Go Pro

Seascape Energy Asia (SEA) Competitors

GBX 86.40 +0.27 (+0.31%)
As of 07/31/2026 12:33 PM Eastern

SEA vs. PTAL, KIST, ECO, TLW, and FOG

Should you buy Seascape Energy Asia stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seascape Energy Asia with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seascape Energy Asia include PetroTal (PTAL), Kistos (KIST), Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas (ECO), Tullow Oil (TLW), and Falcon Oil & Gas (FOG). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to PetroTal?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and PetroTal (LON:PTAL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PetroTal has a beta of 0.17, indicating that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

21.9% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of PetroTal shares are held by institutional investors. 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of PetroTal shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PetroTal had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for PetroTal and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PetroTal'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral
PetroTal Neutral

PetroTal has a net margin of 11.17% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. PetroTal's return on equity of 5.39% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -46.66% -8.13%
PetroTal 11.17%5.39%17.91%

PetroTal has a consensus price target of GBX 74, suggesting a potential upside of 188.50%. Given PetroTal's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PetroTal is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
PetroTal
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

PetroTal has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. PetroTal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9210.91
PetroTal£264.64M0.89£132.43M£4.006.41

Summary

PetroTal beats Seascape Energy Asia on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Kistos?

Kistos (LON:KIST) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Kistos has a beta of 0.446, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kistos' net margin of -1.13%. Kistos' return on equity of -6.64% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kistos-1.13% -6.64% -3.05%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Seascape Energy Asia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kistos. Kistos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kistos£215.75M1.05-£63.50M-£2.00N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9210.91

Kistos presently has a consensus price target of GBX 325, indicating a potential upside of 19.49%. Given Kistos' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kistos is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kistos
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

16.3% of Kistos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.9% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Kistos shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Kistos had 3 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kistos and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Kistos' average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Kistos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kistos Neutral
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Summary

Kistos beats Seascape Energy Asia on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas (LON:ECO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9210.91
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & GasN/AN/A-£23.81M-£0.30N/A

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' net margin of -45.95%. Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' return on equity of -41.15% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -46.66% -8.13%
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas -45.95%-41.15%-7.60%

21.9% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of GBX 126.50, suggesting a potential upside of 125.89%. Given Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.961, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas Neutral

Summary

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas beats Seascape Energy Asia on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Tullow Oil?

Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Tullow Oil has a net margin of 0.76% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Tullow Oil's return on equity of -2.23% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tullow Oil0.76% -2.23% 5.94%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -46.66%-8.13%

Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.475, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Tullow Oil currently has a consensus target price of GBX 13.85, indicating a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Tullow Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Tullow Oil is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

21.8% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.9% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Tullow Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tullow Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tullow Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.27£19.84M£0.4038.20
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9210.91

In the previous week, Tullow Oil had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tullow Oil and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tullow Oil's score of -1.02 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tullow Oil Negative
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Summary

Tullow Oil beats Seascape Energy Asia on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Falcon Oil & Gas?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Falcon Oil & Gas (LON:FOG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Falcon Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.34988192, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Falcon Oil & Gas had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Falcon Oil & Gas and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Falcon Oil & Gas'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral
Falcon Oil & Gas Neutral

Falcon Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£7.9210.91
Falcon Oil & GasN/AN/A-£3.52M-£0.20N/A

Falcon Oil & Gas' return on equity of -8.00% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -46.66% -8.13%
Falcon Oil & Gas N/A -8.00%-3.61%

21.9% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 8.3% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Falcon Oil & Gas beats Seascape Energy Asia on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seascape Energy Asia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEA vs. The Competition

MetricSeascape Energy AsiaOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£60.77M£11.07B£9.67B£2.82B
Dividend YieldN/A11.32%11.58%6.15%
P/E Ratio10.9119.6519.40368.29
Price / SalesN/A448.08367.5783,501.30
Price / CashN/A39.4235.9427.89
Price / Book14.404.393.987.04
Net Income-£10.01M£5.28B£4.35B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.40%1.16%0.86%6.05%
1 Month Performance-0.12%4.88%4.21%-0.22%
1 Year Performance23.43%34.51%35.91%63.72%

Seascape Energy Asia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEA
Seascape Energy Asia
N/AGBX 86.40
+0.3%
N/A+23.4%£60.77MN/A10.9121
PTAL
PetroTal
4.0488 of 5 stars
GBX 26.50
flat
GBX 74
+179.2%
-35.9%£243.89M£264.64M6.6389
KIST
Kistos
1.8127 of 5 stars
GBX 258
-3.7%
GBX 325
+26.0%
+60.5%£214.44M£215.75MN/A33
ECO
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas
1.5362 of 5 stars
GBX 58.40
-4.3%
GBX 126.50
+116.6%
+529.3%£204.23MN/AN/AN/A
TLW
Tullow Oil
0.9489 of 5 stars
GBX 13.46
-6.0%
GBX 13.85
+2.9%
+7.8%£203.92M£851.20M33.65399

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SEA) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners