MAFL vs. LMS, KLSO, CIN, SWC, GV1O, TV2H, HOYE, SVCT, BPCR, and WINV
Should you be buying Mineral & Financial Investments stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Mineral & Financial Investments include LMS Capital (LMS), Kelso Group (KLSO), City of London Group (CIN), Summerway Capital (SWC), Gresham House Renewable Energy VCT 1 (GV1O), Thames Ventures VCT 2 Healthcare Shs (TV2H), Honye Financial Services (HOYE), Seneca Growth Capital VCT (SVCT), BioPharma Credit (BPCR), and Worsley Investors (WINV). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, community ranking, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.
Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 62.87% compared to Mineral & Financial Investments' net margin of 0.00%. LMS Capital's return on equity of 15.75% beat Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity.
31.3% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 38.7% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Mineral & Financial Investments received 41 more outperform votes than LMS Capital when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 69.31% of users gave LMS Capital an outperform vote while only 62.01% of users gave Mineral & Financial Investments an outperform vote.
Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mineral & Financial Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments had 1 more articles in the media than LMS Capital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mineral & Financial Investments and 0 mentions for LMS Capital. Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.
LMS Capital has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Mineral & Financial Investments beats LMS Capital on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Mineral & Financial Investments News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAFL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Mineral & Financial Investments Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
