Go Pro

Softcat (SCT) Competitors

Softcat logo
GBX 1,857 +19.00 (+1.03%)
As of 09/11/2026 11:58 AM Eastern

SCT vs. SXS, RSW, DSCV, RTN, and GHH

Should you buy Softcat stock or one of its competitors? Softcat's main competitors and comparable companies include Spectris (SXS), Renishaw (RSW), discoverIE Group (DSCV), The Restaurant Group (RTN), and Gooch & Housego (GHH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment, instruments & components" industry.

How does Softcat compare to Spectris?

Spectris (LON:SXS) and Softcat (LON:SCT) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Spectris pays an annual dividend of GBX 83.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Softcat pays an annual dividend of GBX 29.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Spectris pays out 144.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Softcat pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Softcat has a consensus price target of GBX 1,937.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.33%. Given Softcat's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Softcat is more favorable than Spectris.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Spectris
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Softcat
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

99.2% of Spectris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.5% of Softcat shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Spectris shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Softcat shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Spectris has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Softcat has a beta of 0.573, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Spectris has a net margin of 17.96% compared to Softcat's net margin of 8.06%. Softcat's return on equity of 45.16% beat Spectris' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Spectris17.96% 17.30% 5.42%
Softcat 8.06%45.16%13.64%

Spectris has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Softcat. Softcat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Spectris£1.35B3.06£270.93M£57.6071.91
Softcat£1.75B2.08£118.54M£70.1026.49

In the previous week, Softcat had 17 more articles in the media than Spectris. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Softcat and 0 mentions for Spectris. Softcat's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Spectris' score of 0.00 indicating that Softcat is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Spectris Neutral
Softcat Positive

Summary

Softcat beats Spectris on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Softcat compare to Renishaw?

Renishaw (LON:RSW) and Softcat (LON:SCT) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Renishaw currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,996.67, indicating a potential upside of 16.88%. Softcat has a consensus price target of GBX 1,937.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.33%. Given Renishaw's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Renishaw is more favorable than Softcat.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Renishaw
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Softcat
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Renishaw has a beta of 1.126, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Softcat has a beta of 0.573, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Softcat has higher revenue and earnings than Renishaw. Softcat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renishaw, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Renishaw£737.26M5.06£96.00M£101.9050.35
Softcat£1.75B2.08£118.54M£70.1026.49

Renishaw pays an annual dividend of GBX 78.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Softcat pays an annual dividend of GBX 29.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Renishaw pays out 76.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Softcat pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Softcat is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Renishaw has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Softcat's net margin of 8.06%. Softcat's return on equity of 45.16% beat Renishaw's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Renishaw10.06% 8.06% 6.85%
Softcat 8.06%45.16%13.64%

24.8% of Renishaw shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.5% of Softcat shares are held by institutional investors. 52.9% of Renishaw shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Softcat shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Softcat had 15 more articles in the media than Renishaw. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Softcat and 2 mentions for Renishaw. Softcat's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Renishaw's score of 1.00 indicating that Softcat is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Renishaw
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Softcat
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Softcat beats Renishaw on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Softcat compare to discoverIE Group?

discoverIE Group (LON:DSCV) and Softcat (LON:SCT) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

discoverIE Group has a beta of 1.295, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Softcat has a beta of 0.573, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Softcat has higher revenue and earnings than discoverIE Group. Softcat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than discoverIE Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
discoverIE Group£443.30M1.71£15.66M£29.4026.87
Softcat£1.75B2.08£118.54M£70.1026.49

Softcat has a net margin of 8.06% compared to discoverIE Group's net margin of 6.54%. Softcat's return on equity of 45.16% beat discoverIE Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
discoverIE Group6.54% 9.04% 4.17%
Softcat 8.06%45.16%13.64%

In the previous week, Softcat had 17 more articles in the media than discoverIE Group. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Softcat and 0 mentions for discoverIE Group. Softcat's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat discoverIE Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Softcat is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
discoverIE Group Neutral
Softcat Positive

51.5% of discoverIE Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.5% of Softcat shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of discoverIE Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Softcat shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

discoverIE Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 894.38, suggesting a potential upside of 13.21%. Softcat has a consensus target price of GBX 1,937.50, suggesting a potential upside of 4.33%. Given discoverIE Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe discoverIE Group is more favorable than Softcat.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
discoverIE Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Softcat
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

discoverIE Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Softcat pays an annual dividend of GBX 29.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. discoverIE Group pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Softcat pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Softcat beats discoverIE Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Softcat compare to The Restaurant Group?

The Restaurant Group (LON:RTN) and Softcat (LON:SCT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Softcat has a consensus target price of GBX 1,937.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.33%. Given Softcat's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Softcat is more favorable than The Restaurant Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Restaurant Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Softcat
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

The Restaurant Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share. Softcat pays an annual dividend of GBX 29.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. The Restaurant Group pays out -6,666.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Softcat pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Softcat had 17 more articles in the media than The Restaurant Group. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Softcat and 0 mentions for The Restaurant Group. Softcat's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat The Restaurant Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Softcat is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Restaurant Group Neutral
Softcat Positive

Softcat has a net margin of 8.06% compared to The Restaurant Group's net margin of -4.74%. Softcat's return on equity of 45.16% beat The Restaurant Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Restaurant Group-4.74% -10.96% 3.93%
Softcat 8.06%45.16%13.64%

92.3% of The Restaurant Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.5% of Softcat shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of The Restaurant Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Softcat shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Restaurant Group has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Softcat has a beta of 0.573, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Softcat has higher revenue and earnings than The Restaurant Group. The Restaurant Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Softcat, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Restaurant Group£927M0.00-£43.90M-£0.06N/A
Softcat£1.75B2.08£118.54M£70.1026.49

Summary

Softcat beats The Restaurant Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Softcat compare to Gooch & Housego?

Gooch & Housego (LON:GHH) and Softcat (LON:SCT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Softcat had 17 more articles in the media than Gooch & Housego. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Softcat and 0 mentions for Gooch & Housego. Softcat's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Gooch & Housego's score of 0.00 indicating that Softcat is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gooch & Housego Neutral
Softcat Positive

20.1% of Gooch & Housego shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.5% of Softcat shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Gooch & Housego shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Softcat shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gooch & Housego has a beta of 0.918, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Softcat has a beta of 0.573, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Softcat has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Gooch & Housego's net margin of 2.44%. Softcat's return on equity of 45.16% beat Gooch & Housego's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gooch & Housego2.44% 3.33% 1.88%
Softcat 8.06%45.16%13.64%

Gooch & Housego pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Softcat pays an annual dividend of GBX 29.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Gooch & Housego pays out 92.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Softcat pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Softcat is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Softcat has higher revenue and earnings than Gooch & Housego. Softcat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gooch & Housego, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gooch & Housego£161.48M2.04£1.07M£14.3084.27
Softcat£1.75B2.08£118.54M£70.1026.49

Gooch & Housego presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,150, suggesting a potential downside of 4.56%. Softcat has a consensus price target of GBX 1,937.50, suggesting a potential upside of 4.33%. Given Softcat's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Softcat is more favorable than Gooch & Housego.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gooch & Housego
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Softcat
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Summary

Softcat beats Gooch & Housego on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Softcat News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SCT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SCT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SCT vs. The Competition

MetricSoftcatElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.65B£8.81B£29.67B£2.87B
Dividend Yield1.49%2.23%2.75%6.23%
P/E Ratio26.4926.1176.34366.83
Price / Sales2.0839.34588.6983,599.70
Price / Cash25.0830.7047.5027.89
Price / Book12.454.767.706.33
Net Income£118.54M£202.80M£703.71M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-9.18%-1.04%-1.07%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-6.16%-6.97%-3.64%0.18%
1 Year Performance15.85%813.11%180.37%20.03%

Softcat Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SCT
Softcat
2.8373 of 5 stars
GBX 1,857
+1.0%
GBX 1,937.50
+4.3%
+16.9%£3.65B£1.75B26.492,315
SXS
Spectris
N/AGBX 4,142
flat
N/A+1.2%£4.12B£1.35B71.917,266
RSW
Renishaw
2.396 of 5 stars
GBX 5,095
-0.3%
GBX 5,116.67
+0.4%
+58.7%£3.71B£737.26M50.005,166
DSCV
discoverIE Group
2.0236 of 5 stars
GBX 781
-1.4%
GBX 894.38
+14.5%
+31.7%£750.75M£443.30M26.564,500
RTN
The Restaurant Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£499.23M£927MN/A64,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SCT) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners