Go Pro
→ Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free MAFL Stock Alerts

Mineral & Financial Investments (MAFL) Competitors

Mineral & Financial Investments logo
GBX 40.72 -0.78 (-1.88%)
As of 07/16/2026 04:40 AM Eastern
Compare

MAFL vs. VNH, FEN, PMI, SBSI, and AUGM

Should you buy Mineral & Financial Investments stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mineral & Financial Investments with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mineral & Financial Investments include VietNam (VNH), Frenkel Topping Group (FEN), Premier Miton Group (PMI), Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI), and Augmentum Fintech (AUGM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to VietNam?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and VietNam (LON:VNH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of VietNam shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of VietNam shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.683, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, VietNam has a beta of 0.448, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

VietNam has higher revenue and earnings than Mineral & Financial Investments. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VietNam, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.70£2.04M£8.404.85
VietNam£9.73M6.43£28.94M£41.008.24

In the previous week, VietNam had 1 more articles in the media than Mineral & Financial Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for VietNam and 0 mentions for Mineral & Financial Investments. VietNam's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Mineral & Financial Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that VietNam is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
VietNam Positive

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to VietNam's net margin of 24.35%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat VietNam's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
VietNam 24.35%6.90%-22.03%

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats VietNam on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Frenkel Topping Group?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.2% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frenkel Topping Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Frenkel Topping Group Neutral

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Frenkel Topping Group's net margin of 6.83%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Frenkel Topping Group 6.83%6.57%5.96%

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.683, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frenkel Topping Group has a beta of 0.068, suggesting that its share price is 93% less volatile than the broader market.

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frenkel Topping Group. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.70£2.04M£8.404.85
Frenkel Topping Group£41.67M1.47£1.05M£2.2022.73

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Frenkel Topping Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Premier Miton Group?

Premier Miton Group (LON:PMI) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Premier Miton Group has a beta of 0.513, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.683, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Premier Miton Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mineral & Financial Investments. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Miton Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Premier Miton Group£57.10M1.00£2.12M£0.06595.83
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.70£2.04M£8.404.85

24.6% of Premier Miton Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.7% of Premier Miton Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Premier Miton Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mineral & Financial Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Premier Miton Group Neutral
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral

Premier Miton Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 58, suggesting a potential upside of 62.24%. Given Premier Miton Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Premier Miton Group is more favorable than Mineral & Financial Investments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Premier Miton Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mineral & Financial Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Premier Miton Group's net margin of 0.16%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Premier Miton Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Premier Miton Group0.16% 0.09% 0.86%
Mineral & Financial Investments 125.37%23.41%11.52%

Summary

Premier Miton Group and Mineral & Financial Investments tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and risk.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's net margin of 51.03%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.70£2.04M£8.404.85
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M25.63£1.04M£2.1535.35

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.683, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Mineral & Financial Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Mineral & Financial Investments. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Mineral & Financial Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Augmentum Fintech?

Augmentum Fintech (LON:AUGM) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Augmentum Fintech's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mineral & Financial Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Augmentum Fintech Neutral
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral

Augmentum Fintech has a net margin of 187.74% compared to Mineral & Financial Investments' net margin of 125.37%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Augmentum Fintech's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Augmentum Fintech187.74% -4.20% N/A
Mineral & Financial Investments 125.37%23.41%11.52%

12.8% of Augmentum Fintech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Augmentum Fintech shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Augmentum Fintech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mineral & Financial Investments. Augmentum Fintech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Augmentum Fintech-£6.34M-9.27£178.09M-£7.20N/A
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.70£2.04M£8.404.85

Augmentum Fintech has a beta of 1.230375, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.683, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Augmentum Fintech on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mineral & Financial Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAFL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAFL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAFL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMineral & Financial InvestmentsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£16.13M£2.50B£6.23B£2.86B
Dividend Yield1.36%6.00%5.24%6.12%
P/E Ratio4.8562.7729.67368.59
Price / Sales10.701,843.381,177.0784,769.40
Price / Cash0.8760.50117.4027.89
Price / Book1.261.326.537.56
Net Income£2.04M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.44%-0.26%-0.10%0.24%
1 Month Performance-9.51%0.06%0.22%-1.15%
1 Year Performance76.97%7.50%15.21%62.40%

Mineral & Financial Investments Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAFL
Mineral & Financial Investments
N/AGBX 40.72
-1.9%		N/A+77.0%£16.13M£1.48M4.852
VNH
VietNam
N/AGBX 336
flat		N/A-7.9%£62.18M£9.73M8.20N/A
FEN
Frenkel Topping Group
N/AGBX 50
flat		N/AN/A£61.45M£41.67M22.73307
PMI
Premier Miton Group
2.8119 of 5 stars		GBX 38
-1.3%		GBX 58
+52.6%		-42.3%£60.42M£57.10M633.33163
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 75.50
flat		N/A-0.3%£59.02M£2.32M35.12810

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MAFL) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel