Log in

LON:JUPJupiter Fund Management Competitors & Alternatives

GBX 246
+0.80 (+0.33 %)
(As of 07/13/2020 01:50 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
240.20
Now: GBX 246
248.20
50-Day Range
233.20
MA: GBX 250.54
271
52-Week Range
161.65
Now: GBX 246
437.80
Volume1.03 million shs
Average Volume2.62 million shs
Market Capitalization£1.36 billion
P/E Ratio9.18
Dividend Yield6.58%
BetaN/A

Competitors

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) Vs. MNG, FCIT, ICP, HICL, ASHM, and RCP

Should you be buying JUP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "asset management" are considered alternatives and competitors to Jupiter Fund Management, including M&G (MNG), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), Intermediate Capital Group (ICP), HICL Infrastructure (HICL), Ashmore Group (ASHM), and RIT Capital Partners (RCP).

M&G (LON:MNG) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares M&G and Jupiter Fund Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
M&GN/AN/AN/A
Jupiter Fund ManagementN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares M&G and Jupiter Fund Management's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M&G£33.16 billion0.14N/AGBX 434.04
Jupiter Fund Management£379.10 million3.59N/AGBX 26.809.18

M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 24 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. M&G pays out 55.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 63.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. M&G is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for M&G and Jupiter Fund Management, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
M&G01602.86
Jupiter Fund Management27101.90

M&G currently has a consensus price target of GBX 217.33, suggesting a potential upside of 25.23%. Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus price target of GBX 242.22, suggesting a potential downside of 1.54%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than Jupiter Fund Management.

Summary

M&G beats Jupiter Fund Management on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Jupiter Fund Management and F&C Investment Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Jupiter Fund ManagementN/AN/AN/A
F&C Investment TrustN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Jupiter Fund Management and F&C Investment Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Jupiter Fund Management27101.90
F&C Investment Trust0000N/A

Jupiter Fund Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 242.22, suggesting a potential downside of 1.54%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Jupiter Fund Management and F&C Investment Trust's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£379.10 million3.59N/AGBX 26.809.18
F&C Investment Trust£712.36 million5.23N/AGBX 124.705.52

F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 63.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 51 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 133.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 63.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Intermediate Capital Group and Jupiter Fund Management, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Intermediate Capital Group02502.71
Jupiter Fund Management27101.90

Intermediate Capital Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,607.33, suggesting a potential upside of 23.45%. Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus target price of GBX 242.22, suggesting a potential downside of 1.54%. Given Intermediate Capital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Intermediate Capital Group is more favorable than Jupiter Fund Management.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Intermediate Capital Group and Jupiter Fund Management's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermediate Capital Group£360 million10.50N/AGBX 38.2034.08
Jupiter Fund Management£379.10 million3.59N/AGBX 26.809.18

Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intermediate Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Intermediate Capital Group and Jupiter Fund Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Intermediate Capital GroupN/AN/AN/A
Jupiter Fund ManagementN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Intermediate Capital Group beats Jupiter Fund Management on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Jupiter Fund Management and HICL Infrastructure, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Jupiter Fund Management27101.90
HICL Infrastructure0000N/A

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus target price of GBX 242.22, indicating a potential downside of 1.54%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Jupiter Fund Management and HICL Infrastructure's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£379.10 million3.59N/AGBX 26.809.18
HICL Infrastructure£51.60 million64.51N/AGBX 2.7066.15

Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Jupiter Fund Management and HICL Infrastructure's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Jupiter Fund ManagementN/AN/AN/A
HICL InfrastructureN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 63.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 296.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jupiter Fund Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats HICL Infrastructure on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Ashmore Group (LON:ASHM) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Jupiter Fund Management and Ashmore Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Jupiter Fund ManagementN/AN/AN/A
Ashmore GroupN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Ashmore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 63.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashmore Group pays out 55.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Jupiter Fund Management and Ashmore Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Jupiter Fund Management27101.90
Ashmore Group37602.19

Jupiter Fund Management currently has a consensus target price of GBX 242.22, indicating a potential downside of 1.54%. Ashmore Group has a consensus target price of GBX 440.73, indicating a potential upside of 4.89%. Given Ashmore Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ashmore Group is more favorable than Jupiter Fund Management.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Jupiter Fund Management and Ashmore Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£379.10 million3.59N/AGBX 26.809.18
Ashmore Group£331.70 million9.03N/AGBX 30.7013.69

Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashmore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ashmore Group beats Jupiter Fund Management on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares RIT Capital Partners and Jupiter Fund Management's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RIT Capital Partners£215.90 million13.15N/AGBX 115.2015.71
Jupiter Fund Management£379.10 million3.59N/AGBX 26.809.18

Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RIT Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for RIT Capital Partners and Jupiter Fund Management, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
RIT Capital Partners0000N/A
Jupiter Fund Management27101.90

Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus target price of GBX 242.22, suggesting a potential downside of 1.54%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than RIT Capital Partners.

Profitability

This table compares RIT Capital Partners and Jupiter Fund Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
RIT Capital PartnersN/AN/AN/A
Jupiter Fund ManagementN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. RIT Capital Partners pays out 0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 63.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
MNG
M&G
2.9$173.55+1.2%£4.46 billion£33.16 billion4.04High Trading Volume
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
1.1$688.00+1.5%£3.71 billion£712.36 million5.52High Trading Volume
Intermediate Capital Group logo
ICP
Intermediate Capital Group
1.5$1,302.00+3.0%£3.67 billion£360 million34.08
HICL Infrastructure logo
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
0.9$178.60+1.3%£3.24 billion£51.60 million66.15
Ashmore Group logo
ASHM
Ashmore Group
1.3$420.20+1.1%£2.96 billion£331.70 million13.69Analyst Report
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
1.1$1,810.00+32.2%£2.88 billion£215.90 million15.71
INPP
International Public Partnerships
1.4$168.80+0.8%£2.68 billion£168.72 million18.35
Quilter logo
QLT
Quilter
1.5$140.70+1.1%£2.67 billion£7.82 billion17.59High Trading Volume
OMU
Old Mutual
1.3$59.76+0.9%£2.66 billionN/A3.16High Trading Volume
ATST
Alliance Trust
1.9$782.00+1.2%£2.58 billion£597.04 million14.06
MNKS
Monks Investment Trust
0.9$1,114.00+1.1%£2.44 billion£261.98 million9.99
Greencoat UK Wind logo
UKW
Greencoat UK Wind
1.3$144.00+1.4%£2.11 billion£196.92 million10.91
WWH
Worldwide Healthcare Trust
1.1$3,590.00+1.3%£2.05 billion£-100,740,000.00-16.53
Man Group logo
EMG
Man Group
2.1$129.60+1.2%£1.89 billion£1.11 billion7.04
FGT
Finsbury Growth & Income Trust
0.7$823.00+0.4%£1.82 billion£-121,346,000.00-12.25
SYNC
Syncona
1.2$259.50+1.7%£1.71 billion£439.12 million4.17
Close Brothers Group logo
CBG
Close Brothers Group
2.3$1,131.00+2.0%£1.68 billion£823.60 million8.86
MRC
Mercantile Investment Trust
0.7$196.60+1.2%£1.61 billion£-142,522,000.00-9.73High Trading Volume
WTAN
Witan Investment Trust
1.6$185.00+1.7%£1.60 billion£85.65 million29.84High Trading Volume
CLDN
Caledonia Investments
1.1$2,690.00+1.9%£1.46 billion£228.80 million7.58
CTY
City of London Investment Trust
1.3$331.50+1.8%£1.35 billion£306.67 million4.28
SCHRODERS/PAR NVTG FPD 1 logo
SDRC
SCHRODERS/PAR NVTG FPD 1
1.3$2,135.00+1.2%£1.30 billion£2.61 billion12.14
MYI
Murray International Trust
2.0$982.00+0.7%£1.26 billion£192.08 million7.32
BNKR
Bankers Investment Trust
1.1$1,010.00+1.6%£1.23 billion£109.69 million12.48
PNL
Personal Assets Trust
1.2$44,350.00+0.6%£1.21 billion£67.33 million18.38
Investec logo
INVP
Investec
2.1$171.55+4.0%£1.19 billion£1.64 billion1.50
FEV
Fidelity European Values
1.2$262.00+0.0%£1.05 billion£235.66 million4.83
BBGI
Bbgi Sicav
0.8$167.00+1.2%£1.03 billion£69.77 million19.88
EWI
Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust
0.5$280.00+1.4%£912.30 million£68.32 million13.73High Trading Volume
HRI
Herald Investment Trust
0.9$1,664.00+3.8%£903.80 million£256.91 million4.68
Rathbone Brothers logo
RAT
Rathbone Brothers
2.2$1,518.00+0.4%£874.15 million£381.17 million31.17
GSS
Genesis Emerging Markets Fund
1.1$749.00+0.9%£869.70 million£335.99 million2.91
BTEM
British Empire Trust
1.0$733.00+100.0%£812.93 million£51.62 million20.82
OTV2
Octopus Titan VCT
1.4$78.50+0.0%£800.70 million£90.94 million11.38
Liontrust Asset Management logo
LIO
Liontrust Asset Management
1.4$1,320.00+1.1%£777.17 million£104.33 million36.97Dividend Increase
High Trading Volume
Brewin Dolphin logo
BRW
Brewin Dolphin
1.9$257.00+2.3%£761.12 million£352.57 million16.47Analyst Report
ASL
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust
1.3$889.00+0.1%£748.50 million£312.61 million2.68
BBH
BB Healthcare Trust
0.7$168.50+1.2%£729.95 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
AGT
AVI Global Trust
0.9$688.00+0.1%£708.72 million£42.13 million31.42High Trading Volume
BGSC
Bmo Global Smaller Companies
0.8$116.00+0.9%£703.26 million£-106,341,000.00-6.17High Trading Volume
IP Group logo
IPO
IP Group
1.4$63.50+0.8%£669.28 million£-46,600,000.00-8.94
BGFD
Baillie Gifford Japan Trust
0.6$799.00+0.8%£664.64 million£41.75 million26.03
JLEN
John Laing Environmental Assets Group Lt
1.3$120.50+1.2%£650.60 million£59.62 million11.06
LWDB
Law Debenture
1.4$545.00+2.8%£640.60 million£166.76 million4.96
SAIN
The City of London Investment Trust
1.7$418.00+2.4%£607.54 million£118.09 million5.60High Trading Volume
BRWM
BlackRock World Mining Trust
1.3$393.00+2.5%£603.67 million£124.03 million6.06Upcoming Earnings
SCAM
The Scottish American Investment
1.1$415.00+100.0%£601.81 million£74.89 million9.02
SOI
Schroder Oriental Income Fund
1.4$228.50+2.2%£594.59 million£34.97 million24.84High Trading Volume
Draper Esprit logo
GROW
Draper Esprit
1.6$474.00+0.4%£566.05 million£52.01 million14.36High Trading Volume
USA
Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust
0.5$226.00+0.4%£564.60 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
This page was last updated on 7/13/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.