Star Energy Group (STAR) Competitors

Arrow Exploration has a consensus price target of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 7.14%. Given Arrow Exploration's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Arrow Exploration is more favorable than Star Energy Group.

Star Energy Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Arrow Exploration. Star Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arrow Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Arrow Exploration had 1 more articles in the media than Star Energy Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Arrow Exploration and 0 mentions for Star Energy Group. Arrow Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Star Energy Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Arrow Exploration is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Arrow Exploration has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Star Energy Group's net margin of -21.04%. Arrow Exploration's return on equity of 7.00% beat Star Energy Group's return on equity.

Star Energy Group has a beta of -0.2, meaning that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arrow Exploration has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

6.1% of Star Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Arrow Exploration shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.8% of Star Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.8% of Arrow Exploration shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Star Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seascape Energy Asia'saverage media sentiment score.

Star Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Star Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Star Energy Group's net margin of -21.04%. Star Energy Group's return on equity of -19.41% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

6.1% of Star Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 32.8% of Star Energy Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Star Energy Group has a beta of -0.2, suggesting that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Zephyr Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Star Energy Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Zephyr Energy and 0 mentions for Star Energy Group. Star Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zephyr Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Zephyr Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 11.10, suggesting a potential upside of 263.22%. Given Zephyr Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Zephyr Energy is more favorable than Star Energy Group.

Star Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Zephyr Energy. Star Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zephyr Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Star Energy Group has a net margin of -21.04% compared to Zephyr Energy's net margin of -190.41%. Star Energy Group's return on equity of -19.41% beat Zephyr Energy's return on equity.

Star Energy Group has a beta of -0.2, meaning that its share price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zephyr Energy has a beta of 0.688, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

6.1% of Star Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.7% of Zephyr Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 32.8% of Star Energy Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Zephyr Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wentworth Resources has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Star Energy Group has a beta of -0.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market.

Star Energy Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Wentworth Resources. Star Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wentworth Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

44.0% of Wentworth Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Star Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.1% of Wentworth Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.8% of Star Energy Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Wentworth Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Star Energy Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Star Energy Group has a net margin of -21.04% compared to Wentworth Resources' net margin of -32.86%. Wentworth Resources' return on equity of -13.43% beat Star Energy Group's return on equity.