Free Trial

Jupiter Fund Management (JUP) Competitors

Jupiter Fund Management logo
GBX 185.20 -0.60 (-0.32%)
As of 12:11 PM Eastern

JUP vs. ATST, EMG, PHLL, JGGI, and CTY

Should you buy Jupiter Fund Management stock or one of its competitors? Jupiter Fund Management's main competitors and comparable companies include Alliance Trust (ATST), Man Group (EMG), Petershill Partners (PHLL), JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), and City of London (CTY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Alliance Trust?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Alliance Trust (LON:ATST) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Alliance Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Alliance Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.77-£8.84M£18.5010.01
Alliance Trust£652.76M0.00£601.66M£2.12N/A

Alliance Trust has a net margin of 92.17% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. Alliance Trust's return on equity of 17.93% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
Alliance Trust 92.17%17.93%10.95%

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Alliance Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 26 per share. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliance Trust pays out 1,226.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jupiter Fund Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 2 more articles in the media than Alliance Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for Alliance Trust. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Alliance Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral
Alliance Trust Neutral

Jupiter Fund Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 192.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.94%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than Alliance Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Alliance Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Trust has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

37.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Alliance Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats Alliance Trust on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Man Group?

Man Group (LON:EMG) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

47.9% of Man Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.7% of Man Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Man Group has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Man Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Man Group£1.69B2.06£382.68M£28.1011.20
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.77-£8.84M£18.5010.01

Man Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 321, indicating a potential upside of 1.97%. Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus price target of GBX 192.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.94%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than Man Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Jupiter Fund Management has a net margin of 19.32% compared to Man Group's net margin of 18.60%. Man Group's return on equity of 20.41% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Man Group18.60% 20.41% 4.61%
Jupiter Fund Management 19.32%11.59%4.00%

In the previous week, Man Group had 7 more articles in the media than Jupiter Fund Management. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Man Group and 2 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management. Man Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Jupiter Fund Management's score of 0.24 indicating that Man Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Man Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Man Group pays out 60.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Man Group has a beta of 0.631, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Man Group beats Jupiter Fund Management on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Petershill Partners?

Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.77-£8.84M£18.5010.01

Petershill Partners has a net margin of 67.97% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petershill Partners67.97% 16.42% 5.95%
Jupiter Fund Management 19.32%11.59%4.00%

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 2 more articles in the media than Petershill Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for Petershill Partners. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Petershill Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petershill Partners Neutral
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral

Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Petershill Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus target price of GBX 192.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.94%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than Petershill Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Petershill Partners and Jupiter Fund Management tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 23 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 25.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.778, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

37.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 2 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a net margin of 95.04% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity of 15.17% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income 95.04%15.17%10.62%

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.77-£8.84M£18.5010.01
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£512.12M6.38£625.87M£89.796.72

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus target price of GBX 192.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.94%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats JPMorgan Global Growth & Income on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. City of London pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 2 more articles in the media than City of London. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for City of London. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Neutral
Jupiter Fund Management Neutral

Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus price target of GBX 192.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.94%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than City of London.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
City of London
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

City of London has a net margin of 96.97% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. City of London's return on equity of 18.79% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London96.97% 18.79% 4.00%
Jupiter Fund Management 19.32%11.59%4.00%

City of London has a beta of 0.871, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.297, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

City of London has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jupiter Fund Management. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£515.73M6.02£294.08M£101.955.89
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.77-£8.84M£18.5010.01

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats City of London on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Jupiter Fund Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JUP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JUP vs. The Competition

MetricJupiter Fund ManagementCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£928.13M£5.36B£14.14B£2.84B
Dividend Yield3.23%5.52%4.88%5.10%
P/E Ratio10.0124.7120.4823.37
Price / Sales1.777.664.855.03
Price / Cash1.4629.7220.3220.23
Price / Book1.201.801.822.45
Net Income-£8.84M£419.50M£1.33B£5.88B
7 Day Performance5.71%0.08%0.02%0.80%
1 Month Performance6.44%-1.95%-0.68%-1.88%
1 Year Performance25.14%-1.93%4.71%7.10%

Jupiter Fund Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JUP
Jupiter Fund Management
1.7554 of 5 stars
GBX 185.20
-0.3%
GBX 192.50
+3.9%
+25.2%£928.13M£525.40M10.01522
ATST
Alliance Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.58B£652.76M600.003
EMG
Man Group
2.5065 of 5 stars
GBX 317.80
+3.5%
GBX 321
+1.0%
+52.0%£3.52B£1.69B11.311,790
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
N/AN/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A
JGGI
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AGBX 608.50
+1.6%
N/A+4.2%£3.30B£512.12M6.78N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:JUP) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners