Go Pro

Jupiter Fund Management (JUP) Competitors

Jupiter Fund Management logo
GBX 168 +15.54 (+10.19%)
As of 08:44 AM Eastern

JUP vs. EMG, PHLL, JGGI, RCP, and CTY

Should you buy Jupiter Fund Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Jupiter Fund Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Jupiter Fund Management include Man Group (EMG), Petershill Partners (PHLL), JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), RIT Capital Partners (RCP), and City of London (CTY). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Man Group?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Man Group (LON:EMG) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Man Group pays out 115.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Man Group has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Man Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.59-£8.84M£17.909.39
Man Group£1.41B2.40£382.68M£15.0020.20

37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of Man Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Man Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 173, suggesting a potential upside of 2.98%. Man Group has a consensus price target of GBX 271, suggesting a potential downside of 10.56%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than Man Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 4 more articles in the media than Man Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 1 mentions for Man Group. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Man Group's score of 0.67 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Man Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Man Group has a beta of 0.636, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Fund Management has a net margin of 19.32% compared to Man Group's net margin of 12.23%. Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity of 11.59% beat Man Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
Man Group 12.23%11.51%4.61%

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats Man Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Petershill Partners?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Petershill Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Jupiter Fund Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 173, indicating a potential upside of 2.98%. Petershill Partners has a consensus price target of GBX 307, indicating a potential downside of 1.13%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than Petershill Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 5 more articles in the media than Petershill Partners. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for Petershill Partners. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Petershill Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Positive
Petershill Partners Neutral

Petershill Partners has a net margin of 67.97% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
Petershill Partners 67.97%16.42%5.95%

37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.59-£8.84M£17.909.39
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59

Summary

Petershill Partners beats Jupiter Fund Management on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus target price of GBX 173, indicating a potential upside of 2.98%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 5 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral
Jupiter Fund Management Positive

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a net margin of 91.40% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity of 11.59% beat JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income91.40% 7.63% 10.62%
Jupiter Fund Management 19.32%11.59%4.00%

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M13.07£625.87M£41.8114.62
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.59-£8.84M£17.909.39

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.79442686, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats JPMorgan Global Growth & Income on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to RIT Capital Partners?

RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus price target of GBX 173, indicating a potential upside of 2.98%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than RIT Capital Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RIT Capital Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 277.36% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 11.79% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RIT Capital Partners277.36% 11.79% 4.22%
Jupiter Fund Management 19.32%11.59%4.00%

RIT Capital Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jupiter Fund Management. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RIT Capital Partners£500.60M6.61£167.81M£327.007.49
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.59-£8.84M£17.909.39

RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.312, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 5 more articles in the media than RIT Capital Partners. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for RIT Capital Partners. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat RIT Capital Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RIT Capital Partners Neutral
Jupiter Fund Management Positive

8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. 20.0% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats RIT Capital Partners on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus target price of GBX 173, indicating a potential upside of 2.98%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than City of London.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
City of London
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

City of London has a beta of 0.8496738, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Jupiter Fund Management 19.32%11.59%4.00%

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M5.30£294.08M£113.995.13
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.59-£8.84M£17.909.39

8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 2 more articles in the media than City of London. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 3 mentions for City of London. City of London's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Jupiter Fund Management's score of 0.95 indicating that City of London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
City of London
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Jupiter Fund Management
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

City of London beats Jupiter Fund Management on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Jupiter Fund Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JUP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding JUP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JUP vs. The Competition

MetricJupiter Fund ManagementAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£833.15M£2.42B£6.18B£2.82B
Dividend Yield3.68%6.05%5.27%6.15%
P/E Ratio9.3961.4029.43368.46
Price / Sales1.591,795.721,147.1384,465.47
Price / Cash1.4660.5088.7327.89
Price / Book1.091.316.687.40
Net Income-£8.84M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.87%-0.33%-0.30%0.98%
1 Month Performance2.19%-0.45%-0.11%0.79%
1 Year Performance27.47%6.54%13.35%68.86%

Jupiter Fund Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JUP
Jupiter Fund Management
2.1513 of 5 stars
GBX 168
+10.2%
GBX 173
+3.0%
+15.7%£833.15M£525.40M9.39522
EMG
Man Group
1.74 of 5 stars
GBX 304.40
+0.3%
GBX 271
-11.0%
+65.8%£3.39B£1.41B20.291,790
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
GBX 311.33
+0.3%
N/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A
JGGI
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AGBX 610
-0.1%
N/A+5.7%£3.33B£255.23M14.59N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,442.75
-0.5%
N/A+28.2%£3.30B£500.60M7.4762

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:JUP) was last updated on 7/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners