Go Pro

ProVen VCT (PVN) Competitors

ProVen VCT logo
GBX 55.50 -2.00 (-3.48%)
As of 06/30/2026 10:00 AM Eastern

PVN vs. BGFD, ATR, HAN, BUT, and GCP

Should you buy ProVen VCT stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ProVen VCT with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ProVen VCT include The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (BGFD), Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (ATR), Hansa Investment (HAN), Brunner (BUT), and GCP Infrastructure Investments (GCP). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does ProVen VCT compare to The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust?

ProVen VCT (LON:PVN) and The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (LON:BGFD) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

0.3% of ProVen VCT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of ProVen VCT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ProVen VCT had 2 more articles in the media than The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ProVen VCT and 0 mentions for The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust. ProVen VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that ProVen VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ProVen VCT Positive
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Neutral

ProVen VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. ProVen VCT pays out 406.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a net margin of 158.45% compared to ProVen VCT's net margin of 115.21%. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's return on equity of 19.34% beat ProVen VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProVen VCT115.21% 1.34% 3.12%
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust 158.45%19.34%0.31%

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has higher revenue and earnings than ProVen VCT. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProVen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProVen VCT£8.84M19.00£9.46M£0.8069.38
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust£154.29M4.41£65.49M£188.955.30

ProVen VCT has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a beta of 0.9896676, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust beats ProVen VCT on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProVen VCT compare to Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.?

ProVen VCT (LON:PVN) and Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. (LON:ATR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

ProVen VCT has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a beta of 1.023242, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has higher revenue and earnings than ProVen VCT. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProVen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProVen VCT£8.84M19.00£9.46M£0.8069.38
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.£66.61M9.69£66.84M£68.5710.12

ProVen VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. ProVen VCT pays out 406.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

0.3% of ProVen VCT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of ProVen VCT shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ProVen VCT had 2 more articles in the media than Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ProVen VCT and 0 mentions for Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.. ProVen VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s score of 0.00 indicating that ProVen VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ProVen VCT Positive
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. Neutral

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. has a net margin of 254.00% compared to ProVen VCT's net margin of 115.21%. Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.'s return on equity of 13.06% beat ProVen VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProVen VCT115.21% 1.34% 3.12%
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. 254.00%13.06%4.75%

Summary

Schroder Asian Total Return Inv. beats ProVen VCT on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProVen VCT compare to Hansa Investment?

ProVen VCT (LON:PVN) and Hansa Investment (LON:HAN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

ProVen VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Hansa Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. ProVen VCT pays out 406.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hansa Investment pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

0.3% of ProVen VCT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Hansa Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of ProVen VCT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of Hansa Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hansa Investment has higher revenue and earnings than ProVen VCT. Hansa Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProVen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProVen VCT£8.84M19.00£9.46M£0.8069.38
Hansa Investment£26.42M24.65£77.36M£19.3017.16

In the previous week, ProVen VCT had 1 more articles in the media than Hansa Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ProVen VCT and 1 mentions for Hansa Investment. Hansa Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat ProVen VCT's score of 0.55 indicating that Hansa Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ProVen VCT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hansa Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ProVen VCT has a beta of 0.02, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hansa Investment has a beta of 0.197, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Hansa Investment has a net margin of 118.62% compared to ProVen VCT's net margin of 115.21%. Hansa Investment's return on equity of 4.86% beat ProVen VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProVen VCT115.21% 1.34% 3.12%
Hansa Investment 118.62%4.86%13.97%

Summary

Hansa Investment beats ProVen VCT on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProVen VCT compare to Brunner?

ProVen VCT (LON:PVN) and Brunner (LON:BUT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

ProVen VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Brunner pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. ProVen VCT pays out 406.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunner pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

ProVen VCT has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunner has a beta of 0.83170027, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Brunner has higher revenue and earnings than ProVen VCT. Brunner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProVen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProVen VCT£8.84M19.00£9.46M£0.8069.38
Brunner£57.55M11.30£105.32M£128.4811.75

ProVen VCT has a net margin of 115.21% compared to Brunner's net margin of 94.80%. Brunner's return on equity of 8.72% beat ProVen VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProVen VCT115.21% 1.34% 3.12%
Brunner 94.80%8.72%11.63%

0.3% of ProVen VCT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of Brunner shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of ProVen VCT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Brunner shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ProVen VCT had 2 more articles in the media than Brunner. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ProVen VCT and 0 mentions for Brunner. ProVen VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Brunner's score of 0.00 indicating that ProVen VCT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ProVen VCT Positive
Brunner Neutral

Summary

Brunner beats ProVen VCT on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProVen VCT compare to GCP Infrastructure Investments?

GCP Infrastructure Investments (LON:GCP) and ProVen VCT (LON:PVN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, GCP Infrastructure Investments had 4 more articles in the media than ProVen VCT. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for GCP Infrastructure Investments and 2 mentions for ProVen VCT. GCP Infrastructure Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat ProVen VCT's score of 0.55 indicating that GCP Infrastructure Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GCP Infrastructure Investments
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ProVen VCT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

GCP Infrastructure Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. ProVen VCT pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. GCP Infrastructure Investments pays out 325.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ProVen VCT pays out 406.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. GCP Infrastructure Investments is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

GCP Infrastructure Investments has a beta of 0.391, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProVen VCT has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

GCP Infrastructure Investments has higher revenue and earnings than ProVen VCT. GCP Infrastructure Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProVen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GCP Infrastructure Investments£21.37M29.72£15.58M£2.1536.33
ProVen VCT£8.84M19.00£9.46M£0.8069.38

ProVen VCT has a net margin of 115.21% compared to GCP Infrastructure Investments' net margin of 22.65%. GCP Infrastructure Investments' return on equity of 2.19% beat ProVen VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GCP Infrastructure Investments22.65% 2.19% 0.89%
ProVen VCT 115.21%1.34%3.12%

35.4% of GCP Infrastructure Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of ProVen VCT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of GCP Infrastructure Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of ProVen VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

GCP Infrastructure Investments beats ProVen VCT on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ProVen VCT News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PVN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PVN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PVN vs. The Competition

MetricProVen VCTAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£167.96M£2.38B£6.13B£2.80B
Dividend Yield5.39%6.00%5.24%6.15%
P/E Ratio69.3862.0629.90366.69
Price / Sales19.002,053.311,113.4086,225.18
Price / Cash2.7860.3394.2727.87
Price / Book0.831.396.617.75
Net Income£9.46M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.60%0.69%0.78%0.45%
1 Month Performance-2.63%-0.52%0.45%-1.40%
1 Year Performance-9.02%8.72%17.24%65.24%

ProVen VCT Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PVN
ProVen VCT
N/AGBX 55.50
-3.5%
N/AN/A£167.96M£8.84M69.38N/A
BGFD
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust
N/AGBX 989.01
-1.3%
N/A+21.4%£671.55M£154.29M5.23N/A
ATR
Schroder Asian Total Return Inv.
N/AGBX 716
-0.3%
N/A+52.9%£666.02M£66.61M10.4413,500
HAN
Hansa Investment
N/AGBX 334
-1.2%
N/A+28.3%£656.81M£26.42M17.31N/A
BUT
Brunner
N/AGBX 1,486.55
-0.6%
N/A+5.7%£643.87M£57.55M11.57N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PVN) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners