Free Trial
→ SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free MKS Stock Alerts

Marks and Spencer Group (MKS) Competitors

Marks and Spencer Group logo
GBX 355.90 -3.90 (-1.08%)
As of 05/29/2026 12:06 PM Eastern
Compare

MKS vs. ALY, CCL, NXT, FLTR, and SKG

Should you buy Marks and Spencer Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Marks and Spencer Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Marks and Spencer Group include Laura Ashley (ALY), Carnival Co. & (CCL), NEXT (NXT), Flutter Entertainment (FLTR), and Smurfit Kappa Group (SKG).

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to Laura Ashley?

Laura Ashley (LON:ALY) and Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) are both department stores industry companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Marks and Spencer Group has higher revenue and earnings than Laura Ashley. Laura Ashley is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Laura Ashley£219.20M0.00N/A-£2.30N/A
Marks and Spencer Group£17.27B0.42£501.71M£0.90395.44

Marks and Spencer Group has a consensus price target of GBX 418.57, indicating a potential upside of 17.61%. Given Marks and Spencer Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marks and Spencer Group is more favorable than Laura Ashley.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Laura Ashley
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, Marks and Spencer Group had 2 more articles in the media than Laura Ashley. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group and 0 mentions for Laura Ashley. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Laura Ashley's score of 0.00 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Laura Ashley Neutral
Marks and Spencer Group Positive

Marks and Spencer Group has a net margin of 1.50% compared to Laura Ashley's net margin of 0.00%. Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity of 8.86% beat Laura Ashley's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Laura AshleyN/A N/A N/A
Marks and Spencer Group 1.50%8.86%6.30%

57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Marks and Spencer Group beats Laura Ashley on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to Carnival Co. &?

Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) and Carnival Co. & (LON:CCL) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Carnival Co. & has higher revenue and earnings than Marks and Spencer Group. Carnival Co. & is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marks and Spencer Group£17.27B0.42£501.71M£0.90395.44
Carnival Co. &£26.98B0.98£2.51B£227.008.39

Marks and Spencer Group has a beta of 1.019, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carnival Co. & has a beta of 2.331, suggesting that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the broader market.

Marks and Spencer Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 418.57, indicating a potential upside of 17.61%. Given Marks and Spencer Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marks and Spencer Group is more favorable than Carnival Co. &.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Carnival Co. &
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Marks and Spencer Group had 2 more articles in the media than Carnival Co. &. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group and 0 mentions for Carnival Co. &. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Carnival Co. &'s score of 0.00 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marks and Spencer Group Positive
Carnival Co. & Neutral

57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Carnival Co. & shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of Carnival Co. & shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Carnival Co. & has a net margin of 11.48% compared to Marks and Spencer Group's net margin of 1.50%. Carnival Co. &'s return on equity of 26.21% beat Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marks and Spencer Group1.50% 8.86% 6.30%
Carnival Co. & 11.48%26.21%4.25%

Marks and Spencer Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Carnival Co. & pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Marks and Spencer Group pays out 400.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carnival Co. & pays out 6.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Marks and Spencer Group and Carnival Co. & tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to NEXT?

Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) and NEXT (LON:NXT) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

NEXT has a net margin of 12.87% compared to Marks and Spencer Group's net margin of 1.50%. NEXT's return on equity of 52.86% beat Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marks and Spencer Group1.50% 8.86% 6.30%
NEXT 12.87%52.86%14.42%

Marks and Spencer Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 418.57, suggesting a potential upside of 17.61%. NEXT has a consensus target price of £140.98, suggesting a potential upside of 6.68%. Given Marks and Spencer Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Marks and Spencer Group is more favorable than NEXT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
NEXT
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

In the previous week, NEXT had 2 more articles in the media than Marks and Spencer Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NEXT and 2 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat NEXT's score of 0.19 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NEXT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of NEXT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of NEXT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marks and Spencer Group has a beta of 1.019, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NEXT has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Marks and Spencer Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. NEXT pays an annual dividend of GBX 245 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Marks and Spencer Group pays out 400.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NEXT pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NEXT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

NEXT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marks and Spencer Group. NEXT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marks and Spencer Group£17.27B0.42£501.71M£0.90395.44
NEXT£6.90B2.21£784.86M£745.4017.73

Summary

NEXT beats Marks and Spencer Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to Flutter Entertainment?

Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) and Flutter Entertainment (LON:FLTR) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Marks and Spencer Group had 2 more articles in the media than Flutter Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group and 0 mentions for Flutter Entertainment. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Flutter Entertainment's score of 0.00 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marks and Spencer Group Positive
Flutter Entertainment Neutral

57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of Flutter Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Flutter Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marks and Spencer Group has a net margin of 1.50% compared to Flutter Entertainment's net margin of -3.10%. Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity of 8.86% beat Flutter Entertainment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marks and Spencer Group1.50% 8.86% 6.30%
Flutter Entertainment -3.10%-7.69%1.18%

Marks and Spencer Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 418.57, suggesting a potential upside of 17.61%. Flutter Entertainment has a consensus target price of £147.50, suggesting a potential upside of 103.95%. Given Flutter Entertainment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flutter Entertainment is more favorable than Marks and Spencer Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Flutter Entertainment
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Marks and Spencer Group has higher revenue and earnings than Flutter Entertainment. Flutter Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marks and Spencer Group£17.27B0.42£501.71M£0.90395.44
Flutter Entertainment£17.02B0.74-£807.30M-£175.00N/A

Marks and Spencer Group has a beta of 1.019, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flutter Entertainment has a beta of 1.154, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marks and Spencer Group beats Flutter Entertainment on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marks and Spencer Group compare to Smurfit Kappa Group?

Marks and Spencer Group (LON:MKS) and Smurfit Kappa Group (LON:SKG) are both mid-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Smurfit Kappa Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marks and Spencer Group. Smurfit Kappa Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marks and Spencer Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marks and Spencer Group£17.27B0.42£501.71M£0.90395.44
Smurfit Kappa Group£11.27B0.00£758M£2.48N/A

Marks and Spencer Group has a beta of 1.019, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smurfit Kappa Group has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Marks and Spencer Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Smurfit Kappa Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 131 per share. Marks and Spencer Group pays out 400.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Smurfit Kappa Group pays out 5,282.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marks and Spencer Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

57.8% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.8% of Smurfit Kappa Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Marks and Spencer Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Smurfit Kappa Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Marks and Spencer Group had 2 more articles in the media than Smurfit Kappa Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marks and Spencer Group and 0 mentions for Smurfit Kappa Group. Marks and Spencer Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Smurfit Kappa Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Marks and Spencer Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marks and Spencer Group Positive
Smurfit Kappa Group Neutral

Marks and Spencer Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 418.57, indicating a potential upside of 17.61%. Given Marks and Spencer Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marks and Spencer Group is more favorable than Smurfit Kappa Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marks and Spencer Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Smurfit Kappa Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Smurfit Kappa Group has a net margin of 6.72% compared to Marks and Spencer Group's net margin of 1.50%. Smurfit Kappa Group's return on equity of 14.31% beat Marks and Spencer Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marks and Spencer Group1.50% 8.86% 6.30%
Smurfit Kappa Group 6.72%14.31%6.89%

Summary

Marks and Spencer Group beats Smurfit Kappa Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marks and Spencer Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MKS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MKS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MKS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMarks and Spencer GroupDepartment Stores IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£7.21B£10.08B£4.00B£2.80B
Dividend Yield1.16%1.15%3.47%6.07%
P/E Ratio395.4425.4578.14365.74
Price / Sales0.4222.07327.4287,758.72
Price / Cash3.0812.3130.8727.89
Price / Book2.374.013.297.79
Net Income£501.71M£421.19M£247.50M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.51%-1.05%1.41%0.82%
1 Month Performance7.82%-2.02%2.66%10.96%
1 Year Performance-4.95%-5.05%1.96%78.71%

Marks and Spencer Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MKS
Marks and Spencer Group
2.9776 of 5 stars		GBX 355.90
-1.1%		GBX 418.57
+17.6%		-4.7%£7.21B£17.27B395.4464,000
ALY
Laura Ashley
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.84M£219.20MN/A2,980
CCL
Carnival Co. &
N/AGBX 1,903.50
flat		N/AN/A£26.38B£26.98B8.3940,000
NXT
NEXT
2.7042 of 5 stars		£131.05
+0.1%		£140.98
+7.6%		+3.3%£15.12B£6.90B17.5831,947
FLTR
Flutter Entertainment
2.2832 of 5 stars		GBX 7,238
-1.9%		£147.50
+103.8%		-60.5%£12.59B£17.02BN/A23,053

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MKS) was last updated on 5/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Massive Data Leak Exposes 512,000-Line Code That Could Change Society Forever
"You won't believe what I discovered at 4 World Trade Center" When our financial media correspondent travel...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
I paid $5,000 to hear Elon say this
One investor paid $5,000 to be in a private room with Elon Musk in Los Angeles - and what he heard confirmed a...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
One page of the SpaceX S-1 will move this stock overnight
When SpaceX files its S-1 in June, the SEC will require full disclosure of operating expenses - including powe...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk lights fire under Swiss chipmaker?
While investors chase the SpaceX IPO, one little-known Swiss chipmaker - 148 times smaller than NVIDIA - has q...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s real war
A 29-page National Security Strategy document - what analyst Porter Stansberry calls the 'Donroe Doctrine' - c...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel