Seascape Energy Asia (SEA) Competitors

GBX 91 -2.50 (-2.67%)
As of 11:53 AM Eastern

SEA vs. PANR, CNE, TLW, KIST, and GTE

Should you buy Seascape Energy Asia stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seascape Energy Asia with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seascape Energy Asia include Pantheon Resources (PANR), Capricorn Energy (CNE), Tullow Oil (TLW), Kistos (KIST), and Gran Tierra Energy (GTE). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Pantheon Resources?

Pantheon Resources (LON:PANR) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

0.9% of Pantheon Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 7.5% of Pantheon Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pantheon Resources' net margin of -86,206.12%. Pantheon Resources' return on equity of -1.85% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pantheon Resources-86,206.12% -1.85% -0.77%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

In the previous week, Pantheon Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seascape Energy Asia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pantheon Resources Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Pantheon Resources has a beta of -0.36, suggesting that its stock price is 136% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Pantheon Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pantheon ResourcesN/AN/A-£19.19M-£0.46N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9211.49

Pantheon Resources presently has a consensus price target of GBX 66, suggesting a potential upside of 364.00%. Given Pantheon Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Pantheon Resources is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pantheon Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Seascape Energy Asia beats Pantheon Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Capricorn Energy?

Capricorn Energy (LON:CNE) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Capricorn Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Capricorn Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capricorn Energy Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Capricorn Energy has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Capricorn Energy's return on equity of 5.30% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capricorn Energy14.14% 5.30% -4.89%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Capricorn Energy has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

82.2% of Capricorn Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 21.4% of Capricorn Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Seascape Energy Asia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capricorn Energy. Capricorn Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capricorn Energy£135.80M1.47-£112.65M£26.0011.15
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9211.49

Capricorn Energy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 369.33, suggesting a potential upside of 27.36%. Given Capricorn Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Capricorn Energy is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capricorn Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Capricorn Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Tullow Oil?

Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Tullow Oil has a net margin of 0.76% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Tullow Oil's return on equity of -2.23% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tullow Oil0.76% -2.23% 5.94%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.436, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Tullow Oil currently has a consensus price target of GBX 13.85, indicating a potential upside of 12.24%. Given Tullow Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Tullow Oil is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

21.9% of Tullow Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Tullow Oil shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tullow Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tullow Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.22£19.84M£0.4030.85
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9211.49

In the previous week, Tullow Oil had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tullow Oil and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Tullow Oil's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Tullow Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tullow Oil Very Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Summary

Tullow Oil beats Seascape Energy Asia on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Kistos?

Kistos (LON:KIST) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Seascape Energy Asia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kistos. Kistos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kistos£197.15M0.96-£63.50M-£57.00N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9211.49

In the previous week, Kistos had 3 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kistos and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Kistos' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Kistos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kistos Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Kistos presently has a consensus price target of GBX 285, suggesting a potential upside of 25.00%. Given Kistos' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Kistos is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kistos
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kistos' net margin of -24.24%. Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity of -46.66% beat Kistos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kistos-24.24% -136.50% -3.05%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Kistos has a beta of 0.437, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

16.3% of Kistos shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of Kistos shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kistos beats Seascape Energy Asia on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Gran Tierra Energy (LON:GTE) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gran Tierra Energy's net margin of -48.50%. Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity of -46.66% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy-48.50% -107.07% 8.16%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Gran Tierra Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra Energy£600.60M0.30£64.39M-£829.00N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9211.49

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.096, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gran Tierra Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seascape Energy Asia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gran Tierra Energy Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

8.8% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 47.7% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Seascape Energy Asia beats Gran Tierra Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seascape Energy Asia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEA vs. The Competition

MetricSeascape Energy AsiaOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£64.01M£1.85B£9.81B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A7.64%10.53%6.16%
P/E Ratio11.4928.3619.15365.72
Price / SalesN/A2,486.51749.8286,253.69
Price / CashN/A85.5337.7627.85
Price / Book15.172.314.137.92
Net Income-£10.01M£82.07M£4.24B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.21%-1.45%-1.22%-0.87%
1 Month Performance-5.21%-7.47%-6.98%-0.76%
1 Year Performance84.70%32.50%32.46%70.67%

Seascape Energy Asia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEA
Seascape Energy Asia
N/AGBX 91
-2.7%
N/A+89.6%£64.01MN/A11.4921
PANR
Pantheon Resources
2.8479 of 5 stars
GBX 15.54
-1.7%
GBX 66
+324.7%
-47.3%£226.54MN/AN/A15
CNE
Capricorn Energy
4.0914 of 5 stars
GBX 313
-3.4%
GBX 369.33
+18.0%
+31.1%£214.93M£135.80M12.04172
TLW
Tullow Oil
2.9783 of 5 stars
GBX 13.60
-12.5%
GBX 13.85
+1.8%
-28.4%£206.04M£851.20M34.00399
KIST
Kistos
2.3772 of 5 stars
GBX 240
-5.9%
GBX 285
+18.8%
+21.6%£199.48M£197.15MN/A33

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SEA) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners