Free Trial
→ I was right about SpaceX (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free SEA Stock Alerts

Seascape Energy Asia (SEA) Competitors

GBX 93.87 +2.37 (+2.59%)
As of 10:42 AM Eastern
Compare

SEA vs. TLW, GTE, ECO, CNE, and FOG

Should you buy Seascape Energy Asia stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seascape Energy Asia with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seascape Energy Asia include Tullow Oil (TLW), Gran Tierra Energy (GTE), Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas (ECO), Capricorn Energy (CNE), and Falcon Oil & Gas (FOG). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Tullow Oil?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Tullow Oil (LON:TLW) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tullow Oil has a beta of 0.425, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Tullow Oil has a net margin of 0.76% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Tullow Oil's return on equity of -2.23% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -111.60% -8.13%
Tullow Oil 0.76%-2.23%5.94%

In the previous week, Tullow Oil had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tullow Oil and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tullow Oil's score of -0.64 indicating that Seascape Energy Asia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral
Tullow Oil Negative

Tullow Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Seascape Energy Asia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tullow Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3939.28
Tullow Oil£851.20M0.28£19.84M£0.4039.89

22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Tullow Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Tullow Oil shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tullow Oil has a consensus target price of GBX 13.85, suggesting a potential downside of 13.20%. Given Tullow Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tullow Oil is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tullow Oil
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Summary

Tullow Oil beats Seascape Energy Asia on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Gran Tierra Energy (LON:GTE) and Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.413, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Gran Tierra Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Seascape Energy Asia. Gran Tierra Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gran Tierra Energy£600.60M0.37£64.39M-£545.00N/A
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3939.28

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gran Tierra Energy's net margin of -48.50%. Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of -107.07% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gran Tierra Energy-48.50% -107.07% 8.16%
Seascape Energy Asia N/A -111.60%-8.13%

9.0% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.2% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gran Tierra Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gran Tierra Energy and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Gran Tierra Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Gran Tierra Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gran Tierra Energy Positive
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral

Summary

Gran Tierra Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas (LON:ECO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.989, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of GBX 115, indicating a potential upside of 101.05%. Given Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Seascape Energy Asia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas. Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3939.28
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas£1.96M101.73-£23.81M-£0.30N/A

Seascape Energy Asia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' net margin of -45.95%. Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas' return on equity of -4.77% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -111.60% -8.13%
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas -45.95%-4.77%-7.60%

In the previous week, Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas Neutral

22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas beats Seascape Energy Asia on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Capricorn Energy?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Capricorn Energy (LON:CNE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capricorn Energy has a beta of 0.267, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Capricorn Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Capricorn Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Seascape Energy Asia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capricorn Energy. Capricorn Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3939.28
Capricorn Energy£135.80M1.61-£112.65M£26.0012.26

Capricorn Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 369.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.85%. Given Capricorn Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Capricorn Energy is more favorable than Seascape Energy Asia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seascape Energy Asia
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Capricorn Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Capricorn Energy has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Seascape Energy Asia's net margin of 0.00%. Capricorn Energy's return on equity of 5.30% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -111.60% -8.13%
Capricorn Energy 14.14%5.30%-4.89%

In the previous week, Capricorn Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Seascape Energy Asia. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Capricorn Energy and 0 mentions for Seascape Energy Asia. Capricorn Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Seascape Energy Asia's score of 0.00 indicating that Capricorn Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral
Capricorn Energy Positive

Summary

Capricorn Energy beats Seascape Energy Asia on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seascape Energy Asia compare to Falcon Oil & Gas?

Seascape Energy Asia (LON:SEA) and Falcon Oil & Gas (LON:FOG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Falcon Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seascape Energy Asia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seascape Energy AsiaN/AN/A-£10.01M£2.3939.28
Falcon Oil & GasN/AN/A-£3.52M-£0.20N/A

Seascape Energy Asia has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Falcon Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.177, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

22.0% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Seascape Energy Asia shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Falcon Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Seascape Energy Asia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Falcon Oil & Gas'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seascape Energy Asia Neutral
Falcon Oil & Gas Neutral

Falcon Oil & Gas' return on equity of -6.08% beat Seascape Energy Asia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seascape Energy AsiaN/A -111.60% -8.13%
Falcon Oil & Gas N/A -6.08%-3.61%

Summary

Seascape Energy Asia and Falcon Oil & Gas tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seascape Energy Asia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSeascape Energy AsiaOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£66.03M£2.11B£10.48B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A7.59%10.22%6.09%
P/E Ratio39.2832.4320.32366.07
Price / SalesN/A3,591.651,037.0788,395.03
Price / CashN/A85.5437.9327.89
Price / Book15.653.674.397.70
Net Income-£10.01M£82.07M£4.24B£5.89B
7 Day Performance8.40%1.03%1.18%0.59%
1 Month Performance14.48%4.27%4.29%2.54%
1 Year Performance176.10%58.42%51.61%87.53%

Seascape Energy Asia Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEA
Seascape Energy Asia
N/AGBX 93.87
+2.6%		N/A+208.8%£66.03MN/A39.2821
TLW
Tullow Oil
0.3806 of 5 stars		GBX 16.20
flat		GBX 13.85
-14.5%		+5.5%£238.95M£851.20MN/A399
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
N/AGBX 640
flat		N/A+80.0%£225.91M£596.71MN/A340
ECO
Eco (Atlantic) Oil & Gas
1.4754 of 5 stars		GBX 65
flat		GBX 115
+76.9%		+542.1%£224.80M£1.96MN/AN/A
CNE
Capricorn Energy
3.5129 of 5 stars		GBX 302
+1.0%		GBX 369.33
+22.3%		+35.8%£207.14M£134.90M11.62172

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SEA) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Microscopic Footage Shows Immune Cells Attacking Cancer
Early human trial data from one NASDAQ-listed biotech showed up to a 63.7% reduction in cancer burden using it...
Market Tactic | Sponsoredtc pixel
Before you buy SpaceX shares, consider this alternative approach
SpaceX has confidentially filed for an IPO with the SEC, targeting a June 2026 listing at a valuation exceedin...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
The US sanctioned itself out of world reserve status…
Russia and Iran are both bypassing the US petrodollar - settling oil trades in alternative currencies while ce...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Peptide Company Lands Exclusive MMA Wellness Partnership
A publicly traded peptide company just signed an exclusive partnership with a NYSE-listed MMA media platform t...
The Tomorrow Investor | Sponsoredtc pixel
Collect $1,170 a month from silver
I've Rarely Seen This With Silver This combination - 20% dividends + 68% share appreciation - never happens...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire warns: Move your money before May 15
Larry Benedict - the trader who generated $274 million in client profits and beat the S&P 500 by 18 times in 2...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel