Free Trial
→ 'The largest market in human history' (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free MAFL Stock Alerts

Mineral & Financial Investments (MAFL) Competitors

Mineral & Financial Investments logo
GBX 42.60 +0.60 (+1.43%)
As of 11:25 AM Eastern
Compare

MAFL vs. OSEC, MIG1, GCL, D4G, and MIG3

Should you buy Mineral & Financial Investments stock or one of its competitors? Mineral & Financial Investments's main competitors and comparable companies include Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC), Maven Income & Growth VCT (MIG1), Geiger Counter (GCL), Downing FOUR VCT (D4G), and Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 (MIG3). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Octopus AIM VCT 2?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Octopus AIM VCT 2 (LON:OSEC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus AIM VCT 2'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Octopus AIM VCT 2 Neutral

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Octopus AIM VCT 2. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Octopus AIM VCT 2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.77£2.04M£8.404.88
Octopus AIM VCT 2£2.92M22.86-£1.34M£1.0728.36

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.681, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a beta of 0.65103215, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Octopus AIM VCT 2 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Octopus AIM VCT 2 has a net margin of 366.39% compared to Mineral & Financial Investments' net margin of 125.37%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Octopus AIM VCT 2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Octopus AIM VCT 2 366.39%3.00%-10.46%

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Octopus AIM VCT 2 on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Maven Income & Growth VCT?

Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and Maven Income & Growth VCT (LON:MIG1) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Maven Income & Growth VCT shares are held by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Maven Income & Growth VCT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Maven Income & Growth VCT has higher revenue and earnings than Mineral & Financial Investments. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maven Income & Growth VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.77£2.04M£8.404.88
Maven Income & Growth VCT£1.57M42.13£3.55M£0.6053.67

Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.681, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maven Income & Growth VCT has a beta of -0.01, meaning that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Maven Income & Growth VCT's net margin of -27.97%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Maven Income & Growth VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mineral & Financial Investments125.37% 23.41% 11.52%
Maven Income & Growth VCT -27.97%1.63%-2.24%

In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Maven Income & Growth VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral
Maven Income & Growth VCT Neutral

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Maven Income & Growth VCT on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Geiger Counter?

Geiger Counter (LON:GCL) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Geiger Counter's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mineral & Financial Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Geiger Counter Neutral
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral

Mineral & Financial Investments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Geiger Counter. Geiger Counter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geiger Counter£60.28M1.07-£11.70M£43.281.26
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.77£2.04M£8.404.88

2.3% of Geiger Counter shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of Geiger Counter shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Geiger Counter has a beta of 0.553, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.681, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Geiger Counter has a net margin of 137.37% compared to Mineral & Financial Investments' net margin of 125.37%. Geiger Counter's return on equity of 69.04% beat Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Geiger Counter137.37% 69.04% 28.68%
Mineral & Financial Investments 125.37%23.41%11.52%

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Geiger Counter on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Downing FOUR VCT?

Downing FOUR VCT (LON:D4G) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Downing FOUR VCT's net margin of 0.00%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Downing FOUR VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Downing FOUR VCTN/A N/A N/A
Mineral & Financial Investments 125.37%23.41%11.52%

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Downing FOUR VCT. Downing FOUR VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Downing FOUR VCTN/AN/AN/A£0.08N/A
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.77£2.04M£8.404.88

In the previous week, Downing FOUR VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mineral & Financial Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Downing FOUR VCT Neutral
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Downing FOUR VCT on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mineral & Financial Investments compare to Maven Income and Growth VCT 3?

Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 (LON:MIG3) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.681, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Maven Income and Growth VCT 3's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mineral & Financial Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 Neutral
Mineral & Financial Investments Neutral

19.1% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 125.37% compared to Maven Income and Growth VCT 3's net margin of -30.02%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 23.41% beat Maven Income and Growth VCT 3's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Maven Income and Growth VCT 3-30.02% -0.77% -2.94%
Mineral & Financial Investments 125.37%23.41%11.52%

Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Maven Income and Growth VCT 3. Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maven Income and Growth VCT 3-£7K-9,135.56£728.80K-£0.19N/A
Mineral & Financial Investments£1.48M10.77£2.04M£8.404.88

Summary

Mineral & Financial Investments beats Maven Income and Growth VCT 3 on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mineral & Financial Investments News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAFL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAFL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMineral & Financial InvestmentsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£16.55M£5.11B£13.26B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.36%7.60%6.07%6.21%
P/E Ratio5.0727.7222.59366.94
Price / Sales11.191,195.06485.2488,666.76
Price / Cash0.8747.5943.4527.89
Price / Book1.323.482.706.80
Net Income£2.04M£415.67M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.19%-0.62%-0.41%-0.62%
1 Month Performance-0.93%-2.97%-3.24%-1.47%
1 Year Performance15.14%9.59%9.68%22.21%

Mineral & Financial Investments Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAFL
Mineral & Financial Investments
N/AGBX 42.60
+1.4%		N/A+16.5%£16.55M£1.48M5.072
OSEC
Octopus AIM VCT 2
N/AGBX 30.40
flat		N/AN/A£66.65M£2.92M28.36N/A
MIG1
Maven Income & Growth VCT
N/AGBX 32.20
flat		N/A-11.9%£66.23M£1.57M53.67N/A
GCL
Geiger Counter
N/AGBX 54.81
+0.8%		N/A-10.8%£64.69M£60.28M1.27N/A
D4G
Downing FOUR VCT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£64.63MN/A812.50N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MAFL) was last updated on 10/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
"The largest market in human history"
SpaceX quietly filed paperwork describing what it calls the largest actionable total addressable market in hum...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
$169 Private Jet Trick Exposed
For $169, a growing circle of travelers are booking private jets without the wait, the hassle, or the high pri...
International Living | Sponsoredtc pixel
A simple options setup that cuts through the noise
Ian Cooper says most options traders overcomplicate the process, juggling countless indicators, strategies, an...
TradeWins | Sponsoredtc pixel
This free guide explains options the way they should be taught
Most options educators jump straight into Greeks, spreads, and implied volatility - losing beginners before th...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
You ignored me once and it cost you... big time.
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla called Rolls-Royce the best value play in market history. Shares have since climbed ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel