Free Trial

Seascape Energy Asia (SEA) Competitors

GBX 88.40 -1.60 (-1.78%)
As of 12:36 PM Eastern

SEA vs. TLW, KIST, PANR, CNE, and ECO

Should you buy Seascape Energy Asia stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seascape Energy Asia with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seascape Energy Asia include Tullow Oil (TLW), Kistos (KIST), Pantheon Resources (PANR), Capricorn Energy (CNE), and Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas (ECO). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Tullow Oil?

Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.425, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

7.9% of Tullow Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Tullow Oil shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tullow Oil has a net margin of 0.76% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Tullow Oil's return on equity of -2.23% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tullow Oil0.76% -2.23% 5.94%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Tullow Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tullow Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.27£19.84M£0.4039.20
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3936.99

In the previous week, Tullow Oil had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tullow Oil and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Tullow Oil's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 1.02 indicating that Tullow Oil is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tullow Oil Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Positive

Tullow Oil presently has a consensus price target of GBX 13.85, suggesting a potential downside of 11.67%. Given Tullow Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Tullow Oil is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Tullow Oil beats Seascape Energy Asia on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Kistos?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Kistos (LON:KIST) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Kistos had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Kistos and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Kistos' score of 0.76 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Positive
Kistos Positive

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kistos has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Kistos shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Kistos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Seascape Energy Asia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kistos. Kistos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3936.99
Kistos£197.15M1.14-£63.50M-£57.00N/A

Kistos has a consensus target price of GBX 285, indicating a potential upside of 5.56%. Given Kistos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kistos is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Kistos
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kistos' net margin of -24.24%. Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity of -46.66% beat Kistos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -46.66% -8.13%
Kistos -24.24%-136.50%-3.05%

Summary

Kistos beats Seascape Energy Asia on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Pantheon Resources?

Pantheon Resources (LON:PANR) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pantheon Resources' net margin of -86,206.12%. Pantheon Resources' return on equity of -2.37% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pantheon Resources-86,206.12% -2.37% -0.77%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

0.9% of Pantheon Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Pantheon Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pantheon Resources has a beta of -0.36, meaning that its stock price is 136% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Pantheon Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pantheon ResourcesN/AN/A-£19.19M-£0.46N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3936.99

In the previous week, Pantheon Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pantheon Resources and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Pantheon Resources' score of 0.45 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pantheon Resources Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Positive

Pantheon Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 66, suggesting a potential upside of 388.17%. Given Pantheon Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pantheon Resources is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pantheon Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Seascape Energy Asia beats Pantheon Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Capricorn Energy?

Capricorn Energy (LON:CNE) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Capricorn Energy currently has a consensus target price of GBX 369.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.38%. Given Capricorn Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capricorn Energy is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capricorn Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Capricorn Energy has a beta of 0.267, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Capricorn Energy has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Capricorn Energy's return on equity of 5.30% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capricorn Energy14.14% 5.30% -4.89%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

In the previous week, Capricorn Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Capricorn Energy and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Capricorn Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 1.02 indicating that Capricorn Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capricorn Energy Very Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Positive

82.2% of Capricorn Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 7.7% of Capricorn Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Seascape Energy Asia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capricorn Energy. Capricorn Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capricorn Energy£135.80M1.58-£112.65M£26.0012.00
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3936.99

Summary

Capricorn Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas?

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas (LON:ECO) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' net margin of -45.95%. Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' return on equity of -4.77% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas-45.95% -4.77% -7.60%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of GBX 115, suggesting a potential upside of 95.58%. Given Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' score of 0.00 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Positive

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.989, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Seascape Energy Asia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas. Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas£1.96M104.57-£23.81M-£0.30N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3936.99

Summary

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas beats Seascape Energy Asia on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seascape Energy Asia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEA vs. The Competition

MetricSeascape Energy AsiaOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£62.18M£2.13B£10.46B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A7.61%10.46%6.13%
P/E Ratio36.9933.6120.72364.74
Price / SalesN/A2,727.65808.3687,565.51
Price / CashN/A85.5338.4627.85
Price / Book14.732.474.417.71
Net Income-£10.01M£82.07M£4.23B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.86%2.50%1.97%0.08%
1 Month Performance-1.73%-1.61%0.13%3.27%
1 Year Performance126.67%53.73%51.53%75.54%

Seascape Energy Asia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEA
Seascape Energy Asia
N/AGBX 88.40
-1.8%
N/A+136.8%£62.18MN/A36.9921
TLW
Tullow Oil
1.4347 of 5 stars
GBX 17.15
-0.3%
GBX 13.85
-19.2%
+7.1%£252.92M£851.20M42.87399
KIST
Kistos
0.8576 of 5 stars
GBX 294
+3.2%
GBX 285
-3.1%
+76.6%£244.37M£197.15MN/A33
PANR
Pantheon Resources
2.6263 of 5 stars
GBX 16.60
flat
GBX 66
+297.6%
-50.0%£242.01MN/AN/A15
CNE
Capricorn Energy
3.8175 of 5 stars
GBX 321.72
-0.4%
GBX 369.33
+14.8%
+28.0%£220.91M£135.80M12.37172

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SEA) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners