Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free MAFL Stock Alerts

Mineral & Financial Investments (MAFL) Competitors

Mineral & Financial Investments logo
GBX 45 +0.50 (+1.12%)
As of 11:24 AM Eastern
Compare

MAFL vs. IVPG, MIG1, VNH, MIG3, and OSEC

Should you buy Mineral & Financial Investments stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mineral & Financial Investments with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mineral & Financial Investments include Invesco Select Glo Eq (IVPG), Maven Income & Growth VCT (MIG1), VietNam (VNH), Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 (MIG3), and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Invesco Select Glo Eq?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Invesco Select Glo Eq (LON:IVPG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.1% of Invesco Select Glo Eq shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Invesco Select Glo Eq shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Invesco Select Glo Eq's net margin of 0.00%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Invesco Select Glo Eq's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Invesco Select Glo Eq N/A N/A N/A

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Invesco Select Glo Eq. Invesco Select Glo Eq is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M11.82£2.04M£8.405.36
Invesco Select Glo EqN/AN/AN/A£0.07N/A

In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Invesco Select Glo Eq'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Invesco Select Glo Eq Neutral

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Invesco Select Glo Eq on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Maven Income & Growth VCT?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Maven Income & Growth VCT (LON:MIG1) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.691, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maven Income & Growth VCT has a beta of -0.01, indicating that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Maven Income & Growth VCT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Maven Income & Growth VCT's net margin of -27.97%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Maven Income & Growth VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Maven Income & Growth VCT -27.97%1.63%-2.24%

In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Maven Income & Growth VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Maven Income & Growth VCT Neutral

Maven Income & Growth VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Mineral & Financial Investments. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maven Income & Growth VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M11.82£2.04M£8.405.36
Maven Income & Growth VCT£1.57M45.88£3.55M£0.6058.00

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Maven Income & Growth VCT on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to VietNam?

VietNam (LON:VNH) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

VietNam has higher revenue and earnings than Mineral & Financial Investments. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VietNam, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VietNam£9.73M6.88£28.94M£41.008.73
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M11.82£2.04M£8.405.36

VietNam has a beta of 0.439, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.691, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, VietNam had 1 more articles in the media than Mineral & Financial Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for VietNam and 0 mentions for Mineral & Financial Investments. VietNam's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mineral & Financial Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
VietNam Neutral
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral

5.9% of VietNam shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of VietNam shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to VietNam's net margin of -15.13%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat VietNam's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VietNam-15.13% -2.83% -22.03%
Mineral & Financial Investments 125.37%23.41%11.52%

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats VietNam on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Maven Income and Growth VCT 3?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 (LON:MIG3) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.691, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 has a beta of 0.13, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Maven Income and Growth VCT 3's net margin of 36.24%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Maven Income and Growth VCT 3's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 36.24%1.83%-2.94%

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Maven Income and Growth VCT 3. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maven Income and Growth VCT 3, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M11.82£2.04M£8.405.36
Maven Income and Growth VCT 3£1.66M40.17£728.80K£0.9147.03

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 had 1 more articles in the media than Mineral & Financial Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 and 0 mentions for Mineral & Financial Investments. Maven Income and Growth VCT 3's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Mineral & Financial Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 Positive

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Octopus AIM VCT 2?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.691, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Octopus AIM VCT 2's net margin of -13.92%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Octopus AIM VCT 2 -13.92%0.21%-10.46%

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus AIM VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M11.82£2.04M£8.405.36
Octopus AIM VCT 2£687K96.64-£1.34M£0.10300.00

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mineral & Financial Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAFL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAFL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMineral & Financial InvestmentsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£17.49M£2.39B£5.97B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.36%6.02%5.26%6.16%
P/E Ratio5.3659.7029.08366.66
Price / Sales11.822,054.671,107.4485,978.63
Price / Cash0.8760.3384.9827.87
Price / Book1.391.386.697.76
Net Income£2.04M£265.27M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.39%-0.31%-0.31%-0.72%
1 Month Performance-3.85%-0.33%0.42%-1.20%
1 Year Performance95.65%9.07%18.34%65.93%

Mineral & Financial Investments Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAFL
Mineral & Financial Investments
N/AGBX 45
+1.1%		N/A+83.3%£17.49M£1.48M5.362
IVPG
Invesco Select Glo Eq
N/AN/AN/AN/A£68.41MN/A3,885.71N/A
MIG1
Maven Income & Growth VCT
N/AGBX 32.80
-3.0%		N/A-6.3%£67.97M£1.57M54.67N/A
VNH
VietNam
N/AGBX 357.65
-0.1%		N/A+4.7%£66.84M£9.73M8.72N/A
MIG3
Maven Income and Growth VCT 3
N/AGBX 42.80
flat		N/A-5.7%£66.81M£1.66M47.03N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MAFL) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold Is About to Do Something It Hasn’t in 90 Years
The U.S. Treasury still carries America's gold reserves at $42 per ounce — a price set generations ago. Buried...
US Gold Bureau | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold Will Hit $4,900
JPMorgan now sees gold hitting $4,900, and central banks are buying at a record 710 tonnes per quarter. Trump'...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire trader who went 13-for-13 on Trump in 2025 now turns his attention to Elon.
Hedge fund trader Larry Benedict went 13-for-13 in Q1 2025 - not a single losing trade - and finished the year...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel