.56-£8.84M£18.508.81
Bridgepoint Group£583.70M5.15£45.58M£3.00113.57

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Jupiter Fund Management on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.78£130.50M£77.544.13
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.56-£8.84M£18.508.81

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 96.24% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Jupiter Fund Management 19.32%11.59%4.00%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus price target of GBX 173, suggesting a potential upside of 6.12%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Fund Management. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's score of 0.34 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Neutral
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and Jupiter Fund Management tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Quilter?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Quilter had 3 more articles in the media than Jupiter Fund Management. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quilter and 0 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Jupiter Fund Management's score of 0.42 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral
Quilter Neutral

37.8% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Quilter shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.56-£8.84M£18.508.81
Quilter£13.46B0.20£49.61M£8.6023.06

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.824, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Fund Management currently has a consensus target price of GBX 173, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Quilter has a consensus target price of GBX 210.86, indicating a potential upside of 6.33%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quilter is more favorable than Jupiter Fund Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Jupiter Fund Management has a net margin of 19.32% compared to Quilter's net margin of 0.88%. Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity of 11.59% beat Quilter's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
Quilter 0.88%8.39%0.21%

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Quilter beats Jupiter Fund Management on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to HICL Infrastructure?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat HICL Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral
HICL Infrastructure Neutral

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.515, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

37.8% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 173, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

HICL Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.56-£8.84M£18.508.81
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M9.30£101.36M£13.8010.04

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

HICL Infrastructure has a net margin of 88.60% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity of 11.59% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
HICL Infrastructure 88.60%8.82%0.58%

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats HICL Infrastructure on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Jupiter Fund Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JUP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JUP vs. The Competition

MetricJupiter Fund ManagementCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£815.87M£5.73B£13.87B£2.52B
Dividend Yield3.69%7.38%5.87%6.10%
P/E Ratio8.8138.2529.38368.50
Price / Sales1.561,208.86507.2283,338.67
Price / Cash1.4648.2837.2627.89
Price / Book1.063.692.817.18
Net Income-£8.84M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.88%0.60%0.77%0.91%
1 Month Performance-5.15%1.18%1.43%2.92%
1 Year Performance28.78%6.64%12.06%64.34%

Jupiter Fund Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JUP
Jupiter Fund Management
2.159 of 5 stars
GBX 163.03
+0.6%
GBX 173
+6.1%
+28.8%£815.87M£525.40M8.81522
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 594
-0.2%
N/A+18.2%£3.06B£568.96M5.21N/A
BPT
Bridgepoint Group
2.218 of 5 stars
GBX 341.60
-0.7%
GBX 390
+14.2%
+0.1%£2.99B£583.70M113.87391
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 315.43
+0.1%
N/A+61.0%£2.93B£781.18M4.07N/A
QLT
Quilter
2.6999 of 5 stars
GBX 202.60
+2.6%
GBX 205.86
+1.6%
+18.0%£2.75B£9.34B23.562,983

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:JUP) was last updated on 8/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners