Go Pro

Jupiter Fund Management (JUP) Competitors

Jupiter Fund Management logo
GBX 171.60 +1.38 (+0.81%)
As of 12:27 PM Eastern

JUP vs. RCP, CTY, TEM, QLT, and ATT

Should you buy Jupiter Fund Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Jupiter Fund Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Jupiter Fund Management include RIT Capital Partners (RCP), City of London (CTY), Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM), Quilter (QLT), and Allianz Technology Trust (ATT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to RIT Capital Partners?

RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) and Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

RIT Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. RIT Capital Partners pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, RIT Capital Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Fund Management. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for RIT Capital Partners and 1 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management. RIT Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Jupiter Fund Management's score of 0.60 indicating that RIT Capital Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RIT Capital Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of RIT Capital Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RIT Capital Partners£500.60M6.60£167.81M£327.007.48
Jupiter Fund Management£465.70M1.83-£8.84M£17.909.59

Jupiter Fund Management has a consensus price target of GBX 155.33, suggesting a potential downside of 9.48%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than RIT Capital Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RIT Capital Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 277.36% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 21.19%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 11.79% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RIT Capital Partners277.36% 11.79% 4.22%
Jupiter Fund Management 21.19%11.49%4.00%

RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.312, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Jupiter Fund Management on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to City of London?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. City of London is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£465.70M1.83-£8.84M£17.909.59
City of London£568.96M5.20£294.08M£113.995.04

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 155.33, suggesting a potential downside of 9.48%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than City of London.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
City of London
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 21.19%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management21.19% 11.49% 4.00%
City of London 97.40%22.92%4.00%

In the previous week, City of London had 11 more articles in the media than Jupiter Fund Management. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for City of London and 1 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat City of London's score of 0.50 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
City of London
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.8605065, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

City of London beats Jupiter Fund Management on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management and Jupiter Fund Management both had 1 articles in the media. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Jupiter Fund Management's score of 0.60 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£465.70M1.83-£8.84M£17.909.59
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.73£130.50M£77.544.05

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.0834277, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Fund Management currently has a consensus target price of GBX 155.33, indicating a potential downside of 9.48%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 96.24% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 21.19%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management21.19% 11.49% 4.00%
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 96.24%31.30%4.50%

37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Jupiter Fund Management on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Quilter?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Quilter (LON:QLT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Quilter has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Jupiter Fund Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quilter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£465.70M1.83-£8.84M£17.909.59
Quilter£9.34B0.29£49.61M£8.6023.44

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 1 more articles in the media than Quilter. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for Quilter. Quilter's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Jupiter Fund Management's score of 0.60 indicating that Quilter is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Positive
Quilter Positive

37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.4% of Quilter shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Quilter shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quilter has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Quilter pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quilter pays out 72.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 155.33, indicating a potential downside of 9.48%. Quilter has a consensus price target of GBX 203.71, indicating a potential upside of 1.05%. Given Quilter's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quilter is more favorable than Jupiter Fund Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Quilter
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Jupiter Fund Management has a net margin of 21.19% compared to Quilter's net margin of 1.28%. Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity of 11.49% beat Quilter's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management21.19% 11.49% 4.00%
Quilter 1.28%8.35%0.21%

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management and Quilter tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Jupiter Fund Management compare to Allianz Technology Trust?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and Allianz Technology Trust (LON:ATT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allianz Technology Trust has a beta of 0.68265253, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management had 1 more articles in the media than Allianz Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Jupiter Fund Management and 0 mentions for Allianz Technology Trust. Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Allianz Technology Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Positive
Allianz Technology Trust Neutral

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 155.33, indicating a potential downside of 9.48%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than Allianz Technology Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Allianz Technology Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Allianz Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Allianz Technology Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Allianz Technology Trust has a net margin of 96.52% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 21.19%. Allianz Technology Trust's return on equity of 21.46% beat Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management21.19% 11.49% 4.00%
Allianz Technology Trust 96.52%21.46%22.44%

Allianz Technology Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. Allianz Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£465.70M1.83-£8.84M£17.909.59
Allianz Technology Trust£409.28M5.90£502.74M£109.396.53

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats Allianz Technology Trust on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Jupiter Fund Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JUP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding JUP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JUP vs. The Competition

MetricJupiter Fund ManagementAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£851.00M£2.43B£6.17B£2.78B
Dividend Yield2.54%6.01%5.23%6.17%
P/E Ratio9.5961.6228.81368.18
Price / Sales1.831,858.151,187.1584,613.91
Price / Cash1.4660.3388.6427.87
Price / Book1.111.396.437.49
Net Income-£8.84M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.05%-0.49%-0.56%-0.48%
1 Month Performance-2.83%0.24%0.30%-1.00%
1 Year Performance38.16%7.67%15.53%61.74%

Jupiter Fund Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JUP
Jupiter Fund Management
1.7054 of 5 stars
GBX 171.60
+0.8%
GBX 155.33
-9.5%
+37.1%£851.00M£465.70M9.59522
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,295
+0.2%
N/A+29.0%£3.11B£500.60M7.0262
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 569
+0.5%
N/A+16.5%£2.91B£568.96M4.99N/A
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 330
-0.8%
N/A+67.3%£2.89B£781.18M4.26N/A
QLT
Quilter
2.6711 of 5 stars
GBX 195.80
+1.8%
GBX 203.71
+4.0%
+21.5%£2.68B£9.34B22.772,983

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:JUP) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners