Go Pro

Pets at Home Group (PETS) Competitors

Pets at Home Group logo
GBX 215.55 -0.25 (-0.11%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:13 PM Eastern

PETS vs. FRAS, INCH, SPD, DNLM, and CURY

Should you buy Pets at Home Group stock or one of its competitors? Pets at Home Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Frasers Group (FRAS), Inchcape (INCH), Sports Direct International (SPD), Dunelm Group (DNLM), and Currys (CURY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty retail" industry.

How does Pets at Home Group compare to Frasers Group?

Frasers Group (LON:FRAS) and Pets at Home Group (LON:PETS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Frasers Group has a beta of 1.236, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.108, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Frasers Group has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Pets at Home Group's net margin of 4.29%. Frasers Group's return on equity of 15.67% beat Pets at Home Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frasers Group7.04% 15.67% 7.43%
Pets at Home Group 4.29%6.50%4.66%

10.6% of Frasers Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.4% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 76.2% of Frasers Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Frasers Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pets at Home Group. Frasers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pets at Home Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frasers Group£5.33B0.66£365.76M£86.709.46
Pets at Home Group£1.47B0.64£75.43M£13.6015.85

Frasers Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 866.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.63%. Pets at Home Group has a consensus target price of GBX 240, indicating a potential upside of 11.34%. Given Pets at Home Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pets at Home Group is more favorable than Frasers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frasers Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Pets at Home Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, Frasers Group had 9 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Frasers Group and 0 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Frasers Group's average media sentiment score of 0.12 beat Pets at Home Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Frasers Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frasers Group Neutral
Pets at Home Group Neutral

Summary

Frasers Group beats Pets at Home Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pets at Home Group compare to Inchcape?

Inchcape (LON:INCH) and Pets at Home Group (LON:PETS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Inchcape has a beta of 0.976, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.108, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Inchcape pays an annual dividend of GBX 32.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Pets at Home Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Inchcape pays out 50.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pets at Home Group pays out 95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

64.5% of Inchcape shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.4% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by institutional investors. 13.4% of Inchcape shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pets at Home Group has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Inchcape's net margin of 2.44%. Inchcape's return on equity of 19.59% beat Pets at Home Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Inchcape2.44% 19.59% 6.35%
Pets at Home Group 4.29%6.50%4.66%

Inchcape currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,057.40, indicating a potential upside of 27.32%. Pets at Home Group has a consensus price target of GBX 240, indicating a potential upside of 11.34%. Given Inchcape's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Inchcape is more favorable than Pets at Home Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Inchcape
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Pets at Home Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Inchcape has higher revenue and earnings than Pets at Home Group. Inchcape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pets at Home Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Inchcape£9.50B0.30£245.92M£63.4013.10
Pets at Home Group£1.47B0.64£75.43M£13.6015.85

In the previous week, Inchcape had 3 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Inchcape and 0 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Inchcape's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Pets at Home Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Inchcape is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Inchcape Positive
Pets at Home Group Neutral

Summary

Inchcape beats Pets at Home Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pets at Home Group compare to Sports Direct International?

Sports Direct International (LON:SPD) and Pets at Home Group (LON:PETS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Pets at Home Group has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Sports Direct International's net margin of 0.00%. Pets at Home Group's return on equity of 6.50% beat Sports Direct International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sports Direct InternationalN/A N/A N/A
Pets at Home Group 4.29%6.50%4.66%

57.4% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sports Direct International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pets at Home Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sports Direct International Neutral
Pets at Home Group Neutral

Pets at Home Group has a consensus target price of GBX 240, indicating a potential upside of 11.34%. Given Pets at Home Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pets at Home Group is more favorable than Sports Direct International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sports Direct International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pets at Home Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Pets at Home Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sports Direct International. Sports Direct International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pets at Home Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sports Direct International£3.70B0.00N/A£21.50N/A
Pets at Home Group£1.47B0.64£75.43M£13.6015.85

Summary

Pets at Home Group beats Sports Direct International on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pets at Home Group compare to Dunelm Group?

Pets at Home Group (LON:PETS) and Dunelm Group (LON:DNLM) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

57.4% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Dunelm Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.2% of Dunelm Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Dunelm Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Dunelm Group and 0 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Pets at Home Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dunelm Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pets at Home Group Neutral
Dunelm Group Neutral

Pets at Home Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Dunelm Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 44.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Pets at Home Group pays out 95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dunelm Group pays out 60.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.108, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dunelm Group has a beta of 0.974, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Dunelm Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pets at Home Group. Dunelm Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pets at Home Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pets at Home Group£1.47B0.64£75.43M£13.6015.85
Dunelm Group£1.80B0.99£150.85M£73.5012.03

Dunelm Group has a net margin of 8.29% compared to Pets at Home Group's net margin of 4.29%. Dunelm Group's return on equity of 105.88% beat Pets at Home Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pets at Home Group4.29% 6.50% 4.66%
Dunelm Group 8.29%105.88%19.34%

Pets at Home Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 240, indicating a potential upside of 11.34%. Dunelm Group has a consensus price target of GBX 1,177.22, indicating a potential upside of 33.17%. Given Dunelm Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dunelm Group is more favorable than Pets at Home Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pets at Home Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Dunelm Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Dunelm Group beats Pets at Home Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pets at Home Group compare to Currys?

Currys (LON:CURY) and Pets at Home Group (LON:PETS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

46.1% of Currys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.4% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Currys shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Currys has a beta of 1.263, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.108, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Currys had 6 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Currys and 0 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Pets at Home Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Currys Neutral
Pets at Home Group Neutral

Currys presently has a consensus target price of GBX 178.50, indicating a potential upside of 18.70%. Pets at Home Group has a consensus target price of GBX 240, indicating a potential upside of 11.34%. Given Currys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Currys is more favorable than Pets at Home Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Currys
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pets at Home Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Pets at Home Group has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.78%. Currys' return on equity of 7.10% beat Pets at Home Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Currys1.78% 7.10% 1.54%
Pets at Home Group 4.29%6.50%4.66%

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Pets at Home Group. Currys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pets at Home Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Currys£9.25B0.17£195.60M£14.5010.37
Pets at Home Group£1.47B0.64£75.43M£13.6015.85

Currys pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pets at Home Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Currys pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pets at Home Group pays out 95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Currys beats Pets at Home Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pets at Home Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PETS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PETS vs. The Competition

MetricPets at Home GroupSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£941.17M£11.45B£13.23B£2.54B
Dividend Yield3.43%115.29%55.79%6.17%
P/E Ratio15.8526.2746.96367.57
Price / Sales0.6418.7888.8583,481.74
Price / Cash9.3513.5629.1327.89
Price / Book1.045.693.937.19
Net Income£75.43M£438.66M£445.72M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.48%-1.32%-0.26%0.30%
1 Month Performance10.20%2.31%2.74%3.31%
1 Year Performance-8.66%-4.12%-1.57%22.13%

Pets at Home Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PETS
Pets at Home Group
1.9472 of 5 stars
GBX 215.55
-0.1%
GBX 240
+11.3%
-8.7%£941.17M£1.47B15.85210
FRAS
Frasers Group
1.8844 of 5 stars
GBX 811.50
+0.4%
GBX 866.67
+6.8%
+17.5%£3.49B£5.33B9.3632,000
INCH
Inchcape
4.4287 of 5 stars
GBX 817.50
+0.1%
GBX 1,057.40
+29.3%
+21.5%£2.85B£9.50B12.8918,000
SPD
Sports Direct International
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.45B£3.70B21.8626,500
DNLM
Dunelm Group
2.9824 of 5 stars
GBX 886
+1.9%
GBX 1,177.22
+32.9%
-27.6%£1.79B£1.80B12.0511,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PETS) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners