Go Pro

Seascape Energy Asia (SEA) Competitors

GBX 101 +1.00 (+1.00%)
As of 09/11/2026 11:58 AM Eastern

SEA vs. CNE, KIST, GTE, AET, and JSE

Should you buy Seascape Energy Asia stock or one of its competitors? Seascape Energy Asia's main competitors and comparable companies include Capricorn Energy (CNE), Kistos (KIST), Gran Tierra Energy (GTE), Afentra (AET), and Jadestone Energy (JSE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Capricorn Energy?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Capricorn Energy (LON:CNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Seascape Energy Asia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capricorn Energy. Seascape Energy Asia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capricorn Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9212.75
Capricorn Energy£135.80M1.94-£112.65M£26.0014.73

Capricorn Energy has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Capricorn Energy's return on equity of 5.30% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -46.66% -8.13%
Capricorn Energy 14.14%5.30%-4.89%

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capricorn Energy has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Capricorn Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of Capricorn Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Capricorn Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 369.33, indicating a potential downside of 3.57%. Given Capricorn Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capricorn Energy is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Capricorn Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Capricorn Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Capricorn Energy and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Capricorn Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Capricorn Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral
Capricorn Energy Positive

Summary

Capricorn Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Kistos?

Kistos (LON:KIST) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Kistos had 3 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kistos and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Kistos' average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Kistos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kistos Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Kistos presently has a consensus target price of GBX 342.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.86%. Given Kistos' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kistos is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kistos
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

16.2% of Kistos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Kistos shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Seascape Energy Asia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kistos. Kistos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kistos£215.75M1.23-£63.50M-£2.00N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9212.75

Kistos has a beta of 0.455, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kistos' net margin of -1.13%. Kistos' return on equity of -6.64% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kistos-1.13% -6.64% -3.05%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Summary

Kistos beats Seascape Energy Asia on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Gran Tierra Energy (LON:GTE) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

9.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 47.7% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gran Tierra Energy's net margin of -39.97%. Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity of -46.66% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy-39.97% -122.08% 8.16%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Gran Tierra Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra Energy£638.42M0.42£64.39M-£722.00N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9212.75

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.157, indicating that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gran Tierra Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gran Tierra Energy and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Gran Tierra Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Gran Tierra Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gran Tierra Energy Very Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Gran Tierra Energy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,119, suggesting a potential upside of 49.20%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gran Tierra Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Gran Tierra Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Afentra?

Afentra (LON:AET) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Afentra has a beta of 0.091, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Afentra has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Afentra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Afentra£114.39M2.00N/A-£1.40N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9212.75

Afentra currently has a consensus price target of GBX 107.67, suggesting a potential upside of 29.56%. Given Afentra's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Afentra is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Afentra
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Afentra's net margin of -0.11%. Afentra's return on equity of -0.15% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Afentra-0.11% -0.15% 12.11%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

In the previous week, Afentra's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seascape Energy Asia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Afentra Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

5.4% of Afentra shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 37.1% of Afentra shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Afentra beats Seascape Energy Asia on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Jadestone Energy?

Jadestone Energy (LON:JSE) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Seascape Energy Asia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jadestone Energy. Jadestone Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jadestone Energy£413.85M0.49-£66.98M-£28.00N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9212.75

27.2% of Jadestone Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 36.4% of Jadestone Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Jadestone Energy's net margin of -35.85%. Jadestone Energy's return on equity of 177.32% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jadestone Energy-35.85% 177.32% -0.76%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Jadestone Energy has a beta of 0.139, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Jadestone Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Seascape Energy Asia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jadestone Energy Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Jadestone Energy presently has a consensus price target of GBX 63.67, suggesting a potential upside of 72.07%. Given Jadestone Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Jadestone Energy is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jadestone Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Jadestone Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seascape Energy Asia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEA vs. The Competition

MetricSeascape Energy AsiaOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£71.04M£11.68B£10.19B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A10.07%10.54%6.23%
P/E Ratio12.7518.7221.80366.83
Price / SalesN/A625.24510.2783,599.70
Price / CashN/A40.0536.3427.89
Price / Book16.834.554.126.33
Net Income-£10.01M£5.28B£4.33B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.48%1.05%0.92%-0.69%
1 Month Performance20.24%5.71%4.62%0.18%
1 Year Performance26.25%37.83%38.88%20.03%

Seascape Energy Asia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEA
Seascape Energy Asia
N/AGBX 101
+1.0%
N/A+23.2%£71.04MN/A12.7521
CNE
Capricorn Energy
1.9867 of 5 stars
GBX 383
+0.3%
GBX 369.33
-3.6%
+84.8%£262.99M£135.80M14.73172
KIST
Kistos
0.9228 of 5 stars
GBX 312
+3.1%
GBX 342.50
+9.8%
+96.6%£259.33M£215.75MN/A33
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
3.5624 of 5 stars
GBX 710
+1.4%
GBX 1,119
+57.6%
+157.7%£251.20M£638.42MN/A340
AET
Afentra
N/AGBX 78.80
+3.4%
GBX 107.67
+36.6%
+62.3%£216.81M£114.39MN/A13

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SEA) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners