Go Pro
→ The investigation Porter spent tens of thousands to document (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free SEA Stock Alerts

Seascape Energy Asia (SEA) Competitors

GBX 103.10 -0.90 (-0.87%)
As of 09:59 AM Eastern
Compare

SEA vs. KIST, GTE, JSE, AET, and FOG

Should you buy Seascape Energy Asia stock or one of its competitors? Seascape Energy Asia's main competitors and comparable companies include Kistos (KIST), Gran Tierra Energy (GTE), Jadestone Energy (JSE), Afentra (AET), and Falcon Oil & Gas (FOG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Kistos?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Kistos (LON:KIST) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Kistos has a net margin of 7.39% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Kistos' return on equity of 49.35% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -18.42% -8.13%
Kistos 7.39%49.35%-3.05%

Seascape Energy Asia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kistos. Kistos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9213.02
Kistos£340.29M0.78-£63.50M-£2.00N/A

22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of Kistos shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Kistos shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kistos has a beta of 0.455, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Kistos has a consensus target price of GBX 382.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.28%. Given Kistos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kistos is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Kistos
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Seascape Energy Asia and Seascape Energy Asia both had 1 articles in the media. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Kistos' score of 0.00 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Positive
Kistos Neutral

Summary

Kistos beats Seascape Energy Asia on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Gran Tierra Energy (LON:GTE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gran Tierra Energy's net margin of -39.97%. Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity of -18.42% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -18.42% -8.13%
Gran Tierra Energy -39.97%-122.08%8.16%

22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.7% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Gran Tierra Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9213.02
Gran Tierra Energy£638.42M0.39£64.39M-£722.00N/A

In the previous week, Seascape Energy Asia had 1 more articles in the media than Gran Tierra Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia and 0 mentions for Gran Tierra Energy. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Gran Tierra Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Positive
Gran Tierra Energy Neutral

Gran Tierra Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 1,119, suggesting a potential upside of 57.61%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gran Tierra Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.157, meaning that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gran Tierra Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Jadestone Energy?

Jadestone Energy (LON:JSE) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Jadestone Energy has a beta of 0.139, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

27.2% of Jadestone Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.4% of Jadestone Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Jadestone Energy's net margin of -35.85%. Jadestone Energy's return on equity of 177.32% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jadestone Energy-35.85% 177.32% -0.76%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -18.42%-8.13%

Jadestone Energy currently has a consensus price target of GBX 70.50, indicating a potential upside of 89.52%. Given Jadestone Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Jadestone Energy is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jadestone Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Seascape Energy Asia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jadestone Energy. Jadestone Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jadestone Energy£413.85M0.49-£66.98M-£28.00N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9213.02

In the previous week, Jadestone Energy and Jadestone Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Jadestone Energy's score of 0.67 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jadestone Energy Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Positive

Summary

Jadestone Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Afentra?

Afentra (LON:AET) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Afentra has a beta of 0.091, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Afentra has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Afentra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Afentra£153.40M1.23N/A-£1.40N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9213.02

In the previous week, Seascape Energy Asia had 1 more articles in the media than Afentra. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia and 0 mentions for Afentra. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Afentra's score of 0.00 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Afentra Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Positive

Afentra currently has a consensus target price of GBX 107.67, indicating a potential upside of 56.59%. Given Afentra's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Afentra is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Afentra
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Afentra's net margin of -6.85%. Afentra's return on equity of -9.14% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Afentra-6.85% -9.14% 12.11%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -18.42%-8.13%

5.4% of Afentra shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 37.1% of Afentra shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Afentra and Seascape Energy Asia tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Falcon Oil & Gas?

Falcon Oil & Gas (LON:FOG) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Falcon Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Oil & GasN/AN/A-£3.52M-£0.20N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9213.02

In the previous week, Falcon Oil & Gas and Falcon Oil & Gas both had 1 articles in the media. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Falcon Oil & Gas' score of 0.67 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Falcon Oil & Gas Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Positive

0.5% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Falcon Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.34988192, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Falcon Oil & Gas' return on equity of -8.00% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Falcon Oil & GasN/A -8.00% -3.61%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -18.42%-8.13%

Summary

Seascape Energy Asia beats Falcon Oil & Gas on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seascape Energy Asia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSeascape Energy AsiaOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£72.52M£11.14B£9.71B£2.80B
Dividend YieldN/A10.26%10.71%6.18%
P/E Ratio13.0217.2120.25366.12
Price / SalesN/A649.43529.8689,425.17
Price / CashN/A40.9236.9327.89
Price / Book17.184.434.006.83
Net Income-£10.01M£5.28B£4.34B£5.89B
7 Day Performance8.53%-1.37%-1.39%-0.70%
1 Month Performance6.29%-3.60%-3.80%16.91%
1 Year Performance21.29%28.36%29.10%16.43%

Seascape Energy Asia Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEA
Seascape Energy Asia
N/AGBX 103.10
-0.9%		N/A+26.8%£72.52MN/A13.0221
KIST
Kistos
1.2987 of 5 stars		GBX 315.75
-1.3%		GBX 382.50
+21.1%		+97.5%£262.45M£340.29MN/A33
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
N/AGBX 725
-6.5%		GBX 1,119
+54.3%		+115.2%£256.51M£638.42MN/A340
JSE
Jadestone Energy
2.7693 of 5 stars		GBX 38.70
+0.5%		GBX 63.67
+64.5%		+78.9%£210.89M£413.85MN/A409
AET
Afentra
2.5709 of 5 stars		GBX 75
-3.2%		GBX 107.67
+43.6%		+48.9%£206.35M£153.40MN/A13

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SEA) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
This AI fund posted a 34 percent annualized payout last month
One small fund tied to artificial intelligence stocks delivered $1,051 in a single month, not through selling ...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
The SEC Just Opened The Floodgates…
The SEC removed the 25 year old Pattern Day Trader rule in June 2026, cutting the minimum to open a trading ac...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end of AI data centers coming?
Marc Chaikin's Power Gauge system flagged Micron before it soared 970 percent, Celestica before a 6,600 percen...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
"How Much Can I Actually Spend Each Year With $2.5M Saved?"
Having $2.5 million saved puts you ahead of most Americans, but how long it lasts depends on the decisions you...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for October 31st
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel