Go Pro

Victorian Plumbing Group (VIC) Competitors

Victorian Plumbing Group logo
GBX 74 -0.20 (-0.27%)
As of 12:28 PM Eastern

VIC vs. TPT, CMO, KGF, PETS, and MOON

Should you buy Victorian Plumbing Group stock or one of its competitors? Victorian Plumbing Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Topps Tiles (TPT), CMO Group (CMO), Kingfisher (KGF), Pets at Home Group (PETS), and Moonpig Group (MOON). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty retail" industry.

How does Victorian Plumbing Group compare to Topps Tiles?

Topps Tiles (LON:TPT) and Victorian Plumbing Group (LON:VIC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Victorian Plumbing Group has higher revenue and earnings than Topps Tiles. Topps Tiles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victorian Plumbing Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Topps Tiles£295.45M0.23£529.29K£2.5813.49
Victorian Plumbing Group£326.10M0.75£5.66M£4.1018.05

Topps Tiles pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Victorian Plumbing Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Topps Tiles pays out 112.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Victorian Plumbing Group pays out 52.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Victorian Plumbing Group has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Topps Tiles' net margin of 1.74%. Topps Tiles' return on equity of 89.58% beat Victorian Plumbing Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Topps Tiles1.74% 89.58% 3.06%
Victorian Plumbing Group 4.75%24.66%9.24%

Topps Tiles has a beta of 0.867, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victorian Plumbing Group has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Topps Tiles presently has a consensus price target of GBX 51.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.99%. Victorian Plumbing Group has a consensus price target of GBX 107.40, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Given Topps Tiles' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Topps Tiles is more favorable than Victorian Plumbing Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Topps Tiles
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Victorian Plumbing Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

22.1% of Topps Tiles shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Topps Tiles shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 48.2% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Victorian Plumbing Group had 1 more articles in the media than Topps Tiles. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victorian Plumbing Group and 0 mentions for Topps Tiles. Topps Tiles' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Victorian Plumbing Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Topps Tiles Neutral
Victorian Plumbing Group Neutral

Summary

Victorian Plumbing Group beats Topps Tiles on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victorian Plumbing Group compare to CMO Group?

Victorian Plumbing Group (LON:VIC) and CMO Group (LON:CMO) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Victorian Plumbing Group has higher revenue and earnings than CMO Group. CMO Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victorian Plumbing Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victorian Plumbing Group£326.10M0.75£5.66M£4.1018.05
CMO Group£61.18M0.00-£2.32M-£3.63N/A

Victorian Plumbing Group has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CMO Group has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Victorian Plumbing Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 107.40, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Given Victorian Plumbing Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Victorian Plumbing Group is more favorable than CMO Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victorian Plumbing Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
CMO Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Victorian Plumbing Group has a net margin of 4.75% compared to CMO Group's net margin of -2.57%. Victorian Plumbing Group's return on equity of 24.66% beat CMO Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victorian Plumbing Group4.75% 24.66% 9.24%
CMO Group -2.57%-10.63%-3.98%

20.6% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of CMO Group shares are held by institutional investors. 48.2% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.3% of CMO Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Victorian Plumbing Group had 1 more articles in the media than CMO Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victorian Plumbing Group and 0 mentions for CMO Group. Victorian Plumbing Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CMO Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victorian Plumbing Group Neutral
CMO Group Neutral

Summary

Victorian Plumbing Group beats CMO Group on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victorian Plumbing Group compare to Kingfisher?

Victorian Plumbing Group (LON:VIC) and Kingfisher (LON:KGF) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Victorian Plumbing Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 107.40, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Kingfisher has a consensus target price of GBX 306.63, suggesting a potential downside of 0.86%. Given Victorian Plumbing Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Victorian Plumbing Group is more favorable than Kingfisher.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victorian Plumbing Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Kingfisher
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Victorian Plumbing Group has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kingfisher has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

20.6% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of Kingfisher shares are held by institutional investors. 48.2% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Kingfisher shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Victorian Plumbing Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Kingfisher pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Victorian Plumbing Group pays out 52.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kingfisher pays out 89.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Victorian Plumbing Group has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Kingfisher's net margin of 1.89%. Victorian Plumbing Group's return on equity of 24.66% beat Kingfisher's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victorian Plumbing Group4.75% 24.66% 9.24%
Kingfisher 1.89%3.91%3.55%

Kingfisher has higher revenue and earnings than Victorian Plumbing Group. Victorian Plumbing Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kingfisher, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victorian Plumbing Group£326.10M0.75£5.66M£4.1018.05
Kingfisher£12.95B0.39£329.55M£13.8022.41

In the previous week, Victorian Plumbing Group had 1 more articles in the media than Kingfisher. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victorian Plumbing Group and 0 mentions for Kingfisher. Victorian Plumbing Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kingfisher'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victorian Plumbing Group Neutral
Kingfisher Neutral

Summary

Victorian Plumbing Group beats Kingfisher on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victorian Plumbing Group compare to Pets at Home Group?

Pets at Home Group (LON:PETS) and Victorian Plumbing Group (LON:VIC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Pets at Home Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 240, suggesting a potential upside of 11.00%. Victorian Plumbing Group has a consensus target price of GBX 107.40, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Given Victorian Plumbing Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Victorian Plumbing Group is more favorable than Pets at Home Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pets at Home Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Victorian Plumbing Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

In the previous week, Victorian Plumbing Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Victorian Plumbing Group and 0 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Pets at Home Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Victorian Plumbing Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pets at Home Group Neutral
Victorian Plumbing Group Neutral

57.4% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 48.2% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Victorian Plumbing Group has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Pets at Home Group's net margin of 4.29%. Victorian Plumbing Group's return on equity of 24.66% beat Pets at Home Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pets at Home Group4.29% 6.50% 4.66%
Victorian Plumbing Group 4.75%24.66%9.24%

Pets at Home Group has higher revenue and earnings than Victorian Plumbing Group. Pets at Home Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victorian Plumbing Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pets at Home Group£1.47B0.65£75.43M£13.6015.90
Victorian Plumbing Group£326.10M0.75£5.66M£4.1018.05

Pets at Home Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Victorian Plumbing Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Pets at Home Group pays out 95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Victorian Plumbing Group pays out 52.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.108, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victorian Plumbing Group has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Victorian Plumbing Group beats Pets at Home Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Victorian Plumbing Group compare to Moonpig Group?

Moonpig Group (LON:MOON) and Victorian Plumbing Group (LON:VIC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

66.6% of Moonpig Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Moonpig Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 48.2% of Victorian Plumbing Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Moonpig Group has higher revenue and earnings than Victorian Plumbing Group. Victorian Plumbing Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moonpig Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Moonpig Group£372.97M2.26£33.88M£15.6018.30
Victorian Plumbing Group£326.10M0.75£5.66M£4.1018.05

In the previous week, Moonpig Group had 4 more articles in the media than Victorian Plumbing Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Moonpig Group and 1 mentions for Victorian Plumbing Group. Moonpig Group's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Victorian Plumbing Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Moonpig Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Moonpig Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Victorian Plumbing Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Moonpig Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Victorian Plumbing Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Moonpig Group pays out 20.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Victorian Plumbing Group pays out 52.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Moonpig Group has a beta of 0.967, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victorian Plumbing Group has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Moonpig Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 299.29, suggesting a potential upside of 4.83%. Victorian Plumbing Group has a consensus target price of GBX 107.40, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Given Victorian Plumbing Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Victorian Plumbing Group is more favorable than Moonpig Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Moonpig Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Victorian Plumbing Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Moonpig Group has a net margin of 13.87% compared to Victorian Plumbing Group's net margin of 4.75%. Victorian Plumbing Group's return on equity of 24.66% beat Moonpig Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Moonpig Group13.87% -99.49% 15.92%
Victorian Plumbing Group 4.75%24.66%9.24%

Summary

Moonpig Group beats Victorian Plumbing Group on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Victorian Plumbing Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VIC vs. The Competition

MetricVictorian Plumbing GroupSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£243.03M£11.03B£12.85B£2.90B
Dividend Yield2.96%118.42%56.18%6.17%
P/E Ratio18.0525.8646.68367.26
Price / Sales0.7518.2388.5883,668.69
Price / Cash5.1413.4419.0027.89
Price / Book4.635.744.206.92
Net Income£5.66M£438.66M£445.56M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.67%-1.97%-1.87%-0.15%
1 Month Performance-3.77%-2.34%-1.21%2.81%
1 Year Performance19.35%-5.15%-3.49%21.71%

Victorian Plumbing Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VIC
Victorian Plumbing Group
3.3113 of 5 stars
GBX 74
-0.3%
GBX 107.40
+45.1%
+18.2%£243.03M£326.10M18.05636
TPT
Topps Tiles
N/AGBX 36
+0.6%
GBX 51.50
+43.1%
-2.7%£70.49M£295.45M13.951,744
CMO
CMO Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.56M£61.18MN/A212
KGF
Kingfisher
1.3586 of 5 stars
GBX 315.50
-0.9%
GBX 306.63
-2.8%
+22.6%£5.16B£12.95B22.8674,525
PETS
Pets at Home Group
1.7415 of 5 stars
GBX 218.60
+2.6%
GBX 240
+9.8%
-2.3%£959.72M£1.47B16.07210

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:VIC) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners