Kingfisher (KGF) Competitors

In the previous week, Kingfisher had 2 more articles in the media than Victorian Plumbing Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kingfisher and 1 mentions for Victorian Plumbing Group. Kingfisher's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Victorian Plumbing Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Kingfisher is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Victorian Plumbing Group has a net margin of 4.21% compared to Kingfisher's net margin of 1.89%. Victorian Plumbing Group's return on equity of 22.57% beat Kingfisher's return on equity.

Kingfisher has higher revenue and earnings than Victorian Plumbing Group. Victorian Plumbing Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kingfisher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kingfisher presently has a consensus price target of GBX 302.25, indicating a potential upside of 9.23%. Victorian Plumbing Group has a consensus price target of GBX 107.40, indicating a potential upside of 37.38%. Given Victorian Plumbing Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Victorian Plumbing Group is more favorable than Kingfisher.

65.7% of Kingfisher shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.6% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Kingfisher shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.2% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kingfisher has a beta of 1.111, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victorian Plumbing Group has a beta of 1.138, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Kingfisher pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Victorian Plumbing Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Kingfisher pays out 89.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Victorian Plumbing Group pays out 45.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Kingfisher presently has a consensus price target of GBX 302.25, indicating a potential upside of 9.23%. Topps Tiles has a consensus price target of GBX 70, indicating a potential upside of 106.49%. Given Topps Tiles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Topps Tiles is more favorable than Kingfisher.

In the previous week, Kingfisher had 3 more articles in the media than Topps Tiles. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kingfisher and 0 mentions for Topps Tiles. Kingfisher's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Topps Tiles' score of 0.00 indicating that Kingfisher is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kingfisher has higher revenue and earnings than Topps Tiles. Topps Tiles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kingfisher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Topps Tiles has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Kingfisher's net margin of 1.89%. Topps Tiles' return on equity of 99.37% beat Kingfisher's return on equity.

65.7% of Kingfisher shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Topps Tiles shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Kingfisher shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Topps Tiles shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kingfisher pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Topps Tiles pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Kingfisher pays out 89.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Topps Tiles pays out 66.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Topps Tiles is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kingfisher has a beta of 1.111, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Topps Tiles has a beta of 0.887, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kingfisher had 3 more articles in the media than CMO Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kingfisher and 0 mentions for CMO Group. Kingfisher's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat CMO Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Kingfisher is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kingfisher presently has a consensus price target of GBX 302.25, indicating a potential upside of 9.23%. Given Kingfisher's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Kingfisher is more favorable than CMO Group.

Kingfisher has higher revenue and earnings than CMO Group. CMO Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kingfisher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kingfisher has a net margin of 1.89% compared to CMO Group's net margin of -2.57%. Kingfisher's return on equity of 3.91% beat CMO Group's return on equity.

Kingfisher has a beta of 1.111, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CMO Group has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

65.7% of Kingfisher shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of CMO Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Kingfisher shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.3% of CMO Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NEXT had 1 more articles in the media than Kingfisher. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NEXT and 3 mentions for Kingfisher. NEXT's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Kingfisher's score of 0.22 indicating that NEXT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

65.7% of Kingfisher shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of NEXT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Kingfisher shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of NEXT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kingfisher presently has a consensus price target of GBX 302.25, indicating a potential upside of 9.23%. NEXT has a consensus price target of £140.98, indicating a potential upside of 12.96%. Given NEXT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NEXT is more favorable than Kingfisher.

NEXT has a net margin of 12.87% compared to Kingfisher's net margin of 1.89%. NEXT's return on equity of 52.86% beat Kingfisher's return on equity.

Kingfisher pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. NEXT pays an annual dividend of GBX 245 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Kingfisher pays out 89.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NEXT pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Kingfisher has a beta of 1.111, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NEXT has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

NEXT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kingfisher. NEXT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kingfisher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.